Are you proud of yourselves?
>>37896836
bad bait thread, you could have opened up the possibility for some actual discussion here OP you fucking normie.
>>37896836
Now if only I can get a woman to start having sex with me.
>>37896836
when does sex start for the purposes of this law?
pants down of both? this way there is no revocation potential resulting from unsatisfactory penor?
or is sex begin at precise moment of penetration?
how does this go with other sex like titjob? if she say "no" can you still nut on the face for a finish?
it's a strange legal concept
>>37896836
Unironically a good law which stops women from deciding halfway through that the sex they sort of wanted is now rape and they fuck up a guys life because he consent at the start and didn't finish with it.
>>37896836
I wonder what kind of shitstorm this is going to get from the feminists.
>I CAN'T BREATHE RIGHT NOW
>I CAN'T BELIEVE I LIVE IN A STATE THAT WOULD ALLOW RAPE
>LITERALLY SHAKING
>>37896836
This is a good law and you literally cannot prove otherwise