Anybody /SuckAtMath/?

>>37779375
You're actually right though. In order to cut a board into 2 pieces it takes 1 cut. It took Marie 10 minutes to make 1 cut. She is going to work at the same pace to cut a board into 3 pieces. This means she will make 2 cuts. The problem tells you she make 1 cut per 10 minutes. So it would take her 20 minutes to make 2 cuts yielding 3 pieces at 1 cut per minute.

File: 02f.jpg (34KB, 655x527px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 655x527px

>>37779375
isn't 20 minutes correct though? I am confused.

>>37779456
>>37779458
>T. Can't do math

>>37779375
>reverse image search
>Top results:
>REDDIT MATH TEACHER FAIL
Wew

>>37779504
Bait harder OP. I already reverse image searched. That pic is at least 7 years old

Lmao, it takes 10 to cut 2 pieces, so divide that and it's 5 minutes per piece. Then just multiply the time it takes to get one piece by however many pieces you need.

>>37779550
Or, because it takes 10 minutes for her to make one cut, it will take her 20 minutes to make two cuts

I'm a total math retard too, OP. I strongly relate.

File: IMG_0922.jpg (24KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 600x600px

>>37779550
OP really pulling out all the unconvincing stops with this bait

>>37779550

The flaw in your logic is that she isn't producing the pieces
she is doing work to produce the cuts

so if it takes her 10 minutes to cut the board once, it would take 20 to cut it twice

>>37779769
At least Sage if you're going to reply to bait mi amigo

File: mkay.png (50KB, 1072x804px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1072x804px

>>37779375

In 20 minutes, she should be able to saw the board in 3 or 4 pieces, depending if she has enough testoterone in the brain...