>tfw Android user

>>37760019
>blackberry
what in the fuck kind of bait is this? kill yourself

>>37760019
Fuck yea im in for some sex sometime next year

>>37760019
>No source
>Axes unlabeled
2/10, got me to reply.

>>37760051
It's from 2010.

File: okcupid1.png (35KB, 495x600px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 495x600px

>>37760069
https://theblog.okcupid.com/dont-be-ugly-by-accident-b378f261dea4

>>37760069
The axes are labeled.

>>37760094
Well, fair enough.
>>37760141
No they aren't.

File: 1385771357054.png (97KB, 1024x749px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1024x749px

>>37760214
X: Age
Y: Sexual Partners

File: 19059193_1600091140001422_2309850158564273736_n.jpg (6KB, 180x213px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 180x213px

>>37760019
probably a product of marketing. the poor and women love Iphones, and you all know about women...

>>37760019
Roasties mostly use iphones thats why iphone users are higher

>>37760239
Clearly detailed in the title isn't good enough, autists need labels to be on the left and bottom.

>>37760073
then this entire post is invalid - shit changes very quickly

>>37761478
hover iphone is the phone to get if you actually socialize because most people will be like wtf is that when they see your awful poorfag android

>>37761513
Nowadays, unless you're looking for partners in Ivy League or some shit, everyone has an android
the reason why android users fuck less in that chart is that in 2010 only neckbeards had androids

>>37761990
this is not true at all. i literally know like 3 people who have androids and they're all fags. every true roastie and chad you will EVER meet has at least an iphone 6 - unless you live in a poorfag country, im in USA

>>37760051
Hey I still have one.

File: 1476418917397.jpg (111KB, 1384x1122px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1384x1122px

>>37760019
>use an iphone
>AVERAGE sexual partners by 18 is over 3
>25 year old virgin
ITS NOT FAIR

>>37761990
wot.

androids are only common for black people and tech workers. college kids all have iphones.

it's sort of changing to be more fairly spread out, but your post makes 0 sense. you even took the OP chart sort of seriously, as if number of partners or social science in general means anything.

>>37760019
iPhone user. This is the most stupid statistic ever made

>>37760019

I remember that OKCupid data. It is from 2010 when android was still pretty new and most of its users were your typical computer nerds.

Though I suspect the gap still exists, but narrower.