After anal

as long as said fucking isn't done by a cis-white male

No, more low key feminist if anything. But she will forever be a slave to the cock after that.

Sauce pls. I want to see her get wrecked.

Not a feminist and never have had anal....

Of course. Having anal sex doesn't change the fact that women deserve equality to men.

>>37761723
>Not a feminist
Good
>and never have had anal....
Do you want to?
I want to hurt you with my penis.

How do anal sex and feminism relate? I don't understand. You have some weird ideas OP.

>>37759789
Sure why not. Those ideas don't clash.

>>37759789
Assuming the idea of feminism stems from the idea that men and women should be equal (or in most cases women risen up to the same state of men) id say probably not.

Since men, or the idea of men that women have in mind when trying to be equal to them, typically don't get fucked in the ass or have any subservient qualities about them it seems that it would be contradictory.

This is of course going by the strictest definition of feminism i've been given. Lots of women take the definition into their own hands so who knows probably not idk.

>>37759789
feminism can mean literally anything at this point
so yes, a women can still be a feminist

>>37762896
I mean if you talk about it like that, then all heterosexual sex is anti-feminist.

I don't think sexual power-play has to do with equal rights in general. In sex the power imbalance is consensual, which means the woman decided that it should happen. It's also only in the sexual sphere. It's a kind of playing, where they pretend the woman is inferior, because fetishes are irrational.

of course. modern feminism is, in big fucking parts, about the sexual liberties of women. Offering chad or tyrone to smash the insides of your asshole is one of the most pro-feminism progressive way to express your liberties as a woman
you go girl!