Well anons, is this woman right?

>>37741867
If a white person says get the fuck out of my country, they're right; get the fuck out.

>>37741867

I don't really care if people think I'm any of those things.

File: IMG_6932.jpg (151KB, 750x867px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 750x867px

Do any anons here get off on racial humiliation?

If a guy says you're being misandrist, you are.

Like I give two shits what some fucking SJW has to say about me.

File: pinochet.jpg (140KB, 424x537px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 424x537px

>>37741867
If mi general says all libtards, faggots, commies, SJWs and other degenerates need to die, then they need to die.

>>37742095
wow
literally shaking right now
my PTSD is off the charts

>>37741867
>Sexworkers news

Why would I care about what literal whores think.

>>37741867
Notice how when she talks about a man, she says they're only "most likely right" instead of all the women being "right".

She's a sexist hog as bad as the rest of them. Good B8 OP.

Yes.
The thing is there is nothing wrong with being any of those except racist and maybe homophobic.

>>37741867
as an autist, that was pretty fucking ableist desu

The problem is that western society validates all sorts of sub-humans and validates them. Whether it's degenerates, or people who are simply inferior human beings. As degenerate as women are, they are actually doing us all a favor by refusing to breed with low-tier or even average-tier males. A lot of women and men, me included, are simply genetic trash and there is no reason we should be upheld to the extent that we are.

>>37741867

unless the mentioned people are completely immune to being wrong or acting in bad faith, then she must be wrong.

No, obviously not. It's a form of argument ad hominem. Who delivers a statement has absolutely zero bearing on whether or not the statement is true. That woman's form or reasoning has been recognized as fallacious for millennia.