Anyone else hate submissive women?

>>37730886
submissive women are my fetish

>>37730924
This thread wasn't made for you.

>>37730958
This board wasnt made for me, loser.

>>37730886
only if they have penis envy

anyone else hate submissive men?

>>37730886
submissive men are even more pathetic

>>37730978
So leave then? Or are you going to act like a child?

>>37731006
>>37731014
Annnd here come the normie roasties.

Maybe some men feel the same way about you and your submissiveness as you feel as the guy being submissive.

>>37730978
>Call him a loser meme

When will this meme end? It should have stayed in the 80's.

>>37731102
Its not a meme im being serious
>>37731043
Acting like a child is bashing on women on 4chan

>>37731147
>Its not a meme im being serious

>Normie social judgment on R9k.
>The whole concept of loser.
>Calling a loser without knowing anything about the person.
>Has no arguments so needs a trendy insult.

Kek okay whatever you say.

>>37730886
So you hate almost all women?

>>37731208
whatever
I dont like the people here anyway

>>37731147
>Acting like a child is bashing on women on 4chan

Where did I bash women? All I said is that I hate submissive women. Why can't I have my opinion based on their actions if they're going to judge me on my actions and lifestyle?

>>37730886
No I don't hate them, i just don't pair up with them well.

I do.

I hate self-degradation.

Dominant men and women are the best, everyone should be dominant.

>>37731240
Yes.. I hate that aspect of them at least. I want a girl who likes regular sex. 18 year old girls who are virgins or only had 1 or 2 boyfriends are more likely to not want to be dominated and have degrading sex but I don't like younger girls. Certain girls who have been sexually abused in their past sometimes don't like to be treated badly sexually so I go for girls like that now.

>>37731308
>I hate self-degradation.
Self degradation isn't as bad as letting someone else degrade you at all. People are often their own harshest critics in attempts to figure their self out, if you witness that it can seem like self degradation but it's not you just witness it though.

>>37731006
Guy here, I find them loathsome disgusting pieces of trash. They're so far off the totem pole they managed to dig themselves into the floor below it like the vermin they are.

>>37731327
I had three virgin girlfriends. Two of them were pretty submissive and the third went off the rails with it. So it has little to do with "experience".

>>37731073
lol i'm a guy loser

>>37731448
Being submissive is a learned habit. You probably projected that onto them or they were influenced elsewhere like porn sites or friends. It's hard to make someone who already is into being submissive and their mind has formed around it it's hard to make them go backwards and not like that kind of sex but if they are a virgin it's a lot easier to do this and keep them from falling into being submissive for guys.

>it's the current year
>everyone is still white knighting and cucking
this stupid planet can go fuck itself

Yes.
They are the most generic and uninteresting women and most likely feminists too.

>>37731596
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.

>>37731676
>Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
Culture overwrites most biological imperatives in humans on a psychological level. Our culture can very well call for the opposite, that women be the dominant ones and men be submissive and if people grew up in that society from birth, saw all the woman dominating men porn growing up, saw their mother being the dominant one to her husband, all the media showed dominant female lead roles and submissive males then the children raised in that society would think it's normal for men to be submissive and women to be dominant.

>>37730886
A real woman is submissive, but not in the BDSM sexual way, but she's willing to let her husband lead her.

>>37731997
What if they're the opposite? Submissive in a BDSM way but not submissive in letting someone else lead her life?

>>37731954
Former post remains, you have so far merely attempted to prove your first assertion by making a second assertion. That does not work.

As for the nature/nurture argument. We have very little to nothing backing up your claims. We have a lot relatively recent evidence that outright contradicts it and much much much more historical proof that the opposite is natural state of humans.

Culture does not overwrite biological imperatives, it usually is formed and shaped by them. Certain parallels can be found in most societies depending on their stage of developement. All of whom point towards M>f being the norm. Matriarchal societies are almost non existent, the few who are are extremely low tech and even then have the men as pretty independant entities.

Western societies have actually tried to bring about what you are describing. With media in general taking the whole "strong womyn" approach. This merely being the most recent of a several decade long developement trying to push said narrative. It has not worked. Not only has it not worked, it has actually lead to a huge drop in female happiness across the board. With many of them being incredible lost and growing bitter and resentful at older ages. While more and more men effectively opt out.

>>37732151
Then that's no good. I don't want to cause her pain.

>>37730886
If you hate submissive woman you are a feminist

>>37732161
Idk what you're expecting some sort of scientific study that wouldn't exist.

It's just basic human knowledge and common sense, you just don't get it or want me to be wrong so much you throw out logic.

>We have a lot relatively recent evidence that outright
Rape is natural, culturally we have outlawed and banished it to the extent that the majority of men think its a horrid thing to do and most will never do it even if they could get away with it. But if this were natural then there would be no moral question about rape it would be natural. Same thing applies to culutural norms in every aspect of life.

>Culture does not overwrite biological imperatives, it usually is formed and shaped by them
"We have very little to nothing backing up your claims"
"You have so far merely attempted to prove your first assertion by making a second assertion. That does not work. "

>All of whom point towards M>f being the norm. Matriarchal societies are almost non existent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_matrilineal_or_matrilocal_societies
Heres a list of some for you. Most societies were based off of physical dominance and your whole assertion ignores the aspects of human psychology and influence of culture because at certain points physical is all that matters and psychological functions didn't exist according to you?

>Western societies have actually tried to bring about what you are describing.
No they haven't

>With media in general taking the whole "strong womyn" approach.
This is neither what I'm talking about nor what you were talking about literally the sentence before. Media marketing strong womyn isn't a matriarchial society, its media marketing.

>This merely being the most recent of a several decade long developement trying to push said narrative
You mean equality? Why such a dismal portrayal of it? Your bias is showing

>it has actually lead to a huge drop in female happiness across the board.
Except male happiness has gone down too

>>37732398
has gone down too and it's not because of feminism as you're implying. It's because of a vast depreciating system of social factors declining, everything from pay and middle management decrease to working more hours for less, housing and education prices rising and so on.

>many of them being incredible lost and growing bitter and resentful at older ages
Applies to both sexes

>While more and more men effectively opt out.
This is a symptom of society and other factors. Video games only lead to more men opting out of society than most things.

>>37732398
Meant to say:
if this were nature*
not natural

>>37730886
Not really. That's like hating kittens or something.