Can you guys quit it with the term "qt"

hey qt whatchu doin this weekend
wanna bang?

I will, but only if you're that qt in pic related.
Otherwise you're a roastie and I refuse to let you mom-dom me.

Ill bite.

You insult people for being ugly, then flip and say that physical attractiveness is divorced from their quality as a person.

Which one is it famalam

no
now go back to plebbit fag

>>37722997
>I'm smarter than all of you
what a stuck up bitch

>>37723029
>You insult people for being ugly
I insult people for being hypocrites

>>37723032
If you did the opposite of everything reddit did you would suffocate.

>stop judging people by their physical appearance

we can't judge other people on other traits because we have no information on them

>>37722997
>t. not a qt

>>37723048
there is nothing hypocritical here.
guys are judged on looks. and i know some guys are having a tough time accepting it but your looks is what seals the deal for a woman.

its not about "game", its not about confidence, its not about you dress. we just invented those constructs because we can't admit that woman go by physical appearance, not until you grow up and stop watching beauty and the beast

>>37722997
t. not qt hamplanet

>>37723051
It's like that in general conversation too. I can't access a single memory of someone saying something like "There's this girl that's really cool that plays the piano" that also hasn't had "qt" appended on the end.

>>37722997
femanon here
i like cute guys but virgins are pathetic
personality is so important but looks matter too and stuff

>>37723095
>>who are you talking about anon?
>I don't know her name, she's like my height and-
>>oh the cute one?
>I don't... probably? to somebody? I dunno. I hadn't considered it... I mean what kinda girls do you think are cute? Cause me personally, I--
>hey where'd you go?

>>37722997
Femamom here.

I don't know why these men don't realise that they are fucking so stupid and project their feelings of insecurity by hating women?

>>37723078
>guys are judged on looks
Sure

Why are you broken up about this?

Are you sad that you don't get to be in a relationship with someone that automatically nullifies everything about you based on what your face looks like?

What would you do if you did date them? Just jerk eachother off for being attractive all day?

>>37723095
because girls are not focused on these type of things.

woman will never write a thesis unless someone forces her to do (academy etc). those girls that play violin are far and few and between and personally i never met one.
they don't bother themselves with reaching the limit of human potential. they just wagecucking until friday comes so they can get drunk and malicious

im sorry if my opinion on woman is too confined or broken but im personally in touch with alot of artists/programmers (because that's what i do) and i can't say i met more than one woman that is actually interested in game development

>>37723118
I meant on /r9k/. Every greentext story describing a female they're interested in is always "this qt"

>>37723119
I'm Ron Burgundy?

It may be hard for you to believe you dumb cunt but not everyone does everything as a projection of their inadequacies. Some people just have opinions

>>37723172
I dunno anon, I was just trying to convey my experiences (online and off) of having qt attached to all females and my brain doesn't work in that way

>>37723141
its more about that girls have a hard limit to what they considered "standard" in a guy. they are willing to wait a long fucking time to meet the right guy. guys are more flexible, guys will date you if you ask them, at least once just for good measure.

>>37723172
Okay, sure cuck. I smell an angry virgin? Oh well, maybe you'll get sloppy seconds someday.

>>37722997
Sup can i pound that qt brainlet Boipuss plz

i feel bitter because it wasn't used nearly as much 5-7 years ago, i feel like i've had a word stolen from me

>>37723252
>women aren't peabrains that operate totally on their biological inclinations
>your rebuttal to this being "virgin neckbeard fedora beta ambiguous insult against your masculinity"

Thank you for that valuable contribution. If only we had more people like you maybe these people would hate women less

>>37723292
C'mon mate you're better than this, its clearly not a real woman.

Sort yourself out

Attractiveness isn't the basis for me cultivating a friendship or professional relationship with someone, but surely we'd all like to be in a romantic relationship with someone we find attractive. I do not begrudge women be they attractive or not for choosing to not associate with me romantically on the basis of my looks.

This is why I just use "U Want Sum Fuk?" as a pickup line. That way even if she looks like a person who would judge your appearance, she be completely distracted by your balls of steel.

>>37723313
i'd believe it

But I feel obligated to do this board's thinking for them, they tend to just accept whatever doesn't get argued with as the cold truth.

File: download (2).jpg (4KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 183x275px

>>37723292
It's okay to be angry, I'd be angry too if I were a virgin neckbeard fedora beta cuck.

Pic related it's you

>>37723156
Do you even regularly speak to women beyond small talk?

File: hqdefault.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 480x360px

>>37723313
Shut the fuck up man, let him figure it out.

>>37723156
>comparing high art with game development
o i'm laffin

>>37723292
>women only operate on biological inclinations

I don't know any women as obsessed with masturbation and sex and porn as the guys in r9k. Seems like a weird thing to indict women for when there people legitimately sobbing because they are virgins.

>>37723382
You say that like it's some kind of profound revelation that the amount of women vs men in academia is highly disproportionate

>>37723382
you wanna have a deep conversation right now? if no then shut the fuck up

>>37723418
you would be surprised,alot of digital sculptors are classically trained

>>37722997
>You all say this as if being "cute" is the delimiter behind why whether you'll talk to a girl

incorrect

your mistake was claiming all people here do it
Seems like a very pleb mistake for a "smart person"

File: FU.jpg (107KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 500x500px

>>37722997
But Qt 5.9.1 is coming out!
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Qt-5.9.1-Nearing

>>37723430
/r9k/ actually evaluates what the implications of sex means instead of their rebuttal just being "haha ur ugly"

Or kind of, anyway

>implying qt refers exclusively to appearance
Hint: you're not qt

>>37723434
Entirely dependant on country, university in Canada is majority women.

http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-004-x/2008001/article/10561-eng.htm

Actually looks like they're more prevalent in academia in the US too

https://www.nber.org/digest/jan07/w12139.html

>>37723430
its because we speak freely on whatever is on our mind
il admit that i can be a mean nasty fuckhead sometimes but venting my frustrations helps me alot.

File: Jesus Doesn't Love You.jpg (12KB, 221x288px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 221x288px

>starts off calling everyone "desolate virgins that have been beaten with an ugly stick"
>goes on to say "stop judging people by their physical appearance"

>I'm smart
False

>>37723446
Say something even moderately insightful, I fucking dare you. If you want to have an actual discussion try it I give you 3 seconds before you start to autistic ally screech about Normies.

>>37723509
I don't owe anything to some anonymous asshole. Check your privilege.

>>37723509
ok lets talk about automation and futurism.
what are the implications of automation in the near future? can universal income remedy the loss of jobs?

File: 92192.jpg (59KB, 500x357px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 500x357px

>>37722997
but OP, what if the term qt isn't only about physical attractiveness? And what if it's a term that almost became meme-like, sometimes used ironically? Oh no never mind you are so much smarter than me, I must be wrong, right?

But you're right on one point, a lot of people here value physical attractiveness too much and chase staceys, but that doesn't have much to do with the term qt, you're one the wrong track.

>>37723538
id settle for a 4/10, and i think many guys here would

>>37723545
Yep, but some people here keep chasing staceys, it probably has something to do with all these normies and failed normies here or something

>>37723524
>implications of automation in the near future
drones with guns
>can universal income remedy the loss of jobs?
so can drones with guns, and guess which is cheaper

protip: these jobs are being eliminated because nobody likes the people that do them
I personally love my job because I work on automated asset tracking, which is bound to kill cashiers, possibly the post pathetic entitled faggots of the workforce.

>>37723481

Oh man this must be what denial and rationalization looks like. /r9k/ is incapable of understanding sex, those who discuss their sexual exploits are written off as Normies, so you have virgins musing on their fantasies. Maybe some would be willing to lower their standards, but the vast majority expect attractive women, nothing wrong with that of course. Desire and attraction are completely normal. It's just bizarre to me that when robots write off a woman as ugly and not worth pursuing A-OK (i.e smelly hamplanet) but a woman doing it is suddenly a problem? And it's factually false that women as a whole boil down to "haha ur ugly" since pretty of average women are with ugly dudes. Maybe it's just shitty social skills that's driving them away.

>>37723497
Fair enough, I can under the need to vent.

>>37723572
i just picked a hard subject off the cuff.
quite honestly i would never ask anyone this. not even guys.
you need to have some sort of knowledge in machinery and engineering + historical precedents to even begin answering

>>37723595
>historical precedents
I believe that only a legal hack can save us now

>>37723575
i think there is a problem within a problem.

ugly bots don't believe ugly fembots would date them, they think that fem bots are high maintenance and always go for chad.
HOWEVER. fem bots need to put in more works and hookup with guys, get a conversation rolling, exchange pictures etc.

>>37723048
Then you are a retard and a hypocrite.
gr8 b8 m8

File: IMG_0415.jpg (70KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 720x720px

>>37723506
> hates hypocrites
> is a hypocrite
> resorts to insults to garner attention

This post is fucking b8, and fuck all of you for replying.

>>37723748
Op, not Jesus dude, my dude

File: image.jpg (316KB, 800x1068px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 800x1068px

>>37722997
omg this has to be bait. in the real world, most of us rank attractiveness in others from most attractive to least attractive, let's say high, middle and low.

we then do the same to ourselves. according to research conducted by dan ariely of duke university, most people date their level: no big surprise, right?

this is because of options: a high level guy can choose any level girl, why would he choose mid or low? the same with girls: why would a high level girl choose a mid or low level guy?

(there are always exceptions btw, the study is about general modes of behavior)

so a mid level guy or girl (most of us, according to the study) chooses mid level, but, according to the study, it's because he/she *has* to. the mid/low level guy or girl would totally choose a high level partner, but they know they'd get rejected so they settle for their own level, always painfully aware there's better out there.

in order to cope with this many mid/low level guys/girls become subjective about attractiveness. a mid level tending towards low level girl might suddenly decide that bald short men are attractive: "there's just something really cute about a short chubby bald guy" "is it weird that i think ringo is the cutest beatle?"

a low level guy might decide that musical/artistic taste is more important: "i'd rather date a 6/10 who appreciates 90s anime and german electronic music than some 9/10 with shit taste who watches KUWTK"

this is how some cope with being mid/low level.

tl;dr research shows looks matter to both guys + girls

>>37723521
Oh boy you got me there! That's what I fucking thought bitch. Can't deliver. >>37723524

Given the rapidity with which technology is developing a large portion of jobs look like they're going to be obsolete. Particularly factory work but anything involving calculation (admittedly my reading on this has been cursory so I can't speak for all the different jobs that are at risk of disappearing) is likely going to vanish(why risk human error when machines are cheaper and more efficient?) . Given the sheer volume of people that are going to be unemployed, no, I don't think a universal income is feasible. I think it's a noble idea, but providing a stipend that allows people to live comfortably (and with enough money to spend so that they can actually contribute to the economy) is a very expensive endeavour for the government. And one I don't particularly trust them to not fuck up. Pension already is looking fairly thin for millennials as currently aging baby boomers suck up the resources, things will be far more bleak when more people are unemployed on top of an aging population that is unable to work. I'm not saying I have a solution, but I think a universal income is a little too optimistic. Where would the money come from? Would taxes have to be adjusted so they're more on companies and less on people since there's fewer folks with jobs able to properly pay into the system? How does that affect the job market, will businesses lay off more people to protect profits in the event that taxes are raised? How does that affect prices for food and housing and services?

TL;DR very messy problem, with very messy implications, and that's discussing that particular issue in a vacuum. There's also job loss with regard to climate change and migrating groups trying to immigrate further straining a potential universal income system.

>>37723785
>>37723791
that's a lot of words that I won't read because they can be summed up with
>i'M a SmArT pErSoN

>>37723806
naw, i'm dumb as rocks (maybe, kek), most of what i wrote summarizes the results of research i had nothing to do with that refutes OP's post.

your choice dood.

File: 1496790734745.png (56KB, 429x500px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 429x500px

Cause even if someone has a great personality who wants to look at an ugly person when they hang out.

>>37723791
I'm also >>37723524
>I'm not saying I have a solution, but I think a universal income is a little too optimistic.
That's what I fucking thought bitch. Can't deliver.

>>37723919
>>Let's talk about
>>You didn't take a firm stance!
>>I'll insult you

>>37723940
If you don't have anything of substance, fuck off.

>>37723940
I'll give you a few minutes to get out your temper tantrum. Go ahead, get it all out.

>>37723947
>>37723968
I literally do not understand why you're upset now. I was making an observation that someone prompted a conversation under the pretext of "let's talk about" which means, to me, that discussion is welcome, and you're not looking for my own personal hardline stance on the issue.

If you wanted to know where I stand on the issue, ask that instead of presenting as an open topic for discussion.

File: Get him out of here!.jpg (80KB, 900x599px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 900x599px

>>37722997
I would have believed you if i saw what you said in meme form but you didn't meme it

>>37723995
That's better. We can all smell your pretentiousness from here. Your diaper needs a change.

>>37722997
the whole point of women is to be pretty you dope

>>37724016
lol ok anon thank you

>>37724057
You're welcome.
If you have any real questions about workforce automation, it's my full-time job.

>>37724067
Yeah I want to talk to the guy that unnecessarily insulted me repeatedly some more.

>>37724095
Well sorrorrorry. cunt

and this is the reason why female shouldn't be allowed to post on this board

>>37722997
>You all say this as if being "cute" is the delimiter behind why whether you'll talk to a girl
it is, i don't have time to waste talking to non-qts
>First off, you're all desolate virgins that have been beaten with an ugly stick so you're either being hypocritical and you think your behaviour shouldn't apply to you
oh no not HYPOCRISY the most HORRIBLE crime a person can commit

and i'm pretty sure the reasoning behind it is that men and women aren't the same

>>37722997
Dis bait is real

What if I want to talk about the Qt framework?

>empty line after every line
Why do newfags do this? It makes your posts far more tedious to read

Ps. this thread is b8, sage to prevent bumping

>>37724659
yuuss
>>37723477

I'd rather be a virgin for life than fuck some fat uggo.

File: C8JsGn3VoAE6qgO.jpg (25KB, 424x406px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 424x406px

>>37722997
>"I'm smarter than all of you"
>made a typo

>>37725168
>I'm superior
>still posts

>>37722997
The only reason I dislike the term qt is the first time I saw qt3.14 I thought it referred to the GUI toolkit, Qt, version 3.14, which puzzled me because such a thing never existed.

>>37725168
I don't feel like finding the image so just imagine an obese man tipping a fedora in your head.

>>37722997
>double spacing between every line
You have to go back

>>37722997
why the hell would we ever talk to a girl if she's not a qt? Fuck off retard.

>>37725793
For any other reason besides looking at her pretty face

Not everyone is as boring as you

Really, are you 5?

>>37725819
>double spacing between every line
You have to go back. Please. Please go back if you're not even going to make the slightest effort to fit in.

>>37725854
It's basic visual hierarchy, stfu

And every site with markdown does that. Either it pads the lines or you just add a blank line so it doesn't vomit a wall of text at you

Complain to that chink admin

>>37725882
>every other site does that
This is exactly my point. Please at least make an effort to assimilate in the board culture.
Have you ever read a novel? Are there line breaks after every sentence? Or even after every paragraph? No there aren't. Line breaks are used much more sparingly than that, because normal human beings that aren't half illiterate don't need them every three words.
So kindly fuck off.

>>37725980
>Are there line breaks after every sentence?
The lines are padded

Plain text is "plain text" with no decoration. All you have is a stream of unicode characters to make it look appealing

I apologize, I can't read the rest of that because your post hits my eyeballs like a freight train. It's quite unpleasant.

>>37726026
>I can't read the rest of that because your post hits my eyeballs like a freight train.
Try reading an adult book, maybe if you keep at it you'll be more than half illiterate. With some effort you could be fully literate. I believe in you anon.
Also none of these sentence were longer than the width of an hd screen, are you browsing on a 600*400 CRT monitor or something? Maybe that's why you have trouble reading, I think it's time to run the degauss.

>>37723806
OP and I are different people.

>pfft I bet you can't even discuss deep topics

>ok anon what?
>N-nothing!

Kek how like robots, all talk and bullshit, no follow through.

>>37726126
Alright, you've shown me the light mr 4chan alpha-male. I'm just too much of a big dumb idiot to intentionally make everything more difficult to use and violate basic principles of visual hierarchy.

I'm also 2 stoopid to watch every episode of a TV show at once instead of sequentially one at a time.

Consider using fedoras as linebreaks, since I'm sure you have so many.

>>37726203
>Multiple users tell you your posting habits show that you're new here and making no effort to integrate, taking no time to lurk before jumping in
>Retort by spouting even more reddit memes
Jeez you sure showed me

>>37722997
>You all say this as if being "cute" is the delimiter behind why whether you'll talk to a girl
>
>First off, you're all desolate virgins that have been beaten with an ugly stick so you're either being hypocritical and you think your behaviour shouldn't apply to you or you do and you just think everyone should be in a relationship with someone at their level of attractiveness
>
>Second off, stop judging people by their physical appearance. If you acknowledge that their physical attractiveness is totally divorced from their quality as a person than the statement is pointless anyway.
>
>You know what? Don't even bother arguing with this. I'm smarter than all of you, just do what I tell you.

U forget that robots have such low standards that 99% of girls they found qt. They just hate on roasties and that have nothing to do with their look

>>37726183
literally who are you quoting and literally what are you talking about

Why would you date(and fuck) an ugly grill when you can strife for better.Of course it comes as personal preference.
Btw better die a virgin then fuck an uggo.

>>37722997
are you a smol qt though?

>>37726697
Have you talked with these robots in chats and stuff? They basically call anything under 5/10 extremely ugly, and that's what they think is a 5/10, which in reality is actually a 7.5/10.

Their perceptions are extremely warped due to a lack of physical social life.