Lol

>>37687879
This is a really low quality post, why did you do it? You think God wants you evangelizing by calling people niggers and telling them they'll burn in Hell? Do you think this is even remotely effective? I don't think this would be effective, it would probably make it easier for me to shrug Christianity off if I was a non-believer. Please rethink.

This is shit-tier bait, OP.
>notlikethis.gif

Matthew 16:18 is not a direct parallel to Isaiah 22:15-25, even though the text is similar, the key of the house of David from Elakhim are not the same as the keys of the kingdom of heaven. The language is similar (binding and loosing versus opening and shutting) but the keys are not the same. Also the key in Isaiah 22:22 was place d upon the shoulder of Eliakim and in Matt 16:18-19 the key is given to Peter. This also does not make Paul or the successors of Paul infallible. He binds and looses into the Kingdom with his keys, not rules and doctrines. Christ's church was built through Peter's evangelism. This however gives no legitimacy to the pope's primacy since Matthew 16:18-19 says nothing about succession, infallibility or any aspects of modern papacy.