>in a couple decades, even the shittiest computers will be

File: 1496808254242.jpg (30KB, 318x286px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 318x286px

>you will be dead within the next two decades and never get to experience true VR

>>37603165
why u gonna dead, anon?

>>37603165
Hopefully you'll be reborn in your anime world, anon-chan

>>37603126
Not really no.
We're hitting the effective limit of microprocessors right now actually.
It used to be every year we'd double the count for the same price but now we're hitting the wall where 1/2 the amount as last year is costing twice as much. Soon it will be 2-3 times as much for 1/4th then nothing. Estimates put this at around a decade.
This means we'll only ever seen slightly above what we see now or slightly above that for an extra $5k.
Currently we're trying to work around this with neurally mapped chips, 3d chips, or quantum computing but at the rate they're going it'll be 30-40 years before they're up to snuff and consumer level pricing.

>>37603165
Don't forget that video games were room sized computers just 50 years ago.

File: 1471157526177.png (583KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 1920x1080px

>>37603207
>Implying (((they))) are not putting a choke on the technology stream to release at an steady pace for the next decade
>implying that all the releases in the near future are not agreed between tech gigants to not aggressively eat (((their))) profit margin

>>37603339
Either or. you'll still be 50 years older than you are now when you first see consumer ready photo-realistic shit.

>>37603185
I don't anticipate living past the age of 50.

>>37603339
Its not the Jews fault, for once. Its quantum mechanics.

Logic gates are so small now, that electrons are capable of quantum tunnelling across them. So sometimes for instance, AND(true, false) will mistakenly return true.