Wait just a sec, if there are more women having sex than ever

>>37425015
Having sex with the top 20% of men

>>37425064
This. Tinder sluts just pick and choose the top 20% of men to fuck and ignore the rest.

File: rdrr.gif (490KB, 500x200px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 500x200px

>>37425015
No one ever said robots were good at math
>Average age for women to lose virginity has been going up for 20 years
>average number of lifetime sexual partners for women has been going down for 25 years
>number of women who self-identify as feminist has been declining for 30 years
>Number of women who agree with RadFem bullshit dropping like a rock for 20 years
Then there's robots
>"No woman is a virgin, they;re all feminist sluts!"
It so weird. it is like they don't even know any women

>>37425085
>literally no sources
>tumblr gif
>acts like some smug asshole
????

Why are you here?

you must've not had friends growing up if you didn't realize that the popular girls in school were all fucking the same 5 guys.

that's why "everyone loses their virginity at 16 nowa days bro!" but you didn't because you weren't one of the Chads or you didn't get lucky, right place, right time with a 15 year old slut.

File: 1496244712160.jpg (138KB, 550x331px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 550x331px

>>37425015
80% of females go after the top 20% men. Girls don't mind sharing an alpha.

It makes sense. Just have to see if their sons and daughters turn out alpha too

>>37425064
>>37425084
>About 15% of all women are 'very promiscuous' but about 15% of men are very promiscuous, too
>40% of all women aged 15-45 have 2 or fewer lifetime sexual partners, but men are about the same
Or - "Wrong!"
I get my data from the annual reports of the NCHS.
Where do you get yours from? A blogger?

>>37425160
>Where do you get yours from?
Life experience

>>37425107
>>literally no sources
Did you mention this for these assholes?
>>37425064
>>37425084
Of course not! You will only ask for sources from people who disagree with you and when you get them, dismiss them in favor of the lie that let's you sleep at night
>NCHS annual report on health indicators and sexual behavior, BTW
>Go ask for those other sources now, pretend science guy

File: arcanine sample.jpg (95KB, 600x480px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 600x480px

>>37425116
Translation
>"As i sat alone in the cafeteria, too frozen in terror to talk to girls, the ones I fantasized the most about talked to boys who spoke freely to them.
>The whores
>You just knew they were fucking them, over and over. Sure, you never spoke to any of them, but you *knew*

>>37425118
A lie invented by a con man to sell ebooks to idiots.

>>37425180
see
>>37425218
'Never getting laid' != 'life experience'

>>37425218
i had a GF freshmen year of highschool, nice projection though.

>>37425292
>i had a GF
suuuuuuure you did. I bet she was from another school, which is why the people you told about her never met her

>>37425118
A retarded meme created by bitter virgins to try to hide the fact they are the bottom 1% and not the bottom 80%.

>>37425160
Don't you know NCHS data only counts when it's used to create meme graphs about how virgins are more faithful.

>>37425232
Makes sense if you ask me, why settle for an average beta when you can share the superior genetic alpha?

>>37425180
How does your life experience help you understand sex and relationships when you have not left the basement in years?

File: 1495718127725.png (128KB, 581x443px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 581x443px

>>37425372
Never said I wasn't at the bottom of the barrel.

>>37425399
Exactly. Why fuck average girls when you can fuck attractive ones?

>>37425338
obviously you aren't going to believe me. that's okay, you can feel secure and have your little argument, i could give a shit less!

>>37425372
>A retarded meme created by bitter virgins to try to hide the fact they are the bottom 1% and not the bottom 80%.
This.

>>37425427
Because I'm not an alpha male.

>>37425085
Average number of partners for men and women has to be the same for two reasons.
1. There are equal number of men and women. (<0.01% difference is negligible)
2. Every time a female has sex, a male also has sex.
It's the distribution of sex between genders that is interesting. This is where the 80/20 rule comes into effect.

>>37425389
Shit! I totally forgot!

>>37425399
Because that isn't how most women think?

>>37425443
>You can't back up your bullshit, no claiming victory
never change, robots

>>37425767
do you want me to find my ex from highschool and have her post on here for proof? are you a fucking moron?
i can't prove it, doesn't mean it's a lie, but you need to feel like you won something today, so here you go.

>>37425399
>Makes sense if you ask me, why settle for an average beta when you can share the superior genetic alpha?

You're ignorant. Women don't even care about looks all that much. We prefer guys with a good personality who aren't boring.

>>37425160
Yes. People will always tell the truth about sex when it comes to in-person interviews.

Nobody would possible ever lie

>>37425820
Bullshit you tranny, there are no women here.

>>37425749
They do subconciously.

File: barbaraeden.jpg (47KB, 616x462px)

47KB, 616x462px

>>37425656
No, it doesn't
>you forgot prostitution!
>there are an equal number of men and women (<0.01% difference is negligible)
There are actual 1.2% more women than men
>It's the distribution of sex between genders that is interesting.
Yeah.
That's why I mentioned it, moron.
If the moronic
>"20% of men fuck 80% of women"
and the implied
>"and 80% of men are thirsty for life"
to be true the distribution of women with high N counts vs. low N count should be many fewer virginss than men and many more women with median counts. Among men you would have a small group with a high N count and the rest with low N counts with a much higher percentage of male virgins than female one.
That isn't what is true
The percentage of promiscuous men is about the same as the percentage of promiscuous women. The percentage of male virgins is about the same as the percentage of female virgins. The majority of BOTH sexes have a low N count
There are only two realistic scenarios that result in this
1)
>20% of men fuck 80% of women AND 20% of women fuck 80% of men
[Which actually doesn't work because of the ~5% of both with stupid high N counts]
OR
2)
>Very promiscuous women fuck very promiscuous men A LOT, the other 70%-75% of both men and women have a few lifetime sexual partners
Which is, of course, what Real Life *actually looks like* rather than Gossip Girl or a soap opera
>FFS

>>37425015
HAHA OP YOU REALLY BLEW THESE FUCKING MORONS OUT OF THE WATER

THEY PROBABLY DONT EVEN BELIEVE THE CDC'S STATISTICS ON 1 IN 5 WOMEN BEING RAPED

LOL FUCKING IDIOTS.

LUCKILY US SCIENTISTS USE VALID STUDIES THAT PROVE OUR SCIENCE WITH SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY

File: AAEAAQAAAAAAAAvvAAAAJGMwN2FiYmE1LWVmODktNDU0ZS1hMzJkLWY3Njk0OTUxZjRiZA.png (5KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 200x200px

>>37425015
because beta males have been replace by the welfare state and the environment switch from K to r selected. Women are free to chase after bad boy alpha thugs without consequences because the government will take care of them for being single mothers. also I hope you are ready to pay more taxes and to put a hockey mask after single mothers collapse the welfare state.

>>37425802
You lost the thread of the convo and are obsessed with proving you knew a girl, once.
You claim all the popular girls were fucking the same 5 guys.
Your made-up personal anecdote isn't proof of anything, He Who Had A GF Once

File: pleb 3.jpg (81KB, 622x568px)

81KB, 622x568px

>>37425829
>Not knowing the NCHS includes medical reports, epidemiology, etc.

>>37425876
Is this more of that bullshit the PUAs peddle where guys that never finished HS convince the gullible that they are experts in evolutionary psychology so you'll subscribe to their podcast?

>>37425916
yes, at my school they were, not made up.

you're obsessed with trying to dogg on me, go ahead and keep trying bro, lol, loser.

>>37425218
>not knowing women are proud to be sluts

women in high school never gave me a chance because I was not a chad who was in to sports and many of them were proud sluts.

>>37425953
No, women subconciously want strong offspring so when they see an alpha bad boy with chiseled features and a don't give a fuck attitude they get interested.

>>37425974
High school experiences so totally apply to adult life, dude!

>>37426021
They do though, people don't change.

>>37425906
>Millennials are on track to have 75% of all Millennial men marry
>When you eliminate Blacks from the analysis this number leaps to 83%-85%. While still down from Gen X, this means that by the time younger Millennials reach age 45 the vast majority will have been married
so - no
>Among the first few years of Gen Z 80% of Gen Z women and 78% of Gen Z men said marriage was 'very important' to them as a top life goal. This number is higher than in Millennials and Gen X and reflects the thoughts of High School graduates in the late 1960's
All from the Pew Research studies Millennials in Adulthood and Gen Z: Aspirations
tl;dr - nope

>>37425820
>Women don't even care about looks all that much. We prefer guys with a good personality who aren't boring.
HAHAHAHAHAHHAAH... AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA.
YEAH NO. You keep lying to yourself.

>>37425974
I see you just can't grasp
>what I think was going on when I was 17 in my school
does not equal
>How the real world works

>>37425372
>>37425232

>but the 80/20 rule is just a meme

https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/1916912/polyamorous-wife-who-brought-ex-girlfriend-into-her-marriage-feels-complete-after-they-both-fall-pregnant/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4340418/Are-world-s-deluded-wives.html

https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/3216578/man-with-three-wives-and-11-kids-considers-taking-on-two-more-wives-and-eight-children-to-honour-brothers-dying-wish/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2987106/Polyamorous-man-s-two-wives-birth-30-days-one-three-insist-couldn-t-happier.html

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/polyamorous-mans-two-wives-who-5306573


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3708485/Lord-wives-says-happier-THREE-spouses.html

>>37425995
see this?
>>37425160
Yes, about 15% of women are sluts.
That is absolutely true.
But
>stay with me, now
*most aren't*.
Take a deep breath.
let it out.
Think carefully.
move on

>>37425015
Because they're not having sex with all men. Are you that stupid?

>>37425015
>why are there so many male virgins?
Simple

80 / 20 rule

>>37426009
You could've just said "yes"
The word 'Hypergamy' means 'the tendency of women to seek out a mate based upon traits such as intelligence, status, wealth, humor, and ambition in preference to appearance'.
Read that again, because what it means is that in Real Life "chiseled features" aren't nearly as important to women as you seem to think

Less sex is happening this generation than previous generations.

What's this thread about again?

>>37426153
We can post it till the cows come home, some people just won't accept it.

File: hypergamy3.jpg (30KB, 600x347px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 600x347px

>>37426090
see
>>37426167
and read a book, would ya'?

>>37426102
>I am going to ignore the data from census, the NHS and the NCHS to post articles from British tabloids
I know why YOU will never breed!

>>37425015
women want to date up

a 5(f) will not go for a 5(m)

In addition women are now the majority getting degrees. This ties in with woman wanting to date up.

A woman with a degree thinks a man without one is beneath her

This also comes into play with money, a women also wants someone who earns more than her because "it's a mans role to provide" (notice how they use stereotypes when it works for them) Again if you dont earn more than her you are deemed lesser

>>37426183

isn't that a meme rule that was initially applied to shit like losing weight and was then co-opted by r9k?

>>37426153
Bullshit
Less than 5% of men are lifelong virgins. When you control for things like priests it is about 1%
If that bullshit number was true then 30%-40% of men would die virgins

>>37426167
I agree however when I say chiseled features I speak in a broad sense in terms of appearance, height, bone structure, social ability etc. Things like that. Regardless the 80 / 20 rule will always apply.

>>37426239
Somebody else already said that
>>37425893
No one has commented on it

>>37425820
women want the full package the last time I checked. He needs to tick off all the boxes of being tall, handsome,funny, having a good job,ambitious,confident, not living with parents, being kind, charismatic and popular.

This thread gets made like every week

why

>>37425015
Because "sexual liberation" dosent mean more sex with more men, it means more sex with less men and less public shame for doing so

File: hypergamy1.jpg (70KB, 630x460px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 630x460px

>>37426248
>when I say chiseled features I speak in a broad sense in terms of appearance, height, bone structure
So when you refer to appearance you mean appearance?
Yeah
We all got that, genius.
And it is wrong
>social ability
that trumps everything appearance

>>37425015
1. It's self reported (like every sex test) which means men are going to lie and women are going to lie in opposite ways
2. I don't really get your point. The 80/20 thing is more so unfalsifiable if anything. These statistics you cite don't mean much. Hypothetically, 80% of the males in this study could have had sex with the lowest of women while 20% of woman could have had sex with the highest of men. Your data makes no indication that this isn't the case.
3. Talking about how there's still virgin women out there when the figures are still relatively low percentages doesn't mean much. 1/3rd of the western world is obese. 10% of the population is utterly undesirable, suffering from server diseases or deformities. It's not surprising that there exists a population of virgins among both genders in the lowest of the low.
4. Even then, this is all assuming the stats are even reliable. These surveys were conducting face-to-face with a woman in their own homes. Young girls aren't going to admit to being nonvirgins in this scenario and young boys certainly don't want to be virgins there.

I think you need to go away and rethink your opinions.

File: puas.png (128KB, 515x297px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 515x297px

>>37426288
Because it is HILARIOUS to watch robots defend moronic PUA bloggers while *screaming* that census data is bullshit all to avoid facing the fact that they are alone because of their choices, not their genetics

>>37426183
>some people just won't accept it.
Its all these redditors wanting to white knight for women.

>>37425015
A pretty low percentage of the most attractive malew are pretty much just fucking evety girl they meet.
Im not even joking, ive fucking seen it.
They get so much sex you would think theyd have AIDS or something by now.
But these fuckers keep breeding like goddamn rabbits.

The sex doesn't trickle down it's all for Chad and occasionally Brad after he gets paid

But god damn is it a great time to be female

>>37426328
I know and an influx of failed normies as well.

>>37426297
Chill out man, that's just the 80/20 rule in effect.

>>37426102
You are posting unrelated articles to your lame 80/20 meme. Why are you so adamant in defending a retarded meme?

>>37426325
What's hilarious is newbs taking self-reported data seriously then wondering why their hypothesis doesn't stand up to the test

How can people be gaining weight of they're reporting caloric intakes lower than their BMR! What a weird phenomenon! They couldn't all be lying!

>>37426153
80% of men are virgins? Shit, that's high! But if a bitter manchild on /r9k/ claims it, it must be true.

>>37426182
Something about being bitter about not getting sex like everyone else.

>>37426183
/r9k/ believes if they spam a retarded meme over and over again it becomes fact.

>>37426403
I made this man of straw and hit him. He fell over. I have won the fight.

>>37426387
>Why are you so adamant in defending a retarded meme?

It's the best analogy to human nature.

>>37426248
Just because you repeat a retarded meme over and over again doesn't mean it becomes a rule, you mentally ill east european.

>>37426267
Funny how bitter kissless virgin NEETs always think they know what women want in a man.

>>37426420
Not an argument. Try come up with a better argument than just:
>lol bitter virgins

I've accepted what I am and we are just trying to analyze how it works.

>>37426315
>Hypothetically, 80% of the males in this study could have had sex with the lowest of women while 20% of woman could have had sex with the highest of men. Your data makes no indication that this isn't the case.
Sure it does.
for 20% of women to have sex with 80% of men AND to explain how the 20% have sex with a lot of women you'd need to see an average lifetime N-count for women of about, oh, 5 *MINIMUM*.
That isn't the case. Women;s lifetime N count is 2.9-3.1 and has been *dropping* for 20 years.
>Talking about how there's still virgin women out there when the figures are still relatively low percentages doesn't mean much.
1 in 12 women between 15 and 45 is a virgin. That isn't low. Seriously - look at all the girls in HS through working in offices up to 45 - 6 times as many of them are virgins as lesbians. 6 times as many virgins as natural redheads
>These surveys were conducting face-to-face with a woman in their own homes.
This is false. the survey portions are done three ways to help adjust for lying and are correlated with medical records, STD rates, etc.
You very literally don't know what you are talking about

>>37426331
Some of the biggest players I know aren't even good looking. They just have charisma and confidence and persistence.

>>37426390
>self-reported data
see
>>37426470

>>37426463
How many girls have you asked out? Have you set up tinder?

>>37426429
>It allows me to never change and blame others
FTFY

File: article-2638474-1E32820300000578-393_634x313.jpg (41KB, 634x313px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 634x313px

The top 80% of women only have sex with the top 30% of men

The bottom 20% of women only consider the top 30% of men, but they have a bigger selection so they decline.

The bottom 70% of men get nobody.

>>37426072
you are still not explaining the influx of single mothers and is not going to get better until we have no welfare at all. if the government offers them a better deal then women are more then happy to become single mothers.

>>37426505
>Have you set up tinder?
I'm not degrading myself.

>>37426403
>>37426239

men lie about their virginity because they are embarrassed

>>37426511
Can't change genetics retard.

>>37426512
Yep, a meme table created in mspaint is plenty proof!

>>37426549
Oh. So you have never once tried to get a gf. Ever thought that's the reason you don't have one?

>>37426570
What do genetics have with getting laid? Unless you have a severe deformity or something you can get sex easily.

>>37426572
Calling something a meme doesn't add credibility to your argument.

>>37426594
So you're saying that graph is true? How do you know it's not a complete lie?

>>37426583
>So you have never once tried to get a gf.
Who said I didn't?

File: 1410105911134.jpg (10KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 251x242px

>>37426593
>What do genetics have with getting laid?
>you can get sex easily.

>>37426610
Nature proves it.

>>37426620
Don't him, he's obviously trolling at this point. It'll end up in a large argument which will eventually circle back to the 80/20 rule.

>>37425015
>then why are there so many male virgins
there aren't. incredibly few males are virgins. less than ever before, in fact.

>>37426627
I just asked Nature and she said you're a liar. So your entire post is a lie.

>>37426687
Look at wolves then for fuck sake, there are alphas, betas and omegas.

>>37426593
>What do genetics have with getting laid
Do you even understand evolution? Do you think biology doesn't exist and sexual opportunities are random? Are you really that much of a retard?

Keep in mine there are aprox 105 male births every 100 female births. Guys outnumber girls from age 0 to 35 when they start dying off (males in general have shorter lifespans) So assuming equal distribution (lol) 1 in 20 young guys will be unable to find a partner.
in some countries the ratio is even worse due to factors like infanticide and immigration. For example in Sweden there are 125 guys aged 18-24 every 100 girls in the same group.

>>37426666
>less than ever before, in fact.
[citation needed]

Here's mine, waiting for yours http://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/20/asia/japanese-millennials-virgins/

>>37425015
there aren't many male virgins.

also, people were a lot more open about sex with strangers 40 years ago. these days most young people have relationships lasting 3-5+ years and only have sex while dating. there's less than 15% that even consider hooking up. the "im such a virgin XD" meme is 13 year old kids posing as 18 year olds and it still never hits more than 30% if it's in person and not some online shit.

>>37425015
I'm not even gonna read the thread. The answer is obvious.
Most women are sleeping with the same small pool of 8+/10 men. Because women don't want sex as much as men, they can take turns with the same small pool of men, who are happy to get it every night, even if that requires taking on some below-league women on some of the nights. So these guys get laid at least once a day, while the women rotate.

>>37426724
And this proves your claim that 70% of men don't have sex?

>>37426785
Don't think there are any studies that cover the world or even the entirety of the western world, but here's one about the UK which can be more accurately extrapolated to the rest of the west than Japan can:
https://www.theguardian.com/observer/sex/story/0,12550,818356,00.html

>>37426666
then why is everyone calling us bitter virgins then if only a very few of them are virgins? this place would not exist if that was true.

>>37426836
men don't have the time or the sex drive to sleep around with more than 2 women. it's usually a girl who will fuck 10 or more men in a year. you seem to think that it's worth finding someone new all the time instead of just fucking the same couple of friends. trust me if you're 8+ you don't need to look around for random ugly people to have sex. are you on drugs my man?

male virgins almost don't exist after age 21. there is a higher percent of mentally retarded, asexual, and disabled men than there are virgins.

>>37426947
I wonder when they'll class virgin as a disability so I can quit my job and claim NEETbux.

>>37426325
why can't they all be full of shit?

what matters is what you do with the time and abilities you're given.

there is no true, platonic-ideal robot, so go out there and give your will a spin in the world. statistics cannot account perfectly for the state of all things in the world - that perfect qt for your autistic ass might be out there. you just have to figure out how to make it happen.

>>37426893
this place used to be about high school kids getting dating advice.

also being called a virgin is an insult exactly because it's rare and pathetic. i don't see where you're confused.

>>37426893
i'm a virgin and i've literally never been called a bitter virgin. it's all a meme. you pretend like you're so woefully persecuted because you like the feeling.

>>37426836
Source for your fanfiction?

>>37426893
The keyword is bitter, not virgin. Nobody cares about nonbitter virgins. But /r9k/ is full of angry people who are virgins and bitter about it.

>>37426844
He's just an Incel making shit up to feel better about himself.

>>37426167
>>37426196
>>37426297

Sexual selection =/= pragmatic marriage for wealth and status

>>37426512
Source: Dalrock's ass

>>37426530
Single mothers who aren't Black usually aren't very promiscuous. And you're talking about the breakdown of marriage, not how N-count is decreasing

>>37425015
If more wealth is being generated than ever before, why are there so many poor people?

>>37426556
STD counts don't get embarrassed, dolt

File: undateables marriage.jpg (60KB, 634x423px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 634x423px

>>37426570
See this guy?
Actual, honest-to-goodness genetic disease that causes cranial and face deformities.
That's his wife.

>>37428029
Money is not equal to sex, retard.

File: ugly-guy-beautiful-girlfriend.jpg (62KB, 730x350px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 730x350px

>>37426620
>Ugly men never get la-"

>>37428078
"Liberation" doesn't guarantee you sex either, dipshit.

>>37426724
1) I am not a wolf
2) The guy that *invented* those terms keeps telling morons like you that you are using them wrong

>>37427913
>FFS
With most women having a low N count AND the number of women with a low N count increasing AND the female interest in marriage and childbearing *always* staying north of 75% 'sexual selection' *IS* 'pragmatic marriage" for all women except the roughly 15% of women who are very promiscuous - they are, essentially, mentally ill.

>>37428029
you're mistaking sheer numbers for proportions. Yes - there were only 2 million poor Americans in 1920 and there are 4 million now - but the total population wen up three fold

>>37428189
>missing the point
There being more of something doesn't guarantee everyone a piece. Even taking what you posted into consideration, there are still poor people.

"Sexual liberation" did not entail everyone will have sex. It wasn't about that.

>>37428275
Oh shut up, stop crying. leave your basement and try talking to girls for once.

>>37428275
>"Sexual liberation" did not entail everyone will have sex. It wasn't about that.
And WTF said otherwise, kid?

>>37428095
. He's not ugly.
. Look at the house. He's rich
. Those photos being shared means that she just wants to show the world how nice of a girl she is for dating that guy despite his 4/10 look

Now give us the date of those photos and tell us what's the current status of that couple.
I bet you can't, because you know that you're a full of shit fucking faggot. Get lost.

>>37428527
>He's not ugly
>despite his 4/10 look
He's very ugly.

>>37428565
He's below average, not very ugly. You sure have the same reasoning as a female for a tranny, which is amazing.

>>37425015
Millenials are actually fucking less than their predecesors, believe it or not.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/janetwburns/2016/08/16/millennials-are-having-less-sex-than-other-gens-but-experts-say-its-probably-fine/#4308e3b6d958

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/americans-having-less-sex-than-they-once-did/2017/03/06/e367ce58-0298-11e7-b9fa-ed727b644a0b_story.html

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2016/02/10/voices/japan-birth-rate-beginning-end-just-new-beginning/

Women liberation only spawned a bunch of cretin lesbians and gave the world the most disguisting forms of ''art'' ever seen.

>>37428672
Nah women are fucking the same but the top percentage of guys are fucking them all.

File: ugly-man-1.jpg (53KB, 286x250px)

53KB, 286x250px

>>37428527
BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anon, calm down and breathe.
now, listen to me:
Ugly
Guys
Get
Laid
All the time

File: hearty laugh.gif (633KB, 300x182px) Image search: [Google]

633KB, 300x182px

>>37428672
Well-sourced; many linked studies; jibes with the CDC, NHS, and NCHS raw data; some peer reviewed; matches up with the 20 year trend. Good stuff
>>37428705
total unsupported bullshit

>>37425085
What movie is that gif from senpai?

>>37428894
inglorious basterds, kohai

>>37428095
>>37428565

I thought he was cute. :(

>>37428069

>fit with strong, masculine bone structure
>has an obese wife

File: undateabes 2.jpg (36KB, 615x409px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 615x409px

>>37429280
you gutless fucks will grasp at any straw to avoid change, won't you?

>>37426512
To whom does this retarded bs apply?

>>37426512
It only applies to teenagers.