>37320460

>>37323162
I don't get why people have to use algebra to do this, you can just see the pattern

1 * 4 = 4 *1 = 4
2 * 4 = 8 * 2 = 16
3 * 4 = 12 * 3 = 36

File: 22.jpg (13KB, 320x480px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 320x480px

>>37323162
i c what u did there op & i couldn't give 36 fucks

File: 1494835401565.jpg (330KB, 1017x579px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1017x579px

>>37323365
using logic like that the answer could also be 64
4^1=4
4^2=16
4^3=64

File: 1489619246897.jpg (18KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x300px

>>37323520
Yeah, I suppose he is essentially saying the what is given is NN X NN where N is some integer and the result of that expression is (N^2)*4 which does really account for how NN X NN was written.

I like OP's way of looking at it. The other way of looking at it is thinking of "11" as some variable in two dimensions. Two dimensions being, the face value of the numbers shown, and the value that they have to make the original expression given true.
i.e.
>11 X 11 = 4
>("11")^2=4
>"11"=2
...
>22 = 2* 11
>"22" = 2 * "11"
>"22" = 2*2
>"22"=4
>4*4 = 16
...
etc.

File: wtf2.jpg (24KB, 800x574px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 800x574px

>>37323629
fridge break anon?

>>37323520
Nope because 1 * 4 which is an abbreviation of 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 makes more connections

There are 4 numbers so you add them

Following the logic it would be

1^4 not 4^1 which doesn't fit the pattern

File: 1495241964877.jpg (44KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x375px

>>37323666
Wait, my computer ate some of my words
>...saying that what is given...
>...which does not really account...
wait, what are we talking about again?

>>37323680
Beautiful
1^4=1
2^4=16
3^4=81
Wait, what were you saying?

File: 1493345540572.gif (2MB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 240x180px

>>37323726
>>37323680
Wait, I got it; I'm going to sleep now.
I'm too tired to read and type and do everything else.

>>37323726
>1^4=1
Right, it breaks the pattern. If it fit the pattern it would equal 4

File: 6s.jpg (7KB, 156x118px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 156x118px

>>37323666
the truth shall set you free ... just saying

11 x 11 = 4
1+1 x 1+1 = 4
3+3 x 3+3 = 36

>>37323162
Did you notice that 16 is a direct square from 4? Maybe its a sequence of squares...
Wacky equalizing, it also could be something like
2 x 2 = 4
4 x 4 = 16
16 x 16 = 256

File: 02.jpg (30KB, 564x564px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 564x564px

>>37323788
you left out 2 + 2 anon

>>37323788
This is the closest thing to an answer this bullshit puzzle will ever have.
You could also say that:
If a*a=b, then a=sqrt(b).
11*11=4, so 11=sqrt(4)=2
Same for 22*22=16: 22=sqrt(16)=4
Assuming that 11+22=33, it follows that 33=6.
33*33=6*6=36
This only makes the assumption that there's a logical connection between the three, which is necessary for this to be solvable.

11*11=121... 1+2+1=4
22*22=484... 4+8+4=16
33*33=1089... 1+0+8+9=18

So yeh this is the asnwer...

File: spidey18.jpg (65KB, 640x435px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 640x435px

>>37325060
seems legal anon