[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Liberals only hate him because he's right.

This is a red board which means that it's strictly for adults (Not Safe For Work content only). If you see any illegal content, please report it.

Thread replies: 86
Thread images: 12

File: 1490358065194.jpg (327KB, 1160x629px) Image search: [Google]
1490358065194.jpg
327KB, 1160x629px
Liberals only hate him because he's right.
>>
>Nominee
Hahaha
>>
It's not just liberals that hate him

a major fallout of support is happening in his own party right now
>>
Can't wait for him to get impeached.
>>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/05/26/john-boehner-unloads-on-trump-a-complete-disaster/?utm_term=.19ea9093a11e

>liberals
>>
File: 1479763106827.jpg (34KB, 381x395px) Image search: [Google]
1479763106827.jpg
34KB, 381x395px
>>37295740
>washingtonpost.com
I blacklisted that domain in my hosts file
>>
>>37295670

Liberals hate him because they're unaware that he's the exact same as Hillary, only he's more honest and blunt about it.

>>37295768
Washington post is fine if you stay away from the opinion articles.
>>
>>37295670
Why on r9k and /pol/ is there this idea that anyone who even slightly dislikes Trump or disagrees with him is a "liberal"?
>>
>>37295811
>Washington post is fine
It's literally owned by the Amazon guy who hates Trump
>>
Liberals hate him because the left have been indoctrinating everyone for years and years into thinking DEMOCRAT GOOD REPUBLICAN BAD
>>
>Is just as bad at BASIC economics as fucking Bernie
>Liberals only hate him because he's right.
Something doesn't add up.
>>
>>37295844
Breitbart was owned by a fat goldman sachs banker who thinks hes a leninist and says he supports a fascist north vs south retard war.

Fox was owned by a fat christfag businessman

All news agencies are owned by less than reputable people nowadays, friend.

>>37295847
No the neoliberals did that. The real left has been actively suppressed aside from a few succdems like Bernie Sanders.
>>
>>37295768

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-boehner-idUSKBN18M2AO

>liberals
>>
>>37295847

To be fair the Republicans are woefully incompetent at handling issues like health care as we saw this year.
>>
>>37295720
>a major fallout of support is happening in his own party right now
nah
>>
>>37295847
>one side votes to not allow people visit websites if their IP doesn't want them to do that.
>the other side is attempting to have a 15 dollar minimum wage to help the poor. (even if that's retarded economically it's still in good intentions)
Really joggles my brain
>>
>>37296154
>even if that's retarded economically

I love this retarded ancap meme

>XD LE BASIG EGONOMIGS MUH SUPPLY SIDE IS LE ONLY FORM OF EGONOMICS XD
>>
>>37296196
>If I ignore the economists then maybe they'll go away!
>>
>>37295957
>fat christfag businessman
What's wrong with that?
>>
>>37296252
>christian
>businessman
Chose one.
>>
>>37296235
Literally every advanced economics textbook says keynesian and marxist economics are more ideal than leganomics.

>>37296252
He has an agenda.
>>
File: IMG_1416.png (88KB, 240x227px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1416.png
88KB, 240x227px
>>37295720
>his own party
what party is that, the mafia party?
I don't think so, anon
>>
>>37296290
EVERYONE has an agenda. Literally everyone. You're fucking stupid if you think otherwise.
>>
>>37296373
That's what I was trying to imply to the guy who said Washington Post sucks because the Amazon guy owns it.
>>
Republicans are only putting up with his dumbassery because they want to get things out of him. Once he's done them, they will impeach him themselves like a whore after you've fucked her. They would much prefer Mike Pence as president than Trump. He's just the scapegoat for all their greedy and unpopular things they want to pass.
>>
File: 1494126367864.png (410KB, 733x510px) Image search: [Google]
1494126367864.png
410KB, 733x510px
>>37295768
>I blacklisted that domain in my hosts file

>Getting so triggered by liberals that you blacklist them at the Hosts file level
>>
File: 1466445729281.jpg (376KB, 1280x1707px) Image search: [Google]
1466445729281.jpg
376KB, 1280x1707px
>>37296418
That's what I get for reading too many threads at once.
>>
>>37295835

Conservatives have a "us vs them" tribal mentality. If you're not with them, you're a fascist commie liberal no matter what.
>>
>>37296575
So what are you, if you aren't commie and/or liberal?
>>
>>37296632

I'm a moderate.. well honestly, I lean center-left, but I dont agree with many of the retarded shit the SJWs spew. But that's enough to make me a libtard, apparently.
>>
>>37296673
Just as bad as liberals and conservatives tbqh.

Possibly even worse.

btw, true commies aren't SJWs. In fact SJWs are generally neoliberals who support capitalism. They want more female/trans/black CEOs and are reformists which commies are against.
>>
>>37296575
I want to know why you think it's conservatives that have this mentality when it's the conservative side that is overwhelmingly more diverse than "if you disagree with us you're a racist misogynistic islamophobe nazi drumpftard"
>>
He's right, whatever. I only hate him because he probably sold us out to the Soviets and he should probably get the electric chair.
>>
>>37296717

Whats wrong with moderates? Meet in the middle instead of being one sided.. the USA is a really divided nation. Why not meet in the middle?

>btw, true commies aren't SJWs. In fact SJWs are generally neoliberals who support capitalism. They want more female/trans/black CEOs and are reformists which commies are against.

Yeah you go and tell that to conservatives. They dont care what the difference is. They throw the word "commie" around like it's the 1950s.
>>
>>37296736

Maybe it's all the Trump supporting tea baggers, then. They were giving Fox News shit yesterday for saying that Montana guy who bodyslammed the reporter was wrong. Some of them actually called Fox News "lefty" news in disguise. Total nutjobs. I've also debated with many of them and they keep calling me a libtard even for the most benign of opinions that aren't right wing.

You will not get the "racist" comments from liberals unless you give an actual racist opinion.
>>
File: 492.png (60KB, 930x794px) Image search: [Google]
492.png
60KB, 930x794px
>>37296914
>You will not get the "racist" comments from liberals unless you give an actual racist opinion.
>>
>>37296914
I need some perspective here, when you say "liberal" do you mean common self-identifying liberals today?
>>
>>37296290
economists are completely full of shit and are basically paid to pretend to know stuff
>>
>breaking literally all his campaign promises
>needs people to constantly jerk his ego
>policies only benefit the obscenely rich
>despite the fact that all 3 branches of government are in the Republican's control, he still can't get shit passed and blames Dems, muh libruls, or the MSM
>Shit's on "the MSM", but unironically considers Fox, Breitbart, Infowars to be reliable news
>Clearly, something's up with Russia, but he denies everything

If anything I don't understand how /pol/ still supports him too be honest.
>He loves Israel
>Acknowledges the Holocaust and condemns it
>His daughter and son-in-law are literally Jews, and influence his decisions
I guess they just deflect it as "le 19-dimensional chess".
>>
>>37297005

When I say liberal, I mean Democrats. Apparently all Democrats are liberal according to Trumptards. Even though Democrats are mostly center-left.
>>
>>37296836
>I have no strong opinions
The problem with moderates is you're a bunch of meek, compromising cuckolds. Stand up for something in your life you milquetoast coward.
>>
>>37297220
8pol and r/thedonald are his autistic support base. /pol/ simply thought he was the lesser of two evils.
>>
>>37297220
>If anything I don't understand how /pol/ still supports him too be honest.
>>He loves Israel
>>Acknowledges the Holocaust and condemns it
>>His daughter and son-in-law are literally Jews, and influence his decisions

I find it amusing that /pol/ is full of real neo nazis, and they support Israel at the same time. They support a guy that loves jews and takes pride that his son in law and grandson are jews. Shit doesn't make sense.
>>
>>37297356
/pol/ isn't full of neo nazis, at least not anymore. They're "libertarians" now.

8pol is where all the legit stormfags and neo nazis hang out. As you might imagine it's a hugbox where any outside opinion is banned within three seconds of posting by one of their schizophrenic janitors.
>>
>>37297220
>government are in the Republican's control
Did you watch the primaries? Most fucking hate him.
>>
>>37297287
Then your argument is based on bullshit and the redditors you've been debating are arguing mostly on bullshit too.

>>37297352
You've got those /pol/s completely backwards, you either weren't going to both during the elections and bought a shill's lies, or you are a shill.
>>
>>37297299
>The problem with moderates is you're a bunch of meek, compromising cuckolds.

Trump being an extreme right winger is the reason his approval rate is ~39%.
Acknowledge the fact that this country is split almost 50/50 liberal/conservative. Try to make both happy instead of just one. Trump is trying to appease his fanbase while fucking over everyone else.. You really think people are going to be okay with that?

And before someone mentions Obama, Obama was moderate as fuck. The only reason he couldn't appease republicans is because they just simply hate the fact that he's black. Nothing else matters.
>>
>>37296055

>Abolishing Obummercare was bad

k
>>
>>37297388
>/pol/ isn't full of neo nazis, at least not anymore

Uh.. they literally have "NatSoc" threads daily with a picture of Hitler and many take pride in being fascists. I dont know when the last time you went to /pol/ was. Still alot of extreme right wingers there.
>>
File: 1455902540842.png (428KB, 989x1018px) Image search: [Google]
1455902540842.png
428KB, 989x1018px
>>37297433
>Obama fan immediately pulls the race card
>>Nothing else matters.

Go ahead, tell me again how Republicans are the real racists when every Dem's first (and usually only) line of defense for him is YOU JUST HATE HIM BECAUSE HE'S BLACK
>>
>>37297388
/pol/ seems to be almost completely split between Nazis and libertarians they openly talk about this, it's strange how well they get on
>>
>>37297389
>Did you watch the primaries? Most fucking hate him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/115th_United_States_Congress

It doesn't really matter if the people hate him, because they're not in government positions.

The House, Senate, Supreme Court, and Presidency is all under Republican majority.
>>
>>37297481

Obama became president only because he was black. No one gave two fucks about his policies back in 2008.
>>
>>37297475
You weren't here when they were literally raiding every board on this site with stormfag threads, were you?

That was when /pol/ was actually stormfag.

>>37297498
Ancaps are fascist sympathizers. Why do you think ancaps all go gaga over Pinochet? Fascism is required for a completely unregulated market and to fully protect private property.
>>
File: 1494967404552.jpg (27KB, 313x254px) Image search: [Google]
1494967404552.jpg
27KB, 313x254px
>>37297498

As a libertarian that browses /pol/ frequently they don't get along that well. Libertarianism and National socialism at their core are ideological INCOMPATIBLE with each other. What you're seeing are either Natsocs trying to co-opt libertarians for their own cause like what you see SJW's doing to liberals or hoppe-snake meme worshipping retards. Frankly I find it very annoying having to be lumped in with those freaks.
>>
>>37297481
>Go ahead, tell me again how Republicans are the real racists when every Dem's first (and usually only) line of defense for him is YOU JUST HATE HIM BECAUSE HE'S BLACK

Because it's true. I wouldn't bring it up if it wasnt true.. It's not everyone's sole reason, I am sure there's many other reasons that have nothing to do with his race but rest assure that's the main one for his haters. Talk to your average tea bagger, just a random one, and tell them what their mean reason for disliking Obama is. They'll either mention Obamacare or because he's a nigger. Try it. Go to /pol/ and ask them. Go anywhere on the net and ask them. I'm telling the truth.
>>
>>37295670
He's right about him being a star, because he's yellow as hell.
>ignore scientific inaccuracy
>>
>>37297562
>not an argument
>still pulling the race card
>>
File: 1305268426026.jpg (155KB, 579x533px) Image search: [Google]
1305268426026.jpg
155KB, 579x533px
>>37297529
Okay? I don't doubt that. That isn't at odds at all with what I said though.

>>37297562
Get out of the echochambers and away from vocal minorities my dude. Most regular tom dick and harry's couldn'tve given a single fuck about the color of his skin.
>>
>>37295721
you're going to keep on waiting and keep on wanting hahah liberals got NOTHING on trump to impeach him, keep dreaming faggots hahaha.
>>
I'm certainly no Trump supporter, but the "grab them in the pussy" thing is just typical of this bullshit pandering to women as a collective, where women in the US - despite being the most powerful class in human history - get to pretend they're the victim of men. It WAS framed that way, as "powerful men thinking they can do anything with women's bodies", and then there were all those false accusations against him, much like the way Bill Cosby was attacked.
>>
>>37297679
>Increasingly nervous man
>>
>>37297606

>Having this level of autism

I wasn't the guy you were replying to, I was simply stating a fact that he became president due to political correctness, something that the democrats drool over to.
>>
>>37297695
The touhou pictures didn't tip you off my dude? I figured you weren't him but I might've come off as hostile to you when I didn't mean it.
>>
>>37295670
They hate him because they want to keep people on their side. The left is in a position where a big enough mistake could kill the party for a few elections.
>>
>>37296575
its the idiots at both extreme ends of the political scale. no room for a middle for either side. they are must right and others are all wrong. no critical thinking abilities.
>>
>>37295721
Can't wait for you to drown in my piss
>>
>Liberals only hate him
>Liberals

I'm not sure what bubble you've been living in, OP, but even the most hardcore Republicans are ready to jump ship. The Trump administration is slowly but surely suffocating in a sea of media fallout over the Russia probe, and everybody is scrambling to save their own skin.

Not only is it starting to look like Trump was completely aware of Russia's involvement in his campaign, but the president has also failed to deliver on any of his campaign promises, making him unpopular with both conservatives and liberals. And don't bother to place the blame on "liberal" courts for blocking his travel ban. Trump's travel ban is too blatantly unconstitutional not to be met with legal challenges. Everything else (e.g. failing to "fix" Obamacare) is just a result of Trump being an incompetent blowhard who has no business in politics to begin with.
>>
>>37295844
Jeff Bezos is way underrated (compared to eg Musk or Gates), if only he wasn't a liberal jew cuck
>>
>>37297955
unconstitutional? when the rules say he can enact the ban for any reason he wants without explanation? hmm...
>>
File: 1495837486570.jpg (49KB, 640x617px) Image search: [Google]
1495837486570.jpg
49KB, 640x617px
>>37295768
based desu famalam
>>
>>37297498

There's nothing remotely libertarian about /pol/. /pol/ completely fails to understand politics, as usual.

But I wouldn't be surprised if the sudden insurgence of far-right nationalists calling themselves "libertarian" is just an attempt to poison the image of honest libertarians.
>>
>>37298025
>when the rules say he can enact the ban for any reason he wants without explanation?

That's not how it works. The president can't enact orders that would explicitly (or even implicitly) violate anyone's constitutional rights. The Supreme Court would have the final say in that.
>>
>>37297955
You're mentally retarted.
:)
>>
>>37298033
>There's nothing remotely libertarian about /pol/.
about half of /pol/ is libertarian, including myself
>>
>>37295670
Trump literally pays for sex and even then he gets rejected after giving women $10k gifts. Just ask Jessica Drake. He's basically a beta male provider and can't even do that right.
>>
>>37298929

Even as president, Melania swats Trump's hand off when he tries to grab her.
I mean.. you got the most powerful guy on Earth and he still gets treated like shit by his wife. Cant get more beta than that.
>>
>>37296575
I have been banned from so many kik groups for not sucking Trump's dick it's crazy
>>
no he seems pretty clueless in what he actually believes in
his cabinet is full of sellouts to big business and other corruption
don't believe what the dems say about the russia thing, seems like they're trying cover up clinton foundation's and dnc's murder/corruption
if you wanted a decent right government gary johnson or austin petersen would have been decent choices that could make compromises with centrists on both sides
>>
>>37295721
I would have voted for a golden retriever if it ran against Hillary
>>
>>37300448
>if you wanted a decent right government gary johnson or austin petersen would have been decent choices that could make compromises with centrists on both sides

I absolutely hate the Republican party but I'd be very okay with Gary Johnson or another level headed Libertarian winning.. sadly, it doesn't seem like there's room for a third party anytime soon. I wish this two party system wasn't a thing in this country. There's no room for anyone else it seems.
>>
>>37300518

I'll vote for a literal rock if it runs against Trump in 2020.
>>
>>37300448
You actually unironically think Gary "What is Aleppo" Johnson would be even a somewhat decent president? W e w fucking lad. I wasn't aware people like you actually existed. Unless this is bait of course, and in that case 9/10.
>>
File: IMG_0047.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0047.jpg
2MB, 4032x3024px
remember when we were gonna get a wall?

:^}
>>
>>37295811
>Liberals hate him because they're unaware that he's the exact same as Hillary
Not Hillary, Obama. Trump is literally republican Obama.
>>
>>37300608

If Trump can be president, anyone can. Literally anyone could do a better job than that bozo.
Thread posts: 86
Thread images: 12


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.