Is there an easier mode than "content creators"?

>>37278213
Not existing desu

Who is the content creator making that amount, OP?

>>37278213
If its so easy then why don't you start creating content?

What does it mean to create content?
Shill normie memes to promote a product owned by a Jewish Corporation ?

>>37278213
investor? Your money makes money. I don't know how to get there yet tho.

>>37278982
>Who is the content creator making that amount, OP?
Heh, Maddox

April fools!

>>37279016
Probably Mariah Mallad or Swimsuit Succubus

"""""Musicians"""""
>record noises
>people give you millions of dollars, women give you sex and orbit you

>>37279043
wait, so youre telling us this girl named swimsuit succubus gets that much support? Just goggled this whore and she looks like a fucking rat, i wouldnt even touch that thing if it was the last woman on earth and i still had my virginity

>>37278986

Because it requires:
-expensive recording equipment
-having a decent sized room with nice lighting
-high end gaming computer
-extensive knowledge on multimedia
-being sociable
-having interesting things to talk about
-being passionate about something to talk about it in great detail
-being knowledgeable of the shady part of Twitch (avoiding scammers, dealing with trolls, people that dox you)
-being knowledgeable of Twitch's obscure rules that get you in serious trouble if you violate them (don't show bare feet.)
-getting in the habit of not doing anything embarrassing on Stream (no farting, nose picking, making sure your vibrator isn't in sight, etc )
-living on your own or at least with roommates that respect your privacy (don't want parents walking in on you at midnight telling you that you've been on the computer too long)
-being good at videogames

>>37279054
For every producer who makes a million, there are a hundred thousand musicians who play concerts for a six pack or even less. It may even be easier to make money as a fucking writer.

>>37279054
do you know how hard it is to become even semi popular as a musician let alone make any money at all?

>>37279117
You are aware that most content creators start out using laptop webcams in their bedrooms.

>>37278999

Ah, the ownership class. You basically have to be born into it nowadays, since class mobility is so low.

>>37278213
draw porn, they get lots of patreons too...vidya devs also get patreons but to a lesser extent (unless its porn). i know musicfags are on there but idk how much they make.

>>37279054
>recorded hundreds of musique concrete and disco tracks on my computer
>I could of have been drowing in pussy this entire time

I'd just like to interject for a moment.

If you want to describe a feeling of comfort and satisfaction, by all means say you are "content," but using the word as a noun to describe publications and works of authorship adopts an attitude you might rather avoid: it treats them as a commodity whose purpose is to fill a box and make money. In effect, it disparages the works themselves. If you don't agree with that attitude, you can call them "works" or "publications."

Those who use the term "content" are often the publishers that push for increased copyright power in the name of the authors ("creators," as they say) of the works. The term "content" reveals their real attitude towards these works and their authors. This was also recognized by Tom Chatfield in the Guardian:

Content itself is beside the point-as the very use of words like content suggests. The moment you start labelling every single piece of writing in the world "content," you have conceded its interchangeability: its primary purpose as mere grist to the metrical mill.

See also Courtney Love's open letter to Steve Case and search for "content provider" in that page. Alas, Ms. Love is unaware that the term "intellectual property" is also biased and confusing.

However, as long as other people use the term "content provider," political dissidents can well call themselves "malcontent providers."

The term "content management" takes the prize for vacuity. "Content" means "some sort of information," and "management" in this context means "doing something with it." So a "content management system" is a system for doing something to some sort of information. Nearly all programs fit that description.

In most cases, that term really refers to a system for updating pages on a web site. For that, we recommend the term "web site revision system" (WRS).

>>37279260
>it treats them as a commodity whose purpose is to fill a box and make money.
this describes pretty much 99.99% of anything of note that's uploaded to youtube. gameplay footage, politics, podcasts, even music.

>>37279260

The OP put "content creators" in quotes for a reason, to emphasise the humorous way in which that term is used.

>>37279147
>draw porn, they get lots of patreons too
i've been at it for a year and i only make 1000 or so a month. i'll never reach OP

i like to make AMV's, is there money in it for me?

>>37279693
The only way to find out is to make a patreon and shill your shit

>>37278213
I make smut and I definitely live on easy mode. By smut I mean exploit lonely, gay betas who like to grovel at the feet of a straight teenager. Discovered findom and gave it a go. Have a nice stable of fags now. Most are older men, but I have a couple young ones too, it's kind of sad to see degeneracy at such a young age, but I'll exploit them just the same.

I am a keyholder for one fag, have a couple that tribute me monthly and Skype with, and I have one that likes to see me crush stuff bare foot. I've always enjoyed doing that so I make him videos of myself stepping on shit like pizzas. I make about $2000 a month so it is a nice side gig.

I really hate myself for think let's plays were a waste of time to try to make like 5 or 6 years ago.

>record for 5 or 6 hours
>get enough content to release daily for a month
>spend a few hours editing which can be as involved as you want it to (like doing real edits, or just adding an intro and outro)
>complain that youtubes algorithm is fucking you over and your watchers should donate to patreon
>thousands of kids with mommy and daddy's credit card gives you money
>make 30-40k a year
>still complain how hard it is being a youtuber

that and vloggers have it so fucking easy

I guess the only tradeoff is that you could become irrelevant in the blink of a eye

>>37280066
Hi kevin, get off my board.

I am pretty darn good at divination, both tarot and runes. Have been considering doing a twitch stream for live readings whilst doing other little things between readings. I figured if I went the patron route, I'd have things like
>$1; thank you, you're awesome
>$5; get card of the month
>$10; get a card of the week
>$20; get a card of the day
>$50; get a choice of spread every week
>$100; get a shoutout every stream, and a personal contact method of your choice to ask me private queries at any time of the day or night (replies subject to being awake).

I think I could make a decent bit of money from normie stacies who eat this shit up

>>37278986
Because the market is completely oversaturated now that everybody wants to live that dream life. It's a very easy life, but if you didn't start like 8 years ago then you have zero chance of gaining traction. The one exception is if you're good friends with somebody that's already huge who can shill for you. The amount of times I've seen a giant like Seananners rocket a fucking nobody like JackSepticeye into the limelight is ridiculous.

>>37280995
> The one exception is if you're good friends with somebody that's already huge who can shill for you.
But you become friends with those big people by making your own content that they themselves will like

Become a tranny and people will throw money at you.

>>37280903
Content creators make less money then actors and spend more time doing it. If you wanna complain who really has it easy go to hollywood and screech at the top of your lungs

>>37280995
>but if you didn't start like 8 years ago then you have zero chance of gaining traction
people said that 8 years ago. all the "established" youtubers like fred and ray william johnson with their 1 million subscriber count were supposed to be insurmountable, and now they're irrelevant.

>>37281408
peasants are more envious of their neighbor's cattle than their king's gold

>>37278213
ENTPs at work : the post