no more worrying, I am can finally relax knowing I am white

>sub-saharan african
one drop nigger

>>37178100
When it says something like 0.01% it's usually inaccurate.

British and Irish as one cohort?
French and German as another?
The English are a mish mash mongrel race of Anglo-Saxons and Normans, while the Scots, Welsh and Irish are Celtic and Brythonic peoples.
You might as well say "German, English, Irish, Welsh, Scottish and Scandinavian" are one group if your just going to lump British in with Irish.

>>37178343
British and Irish people are all the same ethnicity that received certain amounts of foreign settlers over time

>>37178033
>13% French
Ruined

>>37178454
Nah buv.
The angles and saxons pushed all the Brythonic men into Wales. The English aren't Brythonic people.

>56.6% British & Irish
I'm so sorry OP

>>37178566
no they subjugated and interbred with them, there wasn't a genocide of the native Britons in England

File: 1495229817916.jpg (80KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1000x750px

Thought about doing a test for a while don't really want DNA to be on record at some company thought. How much did that cost / who did it?

>>37178033
>0.1% Sub-Saharan African
Nigger

>>37178634

The Brittonic and Goidelic are clearly as ethnically different from the Anglo-Saxon groups as the Spanish are from the French or Germans, and yet they've lumped them together into British and Irish.
That's just stupid, the Insular Celtic groups are more closely related to the Iberians than they are to the Anglo-Saxons.

>>37178135

Doesn't matter, 0.01% is as a good as 99.99%.

No more posting on Stormfront for you.