>mutilating your baby's penis Why do ameritards do this?

Same reason we do most of the stupid shit we do, it can't be helped we were tricked by the Jews.

>>37174706
Christians are not even supposed to get circumcised. America is truly Israel's little bitch.

File: informed-consent-guidelines-censored.png (309KB, 798x816px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 798x816px

>>37174663
Where else would they get such healthy skin to use commercially?

Because doing it to agirl is a no no.

>>37174663
because they fucking can, that's fucking why.
showing their male-pig-offspring their place as early as possible.
this joint is run by women now, bitch.

File: skinmedica-censored.jpg (391KB, 1511x1000px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 1511x1000px

>>37175463
>tfw your dick could be all over some rich women's face being used to reduce her wrinkles

>>37174663

Health. Foreskin is a breeding ground for bacteria.

It's practice began as measures against sexually transmitted diseases.

Debate this and you're a science-denying infidel.

>>37175626
>I'm unable to wash my cock
Do you also need help to wipe your butt?

>>37175626
>It's practice began as measures against sexually transmitted diseases.
That's wrong. It began in the Middle East as a religious sacrifice.
In the US it was started in the late 1800s to punish boys for masturbating, and to make it more difficult. The medical justifications came long after it was a cultural practice already.

>>37175463
>>37175575
How do they harvest enough for commercial mass production, though? With all these face creams and treatments, and the rates at which they are sold, they would need millions upon millions of foreskins every year. Is the male birthrate even that high? Out of that male birthright, do enough people even get their newborns chopped?

>>37175626
>Your mouth and nails harbor a much greater amount of much more dangerous bacteria
>Cut off jaws at birth
>Rip out nails monthly
>Americaaaaa-a-a-aaaa fuck yeeaaah

>>37175626
I got this trick that you can do in the shower, you put on your hand on your foreskin and you retract the skin over the head and blast it with water.

This one trick keeps it perfectly clean, experts don't want you to know this.

>>37175713
it's only used in high-end premium facial cremes, endorsed by Oprah.
and the apligraf-shit is expensive as fuck, too.

>>37175680
>>37175699
>>37175738
>replying to obvious trolling

File: foreskin-for-sale.png (235KB, 1060x1102px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1060x1102px

>>37175713
The creams are not 100% foreskin, and it is only a small number of products. SkinMedica makes an anti aging product from harvested foreskin, HydraFacial is another one:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/10/baby-foreskin-facial_n_7040808.html

The foreskins are reduced to fibroblasts before they are used, and the fibroblasts are sold for over $400 per mL. They are used in very high end products and treatments.

>>37175800
>The use of an infant's foreskin isn't new to the skincare industry, as Oprah Winfrey previously faced criticism for endorsing a face cream derived from human foreskin. Researchers have found that it promotes skin cell regeneration when applied topically. And as Weatherford learned, the growth factors obtained from the foreskin for the HydraFacial is "at a microscopic level." So no huge chunks!
What level of cognitive dissonance is there for people to see this as normal...

>>37175880
>Researchers have found that it promotes skin cell regeneration when applied topically
hmm I wonder if this would help with my foreskin restoration

What's the percentage of circumcised americans? Are they shocked like jews and muslims if they learn that you're uncut?

File: Medicaid Coverage - Newborn Circumcision.png (266KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 960x720px

>>37175942
>What's the percentage of circumcised americans?
Around 70% of adult males are circumcised in the US, but the rates for infant circumcision are dropping below 50%.
>Are they shocked like jews and muslims if they learn that you're uncut?
That depends on where you are. Some places are like that, but that is slowly changing.

>>37175916
>Dr. Rosengold, MD steals your foreskin at birth
>Dr. Feinberg, PhD sells your foreskin back to you as an adult
This is the end game of Judaism.

>>37175800
So it's like a legal, socially acceptable way to use stem cells in your anti-aging products.
Companies would have wanted to use stem-cells for face creams but you can't get them in america because it comes from abortions. I think there's still a lot of controversy. By hacking off a small part of a newborn baby, it's still alive and you've got your magical skin regen product.

It's clever. 100% pure evil, but clever.

File: my_restored_foreskin.jpg (64KB, 1280x563px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1280x563px

>>37175916
>hmm I wonder if this would help with my foreskin restoration
I wouldn't think so. All ethical considerations aside, I think the most that it would do is speed up dekeratinization a bit.

>>37176001
Foreskin restoration uses tissue expansion techniques. By applying tension to skin, you induce mitosis, which causes your skin cells to multiply. It took me around two years to grow my foreskin to the point it is at now, using ring taping and cross taping. All it took was cheap rolls of medical tape. I started at a CI-2, and now I am at around a CI-7 flaccid.

File: Antibacterial-soap.jpg (24KB, 400x298px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x298px

>>37175626
>Foreskin is a breeding ground for bacteria.
>It's practice began as measures against sexually transmitted diseases.

Yes, back in the fucking medevil days it probably was a good solution. But guess what. We have stuff like soap and medicine now. All cerciumcism is now is a form of permanent de-masculization right off the bat. It's extremely unnecessary in today's world.

>>37176063
>using stem cells from a fetus some roastie doesn't want anymore and is going to abort anyway is unethical
>slicing up a newborn with no anesthetic, thus releasing massive amounts of cortisol in his undeveloped brain, and forcing him to live with the effects of this butchery is perfectly ethical

>>37175985
thx for the info

shtrsg

>>37176089
>two years from ci2 to ci7
wtf am I doing wrong, six months and i'm not even from ci3 to ci4.

>>37176063
when enough people believe the biggest bullshit ("healthier!") you can get away with anything.

Did any of you ever get into a heated argument about this irl? Tell me about it.

File: circumcision.jpg (455KB, 1000x1567px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 1000x1567px

>when circumcision causes irreversible trauma to infants
But its doesn't matter, because their just males.

>>37176240
Not in real life, but with plenty of retards online such as>>37175626

File: T-taping.jpg (1MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5312x2988px

>>37176229
I basically jumped from almost no glans coverage when flaccid, to almost complete glans coverage when flaccid. It will seem like it is slowing down, because the skin is bunching up behind the glans. Some people will get partial coverage for a while, but it is common for it to jump like this. CI3 to CI4 takes a long time for many people. The most important thing to do is tug consistently.

I took a break for a few years once I was at a CI-7 flaccid. I am a grower, so I still don't have much erect coverage. I am using inflation and T taping to try to grow more skin now, and make it look intact when I am erect.

File: 1495144620340.png (506KB, 680x719px) Image search: [Google]

506KB, 680x719px

>>37176240
Not heated, but I talked to my mom about it before.
Her and my dad laughed about it, and she asked me if I would really want an adult touching my chick when I was a little kid. She was also a nurse and said that almost everyone she saw who was uncircumcised had issues with their peens. I told her that was bullshit and that I guess everyone around the world but America and Bombfuckistan countries had issues with their peens. I also told her about how it could just be a fucking excuse since it's fucking sold as snake oil skin restoration for old fucks. but she got pissed off at me for that and my dad told that I should leave her alone.
Cool thing about the whole situation was that my normie brother was on side.

This thread makes me thankful I'm British. Sorry Ameribros :(

>>37176229
What positive spin do you reckon they could do to get people to donate/sell their aborted fetuses?

Surely donating aborted fetuses is a good for everyone health. For medical research, to help save the lives of sick newborn babies. Truly it would be a blessing if your aborted/miscarried babby could save the life of a real living one.

>>37176384
up until the 50s it was just as common in the UK.
then NHS cut the funding and stopped endorsing it and it vanished.
hmmmmmmmmmmm
>>37176423
none, because you'd have to argue against all the christfags. good luck doing that in God's Own Country.

>>37176378
>everyone she saw who was uncircumcised had issues with their peens
lol wat
>my normie brother was on side
Is he a cutcuck too?

I'm glad I got circumcised
Less effort for cleaning it plus it doesn't look as bad.

>>37176493
>Less effort for cleaning it
lol

File: female-practicioners-mutilating-children.jpg (934KB, 2604x1576px) Image search: [Google]

934KB, 2604x1576px

>tfw roasties can harvest male infants

>>37176493
There's no fucking "effort" necessary to clean it you clueless cutcuck, it takes less than 5 fucking seconds in the shower. Jesus Christ, you are so brainwashed.

>loses tens of thousands of nerve endings
>"heh, a-at least I'll have extra seconds!"
Sad!

>>37176626
Someone is so mad that my dick got the extra skin cut off at birth
Sad!

File: 180px-FGC.jpg (8KB, 180x135px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 180x135px

>>37176670
We could start cutting "extra" tissue off of females too, like we did to some girls in the 50s.

>>37176670
>extra skin
That's like describing one of your balls that got removed as "extra ball". You're brainwashed.

>>37174663
Because America seem to accept male genital mutilation.
It's quite disturbing.

>>37176688
>>37176711
My dick will always look better than yours. Stay mad

File: jewcream.jpg (709KB, 1288x2080px) Image search: [Google]

709KB, 1288x2080px

>>37176760
My dick was harvested for use in skin cream too.

File: 5W3ta3K.jpg (26KB, 500x286px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 500x286px

>>37176760
>My dick will always look better than yours.
No, your mutilated dick looks like shit.
>Stay mad
Why would I be? I'm not the cuck who got tens of thousands of nerve endings removed without his consent.

>>37176467
>cut funding
The only place that would have worked is in the UK. If it's not free on the NHS then we won't bother with it.

File: tumblr_nmdc5dBrfs1u8oiq6o1_500.jpg (53KB, 500x319px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x319px

>>37176760
>My dick will always look better than yours.
lmao

File: sweeting.jpg (94KB, 959x641px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 959x641px

>>37176760
>My dick will always look better than yours.
el em ay oh

>>37176863
It works in the US too. If it isn't covered by medicaid, then most private insurance stops covering it too. Since it isn't covered by insurence, doctors stop pushing it so hard, because they won't make as much money. See:
>>37175985

>>37176711
Does anyone really need that extra ball, lung or kidney? And how many eyes do you really need? Might be a good idea to trim those earlobes, too.

Should probably harvest all of them and keep for someone else to use.

File: controlling male sexuality judaism.png (116KB, 1149x985px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1149x985px

>>37176114

>Yes, back in the fucking medevil days it probably was a good solution.

No, it never was.

In old days people had NO IDEA about germ theory and they didn't have access to sterile surgical tools. They didn't even understand the concept of sterility.

They would create an open wound on a baby's penis with dirty tools, then leave the wound to soak in shit and old urine.

Doubtless many boys died as a result of being circumcised, or lost their entire penis.

Just like what happens today when circumcision is done under primitive conditions.

If you want to see how circumcisions tend to turn out when they're performed by people who don't understand germ theory or anything about how the body works, google "ulwaluko". Don't say I didn't warn you, because I'm warning you.

Male genital mutilation was never about "hygiene". It was about suppressing and controlling male sexuality.

We have records from the medieval era all the way to the 20th century that state this very plainly. Not from circumcision opponents, but from circumcision SUPPORTERS.

The fact that it damaged the penis was the point, and this was explicitly stated.

File: 7090acf612499afd17eb535bf596773d.jpg (62KB, 660x660px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 660x660px

>>37176916
>Might be a good idea to trim those earlobes, too.
Yeah, it'll make the cleaning easier ;)

File: 536810_1.jpg (71KB, 675x800px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 675x800px

>>37175575
T-that means my dick has touched a woman
Well guys, it was a fun ride, but I'm a normie now

File: DK393j9jf339kdfDN3g.jpg (74KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 640x640px

>>37176670

Most of the foreskin isn't even skin. Only the outer part is skin. The inner layer is highly specialized erogenous tissue, and a great deal of the middle part is muscle.

Circumcision is cutting out muscle and primary erogenous tissue, not just "skin".

File: female-and-male-circumcision.jpg (132KB, 1000x650px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1000x650px

>>37176688
Female circumcision was banned in the US in 1996. There were cases of female circumcision in the 1950s, and it was promoted for similar reasons to male circumcision, like cleanliness and protection from disease. It was never done on as large of a scale, but it was very common for girls that were born with large clitorises.

The law that bans only the circumcision of one gender in the US is unconstitutional, as the 14th amendment guarantees equal protection under the law for all US citizens.

>>37176908
>jewish insurance agents sell a jewish procedure so that jewish doctors can get paid to perform it and then a jewish pharmaceutical company can process the foreskin to sell in jewish pharmacies/beauty shops to the stupid goyim
Genius.

File: image.jpg (36KB, 500x462px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 500x462px

>cutting an essential part of your penis

File: 1492742786657.png (23KB, 998x851px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 998x851px

>cutting your penis

>>37174663
can someone post the pic this pepe is based on

File: His Body His Decision.jpg (77KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 720x960px

>>37176114
>>37176918

By the way, I'd also like to add that in the old days, people knew fuck all about hygiene compared to now.

The doctor who suggested that other doctors wash their hands between one patient and the next was ridiculed, called a quack, and shunned by the medical establishment. He died in an insane asylum because people thought he was just cuuuhhrraaayyyzzzeee for suggesting something as simple as washing your hands.

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/01/12/375663920/the-doctor-who-championed-hand-washing-and-saved-women-s-lives

Most people in the old days were fucking idiots. They didn't understand what an "infection" was or how to prevent it. Even doctors in the 1800's didn't know until the end of that century, and there were still germ-deniers even then. It wasn't till the 20th century that germ theory became universally accepted in the medical establishment.

Thousands of patients died due to their idiot doctors infecting them because the doctors were too stupid to wash their hands.

So...it wasn't a "hygiene" measure. People back then had only a vague understanding of hygiene and believed that masturbation caused diseases like epilepsy.

The entire field of western medicine was essentially pure quackery and lies until very recently.

File: 1491991703892.gif (1MB, 200x190px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x190px

>circumcision

what the fuck

File: tumblr_nk1pjyCFPw1r2sy0fo1_540.gif (918KB, 540x294px) Image search: [Google]

918KB, 540x294px

>>37177074
It's comes from this scene.

File: female_circumcision_clamp_US.gif (52KB, 294x146px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 294x146px

>>37176688
The clamp looks like a duck.

>>37176114
>>37177113

Sorry but you got me on a rant here.

Another thing I'd like to state is that the stupidity of doctors of the old days wasn't just ignorance.

They were stubborn and had their heads stuck so far up their asses that they wouldn't even listen to the handwashing suggestion. It would have taken them almost no extra time, and there was already evidence that it worked.

But they were so full of themselves and so sure that their "advanced medical training" was God's gift to humanity that they wouldn't take two minutes to wash up and instead killed their patients. They were hardly more than murderers.

And the decent doctor who went against the medical establishment and saved his patients from getting infections fucking died for it. They as good as murdered him, too.

Fucking quacks, I swear.

>>37177113
Why would there even be such a rage against simply washing their hands between patients? Even if they didn't think it necessary, why go all the way to denounce and ridicule the guy suggesting it?

File: plastibell_procedure.jpg (128KB, 728x546px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 728x546px

>>37176670
>extra skin

>>37177268

Because they were narcissistic assholes who put their pride above their patients' health. There are a lot of doctors still like this today, sadly.

They say Dr. Semmelweis "berated" the doctors who wouldn't listen to him.

What else was he supposed to do? He clearly was an intelligent man with at least a shred of integrity who actually wanted to save lives and prevent suffering. He saw doctors killing their patients left and right. How was he not supposed to get hopping mad?

Maybe he could have been more "tactful", but when your colleagues are literally ending peoples' lives, the people who came to them for help, that's not easy.

>>37177268
Why would there even be such a rage against not mutilating infant boys? Even if they didn't think it necessary, why go all the way to denounce and ridicule the guy suggesting it?

File: 553.png (106KB, 320x311px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 320x311px

>>37177434

Narcissistic assholes. Narcissistic assholes, everywhere.

Pic very much unrelated.

File: father emotionally attached to circumcision.png (19KB, 903x220px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 903x220px

>>37177434

Oh, and there's also the fact that apparently some circumcised men have an "emotional attachment" to circumcision and even though it's "not 100%" ethical, society should just let them have "this one teensy weensy little thing!"

I sometimes get the feeling that humanity is doomed by our own ignorance, stubbornness, and irrationality.

People are fucking sick.

>>37177522
They're emotionally attached to it because there's a part of them that think if they had to suffer, then they want others to suffer. Why should they be the last ones to get cut and then everyone else after them get off unharmed? It wouldn't be fair to them.

It's really just a cycle of abuse.

File: risk-of-death.png (601KB, 806x664px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 806x664px

A boy is more likely to die from his circumcision than to need one at any point in his life.

>>37176475
Sorry about that. I was on the phone earlier. First part of what you stated was true, my mom is a nurse but i think she was exaggerating.
Second part I meant that my brother was on my side.

>>37177559

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipg4EL_JUyE

>>37174663
Because they're jews

>>37177522
This makes me wish a nuclear holocaust happened.

File: 1495258050560.jpg (325KB, 836x1010px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 836x1010px

>>37176493
If I knock your fucking teeth out it you wouldn't desk with the effort of cleaning them.

>>37176884
>have eurodick
>it looks like the one on the right
Should I be worried?

>>37174663
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceht-3xu84I

File: I WANT HIM TO FEEL IT.png (10KB, 472x92px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 472x92px

>>37177647

I can't tell whether this one is worse or whether the other one is worse.

The other one is a bizarre emotional appeal. This one is clear and overt malice.

File: 1472175499358.png (177KB, 367x321px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 367x321px

>>37174663
>Foreskin was a little too tight for a few years so piss went half in the toilet half in my foreskin
>didn't really care much just opened it up and everything fell into the toilet
>tired of it so go to the doctor to get it fixed
>"holy shit if this keeps going you're fucked we'll need to cut it off goy"
>believe him
>get circumsized
>wake up and look at my health journals to see what I had (basically everytime you go to the doctor they write what you had in there)
>"phimosis (phectomie)"
>whatthehellisthat.jpg
>look it up when I get back home
>it doesn't exist
>tfw got circumsized because doctor was too lazy or too jewish to deal with my phimosis
This happened 10 years ago.
I could have a normal penis right now if it wasn't for this piece of jewish shit. Goddamnit I'm so fucking pissed off everytime I think about it or look at my dick. When will they make something to regrow my foreskin I want my foreskin RIGHT NOW

>>37177739

It might be possible in the future with new medical technology.

By the way how old were you when this happened? If you were young it's pretty normal for the foreskin opening to be a bit tight. When you're a baby it's VERY tight, but this is actually a good thing because it serves to keep feces from getting inside the urethra. There's a muscle at the tip of the foreskin that relaxes to allow the urine to pass, then tenses up again to prevent contaminants from entering the urethra.

It's a brilliant system really.

File: 8Fr43u1.jpg?1.jpg (122KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1024x768px

>>37177739
>When will they make something to regrow my foreskin I want my foreskin RIGHT NOW
I restored my foreskin:
>>37176089

Look up foreskin restoration, it has helped me a lot. This is my goal:
https://www.reddit.com/r/restoringdick/comments/6ag77y/current_erect_coverage_051017/

>>37177650
Is that the autistic woman from mass effect?

>>37177739
>>37177792

By the way, the sphincter muscle at the foreskin tip mostly seems functional in babies.

In adult men it doesn't seem to do that anymore. Presumably because it wouldn't be necessary.

Evolution is amazing. Speaking of evolution, the human foreskin is the most specialized tissue compared to the foreskin of any other animal studied.

http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/cold-mcgrath/

>The results of this study demonstrate that the human prepuce is not "vestigial" but is, in fact, an evolutionary advancement over the prepuce of other primates. This is most clearly seen in the evolutionary increase in corpuscular innervation of the human prepuce and the concomitant decrease in corpuscular receptors of the human glans relative to the innervation of the prepuce and glans of lower primates.

>>37177819
Yeah. I don't have it, but there's a Shadbase pic of her as well being autistic.

>>37174663
Abrahamic religions have brainwashed society into believing that the baby you bring into this world is somehow a mini-you, or some kind of doll to do as you please with.

>>37177792
I was around 12. At the time I just thought there wasn't anything on it on the internet, but now I know there's no way that's possible

>>37177811
Did someone who used to have a foreskin regrew it and said it was the same or at least close as before? I want to do this but I want it to be just like it was before.

>>37177909

At age 12 the penis is nowhere near fully developed. Most boys can't even retract their foreskins until 10 and a fair number can't at 12, and even that is perfectly normal and not an indication to even do anything.

Your doctor was a quack.

>>37177907
See >>37174758

dumbass

ojrgslaff

File: inflated2.jpg (1MB, 4016x2988px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4016x2988px

>>37177909
There have been people that were circumcised as adults that restored afterwards. You could search here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/foreskin_restoration/

I was able to grow more inner and outer foreskin, so now my glans and inner foreskin remnant are always covered when I am flaccid, and my mucous membranes have been restored, so the skin is shiny and sensitive. It also brought back the mechanical gliding that you get with a foreskin.

However, you can't bring back the frenulum or the ridged band with tissue expansion, and you can't bring back all of the nerves that you lost. Restoration basically allows you to use the nerves that you still have to their fullest extent.

File: foreskin restoration disaster.png (77KB, 1592x463px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1592x463px

>>37177909

It would not be just like it was before. The muscles won't regenerate and neither will the specialized nerve endings of the foreskin.

>Although foreskin restoration cannot regenerate dartos muscle or encapsulated sensory receptors, it appears that the residual stump of prepuce could be stretched to provide partial covering of the coronal sulcus and corona. This re-covering of the corona, combined with a reversion of the epithelium to the normal squamous mucosa of the glans, may account for the improved sensitivity reported by men who have nonsurgically restored their foreskins [97]. Likewise, it appears that restoration of the female vulva after circumcision may provide subjective improvements in sensitivity and selfesteem [98]. Further histological examination and somatosensory evaluation of the circumcision scar and the restored foreskin is needed to explain the altered sensitivity reported by circumcision and restoration.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1034.x/abstract

Best case scenario you could regain the look of a foreskin (approximately), the gliding action, and your glans might return to its previous appearance and sensibility. But that's the best case scenario. Some guys have gotten their dicks even more messed up when they tried foreskin restoration. It is a risk.

I saved this screencap a while back to illustrate the fact that restorations don't always turn out well. There's no data on the rates of men who restored and were satisfied, neutral, or dissatisfied with their decision. There is very little study of foreskin restoration as a concept even though it has existed for thousands of years.

I'm not being prescriptive here. Just sharing some info.

>>37176932
I got the right pic when fully erect and the glans is fully pumped with blood.
does that count as "natural" or is it supposed to be like that at any time?
>>37177664
if you got the frenulum, full coverage when flaccid and at least partial coverage when erect, probably not.
>>37177811
hardacroposthion on 4chan?
You're a God among mortal men, thank you for what you're doing in foreskin_restoration. ;_;7

>>37178040
Yes, it is important to not use too much tension when you are restoring. Most guides that I have seen warn about this. You need to keep in mind that you are not trying to stretch the skin, you are just trying to apply enough tension to induce mitosis. Problems with restoration like this seem to be rare, but it is good to be careful.

>>37178106
kek, thanks, but that's not me. I posted that as an example of what my end goal is.

>>37178040
>pic
>scar-tissue breaking/ripping
that's weird.

>>37177730
This one's worse. It's someone deeply entrenched in the "Manly masculine men should punch a guy for looking at him funny" meme

>>37178278

Yeah, but on the other hand, the other one would be more influential maybe to fence-sitters? Maybe.

Mr. Brent's comment over there ONLY appeals to the psychopathic "me big he man, ooga ooga" demographic. Everyone else would look at it and be like, "You are fucking nuts"

the other guy's is more like, "Waaahhh I wanna cut my baby, let me cut him pwetty pwease" and that might influence more people I think. Maybe.

Actually now that I look at it...I'm still undecided.

These are two very, very emotionally damaged men.

See >>>/pol/126475575

I don't want to live on this planet anymore, originallylasopdkpasnjof

>>37178390

Oh, on top of it, the other guy (not Brent) is appealing to "sharing something with your son to bond with him" or something like that.

Of course the fact that he reframes this as "sharing" requires an amazing level of mental gymnastics.

Destroying something that belongs to someone else because the one you had got destroyed isn't "sharing".

If someone cuts off your little toe, you aren't "sharing" shit with your son by cutting off his. You're taking something away.

The way people abuse and distort language to justify their own fucked up ideas is really something.

File: REEEEEEEEEEEEE.gif (2MB, 107x314px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 107x314px

>>37177559

Normies disgust me, if I ever have a son he won't be cut (I am cut)

File: lyin i mean brian morris.jpg (27KB, 261x325px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 261x325px

>>37178439

I refuse to die until Brian Morris does. I will not be outlived by that creep.

File: plastibell.jpg (224KB, 1600x1195px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1600x1195px

>>37174663
Circumcision is disgusting.

>>37178859

Morris says there's "no cut" with the plastibell method.

You can clearly see the foreskin being cut before the gangrene-inducing "bell" is placed.

Morris is so full of shit. His initials are rather fitting.

File: FGM-vs-MGM.jpg (106KB, 779x565px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 779x565px

(((google))) is promoting (((their))) tricks.

>>37179450
did the same last week.
"female circumcision" came up with the usual stuff, "male circumcision" comes up with "why cut dick is better for sex" and shit.
Was devastating to see.

>tfw circumcised and my dickhole drys up against my underwear and i have to rip it off everytime
feels like im ripping out my urethra when it happens and it happens alot
not to mention i cant feel shit because circumcision

>>37180163
I don't even want to imagine what it must feel like to have your glans constantly into contact with something.

>>37180429
cant even feel anything because its keratinized
i have to use lube to even masturbate and its not worth it because i feel nothing

>>37180429
can you rub your glans with the towel after taking a shower?
you can, with a cutdick.

>>37180458
If you were uncut you would've been able to fap without even taking your pants off.

>>37180528
I lose my breath just by caressing it with my hands, it's very sensible.

>>37174663
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCSWbTv3hng

It doesn't help that anyone who argues against this insanity is derided by feminists as an "MRA manbaby." My parents elected to cut my brother for no reason when he had a testicular problem and I think they realized their mistake before having me.

there's a thread about this every fucking day, are you cutfags that butthurt about your dry jew dicks?

>>37180774
Yes, we are that butthurt about our dry jew dicks.

>>37180774
They are right to be mad, you fucking kike.

>>37180567
how do you fap without even taking off your pants ?!?! that sounds interesting.
im the cutfag by the way

>>37181001
Not him but
>put hand in pants
>touch dick
It isn't complicated.

>>37181001
You can use the gliding mechanism of the foreskin to fap through your pants. The foreskin is a dual layer of skin over your glans, and it can work kind of like having a built in fleshlight. You rub the foreskin over your dick, which stimulates the stretch receipting nerves in the foreskin, along with the inner foreskin and glans. I am circumcised, but I have restored my foreskin, which brought back my mechanical gliding.

>>37181001
>how do you fap without even taking off your pants ?!?!
I just thrust my cock over my pants (hand outside), I've fapped like that when people were in the next room. You can never get caught like that, never.

why are you faggots so obsessed with dick appearance

>>37181193
Shut up tranny.

hweq

>>37181193
its not just dick appearance you braindead mong

>>37181200
>>37181204
lmao you lot act just like niggers
>muh dick nigguh muh fuggin foreskin n sheeit
>ayo ayo cant feel nuffin mane
that's implying you losers on r9k will even be using it or have someone see it

lmaoing @ u

>>37181235
cringe

Get out, kike.

>>37181235
i can masturbate with it dumbass
thats what i do with 90% of my time anyway why wouldnt i want it to feel better also when niggers say muh dik they are boasting about it being big you fucking tard not not having a foreskin

>>37181235
How old are you?

ifjnadvkls

>>37181259
>>37181265
>>37181274
old enough not to care about menial shit like whether or not my dick doesnt look like a fucking cold vienna sausage
MUH
DICK

>>37181294
I'm not even cut, I'm just here to support those that were, get the fuck outta here kike.

>>37181348
CUT NIGGUH
MUH FUGGIN WORM DICK

thanks for the (you)s retards

>>37181365
Get the fuck outta here kike.

>>37174663
>tfw born in the US
>tfw still uncut.

I feel pretty lucky and thank my Dad for ending this fucking retarded "tradition".

>>37175575
>tfw your smeg-encrusted skin won't be useful anymore because you're old as fuck.

>>37175626
I wasnt forced into a non reversible operation but I guess Im the dumb one right?

>>37181919

The human body is a breeding ground for bacteria. Humans at any given time are carrying roughly 1 to 5 POUNDS OF BACTERIA IN OUR BODIES. The mind boggles.

It's absolutely disgusting. The only solution is self-immolation to cleanse the body.

This provides so many health benefits. You get a 100% reduced risk of ALL diseases!

Of course self-immolation is also an important aspect of many peoples' cultures and religions, too.

I can't believe my parents didn't love me enough to burn me alive when I was born. I've heard it's really painful to do it as an adult, but I guess they wanted me to be "natural". Stupid hippies!

File: metzitzah-b'peh.jpg (24KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 600x400px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZy5lbWb9Xg
Don't forget to have the rabbi suck it clean afterwards!

>>37181680
>Not born in US
>Still cut
Fucking nobody else here is cut and I'm shy about my dick because of it

>>37183070
>here
where?

ori

>>37183089
Australia
Soon to be little America anyway thanks to rightists.

>>37183123

Did your parents fall for the Morris meme?

File: 1436469464682.jpg (56KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 640x640px

>>37174663
>mfw american and uncut

>>37183156
Morris who??

File: cpd25edit.jpg (52KB, 375x306px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 375x306px

>it is considered normal to hold and infant down and remove over half of the skin on his penis

File: female-and-male.jpg (111KB, 1057x577px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1057x577px

>>37175513
It's only a human rights violation if it is done to a female.

>>37183380

Brian Morris.

http://www.circumstitions.com/morris.html

File: weheartcircs.jpg (165KB, 909x682px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 909x682px

>>37174663
Because we <3 circs!

>>37184996
It looks like all they are using for pain relief is that "Sweet-Ease" on the table, which is just a 24% sugar solution.
http://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/product/HC989805603401/sweetease-natural-15ml-cup-sucrose-solution
>having the most sensitive part of your body torn open while having sugar dripped in your mouth

I wonder how many of these "my body, my choice" pro-abortion bitches are the same ones authorizing their infant sons to get their dick sliced, and their toddler daughters to get their ears pierced

Yes, we've all heard your retarded argument that the baby's body is still "your body" as long as he's still inside you. But babies get circumcised after birth.....so shouldn't it be "baby's body, baby's choice" by that point? Shouldn't it be up to the baby to choose at an appropriate age whether or not he wants a cut dick?

File: tightness.png (16KB, 499x300px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 499x300px

>>37185466
Yeah, I think that piercing infants/toddler's ears is weird, but I don't think it is anywhere near as harmful as circumcision. Ear piercings are much, much less invasive. I wouldn't do it to my children, but I don't think that it is anywhere near the same level as circumcision. I think that almost anyone would be against doing something more permanent, but still less damaging than circumcision, like gauging the ears of a baby.

The sad thing is that in the US, there are many people who have a problem with piercing young girl's ears, but have absolutely no problem with circumcision. The amount of cognitive dissonance needed to think that way is astounding. An ear piercing is a small hole, and a circumcision removes over half of the skin of the penis, destroys the mucous membranes, and removes the mechanical gliding, along with the possibility of many complications.

I agree completely with "baby's body, baby's choice." Many people seem to think it is their right to permanently alter their children like this. They will go so far as to casually talk about increasing the severity of the mutilation to fit their own aesthetic preferences. They have the idea that their children are their property, and they can do what they want to them, without regard to their rights.

>>37184294
Look at that cut in the upper right pic. They are removing ALL forskin and cutting him right down to the corona of the glans. HOLY SHIT that's horrible!

The inner and outter forskin, yes there are two sides, are sexually pleasurable and also the frenulum underneath. Is this pic he is getting all of it removed 100%. Only thing remaining is shaft skin and most of the glans.

The remaining most pleasurable part is where the glans meets the shaft and in that pic he will probably lose some of that too. poor guy. This is horrible abuse by sickos.

>>37174663
One of the other problems with circumcision is that there is no standard accurate procedure. Every circumciser does it his/her own way.

No everyone gets the same results. Some are allowed to keep more pleasure zone and others not.

Some think to remove the most so that "he will last longer in bed". Total abuse.

Some do it just for the look. I'd like to make my own decisions about my look, thank you.

Also the whole procedure is so wrong. It forces the removal of best part, the sensitive foreskin, instead of just removing shaft skin that is not sexually sensitive.

Also, since so much skin is removed it actually negatively affects the cosmetics by causing the skin web between the shaft and balls.

>>37174663
Just because one person is okay with their circumcision does not mean your child will. Nor does it mean that the one you got, and like, will be the same as the one your child gets.

Do you even know what exactly will be done, and why? Do you even know what will be removed and why; and what will be left intact?

BTW Circumcision does not prevent ANY disease, sexual or otherwise. No it does not.

Doctors treat circumcised patients every day for the same diseases that intact people people. Everyone including penis cancer, UTI, and ALL other sexually transmitted diseases!

>>37181067
>it can work kind of like having a built in fleshlight. You rub the foreskin over your dick

21-year-old phimosisfag here

This is the only way I can masturbate since I can't pull the foreskin back over the dickhead

File: Preputioplasty.png (15KB, 395x182px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 395x182px

>>37186131
Have you tried stretching and steroid creams? There is also preputioplasty if that doesn't work.

So their kids don't die from penis cancer and never have to deal with dickcheese and will never get urinary tract disorders. Uncuts are literally the worst. I don't like my family associate with anyone who isn't cut.

>>37174663
>Abortion allowed because my body my rules.
>Get your son circumcised at birth.

L M A O

A M E R I F A T S

File: LUL.jpg (49KB, 600x906px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x906px

>>37186239
>So their kids don't die from penis cancer
>Foreskin causes dick cancer

AMERICAN DELUSION LOOOOOL

>british
>not Jewish
>parents had it done anyway when I was a baby because its """cleaner"""
>only girl I've ever been with thought it was weird, and actively said she preferred uncut
Fucking ree

File: 1278475061809.jpg (47KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 320x320px

>>37186314
HOLY SHIT UNCUT FAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH.
I guess suicide would be better than the penis cancer you're gonna get.

Easier hygiene. Circumcision makes it simpler to wash the penis. ...
Decreased risk of urinary tract infections. ...
Decreased risk of sexually transmitted infections. ...
Prevention of penile problems. ...
Decreased risk of penile cancer.

File: OMEGALUL.png (29KB, 122x128px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 122x128px

>>37186436
Hahaha sure thing Shekelstein

>>37186131
25 here and I recently bought the phimocure rings to test out, should arrive this week..

File: 1466549748054.jpg (107KB, 620x948px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 620x948px

>>37186432
>preferred uncut

that girl is probably a whore . Large majority of girls prefer cut.

File: KEK7.jpg (8KB, 200x196px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 200x196px

>>37186490
>majority of girls prefer cut
In the land of Amerifats maybe lol

>>37186467
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) says the benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks. However, the AAP doesn't recommend routine circumcision for all male newborns. The AAP leaves the circumcision decision up to parents and supports use of anesthetics for infants who have the procedure.

keep digging your grave uncut fag. There is a reason a cut diamond goes for a lot more than an ugly uncut diamond.

File: TINK.jpg (28KB, 519x442px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 519x442px

>>37186516
>American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
>American

Really makes you think

>>37186490
Well she was a whore, but over here where about 90% of guys are uncut, that's what girls are used to, and therefore what they like.

File: 1351237066626.jpg (441KB, 1920x1260px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 1920x1260px

>>37186513
>you will never have an all american girl obsess over your cut penis but will have to deal with annoying inbred British hags and their fucked up teeth

I sort of feel pity for you


pic related its my girlfriend

File: KEK10.png (59KB, 576x507px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 576x507px

>>37186558
>pic related its my girlfriend
You wish it was

File: circumstraint.jpg (196KB, 960x954px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 960x954px

>there is a board sold specifically for strapping down infants as their genitals are mutilated

>>37175798
>valid points and historical facts are trolling
Hello goldberg

File: 1487380008687.png (1MB, 1080x1225px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1225px

>>37186603
I love cut penises so much but not in a gay way.
All i'm saying is that i'd suck off a cut futa ( no balls) but not in a gay way.

>>37186131
>>37186477
I think I have phimosis but I'm not sure. I can pull the skin all the way past the head, but it sort of "gathers" RIGHT under it. I need to leave the skin up in order to beat it. What's this called?

File: 1473186587505.jpg (9KB, 240x193px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 240x193px

>>37186644
>I love cut penises so much
>i'd suck off a cut futa

>"I'm not gay I swear"

yea..

>>37186680
No wonder you British fucks love blue cheese maybe it reminds you of the dickcheese you faggots taste when sucking each other off .

MUH FUGTGIN CUT DICKS
LMAOOOOOOOOOO

YALL NIGGAS BE SO GAY

>>37186680
It sounds like you have a short frenulum. That can be fixed by gradual stretching, or with a frenuloplasty in extreme cases.

>>37186710
>>37186712
Enough computer for today Shlomo

in all honesty, circumcised dicks just look better. yeah, it's harmful, but american roasties think uncut dicks are gross, so...cut it is.

there's a reason there are no successful uncircumcised pornstars.

>>37175626
pussies are also a breeding ground for bacteria, but that doesn't put you off, does it?
all that victorian drivel about circumcision being more hygienic has been proven bullshit. all of europe is fine. but here's a free reply anyway. next!

>>37186747
>le schlomo
>g-g-uys IT MUST BE THE JEWS

hey
psst
heres a reminder
go back to /pol/ faggot

>>37176493
>too lazy to pull some skin for half a second
do you even wash at all?

>>37186775
>all that victorian drivel about circumcision being more hygienic has been proven bullshit. all of europe is fine. but here's a free reply anyway. next!

>low birthrates all across Europe
>STD's are worse there than a lot of places in Africa

b-b-b-but we're fine all of Europe is fine.

File: 18.jpg (96KB, 640x944px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 640x944px

>>37186691
There is nothing gay about wanting to be dominated by a futa

>>37186735
Do I just put my fingers in there and stretch in opposing directions?

File: 1460579736570.png (592KB, 977x1016px) Image search: [Google]

592KB, 977x1016px

when will cutlets learn?

>>37186839
Your frenulum is the tissue that attaches your foreskin to the underside of your glans. I would try applying tension to that. If your foreskin is tight then you can also try pulling your fingers outward like that.

File: F3o8Z93.jpg (42KB, 630x469px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 630x469px

>>37186856
>when will cutlets learn?

Little did that 2d whore know that, that wasn't semen but dickcheese

>>37186239
>dickcheese
nice meme

>>37186239
>I don't like my family associate with goys.

>>37186889
at this point, "dick cheese" is so uncommon that you have to make a conscious decision to foster it.
I haven't showered in an entire week and still, no smegma.

Originally it was though to decrease masturbation, after that however, it was mostly "well if I'm circumcised then my son should be too".

I'm an American and I'm not circumsised, so it's not like its all of us either.

>>37186775
>circumcised dicks just look better.
Maybe to some American women, but that is just because that is what they are used to. To anyone who is used to an intact penis, the dry head and scar on a circumcised penis is very offputting.

>there's a reason there are no successful uncircumcised pornstars.
I don't know what porn you have been watching, but circumcised seems to only be a slight majority to me. Are you sure you aren't confusing men with their foreskin retracted for circumcised?
>>>/hc/1161027

Also, basically anything outside of the US will be intact.

>>37186935
You got to go back

>>37186889
>dickcheese
I didn't get this meme even after not showering for a literal month.

>>37186953
Thankfully America is the only country that matters these days.

>>37186962
You did have it but you needed the right humidity for the cultures to expand and ferment. There are yogurt making tutorials on youtube incase you want to produce top grade dickcheese.

File: smug anime face [chuck e cheese edition].jpg (7KB, 251x190px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 251x190px

>tfw my mom is a literally insane religious nut and STILL had enough sense not to mutilate me at birth
feels good man

>>37186972
Circumcision rates in the US are dropping significantly. Washington is down to around 15%. Across the US it is around 50%.
>>37175985

File: 337515819db66dff0c.jpg (596KB, 938x912px) Image search: [Google]

596KB, 938x912px

>>37186996
>Jesus was cut
>Christians see him as the best example for humanity to replicate in order to live righteously.
>Decide to not get cut

How can uncut Christians call themselves Christians? Truely boggles my noggles.

>>37187028
Hmmm and America seems to be descending into hell little by little these days. Maybe there is a correlation.

>>37187073
[a]It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery.

2 Behold I, Paul, say to you that if you receive circumcision, Christ will be of no benefit to you. 3 And I testify again to every man who receives circumcision, that he is under obligation to keep the whole Law. 4 You have been severed from Christ, you who [b]are seeking to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace. 5 For we [c]through the Spirit, [d]by faith, are waiting for the hope of righteousness.

--Galatians 5

>>37187073
No Christians outside of the US circumcise. Circumcision in the US was started by Seventh Day Adventists in the late 1800s that wanted to stop/punish boys from masturbating.

>>37187127
>And I testify again to every man who receives circumcision, that he is under obligation to keep the whole Law.

So pretty much anyone who gets cut is more righteous than someone who isn't. lol uncut fags never catch a break eh

>>37186490

>Large majority of girls prefer cut.

I don't prefer girls who prefer cut. I think they're gross.

So give me my foreskin back. Those girls can fuck themselves.

>>37187152
Hmmm about the same time the glory of the lord shined upon America.

>>37187157
He is referring to the old covenant when he says the Law, which is why Law is capitalized. Galatians was a letter that was sent to combat false teachers that were trying to impose Jewish customs on the early church.

File: 6765787.jpg (87KB, 640x890px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 640x890px

>>37186775

>there's a reason there are no successful uncircumcised pornstars.

What about this one?

>>37187203
The early church was Jewish. Christianity is a sect that arose from the sect of the Essene Hebrews which was one of the three largest sects of Judaism. Paul wanted to white wash Christianity so it would be more appealing and easier to swallow to the Romans and other pagan tribes surrounding Israel.

>>37186775
>in all honesty, circumcised dicks just look better. yeah, it's harmful, but american roasties think uncut dicks are gross, so...cut it is.
>there's a reason there are no successful uncircumcised pornstars.

>
>
>using porn as a barometer of taste
>
>

Uncircumcised not only look better, but the skin peels back. It's a fuller, more wholesome penis. End of story.

>>37186516

>The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) says the benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks.

They also said they don't actually know what the risks are, and that they were factoring in "religious benefits" into the equation, not just medical benefits.

Their position was lambasted by the international medical community.

By the way, the AAP also advocated legalizing female circumcision in 2010 until people called them on their bullshit.

File: thinking-face.png (53KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 256x256px

>>37174663
>206 replies
>64 images
>48 posters
>first page

really makes you think

>>37187073
Read the New Testament, Christians are not supposed to be circumcised, filthy Judaizer.

>>37187318

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/722840

>>37187264
nice memes

rthaegaearhe

File: thinking_face.png (66KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1000x1000px

>>37186516
>The American

hhmmmm

>>37186555
it sure does, fellow thinker

>>37187346

Go worship Paul instead of Jesus if you think that.

>>37187340

Really makes me think that this is an issue that people care about, even if they lie and say they don't because they're afraid of social repercussions for talking about a taboo subject.

>>37187304
>>using porn as a barometer of taste
not defending him but pornography is the optimal way to gauge what's "in" and what's unattractive, isn't it?
porn is the epitome of attractiveness.

>>37187381
You are not Christian.


serht

>>37187429
>porn is the epitome of attractiveness.

idk about that I don't see a whole lot of people shitting on each other's faces at the Academy Awards while wearing suits and dresses.

>>37187429

The majority of people watching porn aren't looking closely to see if the dude is circumcised.

Most intact dicks look similar to circumcised dicks when erect, except without the scarring and loss of girth.

I wouldn't be surprised if most Americans couldn't tell the difference between an erect intact dick and a circumcised one in a video. Maybe not even in person.

I've seen people using "dildos are circumcised!" as an excuse to hold down children, penetrate them, and slice off part of their dicks. They don't even know the foreskin pulls back in most adults.

These people are ignorant as shit.

>>37187477
Jesus wouldn't tell his followers to disobey Abraham covenant only someone like Paul would do that .

>>37174663
It's very ironic and hypocritical how Americans are totally okay with cutting something off a baby boy's penis without their consent, but if a child or teenager wants to take hormones and expresses their wish to be of the opposite gender, then those same Americans will flip their shit and be all against it, e.g. calling it "unnatural". What makes circumcision so "natural" to you Ameriturds?

Another double standard is, why is removing the foreskin acceptable, but altering a girl's genitals or cutting the clitoris considered to be socially and culturally unacceptable? I don't believe the foreskin is even bad for a person's health. If nature put it there for a reason, then there's no reason why it should be artificially removed.

>>37187554

By the way, shit like this has made me think that a significant percentage of people do not see males as real human beings or real moral ends in themselves. Just as tools to be used for labor, war, and female sexual pleasure.

It's like some people make being male out to be some curse where you have to destroy your humanity and become a pulsing brainless soulless human dildo/weapon.

>>37187554
Yeah, most dildos that I have seen that are made to look like actual dicks have well defined frenulum and look like intact dicks. I don't think I have ever seen a dildo with a circumcision scar.

>>37174663
Dr. Kellog popularized it in America to curb masturbation and improve hygiene. He also hated jews.

>>37176089
Oh hey, it's you again.
Nice to see you're motivating others to restore their foreskin.

File: 1476927529222.jpg (2MB, 1333x1897px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1333x1897px

>>37187574
Health Benefits outweigh the risks.
Why does the public have to pay for you uncut fags and your stds and penis cancer . Get bent Ludwig Ich Bin Luust von Hauber the 3rd

>>37187596

I know, that's what I mean, man.

People don't even know what they're talking about. It depresses me and angers me.

>>37187609
wtf I love circumcision now.
eherge

File: 1492394037424.jpg (21KB, 312x345px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 312x345px

>>37187629
>AYO HOL UP HOL UP
>WE ARYANS DOMINATE THE DILDO WORLD N SHEEEIIITTT

>>37187612

>Health Benefits outweigh the risks.

According to the AAP.

But they also said they don't know what the risks are, and they weren't just factoring in health benefits but other "benefits" that aren't related to health.

Their position statement is literally incoherent. You can't say "The risks are unknown" while also saying "the benefits outweigh the risks".

They would fail a fucking high school ethics class if they tried to pull that shit there but apparently the American public is dumb enough according to them to buy it.

>>37187670
yes because the AAP are the only ones who think that..... rightttttttt

>>37187690
Basically nobody outside of the US believes it. The US is the only industrialized nation with such high circumcision rates, and even here they are falling steadily.

>>37187690

Oh, yeah. There are tons of other great medical organizations that believe that too, like Cutting Club, Circumsexual Pride, and the Gilgal Society.

>>37187728
58 Percent of Australia is cut
48 percent in Canada

80 percent in Korea
Albania, Kosovo, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina Turkey,Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel,[39] Jordan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, the Philippines,[11] Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, United Arab Emirates, Yemen Kazakhstan, Malaysia etc etc etc etc


about 20 percent in
Armenia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany,[42] Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine,[9] and the United Kingdom.[43]


>no one

>International physicians protest against American Academy of Pediatrics' policy on infant male circumcision

>Circumcision conflicts with children's rights and doctors' oath and can have serious long-term consequences, state an international group of 38 physicians from 16 European countries in Pediatrics today. They comment on the American Academy of Pediatrics' new policy on infant male circumcision.

>There are no compelling health arguments in favor of circumcision, while it can have serious long-term urological, psychological and sexual consequences. And performing medically unwarranted circumcision of underage boys conflicts with good medical practice. Male infant circumcision conflicts with children's rights and the doctors' oath not to do harm.

>This is the main message of an international group of doctors in reaction to the policy of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), issued in August 2012, promoting non-therapeutic circumcision of boys. In an article in the scientific journal Pediatrics today, the authors comment on this policy and state that physicians and their professional organizations should discourage parents from having their healthy infant boys circumcised.

>Among the authors are presidents and representatives of several national medical associations and societies of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons. The Dutch Urology Association (NVU), Pediatric Association (NVK) and surgeons (NVvH) also signed as authors of the article. Already in 2010, all relevant medical associations adopted the identical viewpoint of the Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG).

https://www.knmg.nl/actualiteit-opinie/nieuws/nieuwsbericht/international-physicians-protest-against-american-academy-of-pediatrics-policy-on-infant-male-circumcision.htm

>>37187795
I forgot to mention non religious. Almost all of those countries have high circumcision rates because of Muslims, not because they believe that it is healthier.

>>37174706
>>37174758
If Hitler ever tried to do one thing right, he was trying to save Western males from the unfortunate pain of being circumcised by the Jewish doctors.

>>37187872
>unfortunate pain

Didn't save them from the unfortunate pain they felt when they weren't able to satisfy their wives for more than 1 min in bed before having the cum.

>>37187861

Or in the case of South Korea, because they were lied to by American quacks during the war.

Circumcision rates in South Korea continue to fall as more and more South Koreans learn about the reality of the situation.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526493/

>South Korean male circumcision is likely to be undergoing a steep decline. The cause for this decline seems to be the increase in information available on the pros and cons of circumcision.

>>37187911
Keep deluding yourself hank

>>37187906

In the old days, circumcision was advocated BECAUSE it supposedly made men less able to satisfy their partners. That used to be seen as a good thing.

Now you're advocating it for the opposite reason.

Give it up. This isn't about anything other than stockholm syndrome and repetition of trauma.

>>37187938
hmm no wonder the world resembles sodom now.

>>37187906
>>37187938

By the way, I'm sure you'll want a source.

>The Sages, may their memory be blessed, have explicitly stated: It is hard for a woman with whom an uncircumcised man has had sexual intercourse to separate from him. In my opinion this is the strongest of the reasons for circumcision.

-Rabbi Moses Ben Maimon, 1190 A.D.

>>37186314
actually that's the only legitimate medical benefit - circumcision reduces the chance of penile cancer by about 5% - this is a fact

similarly, removing one testicle cuts the chance of testicular cancer by 50%, and cutting off the entire penis reduces the probability of penile cancer by 100%

>>37187947

So which is it?

Is circumcision good because it cripples sexuality (which is the reason why they said it was good for roughly a thousand years, until the sexual revolution in the mid 20th century)?

Or is it good because it somehow improves sexuality, which is the excuse circumcisers started to give (with zero evidence) after social attitudes towards sex changed around 65 years ago?

It can't be both.

>>37187911
It's hard to imagine cutting off anything in a korean boy's penis since there's very little of it to begin with anyways. Could there be a possible correlation as to why koreans have one of the smallest measured penises in the world?

>>37187947
Religion is the cancer that should be removed. Not foreskins.

File: world_map.png (1MB, 4000x1779px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4000x1779px

>>37187795
Here is a map of Male Genital Mutilation across the world.

>>37187152
>stop/punish boys from masturbating

It's impossible to justify how infant boys who are only a few days old are already being punished for the "crime" of masturbating, which is quite frankly an undeserved punishment, especially if it hasn't even happened yet. It's those Jews and fundie Christians who are the ones that are fucked up in the head for thinking about genital mutilation. Not the people who are merely exploring their own sexuality.

File: those fucking jews.png (99KB, 1425x625px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1425x625px

>>37188175
Found another map. Not sure which one is more accurate tbqh.

Either way, most of the circumcision cucking happens only in Israel, the United States, and the Muslim world countries. It's good to see the rest of the world no longer practices this barbaric semitic shit.

>>37188208
John Kellogg, a Seventh Day Adventist who started to popularize MGM in the US, was actually against infant circumcision at first. He recommended catching your children masturbating, and then having them circumcised in the most painful way possible, so that they would associate their genitals with punishment and pain.

"The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anaesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases. The soreness which continues for several weeks interrupts the practice, and if it had not previously become too firmly fixed, it may be forgotten and not resumed."

File: what the fuck.png (37KB, 827x344px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 827x344px

>>37188208

This family kept their boy intact until they noticed that he would get erect when he washed his penis, so they circumcised him because they think God doesn't want him to masturbate and having a foreskin would lead to masturbation.

These people are literally delusional.

>>37188297
Yeah, this map includes everything between 20 and 80% in the same category, so that the US does not stand out as much compared to the rest of the civilized world.

>>37188311
>literally child abuse right there mate

This is why religious parents should be audited by Child Protective Services regularly.

File: Kellogg Grave.png (1MB, 784x693px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 784x693px

>>37188311

True, true.

He was also an advocate of male infibulation as alternative to circumcision.

That means sewing the foreskin mostly shut with metal wires.

I think the guy (and most of the nutty little "doctors" who came before him and advocated for this) was a psychopathic, child-molesting pervert. There's no way he believed any of this shit. He had zero evidence. I think it was an excuse for him to torture kids, so he'd get a kick out of it.

>>37188380
Why are atheists so retarded?

t. uncircumcised Catholic

don't 404 on me

gsngrgj

File: circumcision-distribution.jpg (48KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 480x480px

>>37174663
>>mutilating your baby's penis
>Why do ameritards do this?

Who could be behind this?

>>37186490
Girls prefer what is socially acceptable.

File: MGM_by_state.jpg (91KB, 600x697px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 600x697px

Infant circumcision rates by state:

File: 1495140904341.jpg (54KB, 597x597px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 597x597px

we'd do literally anything if it would benefit Shlomo

oral genial

Bump

Difjfjrndignrjfkgj

>>37186239
incidence of penis-cancer: 1:100,000 (when men turn 80 or so)
incidence of female breast-cancer: 1:8

mandatory mastectomy of babies now.

>>37187554
>The majority of people watching porn aren't looking closely to see if the dude is circumcised.
since I've been redpilled on this topic I immediatebly recognize a cutdick in porn.
insta-boner-killer.
and there's so many of them, like 9 out of 10.

>getting your dick fucked up
Yikes

>>37190474
this, fucking crazy desu

>>37190936
no, it's capitalism.

File: 1495215492108.jpg (273KB, 1136x676px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1136x676px

>>37186775
>there's a reason there are no successful uncircumcised pornstars.

which is because porn is almost entirely owned and produced by Jews

>>37177559
You hit the nail on the head with 'cycle of abuse' here. The wording of the same order used by people who were diddled as kids in order to justify doing it themselves along with a 'If never did me any harm, you just don't get it haha'

>>37175626
Your teeth are also a breeding ground for bacteria, you gonna remove those too?

File: 1495372261345.png (135KB, 800x850px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 800x850px

>catholic parents
>still decided to jew my dick
>try and talk to parents about it
>they bring up the "muh cleaning" meme
>I bring up the lack of feeling and damage to benis and the fact that it is a natural part of the human body
>parents keep sticking with the "muh cleaning" meme
>bring up foreskin wrinkle cream and jews
>get called an antisemite

I want off this wild ride

>>37195061
>kiked Christians
sad to see.

>>37195130
It really is, we went to church and everything. Hell, I even went to a private christian school.

>>37175626
The entire vagina is a breeding ground for bacteria, should we sew it up?

This thread is so fucking good. I love my foreskin. If someone would have cut it of when I was a child I would hate their guts. Some sick fucking people inhabit this place. Lucky me my parents isn't that messed up.

>>37177201
>The clamp looks like a duck.
Quack Quack Quack

>>37175575
In Australia they use them for skin grafts on babies elbows

you guys are like these ps4 vs xbox people posting the same pics over and over and over and over again

>>37196295
But choosing PS4 over xbox does not result in a child's dick being mutilated.
Also, PC is better than both.

>>37176378
I talked with my parents about it, they didn't understand at first, but they realized that it was a mistake and apologized. They were even supportive of me restoring my foreskin.

A few years later, I talked with my sister about it. She was actually the one who compared it to female circumcision before I did, and she agrees that both are human rights violations, and should be outlawed. I know that she will not be mutilating any of her children.

File: probe_tool.jpg (279KB, 615x585px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 615x585px

>>37186603
>there is a tool sold specifically for ripping the foreskin away from the glans, since they are fused at birth until at least 3 years

File: cicumcision-baby-crying.gif (60KB, 367x252px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 367x252px

>>37174663
>this is normal in the US

File: complications.jpg (604KB, 2140x1968px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 2140x1968px

>>37175515
They get bonus points when they flay it even more than normal.

>>37174663
I don't know but I'm uncut the way it should be

>>37199094
>that pic
fuckkkkk

ori

File: men-vs-women.png (1MB, 3072x1402px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3072x1402px

>tfw roasties are protected and we aren't

>>37200976
it's a patriarchy, or something.

>>37201054
Yeah, it must be all of that male privelage.

>>37186815
The US has the highest levels of circumcision in the industrialized world, along with the highest levels of AIDS.

>>37174663
The Jews have bamboozled us anon.

bump

giewugkwae

File: apligraf.jpg (848KB, 1756x1860px) Image search: [Google]

848KB, 1756x1860px

>>37202807
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZy5lbWb9Xg
They are absolutely insane!

I care about this issue deeply as a prancing lala homo man and also a fetishist.
Thankfully in my country it's all but unheard of, even with how old school the church is. I feel genuinely sorry for yanks and the like, though, it can't be fun.
For quite a while, I've been considering trying to find out how to ask my MP to try and get some law against it put in. I'm not actually at all knowlegable in politics and the like, but I don't like the idea that it's even legal where I am.
also,
>tfw CI-10+ on that scale
I really don't want to brag or anything but it's just tight enough that if I push a finger in it's pressed against the head by the foreskin and it feels daijobu

>>37203892
They're pedophiles on top of greedy jews mutilating them for money. How can they keep getting away with it?

>>37204327
which country?

gkhjb

File: ^DE5AFC0F2C164DEA4684798D644B0E5477A4C3AF1443D6DFEA^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr.jpg (78KB, 740x960px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 740x960px

>>37205113
this shitey one

>>37204996
>for money
That's how they get away with it. If they can continue to make money off of it, the mutilation will continue. The government uses taxpayer money to pay for circumcision in some states (>>37175985), which incentives private insurance to cover it too. Because it is insured, doctors and medical institutions will push it harder, because they can make more money off of it. States that have ended the state sponsored mutilation of children tend to have much lower rates of mutilation. bnvcb

It will take a long time to die off completely, because of how ingrained it is in our culture:
>>37188325
>>37185771
>>37178040
>>37177522

File: residentcirc.jpg (41KB, 691x518px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 691x518px

>smug roasties standing over a helpless immobilized male infant
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>37176583
how can they fucking do this to a baby and keep a straight, even happy face...

america is still a shithole after all these years

>>37205958
Absolutely disgusting desu senpai.
Dgfdg

>>37186432
>parents had it done anyway when I was a baby because its """cleaner"""

is this a common practice over there? never heard of it being done on Europeans

>>37206905
It used to be common in Britan, for stopping masturbation, just like the US. It was stopped after a report came out about all of the infants that it had killed. Now it is very rare, and only Muslims perform it.

>>37176423
>>37176467
They already use aborted fetuses in the US for profit and research. They just don't tell the stupid goyim getting abortions that Dr Shekelstein is getting double paid for it. For the abortion, and "disposing of it" by selling it to other medical companies.

>>37208518
Throw the Jew down the well.
Htuhg

>>37207998
The rates in Britan were higher, but they were never as high as the US.

>>37174663
Because the US always follows its Jewish overlords.

File: Trump-at-the-Western-Wall-Kottel.png (347KB, 640x397px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 640x397px

>>37209815
lol

groksea

>>37210269
>Donald Trump's eighth grandchild is due to have his bris -- the Jewish circumcision ceremony
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2016/03/30/next-up-donald-trump-jewish-circumcision-ceremony/82427428/

>cutlets think they can never wash their dick and fuck a roastie with a ton of STDs just because schlomo needed to make up a reason to rip a baby dick in half

>>37188297
>20 to 80%
>how to make people not realize your country is lowkey third world tier

bump

gbieursjgs

>>37210610
when will it end, I want it to end, all those poor beautiful baby boys...

I'm uncut but the tip looks very dry, am I fucked ?

>>37210812
Yeah, every other 20-80 country is on the low end.

>>37174663
Because its what their parents did to them, bitter dads want to cuck their boys.

File: sosalty.jpg (7KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 259x194px

Because they are fucking retarded

Literally a crime against humanity.

>>37176378
My fucking brother bowed to my parents instead of defending my argumentative.
I have s god dammed right to be upset. Fucking kikes.

>>37176583
Every time a baby boy is circumcised a woman is gangraped by niggers.

>>37176855
My fucking dick looks like the left. Fucking wrinkled arrowhead.
I hope this planet ends in a Holocaust. Give me another Eliot at the very least.