w e w

are there nudes of this choker slut yet?

I bet she spends a huge amount of time on these videos so in reality this is pretty underpaid. Dunno what the ad revenue would be though

File: nice.png (123KB, 1574x376px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1574x376px

>>37145150
also

>patreon.com/rageafterstorm

>>37145230
She's a student tho.

>>37145206
I'm not sure why you say that. Her videos are about 5-10 minutes long. I really don't understand what you mean. All she has to do is throw together some shitty script, turn on the camera, and upload her video to the internet.

Watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlKUMd9vfkE
Do you seriously think she spent more than 3 hours on it? Hell, even if she spent 6 hours on it, she would still be making over 20 bucks an hour.

>>37145279
What's your point?

File: blairhwite.jpg (67KB, 1583x773px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1583x773px

there's a huge market for anti-SJW youtube vids. any female looking creature has a natural immunity to the normal criticisms of that movement.

fox news has been doing this for decades with hot female newswomen because 1. eyecandy and 2. older men pretend their daughter could have turned out like this instead of a fat SJW

>>37145361
true. but I'm pretty sure that's a man.

>>37145380
> female looking creature

>>37145302
You can't expect a student to also work a full time job. Were you referring to the fact that she want's to quit her shit part time job? Well, who'dve thought...this is every youtubers endgame essentially.

>>37145380
"she's" a good example of immunity though, because she can bash trans people without the torrent of hate and doxxing any male yterwould get. she's just saying what everyone thinks

I don't really see the problem here
Your only indication that she doesn't actually mean what she says is the timing of her start and her clothing
Those are both terrible indications of anything.
To me she seems relatively genuine, after all, would even an SJW that care about money go so far as to criticize shit like immigration in germany?

Couldn't it just be that she realized it's getting more acceptable to voice opinions like the ones she's had for a while?

Seems more probable that Laci Green is the one to shift for money, just that she's making a soft shift to make it seem natural

>>37145405
I was pointing out how easy she has it. That was my point.
To be able to do something that's super easy, for only 4 months, and then to be able to say "fuck it, I want to quit my day job".
The fact that that's even an option for her is what I think is insane.

I guess that's life though. It also shows who's really "privileged". also see >>37145417

>>37145150
Stop whining and start winning, faggot. I make more $ than my friends who when to college and I'm an out of shape loner male who buys toys.

If you have working arms and legs, you can make money, even if you're mentally ill. Which you might be.

>>37145442
and the white knights arrive

>>37145460
Oh i'm sorry, you made a great point, i guess i'll have to rethink everything i said about her.

Fuck off with that! Or at least tell me why i'm wrong, fucko

>>37145442
>Those are both terrible indications of anything.

The timing of her start maybe, certainly not her clothing. People judge people based on what they wear all the time. There's a good reason for that.

>would even an SJW that care about money go so far as to criticize shit like immigration in germany?

I'm not sure what your point is. She's the alt right kekistani anti sjw girl, covering immigration issues is part of her job.

>Couldn't it just be that she realized it's getting more acceptable to voice opinions like the ones she's had for a while?

w e w

You're contradicting yourself there, buddy. So which is it? Does the timing of her start matter or does it not?

A man got $40,000 to make potato salad. These people are exceptions. What's your point?

>>37145150

>an anti-SJW attention whore thread


Finally!

>>37145553
She isn't an exception tho.

>>37145553
>These people are exceptions.

I don't see what's preventing your average 5/10 from doing the same as this girl is doing. She's an exception as far as being relatively a early investor in this little scene, but other than that she's not exceptional in any way.

>What's your point?

Did you read the thread?

>>37145579
I'm going to assume you're being serious.
Finally is right, and this really might be final. If this thread itself is anything to judge, this board(and website in general) is being overtaken by normies and bluepillers. Maybe that's a good thing though. We can all just quit using 4chan and go outside.

people are quick to claim a person is covering anti-SJW strictly for money/popularity- especially if youre a female.
the truth is, it is not EASY to be openly anti-SJW. people like laci green and choker bitch have lost many friends from their conversions.
my estimate is by the end of 2017-2018 anti-SJW will be the new cool and at which point the bandwagoners will begin and ruin everything like the always do. but that hasnt happened. yet.

>>37145519
>People judge people based on what they wear all the time. There's a good reason for that
I'm not gonna disagree with that, but glasses and a choker? You don't have to be an SJW for wearing either of those

>I'm not sure what your point is. She's the alt right kekistani anti sjw girl, covering immigration issues is part of her job.
I mean, if she's actually an SJW, and actually think immigration and other stuff like that is going too far, would she actually bother to do enough research on the subject that she can make some proper anti-immigration points? Or at the very least, if she didn't believe what she said, wouldn't her points be a lot more like what SJWs think anti-immigration people are thinking?

>You're contradicting yourself there, buddy. So which is it? Does the timing of her start matter or does it not?
I'm not contradicting myself, i'm saying she didn't -change- her opinion because of Trump, just get more emboldened by to express it.

>>37145630
>IT'S NOT EASY WAAAAHHHHHHHH

simp harder. see if it will get you laid.

>>37145616
Most people who make videos don't reach this level of success. Someone like her could try, but a lot of it is luck, whatever happens to be "in."

>Caring about youtube drama
>Caring about literally who tier e-celebs
>caring about women
>Not realize that creating a thread about a youtuber will benefit them by creating new viewers even if your thread is about how shitty they are

Dumb!

>>37145302
Who cares. I've encountered a variety of people, male and female, who get away with somehow spending most of the day socializing in office environments. I bust my ass and they do nothing, hell, half the time they are talking to the boss about non-work related shit. Did I mention I later found out these people made more money than me? On a couple of instances they were making double my wage.

Life isn't fair. If she's a voice against sjw and shit immigrants then good for her. It's more than I'm willing to publicly say because I'm scared shitless of someone identifying me and making me lose my shit job.

To be honest, if women need to be paid not to be SJWs, I'm fine with that at this point.

>>37145616
She's not an early investor, early ones were a lot before trump was elected. She's as late as possible...

>>37145630
I think anti-SJW stuff has lost a lot of its edginess now, it's not as controversial as it was a few years ago.
It's not as close to the edge of the Overton window any more.

It's partly to do with more "extreme" ideologies like ethno-nationalism becoming common talking points, and the behaviour of SJWs over the last few years making most people tired of their bullshit.

>>37145230
easily done if she goes full porn (also called the asmrtist route)

>>37145650
>I'm not contradicting myself

Yes, you are. You said that the timing of her start was a "terrible indication". Then you go on to say that the timing of her start was in fact pertinent.

>>37145706
>whatever happens to be "in."

That's kind of my point...

>Most people who make videos don't reach this level of success.

Most people don't make videos that are good for the betabux.

Also, there are about 5-6 different clones of this girl, all playing "le cute conservative girl" role. Take Roaming Millenial for example. Now, I will say that she makes pretty decent content, however, she still has a MASSIVE channel considering the amount of time she has been around. Specifically, she has almost 170k subs, and she's only been around one year.
I don't think she would have come nearly as far if it weren't for her pretty face.
She's made 72 videos, or 6 videos a month, which isn't terrible if they weren't all 5 minutes long and entirely unoriginal.

People like shoeonhead are even worse. This ugly little rat doesn't try at all. Her videos are on average 5 minutes long also, but she records her videos with a fucking WEBCAM.
She has 712k subs.

Do you not see what's going on here?

>>37145150
Comment that on all of her videos

>>37145824
I forgot the asmrtists. That adds even more to my point.

>>37145718
Who cares? I do. You're right. Life isn't fair. But I still think it's important to point these things out, so long as people are denying them. Look in this thread.

It says a lot about how retarded modern Western women are that a girl simply not being a complete SJW retard results in her being worshipped.

>>37145731
>She's as late as possible...

...and still laughing all the way to the bank.

>>37145841
Roamind millenial is absurd. Shes getting 3500$ a month on patreon and she's fucking ugly.

>>37145150
I'm not even that mad at her. She saw an opportunity and took it. Good for her. It's the pathetic cucks who go to youtube for "political commentary" that are the worst. I fucking hate that all of these just gobble up this simplistic bullshit. Like read the fucking newspaper and use your fucking brain for once jesus fucking christ

>>37145150
>For the kind of pay that takes a man 4 years and 5 figures spent on college to attain, this woman makes that much after spending 4 months and $200 on a camera. That's it.

I'd do the same if I could.

Blame the betas who throw money at them.

>>37145880
Denying what? The video that was linked cited a variety of sources that take time to read about. She's also talking about the platforms of politicians. When you make youtube videos you're going to need to spend time organizing your thoughts so everything runs coherently for the audience. Whether you want to rag on her for it or not, yes she has to put time into looking good. She clearly puts plenty of time into her videos. She's also going to school and working, apparently >>37145230 . I already graduated college and can tell you that it's difficult balancing work in with it.

Putting your face up on the internet and speaking on subjects that can get you serious backlash in real life is scary and stressful. I wouldn't do it because I'm too afraid to. I'm talking about backlash from someone who recognizes me on the street or pertaining to my employment.

The people complaining sound like shitskin welfare scum. Check yourself.

>>37145841
>Yes, you are. You said that the timing of her start was a "terrible indication". Then you go on to say that the timing of her start was in fact pertinent.
No, i'm saying that -if- the timing is relevant, that doesn't mean she had to have changed her opinion at all

Do you really not understand what i'm saying, or are you just being nitpicky to act like a cunt?

>>37145934
I didn't even think to check her patreon. It's up to 4k now. Crazy.

>>37145991
>Blame the betas who throw money at them.

believe me, I do. That's the point of this thread. To "raise awareness", if you will.

>>37146030
>Check yourself.

NICE

>>37146097
>No, i'm saying that -if- the timing is relevant, that doesn't mean she had to have changed her opinion at all

What do you mean "if" the timing is relevant? You said yourself that the timing was irrelevant. Make up your mind. There shouldn't be any "if" here.

>are you just being nitpicky to act like a cunt?

I'm the one being nitpicky? Do you read what you write?

>Couldn't it just be that she realized it's getting more acceptable to voice opinions like the ones she's had for a while?

What do you call that other than suggesting that the timing is in fact relevant? You go from saying the timing couldn't possibly be relevant to saying "even if it could be". Hell, you didn't even say "even if it could be". You pretty blatantly suggested that it could be.
It's not being nitpicky if the distinction is central to your argument.
Please, fuckoff back to tumblr where they allow for these logical inconsistencies.

>>37146103
I would seriously get violent if I see a person I know supports her

How fucking beta can you be to see a bitch getting 3000$+ a month and say to yourself, "Hey, I better put my hard earned money to support this bitch who already earns more than me, maybe one day she will respond to my youtube comment and I will masturbate to that memory forever!!!"

>>37146304
We can only hope things will change. I don't know if you've heard of mgtow, but it's growing pretty fast. It's basically men who've declared themselves redpilled. I know it's cringy, but I'd rather see would be beta males get angry and make cringy remarks online than be equally as cringy and simp up to these women.

>>37146250
>What do you mean "if" the timing is relevant? You said yourself that the timing was irrelevant. Make up your mind.
I didn't even use the word "relevant" in my first post this is what i said.

>Your only indication that she doesn't actually mean what she says is the timing of her start and her clothing
>Those are both terrible indications of anything.
>To me she seems relatively genuine, after all, would even an SJW that care about money go so far as to criticize shit like immigration in germany?

Now stop getting your panties twisted by inane shit, and actually try to understand what i'm saying. Which is that just because she started doing videos at a certain time doesn't mean it -has- to be because of the trend, and even if it is because of a trend, it doesn't mean she -did- change her opinions for that, which is what OP highly implied.

>What do you call that other than suggesting that the timing is in fact relevant
Once again, i did not use the word "relevant" in my original post.
I wouldn't say it's "central to my argument" when you don't even seem to remember what i said.

Besides, my main point is that she's not an SJW/former SJW just because of those two points, which are, as i said, terrible indications. Just because she showed up at that time, doesn't mean she didn't have those opinions before.

And no, i've never been to tumblr

If you keep misrepresenting my points like this, don't expect a response from now on

>>37146436
>don't expect a response from now on

lol. Does that mean you'll be heading back to tumblr?

>actually try to understand what i'm saying

>Which is that just because she started doing videos at a certain time doesn't mean it -has- to be because of the trend, and even if it is because of a trend, it doesn't mean she -did- change her opinions for that

I know, you idiot. I know what you are saying. I'm saying you are stupid for saying it.

>doesn't mean it -has- to be because of the trend, and even if it is because of a trend

Do you not realize what's wrong with saying that?

>doesn't mean it -has- to be because of the trend

Also, the above is dishonest. You didn't say it doesn't have to be part of a trend. You suggested that it definitively wasn't part of a trend. Hence calling it a "terrible indication".

File: 1482981346437.jpg (52KB, 446x604px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 446x604px

I remember being afraid of white nationalists, thinking they would go full nazi and kill me and my family.

But now, the right is gone. It's just shifted to the left, except they "dislike feminists" and hate immigrants. The same people who want strong family values yet make fun of old senators who want are anti-porn.

I want the old Christian, Traditional right back. This isn't funny anymore guys.

>>37146584
>I remember being afraid of white nationalists, thinking they would go full nazi and kill me and my family.

shit, I still am. What made you not afraid?

>I want the old Christian, Traditional right back. This isn't funny anymore guys.

tradcons? You realize that they are the kinds of people that enable this degeneracy. Traditionalists want you to keep a stay at home mom, and work your 40 hour work week while she sits on her ass at home and does nothing. Some refer to that kind of behavior as "gynocentric". "Gynocentrism" gives rise to feminism which gives rise to the shit you see today. It's because women don't give a fuck. When all you do is cater to women, without any sort of bound, today's society is what you get.
On christianity, I think some of their values are agreeable, but when the only justification you have for those values is "god tells you so", you aren't going to be able to win over many people in a thinking society.

>>37146304
>I would seriously get violent
No, you wouldn't pussy.

>>37146704
It's a system that has worked for thousands of years, and enabled civilisation to prosper. Moving away from those values irreversibly doomed the west, and is in the process of dooming the rest of the world too. Even now I see these thoughts pop up in Muslim communities and households, maybe this should comfort those who despise us, we're also doomed.

What gave rise to feminism wasn't tradition, but rather moving away from it. Egalitarianism caused feminism, as did modern thought. Under a traditional system, women have their place, had so for centuries. If traditionalism gave rise to feminism, feminists would be millennia old.

>>37146547
There's a difference between saying "it doesn't have to" and "it isn't", retard

>>37146781
I have a video for you. I haven't watched it yet, but I think you might relate to it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wNEy_Zffpc

>>37146780
No, hard patriarchy in which women were nothing but property kept that system in place. The moment men considered womens feelings in the early 1800s is when tradcon mindsets started to arise - and they do inevitably lead to egalitarian ideas and feminism.

>>37146780
I'm having trouble understanding what you are trying to say. It's late and I'm tired, so my reading comprehension probably isn't the best right now.

Let me point you to this post>>37146869
I think this post has a good point.

I was referring to the 50's in particular, when I talked about stay at home mothers. My point being that women were most definitely massively catered to at that point in time, and those times were gynocentric. Sure, in the dark ages women were technically stay at home mothers, but because it was a different age, what they did was very valuable. i.e. taming of the shrew. in times like those, a certain standard of behavior was expected of women, even if their primary role was staying at home and being a mother. What did women in the 50's do? How were they at all useful? All they did was press a few buttons on a dishwasher and call it a day. That's my point.

>>37145150
> be normal IQ male
> show up to interview not looking disheveled like most women
> get the job before I even leave
> make well over $3k a month
> would rather do what I'm doing than camwhoring lite

>>37147052
>would rather work a 9-5 job than working a few hours per week

File: check.jpg (121KB, 469x393px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 469x393px

night folks. It would be awesome if you guys kept this thread alive for the next 7-8 hours. There's discussion to be had.

>>37146723
Provided I wouldn't be at risk of arest, I could see myself punching a beta cuck that supports female youtubers on patreon

>>37147836
how many times would you punch said beta cuck?

>>37148268
Do you support roaming millenial and get off to the idea of being punched for it? Betas have reached a new low