Are all doms assholes ? Is it even possible for a dom to be a good person ? I doubt that someone who has a sexual desire for violence could ever possibly be a moral person. They also seem to lack any sort of creativity or sophisticated intellect.
yeah, it's called alpha testosterone
it's called being a leader! gayass
Dominance doesn't equal violence you fucking reetard
Are all subs pussies ? Is it even possible for a sub to be a worthwhile person ? I doubt that someone who has a sexual desire for submission could ever possibly be a useful person. They also seem to lack any sort of initiative or self confidence.
if the idea is that they derive sexual pleasure from subjugating a person, then no, it is not possible for a dom to be a good person
>>37137972
le copipasta poster :#
>>37137972
>triggered dom detected
>>37137974
That's horrible backwards logic.
If the dom enjoys being dominant and the sub enjoys being submissive who are you to say that's morally wrong?
>>37138068
physically harming someone is yes morally wrong even if the sub wants it. If fact its worse because then you are taking advantage of a broken person who feels a sexual need to be physically harmed.
>>37137974
Are superheroes submissive?
>>37138185
superheroes are fascists
>>37138114
Domination is not about physical harm, it can be an aspect of it but it's not the sum.
Also assuming someone is a "broken person" becasue they are into submission is pretty dumb. Everyone has their kinks and the goal to find someone to explore those kinks with
>>37138030
>triggered sub detected
Do you not see how easy this is for me
>>37138030
heIIo summerfriend
>>37138221
>Domination is not about physical harm, it can be an aspect of it but it's not the sum.
in this convo thats what it is obviously referring to.
>"broken person" becasue they are into submission is pretty dumb.
if someone wants to be physically harmed to the point where they get bruises or other injuries then yes they are a broken person. the only people who push this bdsm meme are doms who want to justify their shitty violent behaviour and subs who are manipulated into being treated like they are worthless
>>37138297
Have you seen or been involved with any apsect of the BDSM community besides watching porn?
What you're describing is super uncommon
>>37138340
what exactly is "super uncommon" ?
>>37138355
It just doesn't happen often at all.
Most people in the community do it for the control aspect. Either they want to be in control or they want to feel powerless.
Very few people get into the hardcore voilence and pain play you see to think defines the community
doms and subs are so cringe.
sadism is not dom.
>>37138406
it literally happens all the time in the bdsm community; people who want to hit spank or bruise others is really common. I am sorry that you are a dom who has to be in denial for the sake of your conscience but these "relationships" are glorified domestic violence
>tfw no dominant gf to set you straight in life
Life is fucking meaningless.
>>37138474
I'm not a dom but i know a lot of people in the community. You obviously have your mind made up on the matter so I'll leave you to your ignorance
Is the guy in 50 shades of grey a kind gentlemen? Yes.
>>37137931
I could pull off gentle, kind dom myself. It's about being assertive, but sensitive.
You insist, but don't force.
The sub needs to trust you implicitly and that trust can't be violated.
You guide their hands, position them. Control when pace changes.
It probably takes real creativity and empathy but I think it's possible and I could do it.
It'd be so much more fun to sub for that though.