What did the scale do to her?

>>37029791
Tell her the truth without regard to her feelings.

>>37029818
But why did she break it

>>37029894
Let her tell you herself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ynZowsDtU

>>37029937
The delusion makes this one of the best unintentional comedy skits I've ever seen.

She probably had already broke it trying to weight herself.

>>37029937
why does she have the exact verbal manner of eric wareheim

>that's like better than sex
How comes everyone gets laid but me?

>>37029937
"Safety first!"

>Is probably going to die of a stroke within the span of 5-10 years

File: hahahahaha.jpg (42KB, 365x450px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 365x450px

>>37030010
I love it how she's panting heavily and struggling to get up after doing literally 30 seconds of hammering.

If I don't take this too literally it makes me kind of jealous of someone being able to frame their self-esteem problems this way. An inanimate scapegoat instead of blaming myself would be nice. Too bad for fat people that it's about more than just self esteem, but health.

File: broken_clock.jpg (45KB, 578x296px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 578x296px

>Ha, I'm a genius! Now I'll never age, I'll be young forever!

File: 1489813919859.jpg (458KB, 640x3904px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 640x3904px

>>37030658
>health
nuh uh

>>37029791
why is she hitting that scale with a hammer? Didn't she break it by stepping on it?

>>37030866
>healthism

holy shit

>>37029791
She freaked out when she saw her phone number

File: 137593505136.jpg (61KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 600x800px

>when you become so rich that breaking objects you bought with your own money is "empowering"

>>37030986
calm down there Soviet Russia, I know the site of a fat woman triggers you because you can't even feed your own people, but could you tone it down a notch?

>>37030866
This entire "debate" is extremely painful to watch. Lard brains.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6mMpE8AaA0

>>37031006
actually I live in Ameristan

>>37030299
She has a vagina and butthole

>>37031014
>jabba talks about everything she did to lose weight
>except exercise

>>37031031
>implying being a Cuckmunist is limited only to those around the iron curtain.

>>37031074
exercise is a shit way to lose weight though, it makes you more hungry

the best way to lose weight is to just eat less

>>37031103
tru dat my dude

>>37031111
>exercise is a shit way to lose weight though, it makes you more hungry

quads of retardation

>>37031134
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXTiiz99p9o

>>37031111
Noice quads bro, now let me tell you why you're stupid.

>exercise is a shit way to lose weight though, it makes you more hungry

Wrong. Exercise burns off fat quicker than any other way about it. Fat is just stored energy, no more, no less. Burning that energy is how you lose fat. Losing fat is simply burning more calories than you take in, so if you eat nothing but salad, and a lot of it, and exercised daily, you'd drop fat like Chris Brown drops bitches with his fist. Eating salads and healthy food fills you up, with less calories, so it makes burning off the fat much easier. I don't know where you got your information but it's as retarded as you.

>>37031229
what is easier to do, work out for an hour to burn off like 500 calories, or just not eat a whole bagel with cream cheese on it?

also watch this >>37031167

>>37031256
It's easier to eat low-calories foods and work out. Losing weight isn't easy, never has been, never will be, not in our quick and easy meal society. That doesn't mean simply eating a good diet and exercising won't do what you want it to. It will, it's medically, scientifically, and mathematically proven that fat is simply stored calories, and the only way to get rid of it is to burn more calories than you consume.

>>37031318
you burn more calories than you consume by just eating less, though

exercise can only make up for so much calorie loss, but taking 2 seconds to not eat something is ridiculously easy

>>37029791
>>>>>>>redpill
Original meatball

>>37031167
Do you not know what it means to eat at a deficite, if you burn MORE carbs than you eat, you will lose weight, that means you can eat more you idiot

>>37031318
>losing weight isn't easy
shut the fuck up.

we don't reserve shit like "i choose to eat 5-6 large meals a day" as an incredibly difficult circumstance in life. jesus fuck. how much lower can we go? i've heard people who think they are "addicted" to video games and "suffer" from depression. the language people use makes none of this shit even matter.

there are literally hundreds of studies that show it is possible for anyone to lose weight with minor shifts in diet and exercise. you cannot call it "not easy" simply because people choose not to do it. do you suppose that shitting your pants is "not easy" as well?

>>37031014
HEh. They're nice and the whole self-acceptance thing is fine, but damn they're being ridiculous on the whole health aspect.
>>37031352
Exercising while dieting works better. It can help you maintain your metabolism and muscle mass. It's healthier.

>>37031397
or you could just eat less to begin with and not have to exercise at all by eating at a deficit

>>37031352
You won't burn as many calories.

Let's say an average male needs 2500 calories a day to maintain his weight. Let's say an obese person is consuming twice that, 5000, if the obese person HALVES his diet, going back down to 2500, he will neither gain nor lose weight, but he will feel the affects of being hungry. Simply "not eating" doesn't work, because let's say this obese, 800 pound man sticks to his 2500 calorie a day diet, his weight will still be at 800 pounds. Then, let's say this obese person cuts his calorie intake in half again, down to 1250, sure he'll lose weight, but he'll very nearly be consumed with hunger at that point. If the man completely changed his diet to consist of 2000 calories of salad (which is a shit ton of salad, let me tell you) he'd lose weight and not feel as hungry. If he then exercised the amount of time he'd need to simply "eat less" would be cut down by a LOT. This would help him stick to his diet, as he'd see noticeable results quicker, he'd be more fit, and he'd be overall healthier by the time he hit say, 200 pounds.
>>37031434
>Losing weight isn't easy
>Shut the fuck up
I'm sorry, when has losing weight ever been easy? Notice I didn't say /maintain/, I said Lose, which is a big difference you fucking autist.

>>37031434
exercising while dieting makes you hungrier and eat more

its quite literally a myth that you should exercise to lose weight sold to people by junk food companies

exercise is really great for your health, but matters very little to losing weight compared to just eating less calories

>>37031423
>people who think they are "addicted" to video games and "suffer" from depression
fuck off REEEEEEEE
I'm totally addicted to vidyas and suffering from depression.

>>37031463
if he can't stick to eating 2500 calories a day there's no way he will have the willpower to exercise every day and eat healthier, too

that is why just eating less works so much better, it requires a lot less willpower

>>37031485
>eating less requires less willpower
I'm finished with this conversation, you're obviously a troll, or someone stupid enough to actually believe this.

File: 323.jpg (25KB, 500x378px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x378px

>>37031463

I'm going to post this on /fit/ and see what they say about it lmao

>>37031497
you really think eating less requires more willpower than exercising every day?

>>37031512
link the post when you wanna do I wanna see them call this fat idiot out

>>37031521
Yes. I was a fat fuck for a while, and I found daily exercise to be much easier than stopping my usual frantic eating pace.

>>37031466
Exercise is how you lose fat and water weight dummy
Throw on some sweats and go to wrestli practice

>>37029937
ROOND AND ROOLD

>>37031463
You're retarded. or pretending to be

An 800 pound man needs about 5560 calories to maintain weight.

If that person cut to 2500 calories, they would lose 381 pounds in 1 year, getting to 419 pounds without doing any exercise.

Light exercise (1-3x a week) would get them to 349lbs
Moderate exercise (3-5x a week) would get them to 289lbs
Daily exercise would get them to 236lbs

http://losertown.org/eats/cal.php

>>37031769
My math is off, I'll give you that. The point remains though. As you stop eating to gain weight and instead maintain weight, you will notice a large shift in how often and how many hunger pains you feel. Exercise would greatly help with that, combined with eating low-calorie foods. It's not as simple as "eating less", that's preposterous.

>>37031861
>exercise helps with hunger pains
lmao wat

exercise makes you feel hungrier

>>37030931
alright that was too much
lmaoooooooo hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahaha

>>37031893
I misspoke, my wording was unclear. Improving your metabolism with a healthy diet and exercise (among other things) will allow you to eat more, as your body expends energy quicker.

File: 1493683850102.png (74KB, 392x398px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 392x398px

>>37031111
>exercise is a shit way to lose weight though

>>37031968
but if you're a fat fuck it'd be easier to just eat less, exercising is a lot of work for obese people

plus exercising won't do as much for an obese person as it does for a person who is already fit. you're better off just eating less and getting down low enough where exercise is easier for you and more productive.

>>37030404

There are so many layers of humor in that video.

>"Safety first"
>Puts self at risk of heart disease and diabetes

>Anger towards a weight scale, a scientific instrument that exists only to give objective and unbiased information

>Claims that the scale controls her life when it's apparent to everyone that looks at her that food is actually what controls her life

>>37032006
Most people aren't fat enough for that to happen, without being middle aged or over. The average weight of an American male is around 200 or so pounds, which is doable in a workout environment.

File: obamacare.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

>>37031861
You mistake eat less calories with eat less. The shitty food (snacks, fast food, soda) is very calorie dense and doesn't fill you up.

1 pound of potato chips is about 2560 calories and has 0g of fiber
1 pound of broccoli has 154 calories and 12g of fiber

The broccoli, despite being the same mass, will fill you up more as fiber is a key factor in satiety.

>>37031111
>>37031969
>>37031229
Exercise is great but unrealistic for the super obese (over 400lbs). Better to concentrate on diet instead.

The 800lber from before would have to exercise for an hour or more a day to match the calories burned from eating at a 3500 calorie deficit (2000 calories/day).

I doubt any of them could maintain that level of activity.

File: marry me.jpg (130KB, 563x784px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 563x784px

>>37031463
hello from /fit/ let me tell you why you're wrong
this anon>>37031352 has the right idea
>>37031463
>lets say an average male needs 2500cal a day to maintain
>an obese person is consuming twice that
and that would make him NOT the average person, meaning that his maintenance is about 2500calories. if he is consuming 5000 calories a day, he is either A). gaining weight or B). that is his new maintenance

If he halves it down to 2500calories he is eating at a deficit because he is NOT the average male so his maintenance is NOT 2500 calories

diet > exercise in losing weight, restated that means not consuming the calories to begin with is better than consuming those calories and trying to burn them off

go lose some fucking weight fat ass

>>37031968
>muh metabolism
That is a meme. Unless you have some severe disorder, metabolism only accounts for a few hundred calorie difference between people. And usually it ranges from normal to higher metabolism, where people use excess energy due to various disorders such as hyperthyroidism.

>>37032104
I already admitted my math was wrong, because it was. I was using the math to make a point, by pointing out maintenance and how that factors into weight loss. Losing weight Can be accomplished by simply "eating less", but exercising and building a healthy foundation will, in the long run, help you lose weight faster than simply consuming less food.
>>37032092
No, >>37031111 this anon simply said "eating less" not consuming less calories. He made no distinction between the two.

File: 1443823503268.png (131KB, 400x346px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 400x346px

>Even this horrible retard fat woman have sex

>>37032177
i literally said:
>>37031352
>exercise can only make up for so much calorie loss, but taking 2 seconds to not eat something is ridiculously easy

>>37032177
Consider what is easier for an 800lb slob to do:

1) Exercise for 1 hour a day
2) Stop buying that 3rd daily bag of potato chips

#2 will obviously be easier.

>>37032177
>exercising and building a healthy foundation will, in the long run, help you lose weight faster than simply consuming less food
no thats wrong

its much easier to not eat the calories than it is to consume them and try to burn them off. exercise overall is a pretty inefficient way to burn off calories compared to eating less. thats why you eat at a deficit if you want to go on a cut

>>37032207
"eat less"
not
"Consume less calories"
To try and convey that message you should've said something along the lines of, "Exercise can only make up for so much calorie loss, but taking two seconds to eat something with few calories is ridiculously easy."
>>37032222
Fine then, a 300 pound man. That's 100 pounds over, not grossly obese, but still very much overweight. Are you saying an hour of exercise wouldn't do anything for him if he stuck to it, combined with simply not buying that third bag of potato chips?

>>37032260
i didn't say eat less in that sentence can you try rereading it pls
>>exercise can only make up for so much calorie loss, but taking 2 seconds to not eat something is ridiculously easy

>>37029791
>so overweight she has to kneel on a pillow to not hurt her knees

>>37032260
>combined with simply not buying that third bag of potato chips?
combined with eating less, he will lose weight, BECAUSE HE IS EATING LESS

he is consuming less + burning off calories

>>37032260
I was 300lbs at my heaviest.

An hour of exercise was HELL at that point. Especially when I first started, I could only do about 15 minutes of stationary bike riding.

Changing up what I ate was a hell of a lot easier.

Instead of eating that bag of potato chips (I could eat a family size 1lb bag in one sitting), I started buying fruit for snacks instead.

Instead of a small bowl of cereal and milk, which are generally ok for you but not filling, I switched to a cup of oats and a banana to make delicious oatmeal.

I'm down about 40lbs now and can do about 45 minutes of cardio, but it's still very taxing.

>>37032296
I'm advocating that physical fitness and exercise is just as important for losing weight as eating fewer calories is. I should've said, "Are you saying an hour of exercise wouldn't do anything for him if he stuck to it, combined with replacing his diet with, at the same volume, food that is less calorie-dense?"
>>37032325
I was nearly 300 pounds as well, I was roughly 280-290, and I found that exercise greatly helped me lose weight and get fit in the process. Simply losing the weight doesn't make you "healthy" just, "healthier". Maintaining an exercise regimen, even if you can do only the bare bones, is just as important to losing weight as eating less calorie dense foods.

>>37032360
>is just as important
its not

thats the crux of the problem

>>37032389
>no it's not
Yes it is.

Being healthy also requires a certain amount of exercise. Laying around all day and eating less won't make you healthy, you'll just reduce the probability of heart disease and diabetes and other weight-related problems.Exercise helps with that, and makes your body fit.

>>37032442
we're not talking about being healthy though, we're talking about weight loss

>>37032360
Then you must remember what it was like to do exercise at that weight. Nobody ITT is arguing that exercise isn't good for you.

At 300lbs, my maintenance consumption was about 2900 calories. You can easily cut down your calories by 1000/day to 1900, lose 2lbs/week and be at a healthy level in a year. This is without changing anything with your activity level.

If you kept your consumption level the same, you would have to do 1000 calories worth of exercise daily. That's about 1 hour of moderate effort cycling every day. If you're only able to do 15 minutes a day, like I was, you're only doing about 250 calories/day.

As the living meme Jordan Peterson would say, it's no joke to change fundamental parts of your life. You have to prioritize what you're going to focus on. If you try both diet and exercise but can't make it to the gym that day, it's really easy to fall back and fuck up your diet too.

Establish a good diet, then establish a good exercise routine. You'll be better off in the long run.

To summarize:
diet + exercise >> diet >>>> exercise

File: laughing.jpg (27KB, 399x385px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 399x385px

>>37032462
>actually believing exercise doesn't help you lose weight
Wew lad
>>37032497
Notice I've never prioritized one over the other, I made the claim that an exercise regimen would help you lose weight. And it would. And it does.

>>37032547
it helps you lose weight but if you're obese it's going to be easier to just eat less until you get low enough to exercise easier and then do both

telling obese people to exercise to lose weight just isn't going to work

>>37032547
You said
>I'm advocating that physical fitness and exercise is just as important for losing weight as eating fewer calories is.
It is neither as important or as effective.

You can exercise for 4 hours a day and be obese although you'd have to try pretty hard
You can't eat 1500 calories a day and be obese, assuming normal height

File: ycbkOXt.jpg (639KB, 1980x3116px) Image search: [Google]

639KB, 1980x3116px

Ima leave this here screenshot for the lulz cuz.

File: grinning.jpg (62KB, 640x633px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 640x633px

>>37032881
4chan, where we can yell at each other all we want, but at the end of the day we'll all band together to make fun of the fat nerds from Tumblr. Keep it classy, 4chan.

Is this an American thing or an internet thing? I don't think I've ever met someone like this in my life. I don't think I've ever even seen a fat person with dyed hair before.

File: 1DxCMWo.png (177KB, 971x757px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 971x757px

>>37029791
https://i.imgur.com/1DxCMWo.png

>>37031111
He's right though.
>t. inactive skeleton

>>37029937
>OMG this is better than sex
like any self respecting organism would want to be inside that animatronic walrus corps.

Why are women incapable of hitting things right? It's like they try to stop right before impact or something.

>>37032569
Everybody should exercise to become healthier. If you just starve yourself you might develop nutrient deficiencies.

>>37029937
>I DECIDE IF I'M GOOD OR BAD
um no you fucking don't what the hell

>>37035376
Who decides if not she.

>Be fat
>Living on uni campus, doing chemistry
>Making way to class, and a group of other fatties with dyed hair stop me and start shoving leaflets in my face
>Leaflet is all about fat awareness, and how they're hosting a seminar in the lecture hall about it later that week
>They keep telling me it would be great to see other 'people of size' who are 'happy and healthy at any weight' come to represent them

rrreee. I just want to go to class and then be left alone. I don't want to be harassed by liberal arts and English majors any more.