Why is polygamy illegal in civilised countries?

Fuck man idk, i'd tell you if i knew

because it's fucking immoral and would lead to unrest
/thread

Because lack of access to women for a significant number of men leads to a collapse a civilization. I'm sure we'll find out in a decade or so.

File: 1494625476247.jpg (25KB, 543x271px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 543x271px

Well, let's start with this. How does this picture make you feel?

In all of the polygamous mormon compounds in North America almost all of the men have no value outside of labor and will never marry a qt mormon chick.

Instead the young men are removed from the community or leave to strike out on their own and get married to have a decent life. These compounds and communities are microcosms of polygamous societies. The difference is polygamous regions or countries have no release valve to get rid of angry, horny and lonely young men like Mormons do by dumping them into mainstream society

>>36972218
Because they're civilised

>>36972218

>Why is polygamy illegal in civilised countries?

There is an important clue that helps answer your question in this sentence.

>>36972218
There are more men than women. It should be the other way arround: one woman and several guys

File: the new normal.jpg (154KB, 1280x496px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1280x496px

>>36972218
>>36972341

this is how it should be

originiggerbull

>>36972218
Christian morals that should stay in place, polygamy is society shattering in practice, legalizing and normalizing it would amplify all tfwnogf struggles tenfold.

>>36972341
Nice, the only correct way if you look at population statistics.

>>36972625
woman have to look out for genetic diversity and shouldn't have more than one child with the same genetic ressoucegiver.

>>36972680
Except 2 people could have 100 million babies and statistically none of them would be identical, aside from twins, meaning there's a shitload of diversity in just a monogamous relationship. This is also why sibling fucking isn't as dangerous as people make out.

>>36972218
It's not. You mean polygamist marriage. Polygamy itself is not illegal. You're completely free to have a relationship with as many people as you please. You're not allowed to legally bind yourself to more than one.

>>36972341
lots of killing

>>36972875
found the bitter khv
don't worry anon: you will be a wizard soon

>>36972735
>t. siscon

>>36972587
Isn't this actually the current trend?

>>36972341
This is where we're actually at and it fills me with rage

File: 1494030788716.jpg (122KB, 1278x1181px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1278x1181px

>>36972218
>>36972341
>1 man could impregnate 4 women at once
>1 woman can only get impregnated by one guy at a time

File: 1273107861039.jpg (51KB, 411x331px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 411x331px

>the 80-20 rule would be 1-99
>all women would literally have no reason not to flock to chad and his harems
>the majority of society would conform with sexbots and VR
>all those faggot youtubers and celebrities would have 10-30 wives or whatever they can afford to sustain