*penis noises*

thank god i was circumcised. that looks like a pig that's beheaded by isis

>>36714404
>*penis noises*
what are these

>>36714689
lmao virgin and a roastie

File: Amys-New-Boyfriend-Really-Likes-Sheldon-on-The-Big-Bang-Theory-RECAP-0001.jpg (39KB, 630x420px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 630x420px

lt's afraid.

>>36714520
>thank God I had part of my cock chopped off I'm so glad my dick is dry and has reduced sensitivity.

>>36714689
Probably something like
>squeeeeeeeeee!

>>36714404
Hey OP, I didn't know you're a fan of Star Troopers.

File: tumblr_m3aprjlhyB1ruefito1_1280.png (94KB, 585x278px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 585x278px

>>36714404
2-2 holes??

>>36714689
Ever seen the movie Tremors?

File: It's afraid.webm (2MB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x960px

>>36714708
>lt's afraid.
>>36714749

blox

File: tumblr_lb17qgnlPz1qcvv7qo1_500 (1).jpg (48KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x375px

>>36714708
STOP POSTING THIS IMAGE FAGGOT

looks like some damn hydralisks about to pop out this bitch

File: b1493104024663.jpg (23KB, 630x360px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 630x360px

>>36714814
>STOP POSTING THIS IMAGE FAGGOT
Why?

I really want to suck a nice slimy uncut cock

>>36715012
>I really want to suck a nice slimy uncut cock
BRISBANE

>>36714916
boogeydeewoogeydeewoo

File: 1451882775829.jpg (11KB, 249x249px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 249x249px

>tfw no uncut bf that isn't fat to give a blowjob to and then cuddle with afterwards
reee etc

>>36715025
>tfw all the qld anons are from brisbane
>tfw none ever in the darling downs etc.

>>36715129
move in with me babe

File: 78977550e9d2d2e67a779b8cb1934dcc.jpg (51KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 540x720px

>>36714916
It's not original enough and the show is cringe.

File: 1493664038971.jpg (109KB, 515x728px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 515x728px

>>36715150
b-but i don't even know you
plus i'm not bf material i just wanna be used as a cocksleeve

>>36714712
>dry
Prevents infection from liquid-based pathogens.
>reduced sensitivity
Last longer in bed.

>>36715183
BBT is the ultimate comfort television, I like it and you can't stop me from shitposting REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

This is why I only date cut, or convince bf's to get cut, and leave unless they do. It just looks ugly.

File: pls dont cut me.jpg (173KB, 734x979px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 734x979px

>>36715214
thats kinda lewd anon
once your bf gets cut do you dump them to find another uncut boy to cut?

>>36715198
>Prevents infection from liquid-based pathogens.
Condoms.
>Last longer in bed.
Something circumcised men tell themselves to feel better about their situation. It has been quantitatively determined that uncircumcised men feel much more pleasure.

File: 1477098572129.jpg (271KB, 1869x957px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1869x957px

>>36715214
here's your (you)

unsurprisingly unoriginal

>>36715214
>getting a circumcision as an adult
That's just a bad idea waiting to happen.

>>36714697
virgin?? roastie?? pick one

>>36715255
>Condoms
Not going to help with bacteria and sweet accumulating within the folds. Example: smegma.
>It has been quantitatively determined that uncircumcised men feel much more pleasure.
Because they're more sensitive, and are likely not going to last as long. Having a desensitised penis means more time and effort is required to achieve orgasm.

File: 1489603291856.jpg (451KB, 1918x1440px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 1918x1440px

*vagina noises*

File: 1490632059091.png (81KB, 213x241px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 213x241px

>>36715303
It's better for the girl but not the guy. The guy will last longer because he can feel less and is getting less pleasure. What do you not understand about this?

>>36715340
His ability to last longer is a benefit. Any type of sexual activity and orgasm that comes easily are nothing but disappointing.

>>36715340
Why you want to last only a few minutes in bed is just beyond me.

>>36715303
>>36715358
>less pleasure is actually better!

File: 1445137393442.jpg (17KB, 216x251px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 216x251px

>>36715303
>Example: smegma.
Takes literally 10 seconds or less to pull back the foreskin and clean it in the shower daily.
>Having a desensitised penis means more time and effort is required to achieve orgasm.
Therefore less enjoyable. If you know what you're doing, and you're a straight or bi guy, you can get a woman to climax by other means than your penis. Less pleasure means less incentive.
>mfw your argument is literally that feeling less pleasure is better

>>36715374
t. roastie

If i'm fucking a girl I don't give a fuck if I didn't last long enough for her. What makes you think I would care about how a woman feels?

File: K9bam_s-200x150.gif (547KB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 200x150px

>>36715304
Oh... oh god. Oh god whatthefuckishappeninghere

>>36715304
is her vag disintegration

>>36715340

>It's better for the girl but not the guy.

It's actually worse for both.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947

Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark.

>Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male circumcision is more common is warranted.

>>36715431
also causes dryness and problems in the vag for women

>>36715407
>Takes literally 10 seconds or less to pull back the foreskin and clean it in the shower daily.
You're still at risk for some kind of bacterial infection that even proper hygiene might not be able to prevent. Regardless of how it was transmitted in the first place.

>Therefore less enjoyable.
Subjective and individual-dependent.

>>36715412
If you're bigoted, maybe.

File: 8IB2T.png (589KB, 4000x3262px) Image search: [Google]

589KB, 4000x3262px

>>36715407
i'm cut and sex still feels really enjoyable. not sure where you're getting the idea it's inferior. :/

File: 6443.png (284KB, 479x483px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 479x483px

>>36715374

Because this obsession with "lasting longer" is a meme that turns sex into a chore for the male and removes the romance and mutual understanding of each other's natural bodies.

Of course beyond that, women with circumcised partners are more likely to experience frequent pain during sex and frequent difficulty achieving orgasm during sex compared to women whose partners are intact.

see >>36715431

You're clutching at straws to defend a psychotic blood sacrifice ritual that is forced onto children without their consent.

File: fuckjews.png (66KB, 616x596px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 616x596px

>>36715459
esdrftgyhujikol

>>36715482
>You're clutching at straws to defend a psychotic blood sacrifice ritual that is forced onto children without their consent.
Ethnocentrism.

File: 4543.jpg (39KB, 658x417px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 658x417px

>>36715473

Many mutilated women say the same thing. Most of them lack a point of comparison.

On top of that "circumcision" isn't even a standardized operation, so one guy's cut could be much more severe than the next guy's.

>>36715459
>0.1% chance to get a infection that can be easily treated
>lol no ima just cut my skin off
fucking brilliant plan anon

>>36715459
loook man im a robot so my hygiene isnt too good and ive still not had one of these bacterial infections u speak of fact is its straight up worse.

File: shopeddingus.jpg (389KB, 862x1388px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 862x1388px

>>36714520
>he doesn't know it pulls back naturally when erect

youngfags with mutilated genitals baka

>>36715502
>On top of that "circumcision" isn't even a standardized operation, so one guy's cut could be much more severe than the next guy's.
You generally risk stuff like that every time you go to the doctor. Be given meds you probably don't need, risk of complications in surgery, procedures that might make your sick condition worse, etc. Not all doctors are created equally.

>>36715511
And I've never had any problems or issues with my circumcised person. The same cannot be said for others. And assertion of such is simply anecdotal and fallacious.

File: 5675465.png (16KB, 499x300px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 499x300px

>>36715521

I'm not talking about the skill of the doctor. I'm talking about the fact that there is no standardized procedure called "circumcision".

A cut penis can be minimally circumcised, radically circumcised, and anything in-between.

File: 1491661006716.jpg (100KB, 500x619px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 500x619px

All these virgins who got their dick chopped up at birth are still trying to convince everyone it's a good thing. Look dude I'm sorry the jews tricked your parents into cutting your dick up but there's nothing we can do about it now.

Do you bathe? no smeg
Have you had sex enough to know how to hold back from cumming? congrats you can skip the chopping your dick head up for "endurance"

>>36715543
There's hardly any standardised procedures of many medical treatments BECAUSE the skill of the medical worker is going to be different. That is not exclusive to circumsory practises.

As someone who got circumcised later on in life I can say for sure that being uncut is better desu
Jerking off has become harder and I feel less than before, dick looks a lot more dry too
There's absolutely no benefit to getting cut and I hate that I had no choice

>>36715589
no its not about skill
there is like 20 different ways to cut the dick and another 20 different loose/tight variations of each

>>36715589

There's no evidence that circumcisions performed by more experienced/skilled surgeons remove less erogenous tissue than those performed by less experienced/skilled surgeons.

I'm considering cutting of my nose to stop from getting boogers. I hear I'll also be able to avoid smelling bad smells too so I can last longer when I'm eating shit out of jewish assholes. They told me the nose is useless anyway, I don't know why I didn't do this sooner. Will probably have it done to my kids at birth. Why should they get a choice am i right haha lmao

>>36715604
And the skill of whoever is performing the procedure is what makes the difference.

>>36715595
Dude, don't get circumcised as an adult. That just adds to the risk. :(

File: 3432.png (431KB, 800x1004px) Image search: [Google]

431KB, 800x1004px

>>36715604

Yep.

This chart shows only SOME of the forms of male circumcision. There are others.

>>36715619
Silence fallacy.

Boriginal.

>>36715632
no
you idiot
the skill doesn't mean jack shit most of them are done with clamps now anyway

the difference between a loose circumcision and a tight one is huge and the difference between what part of the skin removed the inner or the outer or both in the worst cases is the difference

some people have all the skin removed and the shaft is just stapled to the glans, and those ones are horrendous
just cause yours is loose doesn't mean everyone else's is

File: extra low and tight.png (354KB, 494x310px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 494x310px

>>36715632

>And the skill of whoever is performing the procedure is what makes the difference.

No. You don't understand.

Here. This is an example of an extremely radical circumcision.

This type of circumcision must be performed "freehand" rather than with a clamping tool. It is HARDER to do than many other forms of circumcision and it is almost exclusively performed by specially trained urologists.

And yet, this harder-to-perform circumcision variation removes MORE erogenous tissue than many types which are easier to perform.

File: 12074787_173697132968145_3312035185654523742_n.jpg (101KB, 960x518px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 960x518px

pic related.

circ'd dicks are gross.

-women everywhere

>>36715676
The skill is one of the most important aspects of any medical procedure because it can just as easily make things worse if the doctor isn't any good at their job.

>>36715690
skill just means they can remove more of the pleasurable tissue
thats it

at the end of the day it depends what type of cut you get >>36715640

>>36714689
Pppssssssssssssssss

And uhh... flap flap flap

Can you fags ever have a dick appreciation thread without it deteriorating into cut/uncut shitposting?

>>36715690

No one is disputing that.

The point is that there are different types of circumcision to begin with, and these variations remove DIFFERENT STRUCTURES AND AMOUNTS of penile tissue.

Many surgeons can perform more than one type of circumcision.

If the person wanting a circumcision is an adult, they can choose what "style" they want by specification.

Some circumcision fetishists, for example, ask the surgeon for a more radical styles because they want to lose as much erogenous tissue as possible.

Post more uncut cocks

>>36715198
>amputees leg
>no leg diseases
>less things to clean
>less weight can do more pull ups
Why haven't you amputated you leg if there are no cons?

File: dcb33e204aa8d76b5bf0f6ecc142a022.png (231KB, 643x837px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 643x837px

Reminder that cut boys and uncut boys are made for each other desu.

>>36715676

>the difference between a loose circumcision and a tight one is huge and the difference between what part of the skin removed the inner or the outer or both in the worst cases is the difference

There's also the question of whether the frenulum gets removed completely or is partially preserved (it isn't possible to perform anything other than perhaps the absolute most minimal circumcision without at least partially ablating the frenulum).

>>36715812
funny. we used to amputate limbs to prevent infection to the rest of the body until medical technology finally caught up. we still amputate limbs for severe conditions to this day.

>>36715835

>we used to amputate limbs to prevent infection to the rest of the body until medical technology finally caught up.

I'd be interested in seeing a source on that. If I recall correctly in the old days, amputation was generally done as a treatment for injuries. Mortality was around 50%, largely due to infection occurring AFTER the amputation.

Germ theory wasn't well understood back in the day and remained controversial until the end of the Victorian Era.

>we still amputate limbs for severe conditions to this day.

As an absolute last resort.

>>36715835
Yes that is true, we still do it in some cases only after someone is already ill but no one in history advocate for amputation to prevent illness.

>>36715473
Unless you were circumcised after you were old enough to have sex, you can't compare the pleasure you feel to what it would be like if you were uncut, so your point is moot.