For ten years, there have been several /b/ threads where people

>>36683909
>tfw missed the hrt window
>tfw too big and hairy to become boiwife
>tfw will spend the rest of my time alone
>tfw no boiwife to cuddle and ____fuck____

>>36683909
You don't understand 4chan. The popular myth is that everyone on 4chan uses every board, and that (for example) the Anon who posts about games on /v/ posts about anime on /a/. Nothing could be further from the truth.

In reality, people are eager to differentiate themselves and scapegoat others, which means that boards' populations rapidly grow to despise each other. This means that, rather than posting about video games on /v/, the regular /a/ user will either post about them on a third-party site with no reputation on his home board, attempt to post about them on /a/, or not post about them at all. The nature of belonging is such that he'd rather remain silent than post on the board of his hated rival.

What this has to do with trap threads is that every board has had its own, slightly unique variant of 4chan gayness. At some point, the management decided this was unacceptable, and ever since then, they've been trying to herd a bunch of people with distinct backgrounds and preferences into one holding pen or another. The reason you see a lot of these threads is that /r9k/ is being forced to absorb posters displaced by administrative fiat from /a/, /v/, possibly /fit/, and other boards as well. The reason you see them HERE is that /r9k/ is a more-or-less "safe" board, with none of the reputation of /b/. The entire thing is down to administrative edicts interfering with board ecosystems.

There's no fix. Allowing them back into their homes is a non-starter, because shitposters will use their return as an excuse to misbehave. Trying to send them to /b/ is pointless, because "go to /b/" is just an insult. Banning them will just create a steadily-growing clique of embittered shitposters, upset that 4chan was suddenly and unfairly pulled out from under them.

Well said, OP. I think it would be 100% reasonable to ban trap threads from the entire site except the LBGT board

>>36683909
Subtle trap thread. I like it, OP.

Well said, >>36684038. More intervention will only lead to more chaos and shitposting.

File: qt.gif (2MB, 357x357px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 357x357px

>>36683909
this is now a trap thread
originally abusing spoiler text~

File: GUN.png (548KB, 715x538px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 715x538px

>>36683909
pfft, you guys can just sit and post with words. some of us are actually angry enough at this play-pretend bullshit to go out and do something about it.

protip: most trannies don't get reported missing by their families.

File: 1492540307890.jpg (520KB, 1728x1296px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 1728x1296px

>>36683909
don't you want to fug her cute boipucci~ teehee

Ugh, stop reminding me that I want to go to my local anime convention next month and try to hook up with random anons so I can get spitroasted. I'd take their cocks in my dirty mouth and boipussy and make sure to milk all the cum from their cute cocks. I can't believe you OP.

File: mylittlepoopy.png (587KB, 707x975px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 707x975px

>>36684038
>Banning them will just create a steadily-growing clique of embittered shitposters, upset that 4chan was suddenly and unfairly pulled out from under them.

>tfw no daddy will clop n plop w/me

File: 1490785659577.gif (2MB, 312x252px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 312x252px

>>36683909
look at this delicious cock, anon

Trap threads exist here because there isn't a dedicated 3D born for NSFW images of traps and trannies, and until one is made there will always be trap threads on /b/ and /r9k/. People go to /b/ to harvest images, people go here for discussion on top of that.

>trap threads are not successful because most people like traps threads, they're successful because you don't need that many dedicated posters to camwhore or dump images
A thread is not successful because it has a high number of posters. It's successful if it stays up, that's it. Who are you to say that because only a small number of people enjoy something they shouldn't be allowed to post it or discuss it?

No matter how you try to spin it it's simply a case of "stop liking what I don't like". Threads that have nothing to do with traps don't get infested with traps. There's never too many trap threads on /r9k/. Just hide what you don't want to see.

>>36684038
>Banning them will just create a steadily-growing clique of embittered shitposters, upset that 4chan was suddenly and unfairly pulled out from under them.
Then keep banning them. Give them a containment board (because they're too picky to use 8ch or /b/), make /lgbt/ NSFW. The problem with trap posting is that it's cancer no matter where it is. It strangles out good content, it infects decent threads with camwhoring, it corrodes brotherhood and turns boards into dating sites. It's garbage that gives teenagers autogynephilia. When some faggot here tells robots to become a "cute girl", they may be genuinely harming people so they can get off. It's retarded to make a fetish go viral when taking it seriously has a 25% suicide rate.

Naruto fans do not deserve to post on /g/ because they cannot post on /a/. Obviously people do not want to use /b/, but they can, and they can also use 8ch /cuteboys/. /mlp/ was successfully quarantined, you could do the same for traps.

>>36684186
Competent intervention would solve the problem.

File: 1488898902132.jpg (158KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1280x720px

>>36683909
look at those smooth legs, i bet you wouldn't even know she had a feminine penis until you took off her cute little shorts~

>>36684292
Buddy....take your meds....

File: 1489166046332.jpg (2MB, 2223x3952px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2223x3952px

>>36683909
ejudirsjdihsfu

>>36684376
I have yet to see an example of good content being "strangled out". I make plenty of high-effort threads, get no replies, and yet I'm supposed to find fault with the people who DO get them?

What you're proposing is, more or less, (you)-Communism. You see other threads that are more successful than your own, so you advocate for centralized posting control, because obviously dumb /r9k/ proles are too stupid to know what to do with their own time. You say that this will bring us a utopia of wonderful posts, but those wonderful posts have to be made with someone's effort, and punishing everyone for posting things you don't like won't elicit that effort.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxIbq7HkalQ

File: redditmod.png (254KB, 749x429px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 749x429px

>>36684424
>meds
>defending mentally ill trannies
I'd tell you to kill yourself, but since you're a) too pussy to do it and b) provoking other people into wanting to kill you for being a nasty faggot, it looks like you've got that covered.

And if you don't get murdered, well...have fun turning 40 and looking/smelling like an old man. Fucking nasty retarded faggot.

>>36684350
>>36684317
>>36684228
Fuck me man.

>>36683909
This is also very hot. Tomboys are fucking great.

>>36684376
If anyone here is seriously influenced by the posts that are made then I don't think there was anything that could realistically save them. People can't be saved by censoring media or discussion.

>>36684374
>Who are you to say that because only a small number of people enjoy something they shouldn't be allowed to post it or discuss it?
Moderation exists to protect communities. A subreddit could take up shop here and post thirty threads of interracial pornography all the time, and the posters in those threads could really enjoy it. The original users of the board would each be incapable of doing anything about the porn other than reporting and ignoring it. In such a situation, mod intervention is warranted.

Same here, especially because traps drag cancer into other threads.

>>36684411
>~
Garbage.

>>36684458
You're intelligent.

Most people on /r9k/ are dumb and post casually. They don't reward effort and reply to things in fits of idiotic rage or to satisfy their urge to find porn. They come and go frequently enough that the same bait can get replies for months. /r9k/ without traps would still be bad, but it would be better.

I also think this stuff is unusually harmful. A lot of people clearly post it with brazen intent to manipulate people into transitioning.

>>36684535
>People can't be saved by censoring media or discussion.
Completely baseless assertion. If people aren't exposed to traps they won't develop feminization fetishes so easily.

>>36684578
>A subreddit could take up shop here and post thirty threads of interracial pornography all the time
The mods would be doing their jobs removing those threads because there is already a board for hardcore pornography.

There isn't a trap or tranny NSFW board, so any threads on that topic automatically default to /b/ and /r9k/

>>36684578
If I'm intelligent, why aren't you listening to my points? Do you really think you can just somehow centrally allocate replies such that only the most edifying and original threads (as determined by you, of course) get them?

I see you're pro-censorship. Perhaps you should learn to respect the board market instead.

>>36684578
>If people aren't exposed to traps they won't develop feminization fetishes so easily.
Before the internet was even in my house I dressed up in my mom's clothes for fun. I saw commercials for dolls aimed at girls and I wanted them. You can't save people by censoring media.

File: 1493604755716-k.jpg (701KB, 897x1842px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 897x1842px

good post OP but i havent seen a trap thread in days and ive seen roastie femanon threads frontpage every time i come here for weeks

roasties and their orbiters are destroying this board faster than any boipucciposters ever could

pic unrelated

>>36684706
>good post
It's really not. He redefines "OC" to suit himself, justifies himself with a majority that doesn't exist and wouldn't matter if it did (we're not Reddit), puts himself in the passive voice ('are annoying' as opposed to 'annoying me'), tries to foment panic against an imaginary enemy, and so on. It's just drum-banging.

>>36684648
>Do you really think you can just somehow centrally allocate replies such that only the most edifying and original threads (as determined by you, of course) get them?
No, I don't. You can at least get rid of blatant cancer, though.

>Perhaps you should learn to respect the board market instead.
Is /b/ better now than it was? Any fast 4chan board goes to absolute shit without moderator intervention.

>>36684654
You are not all trans people. If you really think the trannies who post on /r/sissyhypno were born with body dysmorphic disorder, and fetishes they developed had nothing to do with their transitioning, you're an idiot.

>>36684614
>There isn't a trap or tranny NSFW board
I agree that there ought to be, and it ought to be banned everywhere else. You can use /cuteboys/ or /b/ though. Even if you couldn't, 4chan does not have to host every type of content that exists. You cannot really post scat anywhere without getting banned, that does not mean there should be a scat board.

>>36684813
This isn't cancer. This board is not your body. We are not your cells. You're requesting that a bunch of posters be removed to satisfy your personal opinions. Why do you think you matter more than they do?

>>36684458
>You came down to this cast-off board last summer
>To show the folks a brand new way of life
>But all you've shown the 'bots 'round here is trouble
>And you've only parted them from their boiwives
>Your concern is not to help the posters
>And I'll say again, though it's been often said
>Your concern is just to bring discomfort, my friend
>And your policy is just a little red
>Now, ain't I right (ain't he right)
>(ain't he right)
>It matters not to you how robots suffer
>And should they, you'd consider that a gain
>You bring a lot of trouble to the board and then you leave
>That's part of your Communistic game
>I detect a little Communism
>I can see it in the things ya do
>Communism, socialism call it what you like
>There's very little difference in the two

>>36684782
Trap threads are almost all /soc/ content (hook ups, online friend gathering, and camwhoring) and porn dumps. That's cancer.

I'm fine with porn threads when some creativity goes into them, like if people are writing a lot or drawfagging, but trap threads are not such things. They're an unproductive, uncreative outlet for loneliness and libido. You can defend them about as much as you can defend fap roulettes. The fact that you're invoking unbridgeable subjectivity here is telling, because it's the only way you can defend what you spend your time on.

>>36684890
It is cancer. Cancer is something that spreads despite being low quality.

>Why do you think you matter more than they do?
I'm trying to convince them.

>>36684959
If people posted threads about video games here, would you demand they go to /v/? Of course not.

>I'm fine with porn threads when some creativity goes into them, like if people are writing a lot or drawfagging
In other words, you're fine with threads as long as people are working very hard, for free, in order to amuse you and boost the site's Alexa rank. But, if they actually want to do something for themselves, then they need to be broken up and made to leave.
>They're an unproductive, uncreative outlet for loneliness and libido.
And feel threads are an unproductive, uncreative outlet for loneliness, libido, and depression, but they're fine, because you like them.

>>36685060
>feel threads are an unproductive, uncreative outlet
Not true. Personal stories are varied and interesting, leg pics are not.

>in order to amuse you and boost the site's Alexa rank
Quality posts are a public good. Pretty much everybody other than attention whores gets more out of lurking a board where people put in effort and say/create interesting things than a board loaded with repetitive pornography and people begging each other for location.

Anyways, surely you don't believe this on principle? /b/ would be better if roulettes were banned, right?

Post frequency is not post quality, threads inviting one word posts can smother threads inviting real discussion or effortposts. That makes the board worse for everybody, or at least everybody who actually cares about the board they're browsing.

>If people posted threads about video games here, would you demand they go to /v/? Of course not.
Video game discussion is not cancer, trap threads almost always are.

I'm tired. If this thread is up tomorrow I'll respond to you, otherwise I'll read what you write in the archive.

File: 1493192128583.jpg (384KB, 920x968px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 920x968px

This is a pretty roundabout way to start a trap thread, as far as these things go, but to each his own.

>>36685242
You're attempting to substitute the board (the people who post what they want and enjoy each others' company) for the Board (an abstraction that requires everyone tie themselves in knots). You want people to stop posting threads they enjoy so that... They can post threads they enjoy?

Moreover, you don't understand the nature of work. You think that banning trap threads will somehow create a vacuum into which unrenumerated posting labor must inevitably flow. It doesn't work like that.

Then you use "cancer", which makes it sound like you have final authority over what the "body" of /r9k/ is, when in fact all you have is opinions.

>>36683909
If porn is such a problem why not just make this a blue board?

>>36685502
because [vip] already exists

File: 1469184812339.jpg (31KB, 427x565px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 427x565px

>>36683909
Nah fuck off, if we're banning trap threads then set down some real rules and ban normalfags/nonvirgins as well, there's nothing that says traps can't post here besides board norms which are shit to begin with considering how often they're ignored for normalfag threads anyway

>>36683909
You really think traps are the problem here? This board has been infested with normalfags for years. They've gotten even worse since /pol/ spread their meme magic shit everywhere during the US election. I've seen people talk about 3D girlfriends even on fucking /a/ without being censured lately. Tranny /soc/-tier shit is kind of cancerous, but at least trap posters might do a better job scaring off normalfags who think they're weird because they're a 22-year-old virgin who likes Current 93.

>>36685662
it's not cancerous
people have been playing pretend here for close to a decade
just because you suddenly want 4chan to be a classy joint doesn't mean we weren't started by otaku, loons, and pervs

>>36685683
I'm not interested in anything classy, I'm a NEET who reads shitty Japanese porn games. But anything involving the word 'Discord' or 'kik' is normalfag garbage.

>>36685830
Discord is basically just modern IRC. To call it "normalfag garbage" is to be blind to what it's actually like.

File: d5fb140a44fa705a8313d1d27fd3f2c6.jpg (2MB, 1457x2063px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1457x2063px

Everyone comes here because there is no proper place for NSFW trap images. This could have been fixed with /lgbt/, but they made it SFW for no fucking reason. I don't go to /b/ because nobody wants to go to /b/.

>>36685463
Good taste, love that artist.

also trapposting isn't even fucking related to trannies
sure, some fembois might take mones to help with their looks, but really, it's just an offshoot genre of yaoi
it's like yaoi cosplay, basically
if anything it belongs in /cgl/

File: 1492370435770.jpg (84KB, 413x464px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 413x464px

I want you to make me love cock, Anon-kun.

>>36685894
of course, /cgl/ are emotionally abusive harpy faggots who'd get off on ruining cute boys' self esteem, so really that's a terrible idea and I shouldn't have said anything

>>36685869
>IRC
Yeah, I never used that either, figures. Sasuga blogposting board.

>>36685925
were you ever on gezou

>when you realize that getting people to take HRT has no real effect but encouraging them to continue posting on 4chan is basically ruining their lives forever

>>36685463
Source on that image?
I know of the character just not the name

File: sniff sniff.jpg (110KB, 700x678px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 700x678px

>starting to like the smell of cocks
pleh dnes

>>36685463
Sauce please

Do not read this