Am I racist if I find lighter skin more attractive?

Obviously no.

Next question.

>>36629223
Is Katya the most beautiful woman in the world?

nope. I only find white and tanned olive skinned girls attactive.

>>36629205
No, but I guess it's considered racist to say it.

>>36629235
Probably not, not for my taste at least. She is beautiful, though.

File: IMG_0872.jpg (79KB, 598x600px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 598x600px

>>36629205
It's but a matter of preference. You're not racist for having that.

>>36629205
no ya dingus

Only if your a shitskin

File: faceappbias.jpg (212KB, 738x369px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 738x369px

>>36629205
Yes, FaceApp has to modify their algorithms for this reason or face consequences by BLM activist.

https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/25/faceapp-apologises-for-building-a-racist-ai/

>>36629205
No, and anybody who says otherwise is just a jealous sack of shit hoping to make themselves feel better.

I personally like girls with really light porcelain skin or really dark chocolate skin, but the muddy brown in-between does nothing for me.

>>36629205
It's sad that the bar is so low these days but I'm cool with anyone who dosen't advocate for genocide or mass deportation.

>>36629205
no - you're a skincist

>>36629205
Pale skin is a feminine trait, so no. People with higher estrogen levels have paler skin than those with higher testosterone levels (assuming similar race).

>>36630818
>People with higher estrogen levels have paler skin than those with higher testosterone levels (assuming similar race).
I just looked it up and it turns out it is the exact opposite of what you claim. Higher estrogen leads to more melanin being produced.

>>36630890
I trust you, but just intuitively that doesn't make a lot of sense, women generally have fairer skin than men

>>36630913
It seems they do, but it is unrelated to estrogen.

>>36629205
No.
You just have a preference.
If you'd said "Am I racist if I HATE darker skin"... yes, racist.