Anyone tried compensated companionship? pic related Invisible

I have done the real thing aka sugar dating. I have paid girls to be my part time gfs (sugar babies).

>>36488388
How rich do you need to be to do that?

>>36488316
>compensated companionship
You mean marriage?
Stop over valuing women. All your doing is preventing this bubble from popping with shit like this. Just buy a wife from a third world country.

>>36488395
You need to have enough disposable income for it, really depends on where you are and how much you are willing to put into it. As an example, I make six figures. I just finished a weekend date with one of my sugar babies, typically I give her 500 per meet, but actually more money goes to flights, hotels, restaurants, shopping.

sorry but I'm too grounded in reality to live a lie

>>36488503
>more money goes to flights, hotels, restaurants, shopping


So basically it's the same price of having an actual gf

>>36488528
You're not wrong. I actually prefer sugar dating vs having a normal gf. It's a bit more expensive but not impossibly so. The best thing is that it comes without all the lies and drama and other relationship bullshit. The worst is that she's not as constantly available as a normal gf.

File: 16298514_1830216257238400_1789425795469241658_n.png (189KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 480x480px

>>36488593
>prefer sugar dating

>waste money
>none of them even like you
>it's literally not a relationship

>>36488666
That's some Satan grade bullshit.

>waste money
How is spending money on nice trips and restaurants wasting it? I can afford it.

>none of them even like you
All of them do. Otherwise they wouldn't spend time with me and spread their legs for me.

>it's literally not a relationship
It literally is. Just not a conventional one.

>>36488707
Anon, stop denying the fact that you're paying desperate women to date you. That is the lowest of the low. Honestly you'd be more of a man if you just fucked a prostitute.

File: 028784845895.gif (518KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

518KB, 480x270px

>>36488707
>All of them do. Otherwise they wouldn't spend time with me and spread their legs for me.
I know plenty of sugar babies who arent attracted to their sugar daddies and are only naturally in it for the money. Without the money involved there's no way they'd give these guys the time of day, especially the younger ones.

Older sugar daddies are more tolerable because usually they're great gentlemen and don't take up too much time in bed VS younger sugar daddies have piss-ant attitudes thinking their hot shit and then want to act like porn stars and generally have awful sex.

That said, I've had a sugar daddy before. Guy in his 60s, funniest person I've ever met. and it's only because of this I'll agree that some really do like their sugar daddies. I liked mine long enough to have for 3 years. I don't think anyone can top him so I dont think I'd sugar again. No point since most sugar daddies are trash and no amount of money would make me tolerate it

>>36488800
You met a gay man in his 60s? Those sure are rare.

>>36488762
They're not desperate, neither am I. I can get girls the normal way. I just like taking young girls on dates that no guy their age could afford. Why are you so bitter about this?

>>36488839
He wasn't gay anon, I'm not a guy. Although I'm sure in places like San Francisco finding old gay sugar daddies wouldnt be difficult

>>36488800
A lot of sugar daddies are trash but so are a lot of sugar babies. The one I just met again is a very nice girl, we have fun together. That I help her with her rent is just a bonus. I have also other sugar babies who don't even want any money. They are just happy with the experiences I can provide.

>>36488316
This would actually help you get laid. Women like experience and social proof. A fake Stacey gives both.