Obligatory daily political quiz

File: smallChart.png (25KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x275px

5 billion percent original comment

>>36485188
Jesus tittyfucking christ, the fact that 1/2 of these questions are even considered on the table for debate is the most depressing thing i've ever said.

>>36485507
What do you mean? The traditional half or the progressive half?

File: Screenshot_2017-04-23-08-30-40-225.jpg (128KB, 1078x637px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1078x637px

>>36485188
I keep getting fucking muted because my comment is not original or some shit reeeee

File: shit.png (25KB, 535x228px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 535x228px

>>36485188
most of these questions are stupid but...

>White men peddle hatred against Muslims as a way to distract women from the fact that they are oppressed.

lmao are some people really this unaware of their own interests?

File: Screenshot_20170423-023653~01.png (93KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 720x720px

>>36485188
Fuck, I'm more of a nu-male than I thought.

File: smallChart.png (24KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x275px

>>36485188
>tfw a tranny is this traditional

>>36485755
>>36485689
>>36485632
Figures that the most misogynist board would be this traditional.

File: 1474051966614.jpg (22KB, 540x300px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 540x300px

>>36485792
>using the word misogynist unironiclly

>>36485819
Well, it is a real word and is an accurate description of a board that has "women hate" threads regularly.

>>36485860
>talking women hate threads literally
you have to be over 18 to post here

>>36485885
Well, much of it is true. You can't deny that a large percentage of beta males that have no success with women end up resenting and hating women.

>>36485909
>board has 50 threads a day of people crying because they dont have a gf
>ERMAGURD THIS BURD H8S WOMN
neck yourself

>>36485909
No success with women because of inveterate traits like height and face, Chad can be a misanthrope and people turn the other cheek

>>36485188
I know for a fact you got this of /lgbt/ you fucking faggot

>>36485936
So you don't believe this board things women are trash (that they're still attracted to)? You can want a gf and still hate women. It just means you want the unicorn.

>>36485188
This isn't obligatory. Fuck you and your stupid thread, go away.

File: FEMINISM.png (27KB, 554x408px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 554x408px

Surprised at the 18% for Marxist feminism. Expected lower.

File: fs.png (31KB, 526x393px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 526x393px

Looks like I'm the biggest sjw in the thread so far.

File: based.png (28KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x275px

>>36486160
thou hast watched thy partner commit acts of adultery, and pleasured thyself to it

File: filthysjw.png (28KB, 601x405px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 601x405px

>>36486160
Sorry buddy, looks like I got you beat.

>>36485617
>>36485507

He probably means questions like

"There are two genders."

File: smallChart.png (24KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x275px

I got a good laugh from some of the questions.

>>36486208

Now you're just being a cuck.

File: 1421110409042.jpg (79KB, 720x704px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 720x704px

>79%
>51%
>21%
>22%
>18%
...
191% total

this quiz must have been made by some chick

File: feministideologytest.png (25KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x275px

>>36486208
>>36486160
Get rekt losers.
>I was really fucking surprised at this result.

File: smallChart.php?trad=95&lib=44&radic=13&marx=13&cult=13.png (23KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x275px

I'm not sure where I agree with the last three, possibly on porn being bad.

File: smallChart.php.png (25KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x275px

tfwnotapolfag

File: woah.png (30KB, 553x386px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 553x386px

I like how so many of us are secretly SJWs once you strip away the memes

File: Screenshot 2017-04-23 12-15-22.jpg (36KB, 529x382px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 529x382px

come at me bros
origame

File: IMG_1900.png (25KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x275px

>>36487645
At least I'm not this guy

>>36487900
ur worse

File: Screen shot 2017-04-23 at 12.23.57 PM.png (24KB, 531x292px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 531x292px

The most organic score.

File: Feminism test.png (33KB, 411x293px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 411x293px

These results are not a surprise to me. On the plus side I can move among the SJWs and say I'm a liberal feminist and I'll probably get through their castration checkpoints intact.

File: smallChart.php.png (24KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x275px

i'm gonna be honest, the definition of lib feminism on that page seemed pretty reasonable to me.
equality in rights, but not equality in outcomes.

>>36487955
liberals get bullet too

>>36487968
Read the definition. It's as >>36487956
says. Equality in rights but not outcomes makes total sense.

>>36487984
It's a meme. Radicals hate moderates even more than their opponents.

File: smallChart.php.png (25KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x275px

>>36487968
Lol get in the oven shitlords.

I'm pretty sure this has more to do with democratic socialist leanings than being an actual feminist. The "patriarchy" is a load of shit that distracts from class conflict.

File: smallChart.png (24KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x275px

I bet all you "marxist-feminist" fags said yes to all of the market-restriction / wage gap questions, didn't you?

>>36488110
desu my answers were mostly neutral because I don't have an opinion or know enough to form one
but I think neutral answers get averaged in as 50%s
so the only way to not be scored as one is to outright deny that it's the case

File: 5fem.png (30KB, 510x403px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 510x403px

Interesting. Transition to what?

>>36488024
That may be true but radicals can go fuck themselves. I'd sooner side with MRAs or whoever over radfems. At least one of those sides wouldn't see me castracted or put in a camp or whatever. When they make it adversarial rather than cooperative they force you to become an enemy or to act fiercely against your own best interests. In the latter case you would also only ever be met with contempt. Radfems need to go desu

>>36488160
Pretty sure it's referring to giving your benis the old snip

File: e9518f6bed7cf6f660379645cd4ed56c.png (69KB, 796x437px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 796x437px

anyone who gets anything above traditionalism should just end themselves.

>>36488200
And yet you're here. And the non traditionalist men are out there, fucking women.

>>36488200
What's so good about traditionalism? I really don't get it. I mean yeah, it worked in the past before all the technological advancements, but what does it accomplish now other than angry, resentful women and men working way too hard to earn a living in the current economic climate?

File: smallChart.php.png (25KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x275px

I am pretty balanced

>>36488229
Women are just as angry and resentful when given their freedumbs m8, just look at society today.

>>36488264
So where is the benefit in traditionalism? At least this way they earn money as well. Besides, it's not most women. It's a loud minority. Most people aren't bothered about anything political until it directly affects them.

>>36488229
its not about traditionalism being sooo good its about every other option being fucking retarded

>>36488285
The benefit of traditionalism is that it just werks.
Almost all other strands of feminism (bar equal rights) is fucked up and will lead to mass hysteria, calamities, cats living with dogs etc.

File: 1411484387830.png (609KB, 1808x3731px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 1808x3731px

>>36488229
we don't have traditionalism anymore since like 1920s or something

>>36488302
All you need to do is take a look at entrenched political and business elites.

>>36488300
It works for whom? The men? Certainly not for any woman wanting to do anything with her life aside from cleaning. We don't have a traditional society now, and although there is hysteria it's mostly about nuclear weapons and refugees.

File: Confusion.png (25KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x275px

After reading about I'm not sure why I have high marxist score, maybe I really am brainwashed.

>>36488332
women could still do what they wanted it was just harder for them, kind of like it was harder for men to become desperate housewives that only clean at home and tend to their families. gender roles are there for a reason.

File: ae.png (36KB, 594x397px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 594x397px

>>36485188
And yes, I'm somewhat of what americans would call, a 'commie'.

File: 1475777930293.png (25KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x275px

Its not that i hate women, i just think that traditional values work best for stability and happiness while maintaining healthy culture and identity. A perfect balance is struck with men being hands on and strong and women being supportive and motherly. People under this model are able to easily establish their identity and role in this world. I find this a big problem in the schools as well. Because we are treating boys and girls by the same standards, even though they arent the same, people are engaging in self-destructive behavior. Boys cant handle the rigid, test-by-test schooling that women thrive in and women have been given so much but with little cultural guidance thus leading to bad decisions.

>>36488360
What reason though? Given that society works well enough now, bar a lot of issues NOT to do with traditionalism, what do they accomplish?

>>36488332
women generally don't want to do something with their life aside from cleaning though. Throw in a little travelling and they'll be content.

File: 562.jpg (36KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 600x600px

>>36488378
Holy fuck, literally the worst scores out of anyone in the thread. Just end it my man.

>>36488378
Shocker, you don't hate women. Congrats. Now what are you doing on /r9k/?

>>36488423
>being leftwinged
>worst scores

baka

>>36488429
I'm lonely and I don't know what to do so I browse this site all day long.

>>36488417
Have you ever met women? All the women I know want jobs, or to be great artists or writers or sports people or whatever.

>>36488438
>I'm lonely and I don't know what to do so I browse this site all day long.
Aww. Do you have any social outlets that you can pursue? Clubs etc.?

>>36488450
I work in a studio that's almost all women. They have no passion for the work, they just do it to get paid. Women put more time into taking a selfie with their breakfast than on any kind of personal project, in my experience.

File: smallChart.png (24KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x275px

Mass Effect Andromeda is a good game... No one's ever said that before. Also, seriously that test is fun

Ah yes, my daily reminder that men are all misogynists at worst and view women as nothing but something to fuck and clean and have babies at best and that dating them is entirely a waste of time.

>>36488423
I don't think thats a man

>>36488513
cool, don't let the door hit your meatflaps on the way out.

Are you joking or have you never taken quizes like these before?
>>36486375

>>36488460
nope, I have one friend, and he is some kind of schizo, so I hardly ever hang with him.

>>36488538
Men are so contradictory. I don't get why you all want something you don't like or respect (a gf).

>>36488513
hey fuck off i'm kind of a good guy.

>>36488561
Probably because we're biologically hardwired to want women, but we logically see why they're shit. It's hard to fight instinct.

>>36488586
>guy
>good
No chance. I mean women suck too for the most part, but men are the worst.

>>36488597
but i'm actually a trap

>>36488561

I want a good woman, but I can't find a woman I respect.

>>36487844
not really, classic liberals have conservative leanings now because they left upped the anty for more crazy like they always do

>>36488513
How are you faggots buying into her/his obvious bait, Desu?

>>36488630
It's not bait if I honestly just want to argue about something, anything.

>>36488608
Ah, okay. That's slightly better.

File: 22.jpg (78KB, 522x347px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 522x347px

>>36485188
I think I judged fairly.
Some of these question just make me raise my hands and go "cmooon"

File: Screenshot_2017-04-23-14-08-56.png (334KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 1080x1920px

literally how the fuck does anyone score any different.

File: fuckingfeminism.png (143KB, 1072x672px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1072x672px

>>36485188
this is what happens when you define "liberal feminism" by what it pretends to represent and not what it actually represents

my view is that all humans (in america fuck yeah) should have the exact same rights and the responsibilities and risks that come alongside them

no rape culture or patriarchy or wage gap or any stupid shit like that

you are in charge of your own life and can do with it as you please, but you are absolutely pathetic if you blame your own failures, shortcomings, and misfortunes on anybody or anything but yourself

equality doesnt mean that everything is magically handed to you. employment quotas are retarded. you dont magically get a pay raise for your sex, you get paid based on the value of your work and competition in the field.

oh and it isnt the governments job to make your life easy and comfortable, government subsidized abortions are absolutely retarded but i fully support clinics that are purely privately funded

80% of the people who receive welfare shouldnt and are wasting money

>>36485188
so am I allowed to transition? I'm twelve by the way,'

File: 1462761243114.png (57KB, 800x750px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 800x750px

>>36489118
This man fucking gets it. A little low on the traditionalism and high on muh marxism for my tastes, but that's probably just because of the market questions or answering in the middle or whatever. Based.

>>36485885
... You guys were just memeing? FUCKING FAGGOTS THE LOT OF YOU KILL YOURSELF YOU SHIT

>>36489324
yeah im a bit confused by the marxist thing as well to be honest

the (relatively) low traditionalism is because i believe that different roles in society for men and women are unnecessary, even though most men and women fall into traditional roles and i am fine with this

most men and women fall into traditional roles by the time they hit 30, but a few dont and i feel it is important to consider these people in our legislation and such

File: IMG_20170423_144958.png (88KB, 825x653px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 825x653px

>>36485188
What the fuck is Marxist feminism?

File: IMG_4254.png (105KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1136x640px

What do we do now? Practice medicine?

>>36489538
"capitalism is patriarchy"

>>36489538
bourgeoisie=men
working class=wymyn

>>36489571
>>36489575
I denied muh wage gap and shit though. Shit-ass test.

File: myscoreorw.e.png (24KB, 559x330px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 559x330px

I'd like to know what the outcomes are of certain answers, because both traditionalists and radical feminists may want to ban pornography for example.

I fucking can't do this anymore what the fuck

how is fat acceptance even a fucking thing

>>36485188
Tanks mr cohen for the usual survey.

File: ss+(2017-04-23+at+10.00.45).png (11KB, 508x199px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 508x199px

>>36489697
picrel holy shit

File: feminism test.png (25KB, 523x337px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 523x337px

Get on my level, neckbeards.

>>36489538
Marxist feminism is a Marxist analysis of feminist issues.

It refers to Marxism as a sociological methodology rather than just another word for "communism". Though Marxist feminism and communism generally go hand in hand.

>>36489697
>how is fat acceptance even a fucking thing

Fat people get tons of shit for being fat. It's psychologically easier for them to go into denial than to accept that.

File: IMG_3677.png (25KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x275px

No real complaints desu

>tfw got 80% on liberal feminism
>marxist was bigger than traditionalism

C-can I still be a robot with these results? also I'm an INFP so it's not that far fetched that I don't get many points on traditionalism

>>36489949
True robots are unironic SJW's.

File: feminism.png (28KB, 532x403px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 532x403px

>>36485188
rather high marxism you got there op

>>36485188
Couldn't finish this test. Its very clear that I am 100% antifeminist and belive that women deserve no rights what so ever.

File: 20170423_082841.png (122KB, 1049x822px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1049x822px

>>36489983
See what I fucking mean? Why did I even bother?

File: feminismquiz.png (24KB, 545x305px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 545x305px

>>36485188
Here you go.
I'm sympathetic to feminism but I don't call myself a feminist as I haven't properly studied it

File: IMG_6460.png (144KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 640x1136px

Military question was not in depth enough I beleive women should have the same opportunities as men in the armed forces but should also be subject to the draft and should serve in segregated units

File: del.png (23KB, 584x299px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 584x299px

Funnily enough, I'm a literal Jewish Marxist communist but I really hate modern feminism (everything after the first wave was terrible, especially Marxist feminism, Marx would likely have a brain aneurysm if he saw that shit).

File: shut up cunt.png (23KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x275px

>>36490053

please tell me the trials of being a woman over being a man i would love to hear this riveting tale of estrogen

>>36490234
Rape culture is real,
1 in 5 women will get raped in their lifetime.
They have to deal with misogynistic dickweeds.

>>36490095

i don't believe they should, i believe even less in women being drafted, i don't think they belong in specialized units either because they simply cannot keep up physically with burly, testosterone breathing beasts and this is just a cruel and unfortunate reality about life

out of the very few women who do join the military, even fewer are physically able, and even fewer of those physically able can rise to the occasion of combat arms roles, and even fewer of those few can hack it in rangers or SOC

there's a few marines that browse this imageboard who can go into great depth the amount of bullshit you have tolerate when deployed with average american women

>>36490308
I understand and agree with your points but I do feel they shiuld not be excluded if they truly want to serve but that if you segregate them men dont have to put up with any bs or sexual tension

File: still need me a gf.jpg (30KB, 457x258px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 457x258px

>>36485188
i'm now accepting GF resumes
pls submit them in a reply to my post

>>36490287
don't argue with that guy
he probably follows cernovich on twitter with his anime avatar account

File: test.png (8KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 500x275px

who /thinks "SJW" memes are bullshit but is essentially a feminist/ here

File: d73d06e297a8d90ce7eb6a9312059ec6.jpg (75KB, 900x636px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 900x636px

>>36490308
i feel like if they want to apply to be a ranger or special forces or anything like that they can apply but still be put through the same test as men
if they can keep up throw them in the squad
if they can't then that's equality
what you're talking about is equity

the only hard part about equality nowadays is either we have to start treating other people shittier or we have to start treating some people better
and literally nobody can agree on who should be treated what way

>>36490544
Yes they most ceartainly should be held to the same standards as men

>>36490544
>nobody can agree on who should be treated what way
The left believes it decides who is privileged and whose rights need to be violated to achieve some perfect commie "equality of outcome" and anyone who disagrees is an evil bigot, their views are often based on very scant evidence and whipping up women's and minority's insecurities and getting them to intimidate peoplee, not facts and logic. They trip over themselves to make sure some rich girl can get into ivy league while ignoring the actual poorest in society. So definitely not the left which is obviously just brainwashed craziness and has nothing to do with ethics.

I used to think Ayn Rand was a joke but more and more I am beginning to see that she was right all along.

>>36490642
and people will say the same stuff about the right
i'm not here to argue about which one is right or wrong just that nobody can as a group decide what baseline we should start treating people equally

>>36490379

it doesn't work, i saw it myself, they get pregnant or some other shit or their bodies can't cope even with basic support unit style PT which is a joke compared to combat arms PT

when deployed, they have special needs, those special needs interfere with the mission and usually they are linked to:

A.) lack of hygiene in shitty environments
B.) lack of physical ability to do 12k and 18k marches humping a full combat load

their bodies can't do it, i knew a woman who could bench 250 and she snapped her fucking ankles just by skipping a beat into a ditch, it's just the way it is

i'm not even going to past the image about iraq where the men had to dig private quarters for female soldiers who needed 'private areas' for dressing that couldn't carry their own shit or be in the heat, as if men in 118 degrees fahrenheit would actually want to fuck some sandy ass sweaty pussy when they barely can stay awake from exhaustion

war is draconian, there is no room for 'fairness or equity', it's not politically correct, if you can't perform the tasks then you have no place there

>>36490544
sure because they all deserved an apple

>>36489651

A better way of describing it is: "Women are oppressed, but more because capitalism benefits from it than because men are assholes"

>>36490886
Aww shit, that sounds a tiny bit more like me. Thanks for clearing that up.

File: IMG_5824.jpg (46KB, 750x438px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 750x438px

who else unironically /sjw/

File: smallChart.png (25KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x275px

oiyoboyoioiooiiiii

>>36491042
>>36491025
>>36490534
Let it be known henceforth that /r9k/ is a board of peace and feminism.

File: IMG_20170423_154617.png (120KB, 984x722px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 984x722px

Why am I even remotely feminist

File: Screenshot_2017-04-23-09-13-55-856_com.android.chrome.png (223KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 720x1280px

I'm confused why I got the last ones so big.. I'm I a closet SJW?

File: image.jpg (40KB, 640x394px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 640x394px

t. faggit that hates women

File: chrome_2017-04-23_17-09-10.png (26KB, 563x332px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 563x332px

More a case of me being liberal than feminist, but whatever.

>>36491075
some anons are women haters, some aren't

I can in principle respect women even though most of them would have me killed in a heartbeat because I bother them just by existing

File: imacuck.png (23KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x275px

The very funny thing is I hate traditionalism and I identify myself with liberal feminism more, but my experiences with women pretty much proved to me that they have very different way of thinking with men.

File: femtest.png (30KB, 553x399px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 553x399px

t. retard that didn't understand half the questions

>>36485755
You might be mentally ill but still think like a man.

If someone could post some of the more infuriating questions >>36485507
Cos what good is a thread full of random faggot's quiz results.

File: Feminism test results.png (29KB, 608x416px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 608x416px

>>36485188
Lenin was a good man.

>>36493472
>Female empowerment necessarily disempowers men.
"empowerment" could mean anything from equal rights, goverment and/or NGO funded programs to gender qoutas

>Children should be raised in as gender-neutral a way as possible.
Does it mean exposing children to only non-gendered toys and activities or exposing the to both gender toys and activities

>Gender equality has largely been achieved in the West. Barring certain ethnic minorities, the struggle for equality is as good as over.
This are two separate statments. If you disagree does it mean that you disagree with second or the first?

>Women have just as much of a sense of honor and duty as men.
If you believe that women are capable, but because of their socialisation aren't currently, how should you answer.

>The fat acceptance movement champions a worthwhile cause for women; it deserves more sympathy and support.
Fat acceptance movement exludes males. What you I believe in fat acceptance for both males and females. Or only males.

File: smallChart.png (24KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x275px

Some of these questions just seemed like a trap t b h

>>36493680
cont.
>Mens rights activists and male-bashing feminists are equally tribal and regressive in their thinking.
What type of MRAs? The once that just fighting for children custody, or the borderline Red Pillers.

>Women can do every job in the military just as well as men.
If I believe this is not true, but think that they are still free to join as long they meet same standards, how should I answer.

>There are only two genders.
This question suports only 2 genders or billion genders believes. No gender is a spectrum believe.

>Women can be just as happy as men without a stable relationship.
>Women are just as rational and logical as men.
>etc.
What if you believe that that this is untrue for both men and women?

>The male gaze tendency to objectify women against their will is a serious problem for women
Multi part question. Do you believe in male gaze? Is objectification bad?

File: smallChart.png (23KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x275px

Getting anything over 20% on the last 3 is reprehensible