The average IQ of /r9k/ I have every reason to expect is low

So, emoticon shrug, or, does someone want to offer some advice at my very slick request dissimulating the fact that the objective of this post is to get my email flooded with pics of boys who are cute and hipper than me, or cute and roundabout as smart. I mean, it's not total bullshit (the request) because I know potentials here are needles in haystacks but a lot of you are fairly capable at discerning things that I overlook. I'd just date a prof. but my life is a pastiche of a cliche of weebery and NEETdom, and I don't do any drugs, so, it's not very appealing to people who have their shit together or even plausibly /romantic/. I want a boyfriend though, the last one was dumber than he was hot and I'm not trying to exceed the post limit for someone who makes me ambiently nauseous all the time or who's going to have an autistic fit after --I'm trying not to be too graphic-- after seeing what a certain sort of female is capable of within the scope of innuendo.

There's no advice even, though, really? I've warmed up to the idea, really. Failing that, how do I get someone famous' contact who I already know a lot about and would be able to fuck with for funs. Thanks. Sincerely.

>>36430271
wtf you attention whores are reaching new heights

>>36430271
>The average IQ of /r9k/ I have every reason to expect is low even for 4chan, but it's not lower than /soc/, so maybe you all can help me out.
>I'm really just looking for a high IQ boyfriend -- not because I care that much necessarily as long as they're not particularly averse to high IQ girlfriends (or as long as they'd not use that as some excuse after they find much bigger reasons to be averse to me, in which case the requirement seems moot), it's just that it /unfailingly/ becomes a problem with everyone I'm actually attracted to.
>I'm also too lazy, unhopeful, and realistic about this place to read through posts and find intelligent-sounding ones and try to see if they're down to ride and also at least kind of cuter than me. And I'm not too autistic to realize that the lack of strategy in saying all this forthright is not in and of itself off-putting in most cases. With that said, I guess I'm here also for advice. I'm not using Tinder and I'm not leaving the house. I'm not playing Steam games and I'm not even looking on Discord or other chat sites because, probably, along with being lazy, I'm too fucking arrogant to not see that as a /radical/ waste of my time. And also too observant, because it always is. But the emotional -- see, I'm really not autistic -- the emotional resonance of a statement like that with most people would probably be found in its overconfidence rather than its matter-of-fact-ness. I don't know du, I probably need to date someone older than me, who's gone to school for a decent amount of time, although I did do grad school for a while and even most of them were pretty useless intellectually as far as I could tell at the time. If you're really internet hip or something, I have a lot of affinity with that, but, you're still probably --the potential partner, I should say-- the potential partner is still likely to get hella pissed at me for being smarter than them.

Kill yourself

File: 1479110231151.png (29KB, 741x568px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 741x568px

Not sure if you're really autistic or just too smart for me to understand

>>36430410
I kind of see where you're coming from, as long as you see that the autism of the expression is really not an apology for any inherent desire to whore for attention and is just what it is at this point.

Also, I should reiterate, I said kind of indirectly, that I'm well fucking aware that sexual success is probably more easily assured if I would just tone it the fuck down with the pretense, but I want what I want and I think I can probably get it before I cash out just dealing with the kind of hysterical mediocrity that I so often encounter. You know?

>>36430570
See above.

>>36430271
You sound like a dumb bitch that thinks she has a high IQ just because she was smarter than the dumbest kids in high school. In other words the male posters here are probably perfect for you.

If you actually apply your intelligence to anything you'll be better off finding an actual smart guy by taking up a hobby in whatever it is you are interested in.

File: IMG_0586.jpg (40KB, 626x395px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 626x395px

>>36430271
Speaking in roundabout ways, doesn't make you sound smart, but I can appreciate your vocabulary. I'm smart, I guess? I'm on par with my little brother whose at a 4.0 GPA at 10th grade already, but I didn't have a 3.5 in 10th grade because I was too concerned with vidya, anime, jap music, etc.

To be honest, I'd be happy if I could be your online "boyfriend" but you'd actually have to be a girl(unlikely) and my damn baby face doesn't help that I'm already pretty young. I'm 20 with a birthday in August. I assume you want to do this over the internet somehow right?

>>36430271

I wouldn't mind a gf having a higher IQ than myself at all, the problem is that they tend to invariably look down on me and resent me for not being as smart as them, so that's why I tend to avoid them now. If you wouldn't mind a reasonably intelligent but by no means genius bf, then pls be in georgia

>>36430271
hi I have a MSc in math let's fug but not really because you seem pretty unhinged

>>36430703
>smart
>Georgia

Pick one

>>36430734

Wasn't born here, faygo. And there are intelligent people here, but, surprise, they weren't born here either.

>>36430271
This post is under the character limit. Amazing.

You have the tisms, seek sonic and tendies.

File: Absolutely Weimar.png (83KB, 258x330px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 258x330px

>tfw no high IQ gf

>>36430752
Yeah that's sounds about right.
Where were you originally?

>>36430717
Nah I don't date guys that were only smart enough to get past intro to abstract algebra or whatever the requirements for a masters are.

>>36430687
This is a high level of cock sucking, anonymous.

>>36430271
Good luck in your quest. Mr or Ms anon.

>>36430685
I used to think that, but no. I went to grad school at an Ivy. It was for liberal arts bullshit, but still. And I don't have any interests, I'm terribly jaded. Did that not come across?

>>36430687
I think it does make me seem smart, it's called wordplay. But that's the liberal arts thing again. Potentials don't have to care about it, again, it just seems to make them kind of assmad when I really get into it.

>>36430703
I'm super far away from Georgia.

>>36430717
Again with the arts education. I was talking to someone last summer who was really dumb about Foucault but at least interested in Foucault. It was good practice. I don't know dog, I'm not going back to school and I thought most of those nerds were nerds anyways, so, I can pick up boys at NA meetings who aren't going to think that I'm less sane than them? That seems bleak.

I have a throwaway Skype, live:likingtrapsisnotgay. I don't want to fucking text all the time but we can do pics and alt contacts on that. re:anyone interested

>>36430815

Florida for the first few years, which probably explains some shit; nobody's really quite sane after living in Florida for a stretch of time

Ok so, I am too lazy to read the op, but mine is atleast 140, at that was at age 5.

>>36430869

>super far away

As they all are. Oh well, best of luck

>>36430271

The issue, clearly, is that you are not hot. It's not that guys are repelled by your intelligence. It's that they don't give a shit.

Hot and smart? Ok.
Not hot and smart? No.
Not hot and not smart? No.
Hot and not smart? Ok.

Sorry about your female existence. it actually must suck. My best advice is for you to spend way more time on makeup and the way that you dress, in order to look more attractive.

File: what.jpg (90KB, 451x575px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 451x575px

Now this is advanced shitposting

I'm taking the liberty of adding it to my repertoire

>>36430905
Not to mention the length of that tl;dr wall.
I think there's something to be said for brevity.
Less is more.

File: IMG_0382.jpg (16KB, 280x180px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 280x180px

>>36430271
Tldr; Faggot cock nigger kek

IQ of 141 here, started taking my college biochem courses when I was 12. Didn't finish for a while though. As a washed up child genius with autism it's my professional opinion that you would be unbearable to date. You are just rambling. If you actually wanted someone instead of masturbating to your IQ you would state in a brief greentext list what you wanted. You are wasting the time of everyone in this thread by doing this, I could have been watching wacky parrot videos fuck you.

>>36430869
>likingtrapsisnotgay
>high IQ

Ahaha. You can't be that intelligent.

>>36430271

Naturally seeing as everything you stated in your post negates saying "go outside", there won't be anything anyone here can offer you in terms of advice.

Also anyone who will offer themselves up here will end up becoming your bitch which may be your intention however maybe you really don't care enough to read into it.

Is there a specific cuttoff for IQ in your search?

I'm not interested in a relationship with you as you sound horiffic however I'm sure we could become decent friends, which interests me

>>36430271
I haven't taken an IQ test yet, just remember that i did some MENSA thing when i was younger (not online) and it said that it was highly probable that i would pass the exams to get in. Didn't really care about that at the time, my opinion about the subject hasn't changed at all.
Still, i don't care about having a gf or not, but having someone that wants me to prove my intelligence seems like fun. Will look into it once i'm done with an essay i have to write.

>>36430869
>liberal arts at grad school
There's your problem. I'm sure you have to be smarter than average to go to grad school for Art History or whatever the fuck it was. But go across campus to the physics department and you'll find the actual smart people that could probably analyze your feminist vagina shaped dinner plate sculpture better than you too.

File: immortals_aresrampage.jpg (228KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 640x360px

>>36430271

In my experience high iq girls don't want high iq bf's.

The ability to quickly follow premises through to conclusions makes young girls stand off-ish and over-sensitive.

These days they're almost all politically radicalised (and yet at the same time personally prudish because they're terrified of sex).

Everyone wants to be able to exert some form of control in their relationship and since for women this can never be physical, there is a demonstrated statistical preference for lower iq partners.

Pair this with the association of low iq behaviour patterns with masculinity, and you've got a recipe for entrenched female selection for low iq.

This is born out in the actual phenotype of societies that were highly female dominated for long periods of time - no prizes for guessing where I'm talking about.

But that's just a general trend, how does this apply to our super-brainy femanon in the OP?

The answer is: the same as the general trend but WORSE:

Long periods without sexual or romantic contact leaves her with exaggerated constructs of male and female behaviour, because (similar to the desensitising effect in porn) more and more exaggerated stimulus is required to trick her brain into thinking it is in contact with romantic subject matter.

Even if she got a brainy robot bf the first sniff she gets of Chad and her defenses would be down instantaneously as she discovered how deeply the spectacle of a 'real man' resonated with her.

Armed with the blank cheque of modern social values encouraging her to 'be her own woman' by going with what she 'feels', she would be on her knees faster than Chad could say 'Antidisestablishmentarianism', which admittedly is not very fast.

Ironically a smart robots best hope for love is a shell-shocked brainless roastie who is sufficiently burned out on Chad's to "see through their bullshit" and is sufficiently stupid to value high iq in a partner mostly based on Clarke's Third Law.

>OP wrote a wall
>smart

>>36430970
>>36430900
Here's the merchandise!

>>36430970
Oh man fucking dead on. Get on my Skype, please, we can overcome all the neuroses of precocity /together/. I mean I've done mine but I can do yours too.

>>36430905
My genetics are good du, I don't wear makeup.

>>36430979
Na, like I said, I really don't care if you're smart as long as you're cooler than me. Get on the Skype, would-be friend, I obviously don't have any.

>>36430990
Send PDF of essay to Skype.

>>36431027
>there is a demonstrated statistical preference for lower iq partners

Source? I believe you, I just need this for redpilling matters.

>>36431101
I'm already dating someone and I'm losing even MORE bird video time to your bullshit.

>>36431047
What merchandise? huh m8

>>36431101
I would have to translate it to english, but it doesn't seem difficult to do. The references may be fucked though.

>>36431131
That's probably because the sexiest girls are usually fucking retarded, for a more mainstream example, Kardashians.

File: 20170403185230_1.jpg (413KB, 2226x1080px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 2226x1080px

Are you the girl I've been waiting for who is capable of stimulating discussion about realistic space warfare?

>>36431182
>Kardashians
>sexy
Wtf anon

>>36431101
>>36430979

Forgot my fucking namefaggy name

>>36431193
Oh fuck, I remember you.
If she can't talk about that subject with you, she's not longer smart.

>>36430271
>>36430282

Congratulations on writing the most pretentious thing I've read on 4chan. I have zero doubt in my mind that I would be a catch in your eyes, but the fact that you feel the need to dress your posts up with weird, affected English is enough to repulse me.

Plus, you are probably a dude. Post a picture of yourself

File: kim_kardashian_uncensored_nude_leaked2.jpg (104KB, 600x680px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 600x680px

>>36431195
Don't lie. If you wouldnt fuck the shit out of this you are gay man.

File: 1490948930603.png (210KB, 464x531px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 464x531px

>>36430869
>Again with the arts education. I was talking to someone last summer who was really dumb about Foucault but at least interested in Foucault. It was good practice. I don't know dog, I'm not going back to school and I thought most of those nerds were nerds anyways, so, I can pick up boys at NA meetings who aren't going to think that I'm less sane than them? That seems bleak.
what the fuck is this garbled mess of a thought process?

File: IMG_0579.jpg (123KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1280x720px

>>36430834
It's what I'm good at, bud

File: fuck you kai-desu.jpg (28KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 480x270px

>>36430271
>kissanime
Stop watching anime illegally and get a job, you piece of shit

>>36431027
That's not my cup of tea anon but I'll hand it to you like, I was with someone for half a year with that exact same exaggerated gender imaginary and they didn't read me even close to that even one time.

I like skinny and glasses and sleeve-tattoos, though, and I'm not really a feminist or even hyper-un/sexual.

Whenever I talk to femanons from here with their beta male anon boyfriends, I mean, they're not burnt out on Chads, but they are dumb. And happy with each other. Anecdotally.

>>36431144
See, it's not any kind of tsundere I'm interested in unless you have a sense of humour about it. likingtrapsisnotgay, anon, add it up.

>>36431178
I have French and German as well.

>>36431182
I meet tons of girls who are way more retarded than the Kardashians.

>>36431218
No I don't play Starcraft.

>>36431221
Thank you. Sincerely. I'm sure someone else will post it when I send it to them on Skype, no sense in self-doxxing.

>>36431239
C'mon, anon, in more clear terms: you have an education in the hard sciences, I did lesbian studies. I would like a boyfriend who is interested in lesbian studies; however, the ones (nerds) from graduate school were just there for the cultural capital and the ones I don't have to worry about being mad at me for being smart are the ones who can't realize it, i.e., the ones who are tweaking all the time, i.e., at Narcotics Anonymous meetings. I don't take a breath, though, no, I'm just looking for someone who's not going to get upset that they can't follow the lesbian studies and kind of language therefrom.

I grow tired, I'm going to check Skype and fuck off right quick, probably.

>>36431239
Philosophy has become a dumping ground for pseudointellectuals like OP that can't think or write at any real level but can parrot enough buzzwords about deconstruction and semiotics to get by.

It's sad really, philosophy could be one of the more interesting subjects.

>>36431426
How did you make the mental jump from realistic space warfare to Starcraft? Starcraft isn't even in space, it's on the ground.

>>36431426
It's like having reddit on 4chan in ONE POST.
Horrific

>>36431539
Don't be mad at her for being so much smarter than you. She went to an ivy for lesbian studies after all.

File: 1466203644402.png (339KB, 823x549px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 823x549px

>>36430271
>words words words

i have this problem too, your writing is too verbose and lazy. True intelligence takes complex ideas and presents them in a simple manner.

Stringing 10 dollar words into complex sentence structures is not good writing. Your goal in writing should be to give the reader a vantage point to see what you see, not describe what you see without moving them


Also, I doubt you're as smart as you think you are
>approx 132 IQ reporting

>>36431570
>She went to an ivy for lesbian studies after all.
Well, I think I've already lost.

>>36430271
>I'm really just looking for a high IQ boyfriend
then go to college and find one, dummy

if you're smart you should be able to figure out where other smarties congregate

t. 129 IQ, accounting major, polisci minor, chess club member, compsci club member, 2 honor societies, honors program
yeah there's retards everywhere but you should be able to tell who's who pretty easily

>>36431239
Translation:

>You said "let's fuck" because I'm smart? Wow! Here, let me prove to you how smart I am again to arouse you even more:

Once I was talking to a stranger about the philosopher, Foucault. Obviously, the man was an idiot, but at least he was trying to learn. It was good for him to use his brain for once.

Anyway anon, I'm not going back to school. I would, but I would only be picking up boys who thought I wasn't as smart as them.

Seems bleak, doesn't it? Because, y'know, the entire purpose of education is to fuck boys.

>>36431670
hehehe I did kind of say that huh

>>36431670
You missed the part about how the men in ivy grad school in the hard sciences were all nerds, and instead she was looking for men at narcotics anonymous (everyone knows what NA means, silly boys)

>>36430869
>was really dumb about Foucault

so he was ignorant? you can't use knowledge as an all encompassing metric for intelligence you dumb whore. I highly doubt you really are intelligent and if you are you're certainly not showing any signs of being so.

please fuck off with this pseudo-intellectual persona that you've created for yourself, come back down to earth where you're a pathetic excuse for human being.

File: 1490721506345.png (119KB, 290x400px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 290x400px

>>36431426
I refuse to believe these are the thoughts of a real person.

>>36431763
Na, I mean the libarts ones were nerds. Either way too earnest about David Foster Wallace or just there so that when they were older bourgeois they could stop pretending to be poor and also have tertiary shit to talk about with each other since they wouldn't be socializing at NASCAR tailgates or even whatever they were doing then. I don't know, I went to cooler parties.

If you're from a city you probably know what NA is.

>>36431779
Na he just didn't go to school and would like email with profs from some shitty colleges like pretty much panhandling for an education, which I think he got the basics of but didn't see any kind of picture. I had to explain everything and became derisive.

>>36431796
Ayy.

>>36432029
How ok are you ?

>>36432087
One Hundred. Uh, original.

>>36432029
>If you're from a city you probably know what NA is.

You have your head so far up your own ass.

However if you are a troll, you are brilliant and I actually do believe you are smart.

>>36432029
Just got the specifications of the essay. My teacher wants just a one page essay. Not more.
Well, time to find something so basic that it will fit in that amount of space. Thought it was going to be something important, but it doesn't seem like it.
I had 3 pages done

>>36431027
now this is fucking reddit spacing

File: Sio-Bibble.jpg (116KB, 1060x655px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1060x655px

>>36431586

This one's mean. The whole distilling complexity into simplicity is an important facet of intelligence, but its not all there is to it. Some people have a complex linguistic idiom, and self-translation can be a real burden. Those people are rarely the true dumb-dumbs, btw, to whom simplicity usually comes as a sort of compensatory virtue.


>>36431615

This one is hilarious.

>Acts tough towards OP chewing her out for her attention seeking post.
>Proceeds to tacitly deliver their credentials for the smarty-pants bf OP is claiming to want.

Were you trying to neg her into liking you dude?

>>36431670

Did you know there is a 100% statistical correspondence between approving of Foucault and sucking on black cocks?

>>36431779
This is reductive. If you are having a conversation about a topic of sufficient density, whether the other person has read up on said topic or not, you are getting a good opportunity to gauge that person's mental horsepower.

Groundlessly distrusting her assessment of the idiot she was talking to does nothing to contribute to this conversation.

>>36432029
I have met my fair share of auto-dydacts, but never one who scrounged up an education from emailing random professors. How strange.

>>36431670
Any truly intelligent man would be like a terrier if he thought you really had the mental advantage. He would want to test out this strange new animal, find its limits. You would be beating him back with a stick.

Unless you can make a smart boy (even a beta cuck) do that, then your intelligence, whether it is lower OR higher than his, simply hasn't hit home to him at all.

You have been having non-encounters. You need to work harder at getting through to people.

>>36430271
In my experience, people who put a lot of pride or faith in the IQ system are not as smart as they think they are. Myself being the source on that, as when I was in middle school I took an IQ test and scored 137. The doctor who gave me the test insisted that I fell into the genius tier category. But if someone dumb as a door knob like me can land in the "genius tier" then the test is obviously very very flawed.

Tinder requires basic social skills, some determination, and to actually follow through. If that's not something your interested in doing then yes it's a waste of time.

My advice for you would be to do one of two things.
A.) Lower your standards a bit
B.) Lose the fucking attitude.

I highly recommend B. Reading your post was almost aggravating DESU. Don't expect any Prince Charming to stick around for more than a week if your going to be a lazy condescending prick all the time.

That's all I really have to say. Good hunting, I guess.

File: 252454526.jpg (151KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1920x1080px

>>36431426

Hi. I'm >>36431027

And I didn't really understand your reply. At all.

You're bf had the buried-but-exaggerated gender ideals that I said were common to smart chicks?

But he didn't 'read you' like that?

What?

Also, the
>I like skinny and glasses and sleeve-tattoos, though, and I'm not really a feminist or even hyper-un/sexual.

Reads as typical femanon contrarianism. That's just normal off-beat weirdo chick stuff. Where's your high iq chutzpah?

If having a Spock brain doesn't change your preferences from being like every other XX vegetable on this site then why make your OP?

And btw Sleeve Tattoos.... fucking yuck. You're clearly attracted to short term mating strategies (because sleeve tattoos are not only counter-cultural/subversive but are also only compatible with a youth look and will turn even more disgusting when he ages, but that doesn't matter to you because you just want a Bad Boy to roast your toast right now and then leave you) which basically makes you a wannabe whore.

I know everyone else is calling you a whore as well. But I want to point out the mine is the only post with valid reasoning to that effect.

If you decide to let only one post ruin your day today, please let it be this one.

The funny thing is I started writing this in the genuine spirit of friendliness and enquiry, then the whore stuff just came rushing out.

lol

File: 1480044426605.gif (2MB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 600x338px

>>36432500
>This one's mean. The whole distilling complexity into simplicity is an important facet of intelligence, but its not all there is to it. Some people have a complex linguistic idiom, and self-translation can be a real burden. Those people are rarely the true dumb-dumbs, btw, to whom simplicity usually comes as a sort of compensatory virtue.

i didn't intend it to be mean

what's your IQ?

>>36432500
Aren't they all trying to neg me into liking them, dude. Also, yeah, Foucault's a faggot, got him. Uh, I'm pretty sure he did a fair share of trying to read too. I should give him shit on Snapchat but I think he's lesbian now, not in fact my area of study. Anyways, that translate wasn't me (offensive if you thought it was), but I can overlook that if you want to add up my Skype. Man, I'm really tired. Will look later though.

File: WhatstheMatterwiththeseScissors?.jpg (34KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 1280x720px

>>36432734

>tests

I'm a white english speaking male.

>>36432733
Oh man, no, it's not even close.

I can psychologize myself a heck of a lot better than that (because I have the history, which I'm not spilling on shit boards), but was seems to me to be strikingly obvious from this whole spiel is that I'm a repressed lesbian and I should just find a girl who I can treat like a girl since all the males are subs if they can't call me out on being dumb (yknow, like a woman would be). So, no, I'm straight, but that would have been better.

But if you were trying to be performative about the diagnosis, I mean, I bet you have mad chops at that with other girls than myself. Like, convince them that they're whores, right, nice. That's giving you too much credit though, isn't it? Since, if it's intellectual /and/ intentional, it shouldn't be spilling out. Fun.

Whoever said I was just jerking off though is damn straight. I'm tired to find it.

>>36430271

I got tested 130+ IQ at WCIS, but i failed hs

Good enough?

I was just admitted to Duke's genetics PhD program, so I probably qualify as smart in your eyes. My question to you would be, what proof can you show me that you're in my league, intellectually?

File: 16.jpg (73KB, 600x342px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x342px

>>36432758

>>36432758


>Aren't they all
Yep. Myself included, but you don't get the points unless you can point out the correspondingly autistic thing that women do on this board because in service to their gender imperatives.

>hint: Its not attention-whoring, that's too easy.

re Skype: You've invited sooo many of us in this thread. Its crazy. I mean, I'm gonna add you on my throwaway account for sure, but you realise that this is the social media equivalent of having r9k run a train on you?

I almost hope I'm getting baited.

>>36432200
I came here to say this; this is one of the best trolls I've seen on here. Seems designed specifically to rile up the "smart but lazy" demographic here. Very subtle in crafting frustrating walls of text designed to be called out for being pretentious.

But I'm a medical student, far too much of an idiot to truly understand OP's erudition. And by erudition I mean disjointed post-stroke word soup.

>>36433095
it's pretentious because of the shit grammar, sentence structure and obsequious language (haha funny little joke there no problem thanks me)

File: 1492390895868.png (19KB, 500x590px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 500x590px

lmao look at all these brainlets in this thread. you dont have brains where it counts, in the DICK. my dick has a ten times bigger brain than all of you fuckboys put together.

peace out

>>36430271
>tfw haf 149 as a kid
>tfe had 130ish as teen
?fw don't know what it is now
>tfw faild genius

>>36432758
I think they just hate you actually. Even if we accept that you're smart - a difficult thing to do, given what I've seen here - you are not likable at all. Actually smart people know how to come across as warm and sociable rather than arrogant, and even adjust their vocab and tone to the audience or listener, since "mirroring" people earns their trust.

>>36433062
Uh, what do you study? I wish you would have just said so I wouldn't have had to ask such an autistic question, fuck.

>>36433079
Ah shit, that's like an SAT question? My eyes gloss over roastie threads du, don't ask me that. Although I do always notice that they have to announce that they're roasties. It doesn't seem very analogous though. I mean, I don't want to get into generalities too much with regard to this, but, negging seems pretty tsundere to me, rather than traditionally masculine.

Uh, it's a throwaway Skype, and I'm PUAing with it I guess, it's not like I have any shame. Do it anon. Send a picture too.

>>36433231
He says genetics you stupid fucking bitch

>>36430271
>>36430282
>I am so high IQ
>I'll prove it by using a word salad of pretentious bullshit phrases like "a pastiche of cliche weebery" and "ambiently nauseous"
>btw I want to bang a famous person heheheheh my interests aren't mundane at all and I'm sooo smart

I realize this is just bait, but fuck you.

File: InCase_484633_Gym_locker_room_bimbo_trap_blowbang.jpg (437KB, 1600x1081px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1600x1081px

this bitch prose like someone hit David Foster Wallace upside the head with a golf club and then put him on oestrogen for good measure

>>36433276
Everyone listen to this faggot pls

>>36433276
Lmao ambiently nauseous. That's so fucking dilettantish

File: Burly_Brawl.jpg (26KB, 350x270px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 350x270px

>>36432864

A few things:

My analysis of sleeve tattoos stands unless you provide a valid alternative.

If you are actually a lesbian just don't bother replying because I have never heard one of those saying anything interesting or even genuine. Lesbian banter is as far below straight banter as Gay dude banter is above it.

>My 'Performative' Diagnosis

I have shit chops with girls because there is some weird macho mode that im supposed to go into that I can't access.

Its galling that it has to be this way, but there is some monkey-like Danny Zuucko mindframe that other men transition into when they talk to chicks that makes them only talk in short insinuative phrases about things in their direct environment and only take actions which are conducive to further sexual closeness.

Women in turn have some form of hindbrain recognition that something is attempting to have sex with them, and the arousal of this competes with environmental inhibitors (including other people that are around, and anything wrong with his appearance etc). When the imminence of sex wins out, they bend over and present.

Plenty of chicks have expressed (shortlived) interest in me on account of my intelligence but the idea of hannibal lectering them into bed is absurd because it throws up so many more inhibitors and depends for its appeal on conjuring insecurities that are normally protected by layers and layers of rationalisation.

Any girl would panic and eject from the situation way before that. I've had more luck just walking up and kissing her on the mouth.

Theoretically you could lecture someone into liking you but it would take a lot of non-voluntary alone time with them and probably a few cc's of sodium pentethol.

You didn't SKEWER me by trying to get me to reflect on the success of these mental 'tactics' IRL because I don't call out whores IRL, I come here to do that.

cont.

>>36430271
>tfw high IQ, but not going to read your wall of text whatever the fuck it's saying. Also, for someone high IQ, you certainly don't know the best place to look for a guy, which makes me question your IQ in the first place. Anyways, thanks for the 144p bait

File: 17t47p1qn6ex8jpg.jpg (75KB, 636x358px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 636x358px

>>36432864
>>36433384

Cont.

Just because it spilled out of me does mean its not the product of a previous rigorous thought process. Doesn't mean that it is, either. Just means that those opinions were floating around in the ol brainbox.

>Just jerking off
People who put psychological phenomenon down to 'just coz' have given up on their introspection.

Women are especially prone to this because they like to reach a negative conclusion and then wail about it and slit their wrists:

>I'm just ugly
>I'm just worthless
>I'm just untrustworthy
>I'm just dark and sadistic X)

People whose opinions don't come in the form of analysis are SHIT.

>>36433227
Actually smart people don't have any motivation to come across as warm and sociable to people du. Why would you want to mirror someone who's not as interesting as you? Just to earn their trust is pure sociopathy, it's not even trust that you value. You're /depraved/, anon, wow, really. I'm repulsed.

>>36433266
lmao ah I wanted it to be something else.

>>36433276
lmao

>>36433333
It doesn't read anything like David Foster Wallace, thanks.

>>36433392

Nice work, bro. Now she'll come to YOU ;)

>>36433162
btw if you want to ride this dick and feel the power of this DICK BRAIN inside u then just hit me up

you know what it is

File: Wojak Shrug.png (146KB, 554x439px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 554x439px

>>36430271
>>36430282
I like everything about your posts: the straightforward bluntness, the intelligent woman aspect, the general dislike for imbeciles. Women are never like this, so I have doubts you even are one, rather than a troll pulling some elaborate ruse.

Alas, I'm just a young NEET who dropped out of college. Not that the educational side was too difficult, but I simply could not stand the people. I hated every second of being on that campus. The only reason I even finished High School was because I went to a charter school and was able to just focus on my work without all the normalfags pissing me off constantly. Which actually allowed me to graduate early and skip my senior year.

I'm not sure if I'm cuter than you, but I'm very boyish looking. I basically haven't aged since I was 15 years old. Though I guess writing all this was a waste of time anyway. You're either not real or not anywhere near me in the world. I guess I'll still continue to read through the thread.

>>36433417
More like (((((((((((((((she)))))))))))))))))

>>36433457
Oop, looks like we got a beta orbit starting
>inb4 a bot generated this topic and your trying to have sex with a computer chip

>>36433457

Mate, she posted her throwaway ages ago. You've got the contact, stop selling.

Its a banter thread now.

http://vocaroo.com/i/s0w1MYjtADZv

File: temp4.jpg (142KB, 1000x1600px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1000x1600px

>>36433415
>It doesn't read anything like David Foster Wallace, thanks.

I'm amazed you managed to set out a thought without for once being - I mean like this - being self-reflexive. It's so middlebrow.

>>36433384
If you are actually a lesbian just don't bother replying because I have never heard one of those saying anything interesting or even genuine. Lesbian banter is as far below straight banter as Gay dude banter is above it.

Faggot intellectuals are my favourite people. Uh, I'm not telling you how to get pussy dude, I'm not /that/ lesbian.

>>36433420
Oh shit, do I know what it is? I'm getting too many kicks out of people telling me to fucking die though. Do you really think you can keep the dickbrain up?

Anyways as the other one said my interests are completely banal and I'm just looking for someone famous. You're not famous, are you dickbrain?

>>36433401
have you ever thought that maybe them saying they're ugly or whatever label is because of some psychoanalysis?

it's not like they just jump to i'm ugly but rather have deduced logically their shortcomings can only be explained to the fact they're not appealing to a person.

>>36433062
cool do you get to bust cheating sluts with paternity testing? you are my hero if you do.

>>36433457
Yeah seriously, don't be shy. live:likingtrapsisnotgay

>>36433506
Ouch, it happens when I'm tired though. Uh, maybe I care too much about DFW to write a forum post about his writing style v. whatever I'm doing in response to a joke that didn't make me laugh. Probably not though.

This is clearly a dude on Ritalin or something but the whole talking like a fag thing really is a nice touch

File: D-Day.jpg (42KB, 1103x678px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1103x678px

>>36433527

No, they short-circuit their self-exploration with self-punishing phrases instead of getting stronger by learning more about themselves. They don't have a thought process to back up their plaintive cries of "Its hopeless" or "I should just kill myself" or when they convince themselves that they're "bad".

Don't confuse that with realism. Because what they're doing is melodrama.

A chick like Condolesa Rice or something could look me dead in the eye and say "A lot of my behaviours in life could be explained by the fact that I'm ugly" and I wouldn't doubt her, because I know that she could deliver on that premise in the form of a 50 page watertight essay explaining how.

Most - nearly all - feminine whining is not like that. Male odds are better but not by much. It just doesn't frustrate me as much with guys, because my dick ignores them.

Being heterosexual and male is like being compelled to obsessively watch bad television.

>>36433571
You're right, as I recall DFWs owns were better formed and lacked the Daria affectation entirely

File: 1481550748150.png (6KB, 195x259px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 195x259px

>muh iq
how to spot a brainlet
>dude faster reaction time I'm so smrt I got proof!

File: IMG_0383.gif (7KB, 227x224px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 227x224px

I don't think the guys you date dislike you because you're (maybe) smarter than them. They probably dislike you because you're a shitty person.

File: 127418772932.jpg (56KB, 490x600px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 490x600px

You studied liberal arts, lesbian studies at that, you aren't high IQ lmao, just another pretentious attention whore who thinks having a strong vocabulary is an indication of how intellectual you are, when in reality it's pretty fucking transparent that it's only a crutch. Don't "dress up" your posts on 4chan, you can express a strong ability to communicate without that. Further, seeking out a boyfriend online, on this website specifically, is pretty low and certainly doesn't reflect very well how smart you claim to be. You deserve absolutely nothing, and if you really were such an intellectual you would understand that getting your shit together is the easiest way to aquire the smart companion that you are seeking. You are way too fucking picky to be selecting an audience of kissless virgins and autists for this. You need to move on from being a NEET. Go outside and interact with people, not libtards in your pansexual studies class, but probably some actual intellectuals and creatives, maybe hopefully not as autisticly as this thread that you've made.

I would email you a photo of myself to show you that I am probably exactly what you are looking for, but that would be spiteful and hardly worth the effort. I have no use for an online relationship, and anyone who does is not high IQ by any stretch, just lonely and autistic.

Good luck though.

Hell yeah another tranty ex goon come to 4chan to girlpost. Win. Did they run you out of D&D

>>36433518

First off: Most of the robots would prefer it if you ignored the guy talking about his dick. I know it seems like you took their side by making fun of him, but the real trick when baiting robots is you've got to tickle the fantasy that
(dicks I= boobs) and the best way to do that is by seeming not to even NOTICE the penis boasts at all.

Once you explicitly reject the proffered massive penis, you place yourself in mental relation to it, and thus engage the robot's suspicion that its all you really want.

Your post is unclear again about whether you're a lesbian.

You throw around the word 'faggot' and then say you're not "/that/ lesbian".

>?

Also, which actual lesbian intellectuals are you talking about? Coz if you're not teeing up Sapho or Ayn Rand or something then you must be taking about some late 20th Century left wing Continentalist fuckery.


Seriously, ARE you a lesbian or do you just want to be? Because the latter is silly but fine, but the former would just kill the whole tone of this thread.

Guys don't actually want to talk to lesbians, its that simple.

>>36433819
Prolly Gertrude stein or some such hack. Ftm McElroy lookin ass nigga

>>36433660
Damn dude.

>>36433680
Not really, sometimes he wrote like that. "Wardine be cry," that chapter. But yeah, it was more intentional. And Daria is OP, cmon. Also she's too deadpan, it's probably preferable to the reflexivity thing. I've learned a lot giez. I gotta go to sleep, big day.

>>36433766
I spoke to that already. Smart people act nice if they're sociopaths, right, so that they have a means to get under other people's skin, because their being smarter than those people means that they lack respect for them, they wouldn't have any other motivation. There's a counter to that but I can't be asked.

>>36433780
Lesbian studies isn't a real thing nigga. I'm well aware that I'm pretentious. Just because I don't need to do something doesn't mean I don't get off on it. And so forth. Read the thread.

You can date a refugee. Around 95% of them are doctors and engineers

I'm in mensa
Send pics so I can decide desu

>>36433819
Dude, I've been plenty clear, /I am straight/. Lesbian intellectuals the other person said, man I'm not tryina clarify shit like that. Uh, Judith Butler is OP but she's not any fun, she's into fags too though. Hannah Arendt, Simone de Beauviour, both good, at least 25% lesbian between the two of them. Mental relation thing was dead on.

>>36433862
Oh yeah Gertrude Stein is cool too. Sappho and Virginia Woolf. Besides that, uh, there are some contemporaries no one would have heard of.

Have fun guise.

>>36433874
Queer studies is a real thing, nigger.

Getting off on your own pretentious 4chan shitposting is pathetic.

You are low IQ as fuck.
Go back to /soc/ you failed roastie.

>read the thread
No thanks, the OP was enough to indicate the levels of cringe at play here, you are a waste of time and so is this blogging thread you have going on here.

File: Laughing.jpg (34KB, 587x347px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 587x347px

>>36434039
>Queer studies is a real thing

Theres nothing wrong with being a smart woman

Ive lost most of my attraction to otherwise very cool hot women who liked me because I felt they were dumb

Can I ask you how much lower you would go than yourself though? How is 10~ points?

File: 1466745029900.png (433KB, 680x451px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 680x451px

>>36434059
>post that is not an argument whatsoever
I never said it was useful or that it should exist, I simply declared that it is in fact a course of study offered by many universities, which means the post I replied to was incorrect in saying that lesbian studies isn't a real thing.

File: dante-and-virgil-in-hell-1850.jpg (54KB, 482x600px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 482x600px

K I'm back, what'd I miss?

>>36433766
>>36433572
>>36433697

Lotta hate for smart chicks on this thread. You boys are so insecure sometimes.

Also, not a lot of follow ups on skype (live:likingtrapsisnotgay). I thought that r9k might be a little more understanding.

Its all good anyway, I suppose, even robots why say they want a clingy smart girl just abandon them when they find out that they're damaged and ugly.

>>36433780
I would have complimented your choice of pic related but your post was pretty mean. That's not me at all. I tried to explain it and everything.

Anyway, I had a print made of William Bouguereau's 'Dante and Virgil in Hell' to hang in my room.

Your pic reminded me of that :(

Good advice too, if you're a confident normie, but its not so easy for girls like me. Not if you're the one who has to be approached and you know you never will be except by some gross oversized builder or something that just wants to fuck you.

>>36433889
Um... no thanks.


>>36434100
>there is nothing wrong with being a smart woman

Wanna switch places then?

File: 1492462793176s.png (89KB, 449x603px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 449x603px

I won't say IQ means anything. Here guys, take this test. It''s very lengthy at 52 questions, no time limit. It's really hard, I think. If you want your score to be as accurate as possible, spend a lot of time on it and think hard until you think you can't answer it anymore. I like these kinds of tests because you don't need a lot of education or prior knowledge on something to figure out some of the hard problems here, you just think and find patterns.

In theory, a lot of people here will face a few questions that they will not be able to answer no matter how much they try. Use this test as a second opinion to gauge your problem solving skills. I think this thread will die soon

here is one of the very hard questions, too

i think it is called the JCTI by the way.

>>36434369

>>36434288
>not a lot of follow ups on skype
Robots don't video chat.

>>36430271
Hey, babe. Chad here, you can use all the Harry potter speak you want but if you keep this up, i'll have to punish you by stopping the cock supply. I'd imagine a cutie like you wouldn't want that now would you? So get back into the kitchen and use that high IQ to make me a nice lunch.
Thanks in advance

>>36430271
130 IQ artist reporting in. What do YOU have to offer?

>>36430271
I'm not entirely sure about my IQ but i'd love to talk and learn. If you have a Discord please post it. I don't think I am the brightest but knowledge is always nice. I have no interest in you romantically and i will not have any attachment either so win/win

>consider taking her offer
>highly value intelligence in girls
>highly value when others value intelligence
>if she's smarter, it's a win
>if not, still a win
Sounds good, but then...
>reads thread

CANT THESE RETARD WHORES GO SOMEWHERE ELSE? FUCK YOU OP

ARE ALL WIMEN, EVEN THE "INTELLECTUAL" ONES, THIS. FUCKING. RETARDED?!?!

File: themoonandsixpence.jpg (141KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 500x500px

>>36434588

Not up for video either, friendo. Text only.


>>36434594
How bout: Avada Kedavra.


>>36434630
>130 iq
>can't read the thread

>>36434650
Already posted a Skype, hon: live:likingtrapsisnotgay

You sound nice.

>>36430271
If you were Australian and I didn't already have a qt pure gf then I'd probably get in touch but I don't see any serious relationship coming out of it.

Your first two posts are full of all these demands about what you want but nothing about why you're worthy enough to set these standards or even why we would enjoy spending time together. If you strip away the demands there's just arrogance about yourself, pessimism about your chances and that's it.
>t. 6'3'' /fit/ MENSA-member cruising through the penultimate year of med school with enough free time to shitpost on /r9k/

>>36434369
Those are the exact sort of questions we had to do in the pattern recognition section of the medical admissions test here.
>tfw top 1% of applicants

>>36435003

Hi there, everyone, I'm Australian too and I can tell you that this guy I'm replying to is almost certainly Indian.

Those results, that profession, the austistic temerity to actually apply to MENSA and he's too tall to be asian. So Indian it is. Over here, the entire healthcare industry is that way, so its not much of a gamble.

Even if he's not, then he's still a scumbag for dangling so much obvious bait at the OP femanon when he apparently has a loyal gf.

He wanted OP to go for contact with him even though he is in relationship. He thinks that he's better than r9k, and that he can have a 'side thing' here. Disgusting.

He's a fucking numpty, but at least he's not an actual robot, because that's the kind of thing that could give us a bad name.

>>36435168
Thank you for enlightening us, Australiabot. I'm sorry you have to put up with such Indian garbage in your country.

Well you certainly are verbose if nothing else. I take it you easily carry conversations.

>>36435188

Yeah, but whatever. Let the workerbees work, I say.

With VR and sexbots just around the corner, white man has earned his ignominous NEETdom.

>>36430271
L A Z Y B U T S M A R T
But if you don't play steam games you better have some other common interests, I'm quite smart but you're probably from America and none of this post matters.

>>36435168
Nope. Rhodesian ;_; One of the <5% of non-rural, non-Jewish whites in my medical
I'll accept the insult over MENSA though, I was pretty autistic in HS

I don't think I'm better than you or the rest of /r9k/ in any way that matters. I mean, you'd need to be pretty lacking in self-awareness if you could maintain a superiority complex while posting on /r9k/

File: hound-sansa.jpg (85KB, 634x300px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 634x300px

>>36435494

>I mean, you'd need to be pretty lacking in self-awareness if you could maintain a superiority complex while posting on /r9k/

What am I supposed to find that funny?

You're still lacking in some fucking self awareness you cringey cunt.

Trying to get back in my good graces because you don't like being sheepdogged with some tough banter?

Tryna suck up now, eh, mister "but I don't see any serious relationship coming out of it."

Youre a faggot mate, we all spotted you.

And I'll fucking fong you you fucking sycophant fucking Yarpie cunt if you try to pretend Rhodesians are still white.

Come ere ya dawg!

File: 9ab.png (68KB, 618x618px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 618x618px

I am pretty sure this creature has signs of some severe disorder, although I cannot remember which one.

It's like acting pretentious multiplied by the need to get some attention.

I do not believe intelligent females to search /r9k/ for intelligent boyfriends. Sure, the crowd is heavily dispersed, and there's a lot of people to choose from, yet they spend their free time on this board mainly due to their insecurity or mental inabilities.

Do you really believe some girl would stroll by you and offer herself to you as an intelligent girlfriend? Are you as naive as she expects you to be?

After all, her speech style is quite peculiar for a "lazy intelligent girl". I'd say she is a Stacy who majored in economic engineering, for example. She got bored and headed to /r9k/, since she heard stories about its mildly crazy neckbearded inhabitants.

>tfw no moderately intelligent Stacy gf to dominate with my own intellect and make her feel like a dumb whore

OP has a penis though.

>>36436046
>OP has a penis though.
What difference does that make? Liking traps isn't gay.

>>36436067
Keep telling that lie to yourself. You're gay. Liking penis is gay.

File: 245.jpg (80KB, 1333x900px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1333x900px

HAHAHAHA FUCK OUT OF R9K YOU STUPID ROASTIEEEEE TOO FUCKING UGLY IN REAL LIFE TO BE APPROACHED BY A MAN SO YOU COME TO R9K ?????? FUCK OFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF I HATYE YOUUUUUUUUUUUUU REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>36433518
course i can you brainlet bitch, my dick has been pontificating ROCK HARD since i posted

how does it feel riding this 100 brain DICK

only thing im famous for is being smarter than all brainlets and being able to fuck for longer too

>>36430271
my iq is 120 so i'm slightly smart kinda dumb are you in argentina?

>>36436158
What's gay about a penis attached to a woman? Is liking girls' assholes gay just because men have them too?

>>36430271
You fail miserably at forming concise sentences, don't seem to posses an iota of self-awareness, aaand you use IQ as a blanket term for intelligence.

You're fucking delusional. I dout that you're as "high IQ" (cringe) as you claim to be. Normally I'd say this was a bait post but seeing as you are actually replying to a lot of these Anons I'm not so sure. In any case I hope that at some point in your life you can find it in you to turn the mind onto itself and perhaps come to some semblance of self knowledge. Although that seems implausible.

In conclusion: tits or gtfo

>>36436419
>tits

OP is a homogay.

>>36436439
I won't bother reading replies here, so. How do you know?

>>36434369
tried for over and hour and a half but nothing..

does anyone know the answer?

>>36436519
>does anyone know the answer?
5

>>36436587
Whats the reasoning, that everything follows the same pattern but the 3 parallel lines and the crossed patterend lines do so without going over the 3 diagonal lines and the horizontal lines? Whereas the white and black are capable of going on top of the diagonal and denser horizontal lines and so keep their movement patterns intact?

Is there a proof for that?

>>36436587
are u gonna tell me why or not? you faggot motherfucker?

>>36430271
Decent troll 7/10.
Seriously, could you guys not post in this thread.
This girl says she wants a man who's older and with a High IQ. Are you fucking serious? You do realize IQ doesn't 100% represent your intelligence, right? Also, you call yourself lazy and arrogant, those are unattractive qualities to many guys. I would say I have fairly big intelligence, (130 range) and I would like someone who is motivated and modest not arrogant/lazy. I know what type of person you are, you want some guy to take care of all of your needs, since liberal arts doesn't have that many job opportunities.
Also, this
>Failing that, how do I get someone famous' contact and would be able to fuck with for fun
This derails your entire post. It shows that you really don't care about settling with a normal guy and you only want someone higher up in the social ladder. Please do yourself and ourselves a favor and delete this thread. You would most likely find unattractive folks and it would be a waste of time for us. Actually why aren't you on soc? It that way >>>/soc/

>>36436587
Respond!! i need to know now!!!!!

File: anon gets tricked twi(...).png (19KB, 238x151px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 238x151px

>>36436760
>>36436969
>>36437234
This is basically what it comes down to.

>>36437531
if you are the guy who made the original post and this means that its unsolvable then i simultaneously loathe you but i feel better in that atleast im not stupid and it wasnt solvable

>>36430271
>>36430282

Peak attention whore

File: 1492749094016.png (288KB, 542x529px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 542x529px

Op you dont sound smart at all, you sound like a typical psuedo intellectual. Incoherent ramblings and intentionally using unconventional vocabulary are the bread and butter of any retard trying to sound smart.

Kudos though on hiding an attentionwhore thread behind psuedointellectual garbage, gotta admit that thats a smart move

File: 1467291215859.png (37KB, 658x662px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 658x662px

b my gf mommy