who /verysmart/ here

Of the choices of answers given it seems obvious to me that the correct one is bottom right

Is it the bottom left?

File: 8Lng.jpg (11KB, 250x201px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 250x201px

not a fucking clue

if someone does know the answer please tell me and why

>>36391659
My gut says top right. So ill go with top right.

>>36391659
Bottom left, squares are incrementing, circles are 1 per line and dots are decrementing every line.
t. IQ >200

>>36392344
The two circles each move one square to the right as the board fills up with black square (as we move from top left to bottom right of each checker board). Circles can't been seen if they move to a black square, and once they pass through a black square they change colour. If we follow this logic, by the time we reach the bottom right checker board every other square will be black and the two circles will be white and visible (i.e the bottom right option of the answers)

>>36392393
i see, that's pretty good
the hard part about this is figuring out what kind of pattern you need to look out for, I didn't even think of looking at it that way.

This is dumb.These pattern tests need to have a clear logical progression, here whatever the rule is, it's too complicated and detailed and probably not even consistent.

>>36392674
No you're too dumb for not being able to solve this.

>>36392674
>This is dumb
>it's too complicated
Yet there's people who can solve it. It's unfair because they're more intelligent than you, right?

File: IMG_9351.png (200KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 750x1334px

next one smarties.

(ps i already finished the test, and i just took some screens of the difficult ones. i just wanted to see what you guys think)

>>36392921
Reeeeee im a fucking retard i cant solve it

>>36392921
Should be the 2nd from the left in the bottom line.

>>36393136
how????tfwtf

>>36393335
Literally Einstein tier intelligence, that's how.

Bottom middle left. For every matching neighbor, count up. If you count past 3, thats wrong

>>36393848
speak english muddafucker.

>>36394031
He's saying there can't be more than 3 pairs of similar adjacent shapes. 3 in a row are 2 pairs.

>>36394063
>there can't be more than 3 pairs of similar adjacent shapes
>3 in a row are 2 pairs
I am sorry but that is gibberish.

>>36394174
Fucking brainlet, this is why you fail tests.

>>36393378
no really tell me

>>36394212
You can't speak english, but you can spot weird little patterns.

>>36394231
English is my 3rd language, what's your excuse?

>>36394270
retaaaard nigar>>36394270

>>36394270
That the pattern you seem to be suggeting is completely arbitary. Making it a shitty test if you are correct.

It's the bottom second to the left.

>>36394223
If you look at the patterns, you can tell what it's not.

If any of you were actually smart you would realize that IQ tests are useless subjective garbage and a waste of your time.

>>36394383
>completely arbitary. Making it a shitty test if you are correct.
That's exactly how it is.
>>36394410
This.

File: answer.png (37KB, 523x401px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 523x401px

>>36391659
Bottom right

The circles move right by 1 each time, moving to a new line when it reaches the end. If they come in contact with a square they swap between outline/filled

>>36391659
Link to the test? Please.

I will never be original.

>>36394410
>what is g?
IQ is an objective measure of test-taking ability. Test-taking ability is correlated with so-called "real-world intelligence." People who do better are on IQ tests are smarter than you, it's a fact. Now that doesn't mean you can't blow your nose and wipe your butt, but good luck completing a PhD. in the hard sciences, mathematics or philosophy with a low IQ.

>>36394562
It is not objective. That you do not understand this seems to suggest that IQ doesn't take understanding of language into account. Or that maybe you have a low IQ.

>>36394597
You're a retard, just close the tab and move on with your life.

>>36391659
Its botom right.

For each slid the circels move on step to the right, if its the end it move to att most left in botom row. yuo cant see any circels in the black squears, and if a black one moves frou one black its beckoms a black on.

P.s sorry for shit enngrish im a derty forener.

>>36394562
IQ is extremely subjective I hope you're kidding you fucking idiot

>>36394642
>you're a retard
That is not an argument.

>>36391659
1st row; 2nd column

>>36392921
top left

>>36394430
he also makes sense

>>36394442
was an app on the appstore.

>>36394597
>>36394716
t. low iq/social sciences majors who can't even comprehend simple clauses

>>36392921
I cant decide between 2nd on bottom row and 3rd on top row

>>36395711
Pseudo-intellectual math student who can't understand abstract concepts like objectivity.

>>36395787
Its third on top row since you cant have more than three stuck together in duos

>>36395842
>Its third on top row since you cant have more than three stuck together in duos
I mean the second on bottom row

>>36395842
>>36395871
so why isn't it the first on top row?

>>36391659
I couldn't get it without the hints. Wasn't really seeing how the circles were moving because they keep changing their fucking colours, with no discernable pattern.

So the last in the sequence is either 2nd one or the 8th one, out of the options.

>>36395927
That one doesn't have a row with a circle, square and triangle along the outside

>>36396046
Why does it need that?

>>36392465
I see it now but damn that's complicated. I would have never seen that.

>>36396096
All the others do

>>36396131
Okay so there is no pattern?

>>36392393
>>36392465
Two smart people with contradicting answers. Can you discuss why you think each other is wrong?

>>36391659
bottom right according to the movement of the circles and the way they change colours when passing through a black square. It gets easy when you see it as a dynamic picture

>>36396293
The first guy didn't realise that the circle is still on the second row

>>36396617
The him saying
>IQ > 200
Was BS then

>>36396648
want to see my penis?
do you?
want to?
see my?
penis?
hmm?
my PENI$$$?

>>36396721
??????????????. I bet you didn't even have to write original after that.

>>36393136
wrong

You always have to have 2 of the same in each column.

It's the 3rd on the top row.

>>36397879
>in 2 columns

Corrected myself.

>>36392465
this guy is correct

>>36392393
this guy is wrong

The dots are not decreasing every line.