can femanons and anons confirm this is accurate?
It is completely wrong. I made a better one.
>>36344097
This is the most autistic and or possibly drunk thread I've posted in today.
>raccoons and crows
>not entirely fucking based as all hell
You put them in the wrong category.how was this not original
>>36344188
This is absolutely correct. OP's one makes no sense at all.
femanons are not intelligent enough to be crows
>>36344097
Is it supposed to be what we feel like or want to be?
A female pig would be better, I just want to be a breeding sow.