JK rowling needs to stop

>>36141768
literally why the fuck would she tweet shit like that

this is canon now

Wait is this actually real??

>>36141768
>group masturbation sessions

why didn't I get to experience this

>>36141768
>Wizards
>Sex

WEW TO THE FUCKING LAD, JK Rowling cannot be this stupid

>>36141768
nigga... I actually liked those books, come the fuck on now...

>>36141803
No it's fucking not.
To be canon, shit like this has to be included in the work. Now, Harry Potter is YA trash but it isn't ridiculous sexual YA trash.

I think it's funny. She's such a weird lady

>>36141768
>Hufflepuff
That's actually funny for 2 reasons.
1. Hufflepuff is a bunch of faggots
2. She's clearly reading /co/

File: 1491493563174.png (152KB, 358x432px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 358x432px

>>36141768
>particularly Hufflepuff
Unintended comedy is best comedy

>>36141768
hogwarts community college tier school of magic confirmed

File: 1489079058170.png (427KB, 956x536px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 956x536px

>>36141845
>ywn get hermionie to shove her want up your muggle boipucci

Why live lads?????? Why????

>>36141896
wrong

to be included in the canon the only requirement is that it is written content about the Established Universe by the author herself

your idea of canon doesn't make sense - what if someone asked the author for clarification on some ambiguous aspect of their work and they answered by clarifying the mechanics in the universe, since it is their universe it's obvious that would be canon
that's all she did here
this is canon

>>36141959
>2. She's clearly reading /co/

explain pls....?

>>36141768
Obviously she's joking, but the faggots that read harry potter will no doubt take it seriously

>>36142021
fanfiction, etc
I meant to say /tv/.

File: IMG_0028.jpg (15KB, 200x192px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 200x192px

>>36141768
>group masturbation sessions
Does this shit happen on the regular over in the United Kaliphate?

File: 1473074436089.jpg (5KB, 250x227px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 250x227px

>>36142050
I can't speak for the entire UK but when I went on a schooltrip a number of kids were jacking it under their clothes. We were 12. Weirdest thing i've ever witnessed.

>>36142002
Exactly, whatever the author says is canon. Doesn't matter if it was in the actual thing at all. That's why databooks exist on various fandoms for extra pointless info

File: hat.jpg (68KB, 658x662px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 658x662px

>tfw came way too fast in the group masturbation session
Anyone know a potion that can help with this?

>>36141768
w-what the fuck?

Is this the eternal anglo I've heard so much about?

>>36142002
"the works of a particular author or artist that are recognized as genuine."
What Rowling is doing here is pandering and akin to fan fiction. If she wants to write a book containing this trite I would accept it, until then, no.

She's an idiot but in this case she was talking shit. In this same question session she was talking about a spell to take a shit and how the Asian girl took a huge shit and broke the toilet

>>36142050
Public (private) schools are hotbeds of lewd boy on boy action

>>36141999
Nigga did you have a stroke typing this? You wasted trips on this YOU FUCK

>>36142165
Look up Jackus Delayus in the Wankronomicon Phallica.

Be careful though, it's deep in the restricted section of the library. Bring a gamete-proof cloak or you'll get covered in the stuff when you try and get in. The book itself is old and extremely well-used - some of the pages are crinkled and stuck together, I'd recommend using a spell of spermicide to unstick the pages.

>>36142238
Dude what

is this real life

She's off on her rocker that potter

File: file.png (57KB, 2119x198px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 2119x198px

>>36142199
>"the works of a particular author or artist that are recognized as genuine."
>What Rowling is doing here is pandering and akin to fan fiction.
see, the issue here is that you and I don't get to decide what is and is not recognized as genuine. You don't get to say "oh, this is obviously pandering".

That's up to the creator, JK Rowling - and since this is a tweet BY her, she is doing more than just acknowledging it as canon, but directly adding it to the canon

the length of the work doesn't matter - these tweets are written directly by JK Rowling herself. If someone were to take a collection of JK Rowling's tweets about the Harry Potter Universe and published them would you say they were then canon?

File: 1488540873736s.jpg (7KB, 250x170px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x170px

>>36141768
You dumb faggots do realize that there is a faded CollegeHumor logo in JK's first "tweet".

Not to mention that this just looks obviously shopped.

> it's obvously not real
> even if it was, it would clearly be a joke
> robots freak out, call it pandering

rowling does a lot of stupid stuff, you don't need to drop your spaghetti over this.

Wait a fucking minute, is circlejerking a normal normie activity?

Imagine being such a washup nobody that you have to continually expand and force in random bullshit into your childrens novel

>uh oh nobodys paying attention to me
>DUMBLEDORE IS GAY!
>uh oh they forgot about me again
>THEY DON'T TEACH SEX ED!

lol is this real? she saying hufflepuff circle jerk with each other?