Is there such a thing as an ISTP safespace where like minded

>talk freely
>safespace
uhh???

>>36074830
I don't mean a literal safespace, calm down.

You can talk freely on /r9k/ but to say it isn't a safespace for social delinquents is counter-factual.

File: 54634545.png (10KB, 843x235px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 843x235px

>>36074819
>sensor
you don't need a safe space most people are like you anyway

>>36074918
Intuition isn't real.

>>36074951
So you made a thread based on MBTI and want to meet people based on MBTI and want to go to MBTI-based spaces yet you also disregard 1/4th of it?

Really makes my gobble wobble

>>36075439
No, what I'm saying is N is just an indicator to people that think think subconscious rationalization doesn't exist or just deludes themselves into thinking they're not consciously rationalizing things.

I didn't ask for a INTP safespace.

>>36075469
I suggest you stop reading MBTI bullshit and instead read into what MBTI is based off: Carl Jung

>>36075512
Archetypes are more pseudo-science than MBTI is.

>>36075830
Yet thought of by the one best psychologist in all history. Literally everything we now know and believe about psychology is based from Jung's works, one way or another.

And we also know that our own understanding is completely limited and not even close to the true reality (as with most of our science, but that's another topic).
So why doubt the one man with the most accurate view on psychology so far? Just because our current limited view doesn't perfectly aligned with something more advanced, we should immediately dismiss it? This wouldn't be called science then, just endless controlled circlejerking.