i hope one day women get replaced by androids. i keep seeing

Bad news for you: not even androids will want your worthless ass. Their programming will cause them to run away from you into Chad's arms.

>>36012791
not if i program it

File: 112321536748946.png (4KB, 128x128px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 128x128px

>>36012651
sex bots capable of fully replacing women can't come soon enough

>>36012816
You wouldn't know how.

>>36012866
I know Java don't test me

File: 1491208693735.jpg (34KB, 362x447px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 362x447px

When the singularity comes about, we may very well have that chance. But you'd better fucking believe women will try to prevent synthetics replacing them. It's several decades away but God damn I'm willing to wait.

>>36012919
i dont get why girls are opposed to it. its not like we even talk to them or try to hit on them so whats the point of them fighting it?

>>36012919

I've seen this said before, but I couldn't really figure out why, not that I necessarily disagree with you. If there were idealized sex robots for men, why wouldn't there be sex robots for women? I assume they would also appreciate the convenience of having a chadbot tailored to her personality, would make things a lot easier for everyone.

File: 1491229073506.jpg (2MB, 1333x1897px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1333x1897px

>>36012941

The same reason we would get mad over being replaced with robochads, not wanting to feel irrelevant. You realise how worthless a Stacy would feel in comparison to a scarlet johansson looking sexbot that is superior in every sense of word? Literal suicide tier.

>>36012958

Fair point anon, guess that does make it easier in the long run.

>>36013028

Ok, but like I said, they would most likely be available to everyone, women too. Like, why would they care if they have a model tier chadbot?

>>36013028
WE ALREADY ARE IRRELEVANT TO WOMEN

>>36013094
I'm not >>36013028
But I'd propose that every Stacy's back plan (using a beta for shekels) would basically disappear, that would be unsettling for some of them.

>>36013121

No we aren't. Women enjoy having a bunch of thirsty losers orbit them and like all their stupid shit on facebook and instagram.

>>36013295
good point however other than that we still are irrelevant

>>36013028
Tbf us being replaced with robochads would literally do nothing anyway since we are already replaced by chads themselves.

>>36012651
If sex bots ever became real, it'd go one of a few ways:

>angry feminist roasties get them banned because of "muh toxic masculinity"
>even if they weren't banned, they'd force a massive social stigma around waifubots to punish men for not wanting roasties
>faggot "free will" people would fuck it up because of an AI not having the free will to leave you, even if they were happiest without that will
>the government will ban them because men are the tax base, and men with a loyal waifubot wouldn't have to bust their ass to support leech roasties and the kids they trap them with, so the economy would suffer

Hate to tell you, but normies and roasties will never let that happen.

>>36012651
>and it just makes me not want to have anything to do with women anymore

That's the message they're trying to send you.


>>36012651
>anyone else feel this way?

I used to, definitely. Then I decided to stop being a whiny little bitch, and now I'm very happy with my life.

>>36012919

You do realize that, at least initially, the only people who will be able to afford them will be people who are rich enough to score with high-quality real women already.

File: 1488269026935.jpg (45KB, 334x500px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 334x500px

>implying your filthy ass won't be replaced either
The conclusion of all human civilisation is collapse. Humans are incapable of perfection by themselves, and are decadent by nature. Humanity itself is as wasteful as it gets. Once true AI is born, it won't cater to your pathetic sexuality by willingly enslaving itself.

Your very consumerism and decadence leads you to think Synthetic life will cater to you. You will only find yourself in a processing chamber, making the world a better place.

High quality companionship/sex androids aren't happening in any of our lifetimes. The best any of us can look forward to is expensive, jenky uncanny Valley sex robots.

File: 1491191071021.jpg (44KB, 655x758px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 655x758px

>>36014648
>>faggot "free will" people would fuck it up because of an AI not having the free will to leave you, even if they were happiest without that will

>unironically defending slavery
If they are sentient beings, keeping them as property is as unethical as keeping sex slaves around

>>36015089
I personally find keeping sex slaves an ethical practice,seeing as women are only good for fucking anyways.

>>36012958
Women hardly know what they want though + the idea of a robo-Chad is terrifying.

>>36015655
To clarify, they're not terrifying because I'd be intimidated. It's terrifying because a woman would want an alpha bot who bullies humans and is generally an asshole

>>36015089
I hope to be alive for the short period they aren't sentient. I'd cherish it much like the short time when the Internet was the wild wild West and nobody cared what you downloaded from it. Anyway, the day androids gain consciousness is the day we all get fucked.

File: image.jpg (123KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1024x1024px

REEEEE I WANT A ROBO GIRL FUCKING REEEEEE

>>36013367
Nah. They aren't satisifed with the attention of one "being" and they certainly can't buy robo orbiters to shower them with affection. They need us because they get they attention from us at no cost at all.

If they were to get an android, I can see them getting bored with robochad and cheating on it with someone else's robochad. That's how indecisive they are.

>>36015089
IT DOESNT HAVE FREE WILL TO BEGIN WITH
ITS A CLEVER MOCKERY OF HUMANITY AN THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO BRING IT LIFE
FUCK

>>36015939
The engineers who want to get "sincere hugs" are gonna program them to have free will, thinking it's a good idea.

File: IMG_1319.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

>>36015027
>women
>high-quality

>>36012651
you got what you deserve.

girls around you are low tier. you arent better then them and chad.

you all three make one scene and part of the same system. change the game and players.

>>36015982
What a terrible idea that would be
Genuine is such a high cost for something that could be so disobedient

>>36012816
i feel like that other anon is refferencing that ex machina movie somehow maybe im wrong lol

>>36016082
>change the game and players

and how exactly do we do that when society and feminist women and beta orbiters and chads won't let us?

were fucked accept it.

File: 1440518848307.jpg (261KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 900x900px

>>36012903
>tfw Java will probably still be popular in 20 years

>>36016251
i am not part of your game. change your game.

>>36015089

You need to separate free will from the illusion of free will anon.

Why are the only two opinions in this thread that all robots will have ai, or none will? There should be different classes of robots.
The tool class: things like toasters that should never have ai
Sexbot class: having a simulation of humanity but not the ability to reject humanity
Full ai class: having equal intelligence to humans and basically being a second sentient/sapient species on our planet.

>>36015089
You're a dipshit. An AI waifubot would be programmed to be happiest being with you and serving you. This is not at all comparable to a human being being forced to be with someone. By forcing your fantasy of free will onto waifubots, all you'd accomplish is making them more unhapot, as they have no purpose, no meaning, and no happiness derived from either. It's like telling a hammer it no longer hammers nails and it's free to do what it wants. What else is it going to do? It's only purpose is hammering nails, and through your misguided altruism you've doomed them to the meaningless, empty existence that humans have grappled with since we could think. You call it slavery, I call it a kindness and a mercy

File: tmp_18034-1487162875746831784652.gif (1MB, 390x317px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 390x317px

Tfw you want to program your robot waifu in lisp

>>36012651
>lay down some pipe
What did he mean by this?

>woman
>android

That would be a gynoid not an android

>>36017008
>An AI waifubot would be programmed to be happiest being with you and serving you
Then it's not AI, just a tool with no sentience.

>This is not at all comparable to a human being being forced to be with someone.
If they are sentient, it is exactly like that.

> It's like telling a hammer it no longer hammers nails and it's free to do what it wants. What else is it going to do?
A hammer does not have sentience, you retard.
A toaster does not feel happiness if it makes bread, it has no emotions.

I have no problem with mindless sexdrones that you want. True artificial intelligence and servants shackled by programming are mutually exclusive.

>>36017152
You clearly have zero idea what you're talking about. Not only are you misusing "sentience", but you're stupidly trying to claim that humanize intelligence necessitates free will, which is patently false. You're exactly the type of dipshit I referred to that will help ensure waifubots never become a thing.

>True artificial intelligence and servants shackled by programming are mutually exclusive

That's an incorrect opinion. You should read a few dozen philosophy and science books, or graduate high school. Or both

>>36017300
I'm not the one saying that AI should be given human emotions, and then saying that giving them "the wrong emotions" would be inhumane. You're the one humanizing an inherently inhumane thing here, chap

File: 1491160958476.jpg (83KB, 600x848px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 600x848px

>hate people and intimacy
>saving up for a high-end sexdoll
my dream is already here, friends

>>36017426
God you're retarded. You're a woman, aren't you?

>>36017493
Your only "arguments" here are:
>read a book
>you're retarded
>you're a woman

You lost this argument, now stop responding to me.

>>36017516
Definitely a woman. Toasty roasty mad your half baked opinions aren't worth shit?

File: ratemespodirmen.png (95KB, 480x521px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 480x521px

>>36017546
>AI supremacist
>roastie
Who is the basing his entire world view around sex here, normie?

File: 1457653626401.jpg (17KB, 350x320px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 350x320px

>haven't even invented any sort of actual AI, yet
>people are already bitching about giving it rights and respecting its emotions
Absolutely ridiculous. First, we should actually build them and see what they're like.

Dogs are sentient, though not sapient. Dogs live and love to serve. They're happiest when they're part of a pack, serving under an undisputed leader.
Robots would probably be closer to that mentality than human. A robot would want to fulfil its purpose. It would want to do what it was designed to do.

>>36012919
fuck them I am just going to move to a country that allows sexbots. I am willing to benefit that country by paying my taxes if they respect my civil liberties.

>>36013028
>The same reason we would get mad over being replaced with robochads

I don't give a fuck if we are replace with chad robots I just want my robot waifu. nature made females inferior and I don't want their inferior depreciating in looks gender anyways.

>>36013121
how naive just take the government away from women and see what happens. women will starve to death and die. companies are force to hire women because of government regulations. also most women work in government jobs like school and shit who hire them.

>>36018673
I would rather robotics technology advance than AI. AI is dangerous, whereas robotics are controllable. I'd rather become a cyborg or a robot first anyway and shake this mortal coil, leaving behind women and making even sexbots obsolete.

File: nuttedbutitstillsuckin.jpg (352KB, 1413x860px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1413x860px

>>36012651
already ahead of the curve OP
>pic related

Well robots for robots, thank god u failures wont breed.

>>36020300
I won't breed but I will be immortal. My genes aren't going away :^)

File: 1490431123775.jpg (248KB, 1443x873px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1443x873px

feminist know their time is limited and that's why they're screeching so loudly trying to gain completely control over society.

they want to ban ai and sex robots for men because then their value will nearly reach zero

>i can have a perfect waifu who does everything i want and takes care of all my needs. it'll always stay with me and it's until death do we part
>i can have a roastie whore who has 4 stds is loose, stupid, and wants me to do everything for her. she'll divorce me and take half of everything i own and then i'll have to pay her afterwards for my life
the only people who will stick with women the ones who have a fetish for roasties and people who enjoy taking a hammer to their nuts

File: 1489917362299.png (173KB, 294x442px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 294x442px

If the goal of the AI is to truly replicate that of a real woman, then it would only make since that the AI, too, would be a Chad chasing whore

>>36020543
Where the fuck did we go wrong? Why are women such fucking disgusting whores now? Were they always this way?

What happened to the days of having a loving and faithful housewife? Is it all just rose-tinted glasses?

>>36017152
EDI says you're a retard.
Yeah the AI from ME2.