What if there was a social network that graphed everyone's sexual partners? Like a family tree.
It'd look more like a fuckin spider web or a fractal rather than a tree
>>35959821
i dont know, what if?
Perhaps something like this.
>>35959841
That's what I meant.
>>35959856
Would it have similar societal implications like tinder did with dating? I put so much more leverage into the hands of women. What if we revealed everyone's sexual partners?
holly
>+10
lindsay
>+3
jen
>+5
lindsie
>a lot
kenzie
>+5
christie
>+4
jenn
>+4
harumi
>+4
asami
>+1
maiko
>+1
darci
>+5
kara
>whole bunch
jacklyn
>+3
sarah
>+6
shannon
>+3
steph
>+3
kristin
>+3
tisa
>+3
cierra
>dont wanna knowknown igloo brothers
Go to Facebook timeline of a chick and scroll down, you'll see exes and pics with guys......
>>35960100
Just need to incentivize people to confirm two users banged (through anonymous submissions) then it reveals a bang match! You might also be alerted with an Eskimo Brother Match! And every stacey would be socially shamed.
If you let guys anonymously submit a pair of people that banged or even stacies then this could definitely work. After so many anonymous submissions then you have a Bang Match! Anonymous submission is the key to making this work though. So many gossipy women would do most of the work and the brag chads would do the rest. The result would be sluts btfo and a social shaming mechanism that takes roasties down a notch. Sluts get taken down a notch, and fat girls with an ego with Bang Matches with a couple of fat guys get brought back to reality.
I call is BangBook.
>>35960193
is that what youre gonna spend all your jerry jones money on taco?