Is demisexual even a legitimate sexuality? >even if it is,

>>35959340
What does it mean? They're half sexual? I'd stop talking to them if they're adamant about it. You just can't take these people seriously if they do.

>>35959340
Bisexual, pansexual, demisexual, panromantic..? What do all these mean? Or what are the differences?

>>35959340
Who decides if sexualities are legitimate? The 4chan council of sexual purity?

>>35959375
Pretty much:

>Demisexuality is a sexual orientation in which someone feels sexual attraction only to people with whom they have an emotional bond. Most demisexuals feel sexual attraction rarely compared to the general population, and some have little to no interest in sexual activity. Keep reading to understand more about this orientation.

A lot of it describes the typical "beta fag" on here pretty well.

File: 1350150280635.jpg (60KB, 960x768px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 960x768px

>>35959340
>>35959375
So, I had to Google this shit.

>A demisexual is a person who does not experience sexual attraction unless they form a strong emotional connection with someone. It's more commonly seen in but by no means confined to romantic relationships.

MY SIDES HAVE BEEN DESTROYED.

This is just women's way of saying they don't want to fuck you, because she hasn't "formed a strong emotional relationship" with you, until Chad comes along and quickly "bonds" with her.

>>35959395
>>35959375

It means they're a mentally ill special snowflake. I'd stop talking to them too

>>35959407
that definition of demisexual basically describes the most wholesome and respectable type of sexuality

Men run away from women who call themselves demisexual not because they're afraid of love but because women who calls themselves that are likely crazy SJW types.

I'm a demisexual in a definition sense but I don't go around calling myself it because that's retarded.

>>35959426
Same. Do you still fap to porn or do you have to actually be friends with the person first?

>>35959420
I mean, I can understand if someone has personal preferences about who they want to sleep with, whether that has to do with emotion, sexuality, gender etc. but why are there so many specific labels for these 'orientations'?

>>35959447
I fap to porn but it only to help me with visualizing it in my head with someone i do have a connection with.

>>35959461
>why are there so many specific labels for these 'orientations'

Because...

They are mentally ill special snowflakes

Why do LGBTQ types categorize themselves into exclusive orientations but then turn around and tell me that sexuality is fluid.

Why not just fuck who you want?

>>35959560
Fucking who you want isn't "special" enough...oh wait let's make that a new sexuality: degenerate

>>35959472
Bruh im the same, otherwise i fucking hate porn

I hate kissing and sex scenes in movies and I also think casual sex is disgusting. By all intents and purposes I am demosexual but I dont call myself that because im not a fag

>>35959340
>implying i care
>implying i have a standard

>>35959560
I'd guess because an orientation's exclusivity doesn't preclude fluidity, while providing a nice way to describe proclivities. No idea why lgbtbbq types tend to use them more than other folk

>>35959340

The whole absurdist delineation of innumerate different categories of sexual and gender expression is one of the most compelling pieces of contemporary evidence in favour of queer theory.

People want the cultural solidarity and protection that comes from being named or labelled, and but those names and labels were originally legitimised and popularised by their persecutors. To paraphrase Foucault, 'the category of the homosexual was invented in the 1880s.' That is to say; historically, sexuality was something used to primarily describe acts and only occasionally individuals.

That's not to say that those categories don't exist, as they exist within the structures of persecution and protection, as well as within implicit bias and LGBT+ cultures.


I'm not doing a great job here because I have the flu and it's 4:00am and I can't fucking sleep but I guess I just tend to see things like this as a struggle to find legitimacy in a system which doesn't necessarily reflect the true nature of human sexuality and gender expression.

>>35960622
>demosexual
You only have sex with one eyed black scotmen?

>>35959340
>>>/lgbt/
Get to your original containment board

>>35959340
What's wrong with having more words to describe things?

>>35960871
>>35961769
What is this libtard bullshit?

>>35959340
I would stop talking to a woman after she told me she was demisexual too. I wouldn't feel comfortable fucking a retard.

>When men find out I'm demisexual, they usually stop talking to me.

Probably because at that point they realize they're dealing with a girl who is too deep into tumblr.

>>35960871
>People want the cultural solidarity and protection that comes from being named or labelled,

It other words, marxism. People are not individuals to the useful idiots of the world they are part of a group. Its sad that these people can't even see themselves as an individual.

>>35960871
Translation: Look at me, I read a book by a French faggot who died of AIDS and I take anthropology classes

>>35960871
>but those names and labels were originally legitimised and popularised by their persecutors
which names and labels?

>>35961769
People are trying to make it seem like these are legit sexualities when it's just a preference. You say you're demisexual, just say you only like fucking people you have a connection with. I'm not running around calling myself a latinasexual or a thiccumsexual, it would be retarded.

>>35959340
Is Whisper a legitimate website?

>>35962367
>You say you're demisexual, just say you only like fucking people you have a connection with.
Demisexual is faster.

>>35959415
Holy fuck anon. You have the true sight tonight.

File: 1490118829159.png (1MB, 890x1275px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 890x1275px

>>35959340
It's all bullshit. A LOT of people feel this way. They're just not autistic enough to want to slap these extra labels on themselves.
People just say it to sound more interesting, or tofeel special.

>>35962401
they must have enough users to sell native ads or something

It's like geolocated anon memes for normies

>>35959340
lol no it's a description of a preference. Like saying that i like girls with big butts is a sexuality desu

>>35959340
oh god, I've seen some shit youtuber label herself as "demisexual" just recently.

it's so fucking depressing to be like that. it's even depressing to be gay in the first place but come on, "demisexual" means you can't even get off on somebody's physical attractiveness until you actually get into a relationship with them. that means you don't even fap to random people or porn.

where's the fun in that shit?

>>35959415
ur probably right. that might really be some typical female bullshit term in all that.

File: 1468700679795.jpg (92KB, 786x595px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 786x595px

Demisexual is a made up sexuality created by a girl as an excuse to fuck all of the elves, lizardmen etc in some game.

If someone unironically describes themselves as demisexual you should avoid them, along with sapiosexual and pansexual off the top of my head.

>>35959461
tumblr has poisoned them into thinking that being straight is a sin
same reason why they can't just say they're a girl who is masculine, they have to say they're a demi-girl or something because not being lgbt is akin to being hitler on their site

File: __takanashi_hikari_demi_chan_wa_kataritai_drawn_by_kotonoha_zaja__d7083554cce56b6963a7575105ea9f6b.jpg (309KB, 800x920px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 800x920px

>demisexual
You're goddamn right.

>>35959415
>>35959415
yea. Chad quickly bonds.

>>35963255
In my experience, it's more the case that being straight just isn't interesting enough.

You might be surprised by how surface level some of the more vapid LGBTQ proponents are - a lot simply base their first impression on how 'unique' another person's sexuality or orientation is, disregarding personality entirely. It's entirely hypocritical, but they have no idea, or don't care to realise. I'm not saying all of them do this, but it's something I've noticed among a substantial number of them.

>>35959340
They probably assumed it was some new term for being gay. Also demisexuality is retarded, you could just say you're not interested in casual sex but then you wouldn't get to pretend you're some oppressed minority.

>>35962193
>people like this exist
wow.

lol, people and women especially have no problem having an "emotional connection" or "loving" someone five minutes after meeting them. I think this might be why so many religions have the no sex before marriage idea, it's a lot more difficult to bullshit that kind of commitment than it is to just say you love someone.

>>35965850
No, it's because marriage was a contract, and a non virgin was worth less cows and grain. Knob.

>>35959340
I've unmatched girls who said they were demi.
It felt so right.

If Chad doesn't have to date, neither should I.

>>35959340
Of course it isn't.

There are two human sexes, man and woman. That means there are 4 total combinations of sexes you can be attracted to. One or the other, both, or neither. That's it, 4 sexualities. The rest is just made up bullshit by people who want to feel special and different.

>>35959415
Saved for future use, your burning rhetoric shall go down in legend my friend

>>35959340
identity is one of the base needs for most people. it guards against insecurity. sexuality is the greatest source of insecurity

what did you expect would happen