>women are oppressed in Western society

well this is brilliant

File: 4b6.jpg (8KB, 400x343px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 400x343px

>>35831367
SHE'S BARELY SHOWING HER BODY AND NOT THAT CLEARLY SHOWING HER FACE WHY THE FUCK ARE PEOPLE DOING THIS THIS MAKES ME SO FUCKING ANGRY
SERIOUSLY FUCK ORBITERS HOW COULD SOMEONE BE SO FUCKING PATHETIC

File: drew.png (572KB, 535x716px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 535x716px

>>35831494
Aw man this is absolutely brilliant. I'm going to do the same thing. I wonder how eager people will be to donate 10 bucks to this bombshell?

>>35831367

American women need to be gassed desu senpai

>>35831772
You probably should choose a picture of a real woman and not a man cross-dressing.

Been trying this all night OP, can't get it to work desu

File: 0291347124.png (171KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1280x1280px

>>35831367
I hope she gets raped and strangled to death by niggers

Kek This is brilliant I don't blame her one bit

>>35831494
orbiters like this are the reason why roasties exist.

only women are beggars
#JustGreasyVirginThings

>>35832184
>only women are beggars
>#JustGreasyVirginThings

I dont get it

>>35832222
The roastie is offended by this thread, but too weak to respond with anything but passive aggressive, indirect insults.

>>35831367
Fucking cucks willing to send a stranger money just because she's pretty. You can't blame women for things like this, it's not her fault men are desperate retards. It only makes sense for her to take advantage.

>>35832239
You've just described the whole female gender.

>>35832246
>you can't blame women for this, because women have no agency

I agree.

>>35832283
You know you made a doo doo in your underwear, right? Can't you feel it? Smell it?

>>35832239
>the thread is exactly that but with the addition of being a circle jerk

Wait, she doesn't have to timestamp or anything
why don't we do this?
Just find uncommon pics of semi cute girls and make tinder profiles

>>35832940

There is a risk of butthurt normies coming to you house

>>35831367

thats not a women, thats a dirty motherfocker fedora tip from /biz/ doing a scam.

but, its a good idea for scamming.

>>35832246
Do you agree with tax evasion too?

>>35833015
Honestly I'm fine with that risk
I'm gonna do this, wish me luck guys

>>35833054
Thats a false equivalency though.

>>35831367
I saw a girl on tinder the other day who's bio was was literally just her venmo name and then basically
>send me money on venmo. No really, that's literally the only reason I'm on here.
I can't up load the screen shot. Every time I try to post any picture i just get redirected to a "bad request" page.

File: 1490573952553.jpg (33KB, 530x600px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 530x600px

>>35832642
Sounds like you were offended by my comment. I wonder why.
>>35832775
You can't even respond directly to my comment. Typical woman.

>>35833054
>tax evasion
>$35
have u ever done taxes?

>>35833078
Tax evaders take advantage of the tax situation. Greedy women take advantage of beta cucks. Neither situation should exist.

>>35833175
I'm aware you're quite stupid, but try to understand that it's the situations that are similar, not the proceeds

>>35833093
Yeah bro, you're sitting there with a fat load of doo doo in your underpants, but when people get offended it must be from your inflammatory comments, right? Just scrape some of it out in the bathroom dude, this isn't Buckingham Palace, but come on.

>>35833201
Well seeing as how our Fuhrer pretty much admitted to all kinds of bullshit loopholes in his taxes, I don't think us humble peasants are allowed to have an opinion on the subject.

Why is everyone assuming its an actual grill doing this? Who gonna use their own face to rob people?

Can't blame her for taking advantage of poor cucks, I know I would rip them off even more.

Hell I still can, cucks can't tell the difference between real and catfish accounts.

>>35833211
>your inflammatory comments
Which part of my comment caused in you the inflammation you speak of?

Can't they get a refund or something like that from PayPal? Looks pretty good for quick cash but may turn out bad (financially) in the end

>>35833015
How would they be able to get your address? And as much as I hate them, I doubt any sane normie would hand over money to some skank online. Only people willing to do this are orbiters.

>>35833321
I can't really see how they could get their money back. There's no goods or services being paid for, if there are they're intangible which paypal doesn't refund for anyway. I think it'll be seen as a voluntary donation.

Only way someone could get their money back would be through something like a chargeback I think and for just 5 dollars is more hassle than it's worth

Finally I doubt anyone would go through the embarrassment of trying to get their money back from this.
>Hello paypal? Yeah I sent this girl 5 bucks hoping for some nude pics or something...

>>35834063
True. This could also be pretty scalable. Set up a VPN for a different location, get more pictures and accounts, etc..

this isn't the girl doing this with her real name and pictures you fucking retards

it's someone trying to make a quick buck and it is literally illegal

society is not as fucked as you think

>>35834380
>>and it is literally illegal

Explain how? She/him/it is not forcing people to hand money over they are doing it willingly for what they must know is a scam.

>>35834380

I doubt anyone will get caught unless you make enough to make it worthwhile for the govt to come steal from you (hundreds of thousands). Technically it is probably wirefraud since the likelihood of an interstate money transfer is high.

>>35834380
how is it illegal? the bio does not promise anything

File: 1444301345252.png (51KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 657x527px

I'm going to do this but I'm going to give them a nude of some random camwhore I'll grab off /soc/ in return.

Much less chance of getting busted if they walk away happy.

>>35833093
>implying that wasn't direct

cry some more fag

>>35834772
Greentexting is indirect. You are not responding to me, you are describing a scenario to a wider audience.