Too good for him.

File: ok_cupid.png (14KB, 480x353px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x353px

>>35776802
They do, it's just the reverse of men ie. taller women are seen as less attractive, pic related. Some shit I found from Okcupid, notice it takes a nose dive around 5'10".

>>35777093

It's not the same though. The tall women get less choice but the choice they get is tallest of Chads.

It's not the same at all.

>>35777093

I'm sure Tayor Swift is really sad she isn't able to get with insecure 5'8-6' men, lol.

>>35777093
I like how the tallest women still get four times as many messges as the shortest men.

>>35777116
>the choice they get is tallest of Chads.

You mean the unattractive lanklets? Birds of a feather...

>>35777093
>tfw no 6'4 Amazon gf

>>35777124
I want to see you creampie Swifty!

File: F3.large.jpg (323KB, 704x1280px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 704x1280px

>>35777126
Kek, I didn't notice that. But I think it's 5 times as many.
>Tall women ~ 1 message
>Short men ~ 0.2 messages

Although it's the same across the board (women get 4-5 times as many messages as men), which I think might mean that height is only a component of what women see as attractive, pic partially related (deeper red=more attractive).

>>35777131

No I mean the tallest of Chads. I know plenty of tall cute girls and they get the best of the best.

>>35777232
>Anecdotes

Opinion discarded.

>>35777126

Man are less insecure about a taller partner than the other way round by a lot.

If you look at the statistics, about 45% of men would date a taller women. About 7% of women would date a shorter men.

>>35777244

>retard who is trying to pretend that being a tall men is somehow bad

Nobody gives as shit about your "lanklet" meme.

>>35777272
Evidence shows there's a point at which men are too tall, it's around 6'7"

>>35777300
>Women want a 6'6 Chad
Jesus Christ. Have some shame you sluts

>>35777300

Even then, a 6'7 dude will still do much better than a 5'7 dude so "too tall" is relative.

>>35777462
A 6'7 /fit/ man is called daddy at instinct, 5' anything is creepy.

>>35777462
>6'7 dude will still do much better than a 5'7
not looks wise, tall people usually have ugly mugs.

>>35777518

Height and facial attractiveness correlate positively, actually.

>>35777544
I'm sure you have proofs for that claim.

>>35777544
>Height and facial attractiveness correlate positively, actually.
Up to 6'-6'3, then the taller you are the uglier.

Because while on average guys prefer shorter girls, there is way more variety in what men like than what women like. Most guys like shorter to average height girls, but plenty like taller ones. Some guys like fit toned girls, some like girls with a bit of chub. Some guys like girls with an hour glass bod and massive T&A, some like slim androgynous girls. Guys are also more likely to be into multiple types of girls.

Every single girl wants a tall, lean decently muscled man with a big dick and a full head of hair. There are some superficial preferences (Some girls like guys with a jockey, bro aesthetic, some like guys with a sensitive, musician type aesthetic) but overall these are the same guy

>>35777598
>full head of hair
meme

>>35777093
Give me those 6'4''s, I'll take good care of them.

>>35777462
What are you smoking? At 6'7" you're 100% guaranteed to die a virgin. You are a circus freak. No man over 6'6" has ever had sex. This is a fact.

>>35777615
Because Jude Law, is considered just as much a heart throb now as he was with a full head of hair

>>35777544
On the contrary, facial aesthetics are inversely correlated with height. The optimal seems to be around 5'6" to 5'10". Anything taller and your facial looks go down fast.

File: 354364457.jpg (82KB, 1017x786px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1017x786px

>>35777669
>Give me those 6'4''s, I'll take good care of them.
What did he mean by this?

>>35777598
>be bitter kissless virgin
>know everything about what girls want

/r9k/ in a nutshell.

>>35777701
Here's your >(you), butthurt roast ghost