Would you date a girl with burns all over her body?
No they wouldn't. Just because they can be moe in 2D doesn't mean it's the same irl. Real burns are such painful eyesores.
I would date a guy with burns. i don't think they look ugly on the body.
>>35762286
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITDaToPnsNs
THEY HAD A WHITE FACE
THEY HAD BLACK EYES
THEY HAD BURNS ALL OVER THEIR BODIES
THEY HAD LOVE FOR MY REVULSION
AND THEY KISSED AWAY MY REPULSIOOON
I would marry a girl like that. I'm into emotionally damages girls.
I'd date any girl that loved me back.
Well I'd love her no matter what. But I'd be surprised if she wanted a chubby, stupid, wage slave, ugly guy.
>>35762286
I'm into guys but I would be friends with someone like that if they wanted to be friends with me
>>35762286
Not even into damaged girls but I'd fuck just about any girl. I had a teacher who had burn marks all over his arms and face and it just looked like a random splot of purple across his body. It's no big deal.
>>35762600
>>35762624
also these
>>35762286
Maybe? It depends how bad, it's not 2D, real burns are gross. But if she's nice, not fat, a virgin/loyal, fun to be around, and loves me then I would accept it. But otherwise I'd have to say no.
I have a hint for unconventionally attractive girls and girls with weird body issues.
I don't think I could if they were like facemelting burns on her face and shit tho
SYLVIE! SYLVIE! WE NEED MORE HEAD PAT THREADS!
>>35762945
>virgin/loyal
This made me think. A virgin would be nice but a girl who's been in a relationship and was loyal throughout would be just as, if not more, preferable.
No.Maybe.I once dated a girl with vitiligo though. Was a cute mexican girl that brought an umbrella with her.
>>35763078
If she's damaged in any way from the experience, no.
>>35763078
How, why would I rather have a girl who's been with other people? I explicitly stated that she'd be loyal, why would I want to to have been with another guy?
>>35763162
wow you are retarded my dude
>>35763126
Don't know what you mean but my thought process is that a virgin is basically a random adopted dog who never got to show its temperament, you have no idea how it's going to act once it's actually your pet, while someone who was loyal in a committed relationship shows exactly what they're like while dating.
>>35763186
How's that retarded? Would you rather date a girl who's sucked another man's dick or hasn't if everything else is equal?
>>35763233
>doesn't know what loyal means
>>35763205
It's all new to you anyway. A non-virgin could just as well try to adapt to the new situation because of the last failure. And I meant if the girl has been damaged (such as mentally or emotionally) from the last experience, that's a minus regardless of her loyalty.
>>35762286
Post a pic and I'll be able to say
Anime burns aren't good enough for me to determine
Self-harm burns, I would. Other burns, it depends how bad they are.