I was telling someone my theory about how I thought a rapist was innocent and part of my scenario had him giving his pants to the alleged victim to wear as hers were soiled by urine. The person I was speaking to then said:
>But for that to work, he'd have to drive his car without pants on.
... Like, this is why it's better to not bother with speaking because 90% of people love in some imaginary land where cars can't go through the ignition sequence if the driver is pants less. Fuck.
>>35754692
Interesting.. My car doesn't work if i dont wear pants. I also dont have a car... Or pants. But if i did it wouldnt go if i didnt wear pants... Maybe..
>>35754718
Wow, that was an awful post. Apologize
>It's a "pretentious Reifag thinks he's smarter than everyone else" episode again
>>35754727
Sorry for the shitpost guys/girls. Also sorry to op.
>>35754748
Wrong on all counts. I am smarter and Asuka is best.
>>35754766
>I am smarter and Asuka is best.
A-alright then, maybe you really are smart then, anon
Rei fucked her son kinda
>>35754718
Still smarter than the other guy.
>>35754692
That was his way of telling you off becuase he didn't care. You can aruge literally anyone's innocence, it's like saying no one should go to jail and people get tired of the reminder that no one knows if someone is really guilty.
>>35755977
Fucking what? X
>>35754692
I would ask you why her pants were soaked in urine if she wasn't actually put into a terrifying(people piss themselves when extremely scared) rape scenario that she claims to have been in.
Her being raped holds water with this information.
>>35757264
The man in the case was acquitted, but it was widely held that he was guilty and got away with his actions. I believe there is a different possibility, not just of technical innocence, but actual innocence.
The cab driver was apprehended by police with with a girl, not wearing pants or underwear, and with her legs propped up on the front seats. A typical rape, it would seem.
I contend that the evidence might add to something else. The girl's pants and underwear were found inside out, in the front, and soaked with urine, but the forensics team found no urine on the backseats. That means, not only did she not urinate herself in the taxi, she did not sit there with soiled pants. My order of events:
>Taxi picks up drunk woman
>woman requests stop to vomit/piss
>cabbie lets her out, after stopping in a secluded area
>something happens to her, likely, she pisses on herself an d passes out
>cab driver leaves and finds her in that state
>he can't just leave her on the ground in cold weather
>so, in order to keep piss off his seats, he takes her pants the rest of the way off
>then he carries her to his car, and props her legs up on the front seats to keep his cab clean
>realizes he can't drop this girl off half naked, so unbuttons his pants to cover her up
>this is when the cops approach
>naturally, he panics when he realizes what this looks like, and tries to hide her clothes he is holding
this is the worst thread i've seen in a very long time