Pointless argument

>>35741459
fyi this is not hurting the tanks at all

what the fuck does this question even mean

are we talking about some specific bong? is this about possible negative health effects of boiling an egg in bong water? or is the water clean? I don't fucking understand

>>35741558
>shower of sparks hitting oxy acetylene tanks isn't bad

>>35741608
no it isn't. a spark won't penetrate a tank you know.

white collar loser.

>>35741608
you could do that all day and they'd be fine, they're thick heavy steel.

>>35741459
No stupid
When you cook an egg in a bong, it gets baked, not boiled

>>35741678
>>35741688
>ignoring the chance theres a leak
this is why theres a thousand videos of retards killing themselves at work

>>35741608
those sparks wont make the tanks explode
This isnt a fucking movie you doughy office fuck

>>35741558
If there's a leak near the valve you could blow yourself up doing something like this. There's no excuse for being a jackass. I constantly see people post this response to that image and i can't tell if so many people are just retarded or just b8.

>>35741608
What, do you think they're made of tin foil? Also the oxygen is in the other tank. So in order for an explosion to happen, the oxygen has to leak out of its tank, into the acetylene tank.

>>35741705
1.If there was a leak they would know about it
2.it still wouldnt>>35741705
be enough to cause an explosion

>>35741678
>>35741688
>>35741706
>>35741731
>t. Explosion fetishists

>>35741608
Did you learn everything you know about the world from video games or something?

>>35741705
>>35741708
if there's a leak then that's your problem, with or without sparks. and a spark won't blow the whole thing up if there's a leak.

idiots.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SNrEp-V8zQs

So are we going to learn if bong boiling will do an egg?

>>35741753
>>35741739
>>35741731
>>35741706
>>35741688
>>35741678
You're why osha is down my dickhole aren't you?

>>35741608
>>35741705
>>35741708
>>35741752
this isn't call of duty, limp wristed bitches

File: 1488948825941.jpg (36KB, 368x525px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 368x525px

>>35741459
Only a weed smoker would ask such a stupid nigger tier question.

Are you really stupid enough to think that your bong boils water? Honestly, i cant tell if this is satire because of how incredibly stupid stoners are.
No, it wont boil, faggot.

>inb4 hur hur put bong on stove hur hur
kys

>>35741766
It's about minimizing risks.
>If there's a leak then that's your problem
What the fuck did you even mean by this?
It's very possible that sparks could cause a fire. Plus the sparks could be damaging your gas lines too, if you're hitting them. You're legitimately retarded.

This threed gave me autism

>>35741766
technically it could explode if there's a leak in the oxygen tank, but the pressure would have to get low enough that the force of the exploding gas is expanding towards the crack faster than the gas is escaping, which would mean being nearly empty.

File: 1046229-12-20151117123206.png (606KB, 991x505px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 991x505px

>>35741816
>xd dis aind cow a doody
no its real life where the 1 in a million chance theres a perfect leak you are now on fire and will look like fucking shrek for all eternity

I suppose it could be done over a Bunsen burner.

But how do you get the egg into the bong?

>>35741884
>>35741816
>>35741753
>>35741708
>>35741706
>>35741678
>>35741688
>>35741706
>>35741731
>>35741706
>>35741688
>Muh impenetrable oxygen tank
https://youtu.be/NaYVZEDrktE
All they did what throw a little metal ball at it and it exploded. Imagine what Sparks would do

>>35741884
it's just not all that likely
>>35741766
this vid demonstrates a good point, grinding sparks are not that hot also they cool quickly. it looks funnier than there is imminent danger

>>35741928
retard
>>35741920
wrong
see
>>35741909

>>35741946
>oh it would only shoot out a jet of flame it wouldn't explode
>who cares about a little old fire?
>in a fucking shop full of things that also just love fire
Kill yourself

>>35741884
a leaking tank would be a problem on its own, you'd know about it if it leaked. and yes, if you have a leaking tank and sparks hit the leak, it will cause a fire. it won't blow the whole thing up which i'm sure some spoiled kids ITT think.

all in all it's not the end of the world. you might lose a tank of acetylene if for some reason you didn't notice it's leaking but nothing will blow up.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oKP49yhp89s

File: Jewish nazi.jpg (47KB, 924x684px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 924x684px

>>35741459
ok guys just to clear this up, i am a handyman and have used similar configurations on a regular basis for several years. Several times i have dripped molten silver on my pony tanks wile using propane, and there was fucking nothing.

Pic related is one of the welds i've made. Here i even made a tutorial where you can see how safe this shit is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgST44DW6NE

>>35741932
Yeah and we aren't lucky enough to have your ass struck by lightning when you sit outside during a thunderstorm.

>>35741946
>I'm the retard
https://youtu.be/bqbWc5bzoiE
Another rock exploding a tank. Surprise surprise

>>35741928
>throw a little metal ball at it
>after being shot by high power rifle
i hope this is bait

DUDE BONG LMAO

>>35741928
How are sparks the equivalent of being shot by a high powered rifle?

>>35742013
>another video of someone literally shooting at a gas tank

metal sparks aren't bullets

>>35742013
I can't tell if you are serious with these videos, but holy fuck that was dangerous

>>35742033
>>35742070
>>35742117
>>35742124
Prove to me that they did not just throw a little metal object at it

Sparks are literally high speed fire, think about what that would do do a tank when it hits it. BURN A FUCKING HOLE DUMBASSES

File: 1488427842325.png (458KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 640x1136px

>>35742009
Wow sick turotiral, fat 12 year old homosexual.

>>35741985
>you'd know about it if it leaked
Not necessarily.
I don't get why the fuck everybody ITT is so adamant about being able to grind near an acetylene tank. Everybody wants to just take their chances with a volatile substance. You shouldn't risk an unwanted fire in a shop fucking ever. Everybody in this thread is the reason that men's on-the-job casualties are so high.

>>35742162
holy shit please be bait

this post made me so angry i jumped out of my gamerchair and shadowboxed for a couple of minutes.

File: 2897407-140402082534.png (184KB, 495x371px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 495x371px

This thread is giving me severe autism

>>35741690
underrated post
organfailure

>>35742208
>I don't get why the fuck everybody ITT is so adamant about being able to grind near an acetylene tank. Everybody wants to just take their chances with a volatile substance.

nobody is encouraging you to do that near tanks, but this whole thing started with two retards saying this will blow up the tank, which is wrong. the only thing we're saying here is that metal sparks won't penetrate a tank, let alone blow it up. then when we rebutted your statement you brought another scenario into this which was a LEAKING tank. when looking at OP's pic you can assume it's not a leaking tank since a non-leaking tank is the default position. then you gave up even on that one and now you're pretending like we're encouraging this. no we're not. give up, kid.

>>35742208
nice try changing the argument, kobe. There is nothing dangerous about sparks hitting a compressed fuel tank in the scenario of grinding.

>>35742357
I never said that this would blow up the tank. I said it could potentially be dangerous if there were a leak and also be damaging to the gas lines. Nice strawman, though. Of course the sparks wouldn't penetrate the fucking tank. The logistics shouldn't be relevant. The point is that nobody should be taking unnecessary risks like that. I'm not the one defending throwing sparks at a tank containing an extremely flammable substance, bud. Who's really the dumbass here?

>>35742357
>YOU SAID IT WAS GUN SPLODE
you mentioned explosions first fag
>WELL YOU BROUGHT UP A TOTALLY REALISTIC SITUATION WHERE IT WOULD BE BAD BUT I IGNORED THAT FUCK YOU
>AND ALSO I DON'T EVEN ENCOURAGE THIS I JUST ARGUED ABOUT IT FOR NO REASON

if you had enough water and heated it enough

why are you guys so quick defend a guy showering sparks on some gas tanks. whether it makes a giant explosion or not is irrelevamt, the fact he's doing at all in the first place is fucking retarded, it's a hazard that can be avoided by just moving the tanks somewhere else.

File: 1485145270567.gif (557KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

557KB, 500x375px

>>35742639
wrong. There is no hazard, you mechanically illiterate goy. Just because you have a thyroid condition that impairs your ability to think doesn't change the outcome of real life events. half an inch, hell even a quarter inch, or 3mm would even be safe given that much surface to dissipate heat.

Just because the shiny shiny is hot doesn't mean the shiny shiny is go boom, nigger. Those flakes of metal that you see as sparks are being flared by the camera, they are finer than half the size of a grain of sand.

>>35741459
it's probably staged because of the age of the pic, back then everyone didn't have a camera to quick catch candid moments

File: Get a load of this guy.jpg (35KB, 600x657px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x657px

>>35742720
Refer to
>>35742527
I outlined the hazards. (different anon).

>>35742773
>2017--01-07
>people didn't have cameras that could capture sparks

>>35742826
Are you autismo? This picture has been thrown around for years.

File: 7e7.jpg (62KB, 600x516px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 600x516px

>>35742822
see this
>>35741909
>posts a picture of a jew
kike eternally BTFO, go back to school kid.

>>35742527
>>35742548
>hehehehe i didn't even say that! and you can't prove me wrong because everyone is anonymouse here!
if it doesn't apply to you then don't reply. i'm talking to the retards that say sparks will blow up a gas tank.

Now this thread really lived up to its name. Op didn't even get his question answered

>>35743839
>>35741861
check again normal

>>35744057
Huh? Huh? Huh? Huh? Huh?

That's what I thought. Fuck off.

File: 2-80L-Acetylene-Gas-Cylinder-Price-with-Oxygen-for-Industrial-Welding.jpg (20KB, 225x300px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 225x300px

>>35742720
>There is no hazard
Pic related you utter ass clown.

>>35741928
>all they did was launch a little metal slug at his head, what do you mean it exploded?

>>35744102
not an argument you insipid little cunt