If you could remove one group of people from /r9k/, which would it be?
My vote goes through nonvirgins. I would rather wade through a sea of boipussy (male) nonsense and fembot AMAs than read about one normie getting laid.
boipussy... their just fucking annoying and keep pushing their stupid fucking ITS NOT GAY IF ITS A GIRL HEHE shit
even if we ignored them the faggots would still run rampant
I agree, non-virgins do not belong on this board.
Females do not belong either.
>>35737826
Even though they're attention vacuums, I can tolerate gurls as long as they somehow haven't had sex.
Probably the most outspoken haters of femanons and Chad etc. They shit threads up even more than the attention seeking females.
I'm as virgin as the rest of you but I'm not too bitter and entitled over it. I possess a repellent personality along with being fat. It's no one else's fault I'm a virgin.
But I really used to like this board a lot more before all this shit. Before "virgin" became a sort of requirement. You can somehow have had sex and still not fit in anywhere. It's not a magical cure all
Gays. Without any hesitation or doubt, gays are the most annoying, worst posters on this board and this website in general.
Ttessftygsschkpplbvdse
>>35737763
nonvirgins are fine if they dont do >virgin detected and shit like that
yeah no shit my nigga
>normie getting laid
even on an anonymous image board, bragging means a lot to them
>>35737763
I swear to god I've seen this image before outside of 4chan
>>35737936
I only see it on /x/.
>>35737936
didn't mean to tripfag
> >>35737763
>If you could remove one group of people from /r9k/, which would it be?white males(/pol/)
>>35737763
I'd remove virgin males, so we could stop bickering about this board being anything other than a second /b/