INTP best type?

>>35731810
Only master race is extroverts, buddy.

Love,
A Stacey.

>>35731836
there are no real stacies on r9k, next.

File: weeeee.gif (14KB, 416x416px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 416x416px

>>35731810
tfw you can see the world for what it is
where my INTP boys at?

Master of disaster

File: image.png (227KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 640x1136px

>>35732177
>where my intp boys at

Right here niggy

>putting any stock in "personality types"

God you guys are autistic children

>>35731810
Normies don't even know what these personality types are anyway so why bother

>>35731810
INTP reporting in
>tfw you spending 20 minutes writing out an argument and no one replies

File: 1490012262042.png (3KB, 379x426px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 379x426px

>>35732497
I would read it, Anon

>>35731810
Camouflaged narcissists

File: 1490168082987-r9k.png (247KB, 500x411px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 500x411px

INTP here as well, still hate everything

>>35732188
This

Doesn't matter how "smart" or rational we are if we can't apply it. We're fucked bros

Big deal, you need TP. We all need TP, who wants to walk around with a gross butt?

>>35732267
INTJ nigger detected, it's actually fairly accurate from my experience.

t. INFJ

>>35731810
Was intp
Then infp

What happened to me?

>>35732679
Not him, but why waste energy by debating on a Cambodian forum like 4chin? If you're good at it, use in ways that are more productive and conducive to self-development.

>>35732628
you mistyped. your type never changes.

how do other intps act around other people? are you like a "social chameleon" at all?

i keep getting intp but i really don't think i fit the description

>>35732679
Honestly you should start posting on /lit/ if you don't already. A lot of that board is dedicated to long winded arguments but people actually read them there. Even if half of the argument is just calling the other person a double nigger faggot mucus

>>35732772
How so? I hate arguing with people but it tends to be something I can't help myself from doing unless I entirely avoid opening my mouth in the first place, I tend to have to massively shorten my arguments as well because they're so long that by the time I would've replied the thread would be dying. I can have so many points I can't remember all of them, and I could rattle on and expand every single one for probably what is 10 minutes each, and it only takes 20 seconds to make each point in my head. It's actually similar to how I normally think sometimes, I'll have a thought, then three thoughts will branch off from that, then three more from each one of those thoughts and so on.

Apart from rambling to an impressive extent which I'd say makes for an peculiar party trick I have found no practical for it. I'm even doing it now, I meant to have replied minutes ago but I've made this post stupidly long.
>>35732816
I hear /lit/ are just massive faggots that argue over philosophy a subject I don't really care about.

>>35732267
I can literally guess what type people are are if I know them long enough. Sometimes I don't even need to know them well at all.

>>35732930
You didn't answer my question though. I asked why you are doing it. Is your answer that you can't help yourself from doing it? Then why even come here if you don't get anything out of it (i.e. nobody replies to you)?

>>35733027
If I don't start in the first place I can generally resist, but once I've started typing or talking in the case of real life I just don't stop, people reply enough but either way I'm going to end up being frustrated.

>>35732930
I have similar communicating problems.
Similarly, I always come up with a few different points when the context calls for just one. In conversation, I usually don't start talking until I pick one, and the moment passes to say any of them before I do. In text, I'll draft them up and reconsider and elaborate until it's too much hassle and and I just discard the message half the time.