Feminists will defend this.

>>35661431
this is stupid
that's like the male sexuality one trying to force itself to the 5th one
how did you think this was good bait or even worth talking about?

File: mating_cad_dad-copy1.jpg (1MB, 3333x2500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3333x2500px

>tfw we could have a perfect society if women would just accept their ideal match instead of always trying to date up

>>35661469
dont other species of animals do this as well? the females will pick the best potential mate?

>>35661495
Some species eat their babies, should we start doing that too? Isn't the point of humanity to wanna evolve beyond women's barbaric nature?

>>35661469
>2.5 aiming for seven and NO LESS
At least I must secretly be a Chad I guess

>>35661431
can someone explain this?

I need someone to start my brain engine

File: 1484350149884.jpg (400KB, 3268x553px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 3268x553px

Anyone whom'st've does not go for wizard is a fag.

>>35661503
sure but if the uglies reproduce then there will be more uglies. lets just stop all uglies from reproducing.

>>35661495
With most animals the biggest and strongest male usually breeds by fighting off the weaker ones

Human sexuality, at least in the modern Western world is nothing like that, males peacock themselves and women pick the richest, best looking one with the highest social status

>>35661495

in the animal kingdom females have no choice. they have sex with whoever rapes them.

who the actual fuck cares m8

>>35661516

20% of men are having sex with 99% of women.

>>35661431
This is exactly why we need arranged marriage
Arrange marriage culture even's the playing field
Also countries with arrange marriage have the lowest divorce rate

>>35661495
Honestly in most cases it's worse, there are a lot of species of crustaceans where the vast majority of males are basically there to die and not much else.
That said OP is just wanting bait

>>35661516
One man is happy to take what he can get. All the women only want Chad. The outcome being of course that Chad fucks all of them because any man in the same position would do the same.

>>35661530
Feminists won't let you. Even the ugliest females want top tier men and they get knocked up and then shitty kids come out and that's how you get /r9k/

The only way to stop this is to take away women's rights to vote and make it illegal for them to try to date outside of their own level

>>35661533
It's still a huge roof. Human females are a lot weaker than their animal counterparts. Hell some females must be rape but they are huge/strong compared to the males.

We have these "players" with 10 girlfriends. Meanwhile nice guys are dying virgins. This is why we should bring back arranged marriage.

I became that guy. I am the one in five now.

Feels good man.

>>35661516
Men give themselves more options.

I don't know how true this is. Girls hook up with me, but not every girl hooks up with me

>>35661431
female hypergamy is a good thing it drives human evolution because women are selecting males who are the most fit for that environment. all women are like this because its genetic and instinctual. also more males are going to suffer in a sexual liberated market and it might cause more violence or reduce human production.

>>35661548
>Arrange marriage culture even's the playing field
and then everyone would bitch they didn't get that top shelf, what most robots are crying about.
>Also countries with arrange marriage have the lowest divorce rate
Correlation does not imply causation. All those countries also have serious restrictions to divorcing whole some just don't allow it. Another big factor is they don't marry for affection, love or even sex.

>>35661597
>seriously arguing against arranged marriage

roastie detected

>>35661553
What's amazing is I had a girl say this last night about men at the bar
>One woman is happy to take what he can get. All the men only want what's hot.
and it isn't the first time for either gender I've heard them bitch like this. Perhaps the rejected just like thinking it's picky mates and not them being failures?

>>35661602

or he's just a chad who feels threatened you're gonna steal one of his many bitches.

>>35661431
>Feminists will defend this.

Actually, they don't try to.

The fact that women are the gatekeepers of sexuality is a huge embarrassment to feminist, because it contradicts their narrative that women are oppressed and disadvantaged.

The fact that women are the gatekeepers of sexuality is so glaringly obvious to everyone that feminists can't feasibly deny that fact -- nobody would believe them if they tried. So all feminists can do is to suppress it and try to change the subject whenever it comes up.

>>35661602
No I'm a married NEET for the last decade. I got way above my station of a 5'4, hundredish pound qt3.14, arranged marriage would have me stuck with an ugly like me and likely force me to work.

>>35661597
>Correlation does not imply causation

Their is a correlation. in arranged married culture you don't have surplus single men and women so getting married again after divorce become insanely difficult.

>>35661612
It's an oft-trotted out example, but if you have a 4 or 5 out of ten woman just say straight up 'Who wants to fuck me?' in a room full of men, more than half will say yes. Do you think the reverse is true? I've slept around a lot, by the way. In that respect I actually do agree with you from my own perspective of having beed myself. I accept that that experience might not be representative though.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (219KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1920x1080px

Children raised by single mothers have 4x higher rates of poverty.

>>35661648
Actually if you look at the numbers they have a huge rate of single men. Compared to other countries it's staggering per average. It's theorized why so many become radical suicide bombers is because they have 0 chance at girls.
>even in an arranged marriage culture, Robots exist.

>>35661582
fuck nice guys its their fault we are in this shitty situation were children have the right to vote. players at least are not afraid to say "no" to women and would not give them rights at the expense of men.

>>35661653
>but if you have a 4 or 5 out of ten woman just say straight up 'Who wants to fuck me?' in a room full of men
Unless it's a porn set or everyone is wasted as fuck most are turned off by that shit because who wants to fuck a slut?

>>35661697
No. Especially if in this hypothetical scenario the men could just do it discreetly then overwhelmingly, they would. If they didn't have to worry about losing face. If you prefer, you could have a woman proposition 100 men individually.

Over 70% of criminals were raised by single mothers.

https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/how-many-prisoners-grew-up-with-both-parents/

>>35661690

They say no because they can afford to. They have like 15 other girls on their phone they can go hang out with. Also they have the right genes. The bitch will be back.

>>35661532
They are the ones able to give offspring the good life, what's the problem there? The kids will be thankful to their mother.

>>35661597
>marry for affection, love
Sup, virgin.
>>35661639
>married NEET
kek
Dream on, loser

File: 1488407062040.png (609KB, 1808x3731px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 1808x3731px

>>35661753
well after society collapses which it will. men after the collapse better learn to say "no" to women and do not give them the right to vote.

>>35661928
this isn't true and you know it

original

>>35661469
>implying you wouldn't date up if you could.

>>35661949
its true because ever country experience the same pattern after we gave them the right to vote and increase the size of the welfare state. also the welfare state is bad in general because it destroyed the black community and even part of the native american community.

>>35661989
This exposes part of the problem - men are so preoccupied with sex that they'll go after anything. Chad needs a new girl every day, and he'll get with some 5/10s or 6/10s if business is slow. This makes the roasties entitled.

>>35662018
to think men would reject women is a more out of touch with reality claim than saying we can win the war on drugs and the such. the demand will never die and there is no men versus women meltdown in sight

>>35662029
that's how supply and demand works unfortunately

>>35662029
yeah because men are retards and have no standards

>>35662080
I'm not sure if you're being serious or not, but a lot of them really have very low standards.

>pictureofthatdownsgirlwhofriendzonedanotherdownsguyandgotwithanondownsguywhowasntgreatlookingbutwasalrightandcertainlycouldhavedonebetterinstead.PNG

This is why there is violence. The other four males aren't always going to be cucked.

Unfortunately in our "civilised" society, it's not permissible to kill the Chad unless you do it discretely. But that's nature.

>>35662080
when it comes to sex, men will literally fuck anything

>>35661989

>implying you wouldn't date up if you could.

But they cannot. They just try and fail and Chad basically has a good laugh a their expense.

>>35662144
I'm being 100% serious originally.

>>35662174
chad is relative to the rest of the competition idiot

put 10 huge betas in a room with each other and they'd gradually become more confident with each other and after a while a dominant figure for that group will form

>>35662080

Have lived with Chad.

Can confirm guy has no standards. He goes from a 10/10 to a 4/10 the next day. As long as he doesn't have to masturbate.

>>35661431
Eggs are worth more than sperm. Get over it. Casual sex isn't even much fun in itself.

t. a fit bi guy who had sex yesterday

>>35662203

Yeah so what? Never implied it wasn't.

>>35662222
you are implying killing chad achieves something

>>35661664
>poor people are poor

>>35662222(checked)
nice post anon Xd

>>35662221
>>35662221
faggot

original original very original

>>35661690
You just discovered mgtow
If you can't have a good relationship with a good woman and have your interests protected by law just as much as women do
Then drop out of the race and demand better odds
Contrary to what you get told the big mass of male earners are necessary

>>35661949
you really believe on average a single male tax payer doesn't pay more into tax services than they ever receive?

>>35662375
what i'm saying is that there will be no war on women by frusturated broken men you mongoloid

just try to take a look outside your house into human society and tell me if you honestly believe the fabric between men and women can be teared

>>35662414
Sexbots will come sooner or later and once women lose their value completely in that sense there will be a happening.

>>35662610
humanlike sexbots maybe will happen when you will be an old grandpa. and even then it still won't be the same for a good while

> tfw you were born too soon for the beta singularity

>>35661431
Everyone should defend this.

Hypergamy came about as a result of the mammal condition, exaggerated in humans, of having to gestate young. Without those selective pressures in place, men would not have needed to be as strong, fast, or smart as we have been and have the potential TO be.

There are other, more malleable forces at work in society today that affect your situation that you should be griping about, instead.

>>35661469
Too bad right has never excited.

>>35661814
this confuses the robot
suck my dick robot

>>35661721
>Especially if in this hypothetical scenario the men could just do it discreetly then overwhelmingly
I have god damn standards and won't just dick any girl with a hole. Stop projecting.

>>35661832
Anon according the book Men Without Work: America's Invisible Crisis about 70% of NEET men in America are married. Most of them are west coast but the idea isn't as far fetch as you think.

File: JUST WHO IS BEHIND ALL OF THIS.png (49KB, 400x467px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 400x467px

>>35661541
shut up lechuga

>>35661541
Thirsty boys. We only care about "fair" when we are on worse end of it.

File: chromozoned.png (562KB, 978x746px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 978x746px

>>35662144
>>35662080
>>35662074
>>35661721
>>35661697
just let the women and white knight faggots have their larp about how many men would turn down a human shaped women with no strings or judgment or effort
it's fantasy but no point in arguing
if they're retard they will never drop this
if they're trolling they will never drop this

none of us win, we're all retarded

>be autistic neet
>still turn down grills

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=En__V0oEJsU

>>35663574

A tard chaser?

I've never heard of that before, but obviously they must exist.

Intredasting.

>>35662727
unironically islam.

File: tumblr_ofam9jBkTL1sippq6o1_1280.jpg (320KB, 850x1200px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 850x1200px

>thinks the reason girls don't like him is because sociey
>he gets mad when poc and feminsts talk about actually being oppressed in society

Keep telling yourself that, it can never be your fault ever

File: womenareoppressed.png (1MB, 1595x818px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1595x818px

>>35664843
okie dokie iff if if if youuuuuuuuu souja yano lemme bee clear ooga booga

File: cycle.jpg (92KB, 584x601px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 584x601px

>>35661495
Depends on species. Some species are in balance - monogamous, perfect dad, and it isn't even that rare.

Some are in sexual selection mode - females have choice and "date up" and are often matrilineal, despite males being stronger and are otherwise "breadwinners" in the pair. Close relatives would be Bonobo, for instance. Humanity is converging towards this mode now.

Yet other species are in natural selection mode (male aggresively controls access to "their" female). Often associated with high male aggresion and mortality. Our closest relative would be chimps. Past mode of humanity/patriarchy.

From evolutionary viewpoint alone, no argument could be made for either way, as even animals have varying instinctive norms of "dating" depending on their circumstances, it does not necessarily seem to be "hardwired".

>females fucking Chads until they hit the wall and settle with betabux is a good thing

>>35661431
So it's the men's fault by being attracted and orbiting more than one female? If everyone only orbited one woman than we wouldn't have this problem of orbiter collectors

>>35665526
It should be also noted that our close relative animal societies bias towards patriarchy and harem when environment becomes more hostile.

Conversely, when food is ubiquitous and predation is rare, matriarchy, sexual selection and "dating up" seems to be more beneficial.

The results of sexual selection can be bizzare, uniformly known as "peacock theory". When there is not enough predation to cull male population, they sexually select for males which are at greater risk to be predated on (larger peacock patterns). One could speculate this is why human females are attracted to guys who appear to "live dangerously" (dark triad is a wrong corellation/causation meme).

>>35661431
Blah blah blah her choice blah blah blah youre an entitled misogynist blah blah blah im a nasty woman blah blah

>>35661664
A single income household is more poor than a dual income household. Hmmmm

>>35661431
If women had their way humanity would be dragged back to the caves so they could pick berries and let Ung and Grok club each other to death for her affection. They're fucking stupid.
>>35661495
It's called hypergamy and should be controlled unless you want beta uprisings. Fools say That's just nature dude, we're just animals dude" as if that's an excuse. A spider's venom is 100% natural but would you allow it into your veins?

>>35661928

also ronald reagan was elected and it became more profitable to trade companies like trading cards and sell them for tidy profits via insider trading

but no, it's dem wimminz fault

>>35661928
I'm gonna go ahead and blame that on Reagan and the increased military spending. And then in 2000 on more military spending and whiny boomers.

>>35661431
It's literally human nature. Men generally feel the need to be dominant, control, fight, etc. . Women are happy to be controlled. When you give everyone the freedom to do whatever they want, we all revert back to our nature.

Plus, we all want the hottest person possible. The vast majority of people out there in either gender are "settling", if you paraded a Victoria's Secret model in front of the average man he'd leave his wife in a heartbeat. Same for whatever it is that women like (Ryan Gosling?).

>>35661495
Some animal species also have perfect monogamous relationships and perfect family cores.

>>35661928
>>35665837
>>35665851
This is a chart about the 1920s. Why are you blaming Ronald Reagan? He was a teenager.

>>35665834
But hypergamy (TRP meme, sexual selection is actually the correct term) is objectively beneficial to the genome. Just because you'll die as an incel doesn't mean it's detrimental to species biologically.

As for beta uprisings and being detrimental to civilization, nature does not care. Just like the spider will bite you, despite you wishing for not getting bitten.

>>35661431
This is primate nature. Let it happen. Tinder is leading to loads of girls getting sterilized because they caught 15 STIs. You let sluts do their dirt and they'll be cleaned out of the gene pool

>>35666015
>Please someone give me a baby!
>Lolno you disease ridden sea cow
>Cleansing by STD's

Is this gods way of saying we weren't supposed to do this or is it natures way of saying we didn't evolve enough for this shit?

>>35666015
>>35666160
Teen pregnancies and refugees to the rescue.

>>35666160
ST Is are natures way of culling degenerates. My sister is a huge slut who has fucked like 30-40 dudes. She's now sterile from it. I might get some girls pregnant in another country so I don't have to pay child support to keep things up

>>35661553
>any man in the same position would do the same
Any person in the woman's position would do the same too. Since 90% of men will accept any average girl, why wouldn't they aim high to get a chad? They can just move down a bit if that doesn't work.
I don't think you were arguing what I'm saying, but for the individuals (including women) in the game, the strategy makes fair sense for them. It's exclusive for lower men of course, though.

>>35666210
Teen pregnancies happen in small towns. Usually they are from religious conservative families

>>35661832
Who's this cool guy on our board??

>>35661431
>yfw you realize this dynamic only exist because the laws that allow women to be so picky are created by, supported by, and enforced by men, not women.

So that was Chad's endgame......rape allowed ancient bots to still get some, so they built a society where only Chads could succeed.

Well played.

>>35666258
>only 'necks and niggers will reproduce
Behold the future of humanity.

>>35666210
>Half developed retards and mulatto mixed monsters
>White people die out
>come in the borderline retarded black baby sub species
>World looks like detroit
>Everyone starves to death because blacks can't into food without a whip of encouragement
>Teen pregnancies very rarily come to term because HERBODYHERCHOICECISGENDEREDSCUM
>End result is usually under developed inhuman trash

End of the universes chapter on humanity and all sub species*

*See black people

>>35666258
>Teen pregnancies happen in small towns. Usually they are from religious conservative families

This isn't true at all. Teen pregnancies mostly happen in poor neighborhoods in big cities. What we would call "urban communities". People who are "disadvantaged".

I'm talking about niggers in projects. Niggers in projects fuck like rabbits and nobody ever knows who the dad is.

>>35661928
>correlation = causation: the argument

>>35666311
>So that was Chad's endgame......rape allowed ancient bots to still get some, so they built a society where only Chads could succeed.

Chads in the West, starting about 1500 years ago, built a society where monogamy was legally enforced and adultery/bigamy/divorce was outlawed. Chads in the Middle East built a society where the rich guys could have dozens of wives and everyone else had to marry their cousins.

Now we see the results.

>>35661431
But, what if this isn't true?

Kind of looks like bullshit.

>>35666374
It's so brilliant I'm more in awe than I am angry, why couldn't we so this?

File: 1_123125_123036_2207915_2219518_090615_for_herbivoretn.jpg.CROP.thumbnail-small.jpg (51KB, 274x237px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 274x237px

Its fair. If you don't have enough resources to care for at least 1 child you shouldn't even consider yourself part of the mating game. Girls aren't really that picky, most guys just don't even meet that one criteria.

>>35666249
You're right, we don't disagree. The options for a man who doesn't meet that threshold are, logically, to self-improve where possible, to lie, to pay for it, to rape, or to become prison gay.

>>35661520
>implying that wont eventually lead to a chad/beta dichotomy within the 7 wizards, 2 of which have unique powers of wind/fire while the other 5 are weak enough to need to team up to summon a a demon
pretty soon the remaining nonwizard population will be worshiping firechad and windchad and the other 5 wizards will go back to being robots