Okay, what the?? How do I fix this please?

File: 00049smug.jpg (10KB, 186x186px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 186x186px

You'd have to stop being gay.

>>35635830
Pls someone help me become more manly

>>35635830
There's nothing to fix. You become my eternal cockslave now.

File: Screenshot_20170319-084610~01.png (84KB, 1067x1150px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1067x1150px

>casually masculine

That actually describes me perfectly

File: gendertest.png (13KB, 293x390px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 293x390px

>>35635830

Look at all these traps having more than 0% feminine.

>>35636015
Fucking casuals git gud reeeeee

File: Untitled.png (45KB, 870x684px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 870x684px

This response was almost buzzfeed tier

File: selection.png (120KB, 1078x1316px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1078x1316px

How can I be typically feminine if I'm a male?

>>35636126
If you are all feeling, you are by definition feminine. Besides, got the link on hand?

File: Screenshot_2017-03-19-05-58-37-1.png (121KB, 1080x1479px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1080x1479px

r8 me originally

>>35636149
>>35636156
http://www.celebritytypes.com/gender/test.php

What do you mean "all feeling"? Like feeling vs thinking? I'm extremely analytical to the point it gives me social anxiety. At least it helps in other areas.

>>35636177
>social anxiety
That would be all feeling right there.

How beta and self conscious do you have to be to take this test?

>>35636126
>How can I be typically feminine if I'm a male?
By posting your feminine penis.

>>35636241
It's a fun way to kill some time.

>>35636294
I'm not a trap. I'm not even a femboi.

>>35636183
But it's analytic as well as feeling.

>>35635830
This makes you Casually Masculine
I need to check my test.

File: Untitled.jpg (72KB, 514x555px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 514x555px

tfw no gender

>>35635830
just a reminder that the more pink you have the lower is your iq

>>35636361
>tfw too smart to be feminine

File: Screenshot_20170319-061914.png (341KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 1440x2560px

I'm a man dammit t(T_T)t

File: %53.png (22KB, 544x552px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 544x552px

Am I okay? Or not? :3

Gender roles are a big meme, why would me liking to take care of children make me effeminate?

File: verticalChart.png (13KB, 293x390px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 293x390px

wtf is wrong with you fucking women

>>35636406
>t(T_T)t
You are not.

>>35636163
Low testosterone and zero estrogen. Go check with a doctor.

>>35636505
t. emasculated manlet

File: verticalChart.png (12KB, 293x390px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 293x390px

>>35636544
they need to man up

>>35636603
I'm a pretty average dude though, probably a bit low test since I still look like a 15 year old

>Casually Feminine
I just care about others man goddamn it

File: nohomo.png (30KB, 588x675px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 588x675px

>>35636031
only 86% masculine? What a homo

File: Capture.png (35KB, 546x669px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 546x669px

>8% male
>0% female
Is this normal?

>>35636740
Maybe you haven't entered puberty yet.

>>35636720
fuck mang, i only got 94/31

Become a girl(male)

>>35636720

>22% feminine

Lmao, look who's talking.

File: 1461133463087.jpg (212KB, 564x564px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 564x564px

>tfw extremely feminine
ehhh, my test is like 10x lower than the acceptable male range floor
kinda makes sense.

>>35636798
You know what to do anon. Become a cute girl and serve cocks.

>>35636756
lets see it then biggus dickus
post your shit

>>35636819
i'm trying. the cute part isn't in my cards
i already take care of my bf and like when he takes control

>>35636798
Post boipucci
You have been muted for 4 seconds, because your comment was not original.
You have been muted for 8 seconds, because your comment was not original.

>>35636837

I don't want to see your feminine penis.

File: 62e01c48513040d448e48520d49e4ba7.jpg (1MB, 1414x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1414x2000px

>>35636842
>i already take care of my bf and like when he takes control
You're gay? What does your bf do when he gets aggressive? How did you meet him?

>>35636883
i'm on whoremoans...
he just does what he want's and goes ontop of me,he's like 5'10" and is a lot stronger than me so he is in total control then, since he is taller and he is stronger..
>>35636846
i don't post that stuff

File: image.jpg (120KB, 1137x1402px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1137x1402px

I could've told you this myself

>>35636883
o and i met him on r9k!

>>35636941
Where do you live? Would be a shame if you lived near me. I'm even taller than him.

>>35636970
i live with him in atl

>>35636323
You can always kill yourself instead of time

File: Screenshot_2017-03-19-16-08-35.png (259KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1080x1920px

What does this mean, is it laughing at me for being gay?

File: 1483752786686.jpg (39KB, 426x463px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 426x463px

>>35636996
>You can always kill yourself instead of time
hope u have a nice day anon.

>>35636984
Ah US well I didn't lose a potential euro cockslave then.

>>35636740
No,you're just very indecisive.

>>35637001
Being gay might really be related with being less masculine, even if you're not a flaming pride parade faggot.

File: 19684984.png (15KB, 362x443px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 362x443px

what does this mean ??

(I'm a male)

File: snip.png (55KB, 738x887px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 738x887px

>>35637001
Dont know about that but boy sure I am

Haha fucking gay

File: gender role test march 2017.png (32KB, 471x621px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 471x621px

this is just a variant on the Bem Sex Role Inventory, I've taken it a bunch of times

File: GroleT.png (48KB, 1022x842px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1022x842px

wonder what the parameter for this test are.

File: genderthing.png (19KB, 295x487px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 295x487px

I'm manlier than the majority of you faggots and I'm actually gay.

File: the gay.png (27KB, 640x597px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 640x597px

>>35636015
Those are just buzzwords for fucking gay

I'm sorry anon but youll die

>>35636331
You're a faggot. Stop trying to defend it

File: Screenshot_20170319-152230.png (247KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1080x1920px

You guys are fags seriously anyone lower than 80% masculine.

>>35635830
Theres a difference between feminine and effeminate

Become a qt trap and sit on my lap

>>35637169
Defend it? Why would I have to defend being a faggot?

File: test result.jpg (64KB, 444x540px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 444x540px

I didn't expect I'd get 0% F

Am I a fag or something? _,,

File: PicsArt_03-19-03.36.21.jpg (31KB, 425x562px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 425x562px

>>35637337
Forgot pic

ou have been muted for 2 seconds, because your comment was not original.

>>35637337
>>35637350
I don't know. Do you like being a girl and sucking dick?

>>35637355
M-maybe?

ou have been muted for 100 seconds, because your comment was not original.

>>35637394
Do you like being submissive and swallowing cum? Then you're pretty gay anon. But don't worry. If you dress in cute girl clothes for me you can pretend you're straight.

>>35637412
How is that gay bigot? Remember it's 2018

File: Gender Role Test.png (24KB, 518x656px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 518x656px

Couldn't they have made the test such that disagreeing would add points for the other gender?

File: image.jpg (54KB, 500x501px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x501px

fuck, i guess i do have a feminine side

>anyone with less than 60% masculinity
yare yare

>>35637443
No. Your result indicates you just don't have a strong personality (my result was the same,except 8% masculine

File: image.jpg (95KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 640x1136px

>>35637573
wrong pic xddd

File: Screenshot_2017-03-19-12-00-06.png (78KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1280x720px

>>35635830
I guess this online test proves trangederism is real hurdydurdur
Thank God I'm pro science

File: sage test results 3.png (14KB, 491x339px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 491x339px

>>35637659
well...
(I'm >>35637097)

>>35637691
Wow
I bet you are also a psychopath, enfp, suffer from mild autism and identify as Sheldon from the big bang theory
Thank you BuzzFeed scientists

>>35637659
>I'm pro-science so I disregard all information I disagree without even though I have no counter evidence or solid arguments against it.
You don't need to be a scientist to point out methodology flaws.

File: fresh.png (27KB, 541x601px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 541x601px

I'm 56% of an androgynous person, with 100% of an overtly male body. Would've been nice to have been born as androgynous as this test says I feel, which isn't too inaccurate.

>>35637720
I simply have the condition with neurological correlates outlined in Guillamon A., A Review of the Status of Brain Structure Research in Transsexualism, Arch Sex Behav (2016), a study you can read online that is not behind a paywall (4chan's spam filter catches the link so I can't give it directly), and that is from a sexology journal infamous for its anti-PC conclusions so has no motive to play into jew conspiracies
I take these tests for fun, they just let me participate in dick measuring contests on /tttt/

>>35637739
>An online test constitutes evidence
And i swear I heard my golden retriever say I love you once
Has any scientists gone as far as to prove there is no soul? Checkmate
Here is a list of other things science can't prove aren't real
Magic
Martians
The healing power of Christals
Lsd
The hability to will things into existance

File: verticalChart.png (13KB, 293x390px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 293x390px

What am I now?

>>35637796
>This test was constructed on the basis of the following studies:

>Donnelly & Twenge: Masculine and Feminine Traits on the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, 1993-2012: a Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis (Sex Roles 0360-0025 2016)
>Holt & Ellis: Assessing the Current Validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory (Sex Roles Volume 39, Issue 11-12 1998)
>Lee & Kashubeck-West: Factor Structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Samples of Ethnically Diverse Young Adults in the U.S. (Journal of Asia Pacific Counseling 2015)
>Robinson, Shaver & Wrightsman (eds.): Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes: Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes (Academic Press 2013)

>>35637793
I bet you have college education and the hability to explain transgenderism from biological, genetical and demographical points
Plus enough evidence as in real evidence of both the exitance of it and a method of actual measuring it with tangible evidence in individuals and I don't mean psychological evidence because anyone can claim pretty much anything when it comes to psychological evidence

So I won't stop you any more, I'm here to listen to you like liberals tell me to

>>35637832
A normie. Bye now

>>35637853
I am, in fact, knowledgable of the neurological basis behind transsexualism -- I just linked you to a literature review of *all* the studies talking about it! And not the abstract, the actual studies! It's waiting for you to read it. You can do so any time, Anon. Come back when you have.

>>35637838
Just because studies exist and you can make them doesn't mean you are making an argument sweetheart
I can easily quote the Bible, what you are doing is an appeal to authority, since studies exist that must mean I'm right even tho I personally don't know what said studies say or prove
If you haven't read and analyzed those studies then you don't claim you have proof of trangederism you claim proof may exist somewhere but your personal feelings are all you need

>>35637868
But why? You are hurting me, anon.

File: DOGS.png (320KB, 697x325px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 697x325px

>>35637838
While I don't disagree with you in arguing against this dude who's "pro-science", I know that at least the Donnelly & Twenge and Robinson, Shaver & Wrightsman studies have nothing to do with the contents of the test's questions. You could pretty much look at any one of the test's questions and guess which answer coincided with which gender because it seems to have been hastily put together with some random sources to make it seem legitimate.

>>35637905
You are hurting me more.

>>35637796
>Christals

>>35637903
I'm all ears, explain
Don't tell me it's not your job to educate me, you people (liberals) jump at every chance you get to talk down to people
So here is your perfect chance to show me I'm wrong
Come on then
You have perfect understanding of it right
You aren't trying to make me spend 5 hours reading the studies you already know so when I come back the thread 404 right?

File: Screenshot (18).png (119KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1366x768px

Alright, so what do I win?

>>35635880
fair enough broski

File: testingthisshit.gif (431KB, 277x252px) Image search: [Google]

431KB, 277x252px

>>35637934
Crystals with the power of CHRIST HIMSELF
Great and STRONK healing properties!

>>35637934
you know that religious ritual they do on babies? It's called Christalization

File: horizontalChart.png (12KB, 293x390px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 293x390px

>>35636544
>>35636707
>>35636720
>having feminine traits
>still calling yourself men
kys dykes

>>35637904
>abstracts are invalid
Anon, do you know how peer review works, or why abstracts exist?

File: barryallen.jpg (28KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 480x480px

>>35637964
How's it feel being 75% of a man?
What are you, 5'6"?

File: untitled.png (24KB, 516x669px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 516x669px

that's rather homosexual

>>35637971
>Derailing
No
It doesn't make sense for me to spend a couple hours right now researching those studies only to come back here to argue with you when you are far gone
Especially when you clearly read them and aren't spamming me with them as a shield not to have this conversation
So yeah, I read none of them. That's my shortcoming and I will read them later
But right now so we can have this conversation explain it to me since you are smarty and brilliant and took the time to read them
You wouldn't quote as evidence something you yourself don't know after all
That would be completely dishonest
That would be like me saying oh yeah? Well I heard that some doctor somewhere says you are wrong

File: whatthefuck.png (38KB, 610x701px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 610x701px

What the fuck is this Tumblr-tier term? Should I be worried?

>>35638042
Abstracts are not very long. Not even the anon who posted them, but you are really defensive.

File: what the.png (59KB, 553x613px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 553x613px

>>35635830

how in the heck do i score 50/50

File: transcend.jpg (248KB, 960x594px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 960x594px

>>35638047
it means you're not particularly masculine or feminine. You're a blank slate. In fact you might not even exist.

>>35637971
I mean of course you aren't the sorth of dishonest asshole that makes a quick Google search and posts the first ten results and demand everyone else reads them and if someone actually does read them then and comes back fast enough you simply post the next ten results and so on to keep the person you argued with so busy he can't take part in the conversation right?
You wouldn't use dishonesty to silence people right?

>>35635830
>I thought we had a stacy invasion from all the feminine tone of text
>it's actually just turbo faggots

>>35638084
Nigga, chill the fuck out.

>>35638070
>>35637774
Then what does that make me, who is more even, but less total?

File: house.jpg (36KB, 480x565px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 480x565px

>>35638070
FUCK

DO I EXIST? DO ANY OF US EXIST?

i knew coming back to r9k was a mistake

>>35638066
It's your job to present your evidence
I didn't link to any study
You don't acuse someone of murder and say well I have no evidence or this rock is the evidence, prove me wrong
That's a logical fallacy

>>35637944
I am interested in educating you, not spoonfeeding you. I just spent several minutes attempting to copy the abstract into this post, but 4chan spam filter keeps telling me it can't accept non-ASCII text, so that won't work. As your teacher here, I suggest you finish your assignment by reading the information I gave you. Don't worry, it's not too long. You can read the abstract alone if your ADHD's been acting up.

>>35638122
That anon gave you the citations.
Are you too fucking retarded to find them?

>>35637904
You claim to be pro-science, but you refuse to even acknowledge scientific papers because of their field. If you were actually pro-science and didn't agree with the citations you'd want to review the papers and point out flaws in the methodology, which in turn would show the test is based on flawed evidence, but you instead just continue to ignore the provided evidence and say it's wrong without giving any substantial arguments.

File: tsathoggua3.jpg (64KB, 400x471px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 400x471px

>>35638114
To look at you is to stare into infinity. You are the void. You are a bottomless ocean

>>35638113
>Just chill out and let me silence the opposition
>It's not like we riot to silence actual scientists and scholars trying to study things we don't like
>It's not like we bully speakers and threaten them with violence
>It's not like we discredit everyone else with a voice then acused them of doing the to us
>It's not like we use mob bullying to ruin someone's live because he dared to disagree
>It's not like we behave like human beings, we have clearly showed disdain for humanity time and time again
>Just let us roll in the mud like the disgusting pigs we are

>>35638127
I'm interested in locking you in the liberal media/academic maze of self reference and paywalls designed to drive you further and further away from actual evidence
How dare you question me without 300 hours of reading I never took part in to make this claim

If I read every study you posted and come up with harsh critique then you will list more and more and it will get me nowhere

There is a man behind the courtain
It costs nothing to you to produce a Google link that would take me an hour to read

>>35638233
Abstracts don't take hours to read, unless you are sub 80iq

>>35638146
A link isn't enough
If you can't explain the content of the link then it's not valid sorry
I don't demand people read the Bible to claim there is no god

>>35638152
>You claim to be pro-science
I don't
I claim that you have never been pro science at all
You say I'm x because science but you have 0 knowledge of said science, science is but a buzzword to you, you may aswell claim to be x because cuthulu
There is nothing further from science than liberalism, you are all in humanities for fucks same, best real evidence I ever see from you are fucking surveys
>Surveys proofs rape epidemics
>Surveys proofs Donald Trump is a Nazi
Fuck you

>>35638254
Explain the abstracts then
Then explain how your abstracts you brought up are sufficient evidence
That's your job not mine

>>35638255
I'm not the fucking anon that posted them, I'm just telling you that you are lazy and retarded since peer review doesn't real to you, and looking up a citation is too challenging for you.

>>35638339
Again, I am not the person that posted the studies.
Also, that is a very unreliable way to review citations. If you want the person using the citation to explain why the study proves that x exists, the explanation will be biased.

>>35638310
>I don't
You did. see >>35637659

>I claim that you have never been pro science at all
That's fine.

>You say I'm x because science but you have 0 knowledge of said science,
Why would I have to have any knowledge in psychology to tell you that your logic is flawed. Writing off evidence you think is faulty doesn't mean the evidence is actually faulty. You can't be pro-science and anti-logic, they both work together.

>There is nothing further from science than liberalism
Why are you bringing politics into this? Is that why you think the evidence is discredited? If so that's yet another way you're not pro-science.

Again, you don't have to agree with the evidence, but brushing it off without any good arguments against it is just ignorant.

>>35638440
The only way to argue against a logical fallacy is to point out is a logical fallacy
If I must read the study to claim it's wrong then you must read the study to claim it's right
Otherwise you haven't presented any evidence and all I need to say is the study is wrong, prove the opposite Wich is what you are doing
The fact that it's a study alone in the year 2017 means nothing, most studies give different results when scientists attempt to replicate them
Most scientists fake results to get more funding

>>35638555
>Most scientists fake results to get more funding
Wow, that proper citation really showed me that you aren't a retard.

>>35638596
And you just proved him right. Nice fallicious argument.

>>35638675
>muh fallacy
This shit ain't fucking formal, but nigga throw some proof somewhere if you wanna say some stupid shit.

>hurr durr my culturally-biased gender test says I'm not a fag

/r9k/ is fucking cancer. Kill yourselves.

>69% masculine
>67% feminine

I like this

>>35636099
this doesn't even make 100 percent

File: fugg.png (35KB, 571x720px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 571x720px

Send HELP please :D:D

>>35638698
>This shit ain't fucking formal
so you are just a trashy whore then

>>35638698
>throw some proof somewhere
you first
pointing and something and claiming this proves me right isnt presenting evidence
to present evidence you must provide facts and circumstances
you provided a link you yourself dont know the contents of instead

File: xtre.jpg (47KB, 679x814px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 679x814px

>>35635830
>extremely masculine
>wear nailpolish and chokers
great test for high test

>>35638596
saying its a study so its right is an appeal to authority
just because a study is a study doesnt mean its right and you will never get me to consider the opposite

>only women can be shy care about others
>only men can be forceful and decisive
so retardely black and white

File: 1427044078077.jpg (71KB, 433x492px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 433x492px

>second question is "Likeable"
Off to a good start I guess.

>>35635830
Cold showers, nofap and red meat

>>35639632
Some attributes are more feminine than masculine and vice versa though.

File: IMG_0249.jpg (86KB, 896x1074px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 896x1074px

Have my years in solitude made me into something else entirely?

File: file.png (19KB, 552x614px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 552x614px

I'm no genius but I'm pretty sure the math doesn't add up here.

File: Screenshot_2017-03-19-20-07-05.png (97KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 720x1280px

Kek,i am on my period cunts!

File: OSRIi.png (1KB, 320x310px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 320x310px

i got this on one test. idk get fucked. i still have agp tho sometimes :^)

File: alpha male.png (33KB, 503x699px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 503x699px

whats wrong with all your gays

>>35640909
Post the quiz I'm not going to bother googling it.

File: fdgghjgkjsfdghjk.png (22KB, 520x693px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 520x693px

Pretty sure jealousy and general unhappiness is the three percent. Whatever, I did better than I expected.

0% masculine
34% feminine

Is this where I sign up to get my boypussy pounded?

>>35641932
18002738255, hit me up slut. I expect a call within an hour or else I'll dump your ass.

File: Screenshot_20170319-192326.jpg (174KB, 978x1366px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 978x1366px

I wonder what the other 33% of me is?

>>35641544
>50% feminine
What a faggot

>>35642139
33% loser
1% IDIOT

File: 1429319766706.png (553KB, 678x718px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 678x718px

>>35642241
Well you're 100% rude

>>35642392
don't worry about him bb I'm sure he didn't mean it

do you look androgynous