WHY DON'T PANTY COMPANIES MAKE PANTIES FOR BOYS

>>35429909
what a great buiness idea op! thank you for this!

>>35429983
>what a great buiness idea op! thank you for this!
will you actually do it though

boys deserve cute soft underwear too

panties optimized to include extra room for the penis while staying tight and form fitting

File: 1467347155550.jpg (118KB, 822x717px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 822x717px

>>35429909
>WHY DON'T PANTY COMPANIES MAKE PANTIES FOR BOYS
because panties are for girl silly!

>>35430427
>girl
*girls
sorry

File: file.jpg (231KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1080x1920px

cute boys or girls (male) need cute underwear too

but I think they make it work with what's available

>>35429909
There is relatively 0 market for that.

Let's be honest, boxers are much better than those tidy whiteys we wore as kids, which are basically male panties.

>>35430686
>Let's be honest, boxers are much better than those tidy whiteys we wore as kids, which are basically male panties.
they really aren't

>>35429909
I'm pretty sure there are fag-panty companies. But they have more of a fag aesthetic than a girl aesthetic

>>35430704
Do you have any verifyable facts to back that up?

Boxers are literally tailored to fit our genitalia and flat asses and hips. There's a lot of breathing room because squeezing your balls up is unhealthy.

>>35430686
>2017
>not wearing boxer briefs

It's like you want people to think you mentally plateaued when you were 14 and just discovered you can wear other things besides old fashioneds.

>>35429909
They're called boxers, you fruit.

>>35430771
>There's a lot of breathing room because squeezing your balls up is unhealthy.
I don't think the people looking to wear panties care too much about this

File: 1461313999771.jpg (103KB, 512x679px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 512x679px

>>35430754
>But they have more of a fag aesthetic than a girl aesthetic
these should be one and the same

Guys always making jokes, "My junk wouldn't fit in panties."

Mine fits fine... I find them really comfy. I'm not even that small either. I'm 6.5". I'm just tiny when soft.

>>35429909
I tried both.

Male underwear is comfier.

>>35430773
I don't see what you mean, Anon. We're in the same page..

>>35430810
>Mine fits fine... I find them really comfy. I'm not even that small either. I'm 6.5". I'm just tiny when soft.

yeah I don't think many of the people in this thread have ever worn panties

they are way more comfortable than my boxer briefs are, because they are tighter and made of nicer material. Honestly they feel really great to wear and make me feel feminine af

I don't know about ball health but I think I am fine honestly

I think the people who find the male underwear more comfortable for daily use are probably more showers than growers

>>35430810
>I'm just tiny when soft.
gee i wonder why they fit so good

File: 1488353744876.png (660KB, 640x639px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 640x639px

>>35430804
I don't like transsexuals but I would totally plow a pretty male all feminized and dressed up if I thought no one would find out.

>>35430863
>thinking boxers and boxer briefs are the same thing
>mfw you really never moved past the boxer phase

I bet you like metal too.

>>35430867
I think they're fine for our ball health. I love the way panties make my butt look too.

>>35429909
They're called Gaffs

>>35430771
>Wanting to wear boxers that let your dick flop around
>Not wearing briefs that keep it securely in place but not too tight

>>35430885
I like when I'm soft. I'd get my balls removed if I could.

>>35430771
>There's a lot of breathing room because squeezing your balls up is unhealthy.
do you have any verifiable facts to back this up?

because nothing I've found supports that.

However, boxers ARE actually unhealthy -
>Not only do boxers increase the chances of physical injury, lack of support down under is also linked to hernia.

boxers will lead to your ballsack stretching and becoming ugly and baggy the older you get

File: 1481478365559.png (73KB, 663x495px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 663x495px

>Why don't companies cater to my mental illness?
Because you're a fag

I bought a bunch of those modal briefs from china. You can get calvin klein, versace, christian anderson, whatever fake goods you want. They try to hide their tracks better but it's still easy to find if you just look.

They're comfy as fuck and fit snug like panties but have a little pouch for any endowment you may have. Just a heads up, the christian style underwear has an xbawks hueg pouch, nice if you like that look, which I do, but I'd avoid that fake brand if you have a feminine penis. It will look bigger even if you're small, but not very feminine.

>>35430948
>wearing girly briefs
What are you a gay

they only make cute panties for girl bodies so that cutebois actually have to be cute to wear them and not fat gross hairy men

if you cant wear panties and you want to be a cuteboi then im afraid you've already failed :( sorry

File: 1469601166706.jpg (237KB, 980x1080px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 980x1080px

>>35431079
>if you cant wear panties and you want to be a cuteboi then im afraid you've already failed :( sorry
but no matter how cute and feminine the cuteboi is he will always have a penis and also balls which get in the way

I mean if they are small enough it doesn't matter too much but still panties could be made slightly differently so cute boys would be a little more comfortable

someone PLEASE make this

>>35431000

nice trips

also why the fuck are pajeets so hillarious

>>35431116
if you dont have a small soft bepis and balls then you're not a cuteboi sorry

>>35430994
Excuse the cancerous faggots
https://www.crossdressers.com/forums/showthread.php?34374-Is-Tucking-Dangerous

>Sagging balls
That's not actually a risk or any sort, just aesthetic. Cosmetic damage. Either way, you sit down in the modern day more than you stand. Tighter undergarments without and leg part would restrict your movement when you do get the doing something, as your balls would push out of them.

>>35430894
I have both, I never really thought them different.

>>35430948
Hence why this Anon keeps shilling boxer briefs

>>35431247
tucking isn't the same as wearing panties lmao

many tuckers also use fucking tape on their dick across their asshole

those people are morons and not relevant to cute highly intelligent boys who wear panties

File: 1455639114256.jpg (95KB, 381x391px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 381x391px

>tfw want to be cute but too heavy, tall, and wide
I need to lose weight but even with that my bones are giant
Fuckhuge hands and size 15 wide feet

>>35431282
Who wants their fembois to be highly intelligent? The only thing I want is for her ass to cook, clean, and not whine about giving a blowjob everyday.

Only an IQ of 80 really required there.

>>35431315
youre a man, baby

They're called briefs you mongrel. Tightie-whities.

>>35430622

Tfw my cock is 8.5" and will never ever fit in panties

>>35431315
Work out, mate. I'm not talking salads and cardio I'm talking about bulking the fuck up and looking like Heavy Weapons Guy. Use your size to your advantage.

>>35431354
...location? Would you bully or degrade me too?
Spank me if I'm not polite or if I break eye contact.

File: cease your faggotry.png (250KB, 500x495px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 500x495px

>>35431538
RP-thread is the other way, faggot

>>35431315
>tfw size 11 wide feet
>tfw 5'9 which is manlet status but is also too tall to be a qt
>tfw bad acne on face and a pimple under my lip healed wrong and looks like a giant mole
>tfw fat thighs with lots of stretch marks for 3 years now
Being a faggot is suffering, anons

>>35431980
I'm 5'4 and I wear size 9. Be grateful, faggot

>>35429909
>WHY DON'T PANTY COMPANIES MAKE PANTIES FOR BOYS
this

File: 1460801207581.jpg (53KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 800x600px

Popping back in just to say that boxers are exponentially better than panties. Just wanted to get the last word.