Robot Personality Disorder

>>35331590
Sounds like me oregano

>>35331590
Is AvPD the sequel to Alien vs. Predator? If so, I don't really want to see it.

>>35331590
Well. Maybe.

Why isn't there more information about, well, people who are considered 'losers.'

Is it too broad?

I mean, us, as robots, are losers. But we have different symptoms.

Maybe some of us have what you described. But what about others?

Autism. BPD. ASPD, ADHD, general lack of social skills. Anything that hinders us from participating in social games.

For example, I only have social anxiety because it helps me not be an asshole or a bore. It helps me with my lack of conversation skills. When I was younger, I didn't have anxiety, but everyone called me an asshole. Can anyone else relate

Is there a smartfag here who can accurately say what 'losers' are and their general traits? And a guide to stop being a loser, taking into account the most general traits of being a loser?

Even psychotherapists can't help. I've read one anon's post saying that their psychotherapist stopped treating them because they don't have autism, but they were a loser, and that she didn't know how to deal with losers

I mean, fuck, do losers have no hope and should just kill themselves?

I wish being a loser was a diagnoseable condition.

>>35331590

I was actually diagnosed with avoidant PD. It's pretty depressing getting your personality called pathological.
Regardless, having a personality disorder like this doesn't brand you as a loser for life. It just means that a lot of normie stuff is just harder for you to do. it's harder being social, it's harder going out and doing stuff and it's harder being a generally well adapted person. doesn't make it impossible though, just means you have to work harder at it than normal people

>>35331874
>Is there a smartfag here who can accurately say what 'losers' are and their general traits? And a guide to stop being a loser, taking into account the most general traits of being a loser?

This. I'd like someone to clarify and research more on this topic.

>>35332061
Hell, we might even need something like loserpedia. A list of losers, former losers, loser things, loser research.

Maybe even peer reviewed loser studies.