How many here fell for the pure math meme.

Math at Calculus level and beyond is absolutely stupid as shit

Just endless assumptions, non-equalities to the point that you can prove 1+1=47

>>35314737
t>>35314586
High level math doesnt have application yet , it will in due time

>>35314586
>>35314737
care to explain? i dobt get what going on in ops picture and ive never taken calculus just highschool algebra so can you actually prove stuff like 2+2=5 with calculus

>>35314765
Nah, it won't. The next "level" for application is quantum bullshit. And in quantum bullshit 1+1 can be equal to 1, fish, Barack Obama, or 0.

>>35314586
I actually research algebraic geometry and other types of pure math. It's pretty sick dude.

Also your picture is the right way to understand the ramification and splitting of primes in rings of algebraic integers over \mathbb{Z}.

>>35314803
>I'm too stupid to understand math so that means it's all bullshit!!

Pure math is cool, I'm too brainlet to make money out of it so it's just a hobby.

>Scientists actually believe imaginary numbers exist
How fucking stupid can these idiots get?

>>35315310
I mean, the field of math basically exists purely as an exercise in pointless abstraction. You're just playing around with logic. It can certainly have very useful practical applications but that doesn't mean all math is inherently useful or practical.

>>35314586
Did you go to graduate school? Just go and you'll get spoonfed your first result

>>35315367
lol I agree scientists are so fucking stupid

>>35315549
I did my master but got rejected for PhD. Might try again this year.

>>35315527
Fuck off brainlet. I bet you were the retard who always asked why we needed to learn math.

>>35315574
One of my friends is starting his masters next spring pretty sure he's focusing on set theory. Any random advice I should tell him

ITT: people (neckbearded manlets) who haven't had even one serious math course in their life.
>>35314737
especially this one.