>these 2 are the same race Explain this, non-racist faggots.

>>35287911
You meant species

Try again nigger

>>35287911
The girl on the right is former miss Australia and she's actually Arab+Indian, so also a subhuman by /pol/standards.

>>35287911


>How do things that look different possibly belong to the same species?

The genius that is /pol/

File: gHLGebU.jpg (84KB, 960x660px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 960x660px

Here is a better version of OP's argument

File: c58c000efd1c88339e8a06fbaaa5e649.jpg (940KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

940KB, 1600x1200px

>there 3 are the same race

>>35288005
Realising the differences is not racism, using the knowledge as a pretext for abuse is.

>black hair
>brown eyes
They both are niggers.

>>35288059
By 2017 standards not giving the person on the left special privileges is already racism

>>35287911
What is it that people from the usa always confuse "race" with species? Besides, I don't think that you actually can use the term "race", because you can't draw a clear line between ethnicities.

>>35288067
Aboriginals aren't niggers.

>>35288085
Well, racism can go both ways

The funny part is that /pol/ will say that the one on the right isn't white because of her mexican genes

>>35288067
Already spotted one

File: 28678316455543.jpg (101KB, 1024x904px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1024x904px

>>35287911
>if right had a penis it would be considered less homosexual to fuck the left

what kind of logic is that

>>35288137
cause she isn't white you dumb fuck
I bet you're a dirty beaner who wishes he was white, you'll never be us Pablo

>>35288137
>/pol/ is one person

everyone hates the aryan faggots

blond hair is feminine and looks bad on men

File: IMG_0342.jpg (22KB, 236x268px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 236x268px

>>35288005
>reality
This woman is the same race as girl on the right

>brainlet
They must be different races.

>>35288164
If right had a penis it wouldn't be a woman, so by definition you're attracted to a man, therefore homosexual.
Also traps aren't attractive, it's just a meme you've read on this board and fallen for like a daft wanker.

File: men-together-700.jpg (389KB, 700x637px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 700x637px

>>35287911
We are all homo homo sapiens now, but our base ancestory was intermingled with whatever other homonid species was in the area before we arrived.

Western and Eastern Eueropeans mixed more heavily with Neanderthals. The human population that moved towards South and East to Papua New Guniea, Australia, New Zealand, and the pacific islands mixed more heavily with Denosovians (large brow big nose denser bone structure). The asians we know today had a different ancient homonid that they interbred with but it's slightly different from Denosovians and Neanderthals so it could be it's own variant.

Neanderthals and Denosovians were still humans (homonids) but they phisically had stronger physical traits, like wide noses, heavier bone structure, and other varients particular to the peoples we see now today.


TL;DR
We are all still modern human hybrids but we intermingled with different strains of ancient humans who lived in the regions we traveled through.

phenotype isn't the same as genotype