>tfw 110 iq.
Being a brainlet is worse than being a manlet. It is the biggest curse that a person can have.
>he still uses IQ to measure intelligence
>>35242617
Your intelligence is measured by the amount of money you make tbqh.
>>35242709
Aaaaaaand now this thread will become one long ass discussion about whether IQ is an accurate measure of intelligence or not, with a fuck ton of insults and name calling inbound.
>>35242617
I've got a pretty high IQ, but I also have absolutely no social intelligence, having literal autism. People think I'm serious at all times, and don't know when I'm joking.
As a result, a decently high IQ doesn't amount to much of anything in most fields. I make a lot of enemies very easily.
>>35242804
And dont forget the 30 anons posting their 132+ iq scores from online tests.
>>35242745
>Your intelligence is measured by the amount of money you make tbqh.
Not really. That comes down to a lot of luck. If you exclude luck I could agree.
>>35242806
You cannot be a robot if you are very smart, smart people will always be appreciated in Western Society. And you could easily get a qt3.14 bookworm gf at any top tier university. Unless you are Chad or very good at sports, being a Brainlet is literal hell, we have nothing good going for us.
>>35242745
Here's how I measure intelligence
>Myself + people I like and respect = Genius
>People I respect = Intelligent
>People I don't know or care about = Average
>People I dislike = Stupid
>People I fucking despise = Retarded
>mfw 143 IQ
I hate myself too OP
Being above average the curve just enough to realize you're stupid is bad. I'm talking about near 110 iq.