Will robosexuality be outlawed in the future?

>>35219227
yes, roasties won't accept it.

No, literally no argument against it

>>35219382
What about AI? People will try to argue for AI rights. And trying to love an AI will put you on a sexual predator list.

File: SpacePope.png (301KB, 542x550px)

301KB, 542x550px

>>35219227

DON'T

DATE

ROBOOOOOOOTS

>tfw born too early to date a robot in my youth
by the time we've got dateable robots I'll be an old creaky man

File: patrick-hook_crop.jpg (10KB, 297x365px)

10KB, 297x365px

>>35219431
>thinking that a literal machine needs rights
Are people really this retarded?

>>35220238
Roasts dont need a valid reason. As long as there something that threaten the price of pussy they will stop at nothing to ban it or aleast call the people partaking in it virgin losers

File: 817305de6703c2cd6d0aec1c9aba762a.jpg (75KB, 800x1115px)

75KB, 800x1115px

>Nano is supposed to be a high schooler
>Looks like a grade schooler wearing a middle schooler uniform
My dick is diamonds.

>>35219227
No but homorobrosexuality will be

I really want to date a cute robot girl

she doesn't need a vagina or anything

File: FUCKING HERETIC!.jpg (218KB, 499x468px)

218KB, 499x468px

that shit is fucking heresy!

>>35220746
Transhumanism is the future, buddy.

If you wouldn't cut off your legs for bionic super legs, you're crazy.

>>35219227
Christianity will get it banned. The feminist know how to use Jesus to push an agenda

>>35219227
>>35220238
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jan/12/give-robots-personhood-status-eu-committee-argues