Can we consider porn art?

File: 1451656675459.jpg (184KB, 1448x916px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1448x916px

>>35172056

no, not really. few things are really are, including modern art and this liberal art bullshit, tv, comics and videogames.

art is something that is skillful work that amazes the watcher and makes him wonder about the nature of thing.

porn is just fast wood fank entertainment. how many times have you finished watching a porn after you spilled your yizz? cant say i did that for many actresses. its rare to come by one who is an artistic performer.

>>35172056
I've seen some pretty interesting erotic photoshoots, but in video format ...I dunno. All I ever want to do is jerk off to it, not "admire" it, if that makes sense.

>>35172114
>art is something that is skillful work that amazes the watcher and makes him wonder about the nature of thing.

[citation needed]

File: blueberry_magica.png (1MB, 1200x956px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x956px

>>35172200
>pic related
true art, just look at the beautiful lighting

>>35172056
of course
most snobby art is veiled porn anyway

File: Chapelle_sixtine.jpg (305KB, 1200x803px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 1200x803px

>>35172200
>>35172211
You need no citation to realize this is universal art.

File: SS_blue.jpg (142KB, 853x1280px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 853x1280px

>>35172114
that's a good meter: if you still want to watch after the orgasm, then this have some artistic value

>>35172114
Bad post.

I don't think there's a whole lot of artistic merit or value in most porn, but on the whole, yes it can be considered a lowbrow form of art. Part filmmaking part performance art. It may be uninspired work but if you saw the process of porn production I think it'd be pretty unambiguous.

File: quasi_b08388.jpg (37KB, 500x575px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 500x575px

>not considering this art

What's wrong with you?