What is your politcal ideology, anon?
ironic-natsoc
>>35170208
Unironically national socialist only ideology at gets rid of shitskins and gives neetbux
>>35170196
post-ironic nihilism
>tfw to intelligent too be cucked by ideology
Post-anarcho-communistic hegelian theocracy
chemo for /pol/reddit cancer
Infantilism. (that word may be unoriginal)
>>35170196
I an enlightened skeptic.
>>35170196
I'm an an-cap
Feels good to be able to say shit like "all drugs need to be legalized and commodified", or "people should be able to own nuclear ICBMs".
Who else here /edgy/?
Right libertarian, fuck your neetbux
>>35170196
>robot
>any political ideology other than "give me NEETbux"
who /comcap/ here?
i believe in complete democracy
meaning every vote is identical in value
everyone is a president so to speak
>>35170196
full blown george washington libertarian
>>35170301
Robotism.
Essentially I don't give a shit either way cause I'm not a normie with a wife and kids so it really doesn't matter to me at all.
>>35170196
ethnonationalism
multiculturalism is a game that only white countries play
>>35170754
>multiculturalism is a game that only white countries play
it's obviously a winning strategy
>>35170780
>the success of western countries is because of the forced multiculturalism enacted in the last several decades
>>35170418
anarcho capitalism is the only option, nice to see a fellow edge lords.
Enlightened extremist alt-centrism
>>35170798
But it quite clearly is. If ethnonationalism were superior, states implementing it would have leapfrogged the aforementioned multicultural countries by now.
>>35170196
I'm unironically a NatSoc. I want the United States and Europe to be White living space, and for all non-whites to go back to their ancestral homelands. I don't care if it requires force.
>>35170829
china and japan ethnonational states they seem to be doing well
>>35170798
you totally miss the point of ethnonationalism. it doesn't matter if the economy suffers temporarily, it is about the People reclaiming living space.
>>35170829
they did, and then ww2 was started in order to stop it
>>35170829
Western countries were unambiguously ethnic states for the vast majority of their existence and were on the road to success hundreds of years before non-western countries. Only in the last few decades has jewish led enforced multiculturalism been put into effect, none of the countries were 'melting pots' or 'nations of immigrants' like we're told. Moreover, the nonwhites who immigrate are incredibly over-represented in crime stats, welfare users, low achievers etc. Immigrants are NOT the reason western countries are more successful than non-western countries and will ultimately reverse the progress made by western countries if they continue to displace white populations.
>>35170899
and we have to remember that (((they))) profited from ww2
>>35170859
>Japan
>doing well
dumb weeb
Their economy has been in the doldrums since the mid-80s and their GDP per capita is a fucking meme. It's doubly pathetic considering they work so hard that they literally have no time to make babies.
>China
now this is just bad b8
>>35170904
>Moreover, the nonwhites who immigrate are incredibly over-represented in crime stats, welfare users, low achievers etc. Immigrants are NOT the reason western countries are more successful than non-western countries and will ultimately reverse the progress made by western countries if they continue to displace white populations.
>/pol/e-dancers in charge of having a clue
>>35170899
dubs of truth! Praise Kek! Shadilay!
Ethnocentric social liberalist meritocratic monarchy.
>>35170196
I've been a lifelong conservative Republican. I've always wanted low taxes, gun rights, a small government, a strong military, and have always supported the police. I love small town living.
>>35170920
what are you then you faggot
>>35170196
>free market
I believe the free market does not, and cannot, exist as long as laws are in place. In a true free market, there would be no crime of theft. If you can not defend your belongings/resources, then you don't deserve them.
Of course, defense of your resources doesn't only mean military strength. You can also defend them by proving yourself to be the most efficient at handling them. If you're the best burger maker in the world then people won't just steal burgers from you. You'll threaten to stop making them if they keep stealing, and then they'll stop stealing. But there would still be nothing to stop them from stealing, if they want to.
Centre-left wing with some right wing social views.
Some form of DemSoc, probably ancom or a bookchin-style communalist if push comes to shove
>>35170196
In public: Libertarian / Classical Liberal
Behind closed doors: NatCap
I dont think I have one.
I'm a classic fence sitter, I just follow the ones with the best arguments and facts.
Politically, I'm a moron.
>>35170662
Please elaborate. I'm kinda intrigued.
I don't have any because I look at everything on a case by case basis and I'll never get how anyone can be fully left or right. I guess you could say I'm a centrist or a moderate but even then I still lean a certain way if even just a little bit. I'm always very confused when people just proudly proclaim they're liberals or conservatives because you're adopting so much questionable shit with both when you say that. Both those ideologies are full of garbage and like a few good ideas.
The thing is though, most people when you question them on all that horrible shit will just distance themselves from it or reject that part of their ideology or even admit to being okay with shit from other side but if you feel that way then just call yourself a fucking moderate or nothing at all. I don't understand why if you're not all in why you would act like you are.
Do people just feel the need to "pick a side"?
I'll be dead soon it doesn't matter.
>>35170196
Basically, if it involves less government, I like it
>>35171145
>Do people just feel the need to "pick a side"?
it makes things easier to look at it in black and white.
"I am a liberal so everyone to the right of me is my enemy" Vice versa.
Also gives you a sense of belonging to a group where you otherwise might not have one outside of the political universe.
>>35170196
Ideally I'd prefer that the human race sterilize itself and go extinct within 100 years, but if we have to exist we should massively reduce the (third) world population (ergo, fewer people to defend your shit from) and embrace extreme individualism.
Any collectivism should be voluntary and transient, i.e., only for our personal gain and all parties should fuck off and leave me alone after the transaction.
>>35171145
I think most of the population largely agree on the majority of things when it comes to politics but they take those 1 or 2 issues that they really care about and make them their political identity. Like women will probably be liberal most of the time just because of abortion even if they agree other conservative viewpoints like guns or economics. Black people will probably always be liberals because they feel like republicans are the white man's party so to speak even though religion is a huge part of the black community and the left is slowly moving toward some weird 'fuck christianity but islam is kind of okay' state of thinking and blacks seem to be largely pro-gun considering how much they use 'em.
>>35170705
/1776/ is the best way to go desu
>>35170196
I was sure I was Stalin because I would kill every single religious person or put on forced camps but I ended up as this...
Moderate Social-Welfarist
Libertarian Monarchist
>>35170196
Party politics and isms are for absolute retards too fucking lazy to think for themselves. I resent anyone who feels like it's their place to tell me what to do.
Radical centrist neoliberal Marxist globalist.
Radical centrism because the far left and the far right are jokes. Neoliberal because it's good for the economy in the short term. Marxist because eventually everything will be automated and we'll have fully automated luxury communism. Globalist because I'm not into being cucked by borders.
>>35170196
I have transendet my anarchic views from political philosophy to existential philosophy.
Like i am so anarchist that there can be masters.
>People can do everything they are able to do.
>>35171111
communist capitalism
basically, you take stuff from people by force as the state because there is no private property, then you give it back to them as a corporation because everything is private property. so everything is public and private at the same time.