You know how in capitalism the rich get richer, and the poor

Simply put the reason that this rings true is because or system isn't socialism, rather it's welfare capitalism where money is redistributed because it cheaper to pay off the poor from rioting than suppressing riots. This goes to the global scale as well ever notice how sexual satisfaction isn't noted as being a basic human right/need? In the end that's life.

Huh. You got an interesting idea here, anon.

What do you think could be done to change this?

File: .jpg (207KB, 1000x762px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1000x762px

>>35166959
>What do you think could be done to change this?
Worldwide communist revolution

>>35165179

Attractive people can get attractive partners. For a wide array of reasons there are a group of men, and an even smaller group of women, who are excluded from sexual relationships because they are unable to appeal to many. Ugly, mental disability, physical disability, disfigurement, major mental illness, etc. are factors for exclusion.

The world isn't nice, kids get cancer and die for no moral reason. Likewise some people are disadvantaged to a degree that massively impacts their sexual success and ability to find a partner.

The first and easiest thing to do is lower your standards if you are looking for sex. Fuck the overweight girl, fuck overweight girl with depression and who is ugly.

Besides lowering your standards you can elevate yourself with diet, exercise, fashion, education, artistic talent, humour, etc.

Renaissance men are rare and they got lucky, so don't focus on how you'll never be this jack of all trades. Focus on getting good at things you like to do for the sake of your own enjoyment and the value you get out of it.

I like to play guitar for example, so I focus on that. I also want to be fit, fashionable and develop technical skills like coding, machining metal, wood working and electrical engineering to make hobby electronics and build my own machines eventually (homemade laser cutter is a long term goal that takes use of all of those technical skills.

The point I am making is that you have a range that you fall into. If your facial structure is highly asymmetrical and you have eyes too far apart for your face you'll never look like a model but you can be fit, you can be interestingnand educated, you can have skills that make you attractive.

There is no cureency in relationships, it is purely a trading system ( barring prostitution) you need have have somethig to trade that others want.

Jaded, edgy, sociopathic, obese, uneducated and reclusive, sexists and racists are not going to have any success in life or relationships

>>35165179
>You know how in capitalism the rich get richer, and the poor poorer?
That's not because of capitalism expressly. That's due to people being dumbasses usually. You hear people argue against paying fast food workers a living wage and saying they don't deserve it. They believe in slave labor even if it doesn't benefit them and would make their own economic interests worse like another super rich slave owning even richer and diminish their small purchasing power even further. None of that is really capitalism. They're just douche bags that would fail any per-requisite iq test if one were implemented in order to vote.

>>35167154
COMMIES GET OUT
COMMIES GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

It's because having a relationship changes you. You start doing things that make you mote attractive. That's why after your first relationship it's far easier to attract girls than before.

Can confirm from personal experience.

>>35165179
Welcome to mother nature
where the strongest thrive and the weakest barely survive

>>35165179
I'd say this but your post bears the connotations that it only happens in romantic relationships, or at least that aspect is emphasized. It applies to friendships and even basic interaction, too. Someone who never made friends in high school or college is going to get further and further behind socially and their chances of making new ones are lower and lower.

>>35165179
>You know how in capitalism the rich get richer, and the poor poorer?
Well i think it is the same thing for relationships

I always thought the same thing, but with sex instead of relationships. Since the sexual revolution, less and less men have sex, and those who do fuck multiple women. Women flock to the alphas while the betas rot. Of course it's nothing new but feminism and the sexual revolution has made it worse

File: 1477725882062.jpg (238KB, 462x654px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 462x654px

In the communist countries, every man was given his own woman because those men without women were weaker.

In the modern Capitalist society, 100 women satisfy one dominate male. Meanwhile the weaker men never get satisfied and thus become weaker.

A man needs a strong woman in his life to guide him and to be there for him always. When men don't have that, it can lead them to suicide or to be very deeply depressed with their lives.